Darkspore - Games - Facepunch Forum

[QUOTE=Nohj;23512694]Gritty, dark, rpg. Yes it is.[/QUOTE] Original Spore: Evoloution, charming, gritty, RPG, RTS, Simulator, where you design everything. Spore we got: Evoloution, Charming, RTS, Simulator, where you design too much. Darkspore: Grity, dark, RPG where you design the character you play as. It's still not what we want, but it still looks better.

Our Spore now is a bit of an RPG, where you balanced and chose certain parts to be more effective as a fighter, or a charmer, etc. and got new parts to get better skills.

What do you do when you make one of the worst games ever? MAKE A SPINOFF! GENIUS!

[QUOTE=Dan2593;23513702]Original Spore: Evoloution, charming, gritty, RPG, RTS, Simulator, where you [B]design everything[/B]. Spore we got: Evoloution, Charming, RTS, Simulator, where you [B]design too much[/B]. Darkspore: Grity, dark, RPG where you design the character you play as. It's still not what we want, but it still looks better.[/QUOTE] one but not the other? :raise:

I'm skeptic, Spore developers don't know crap about gameplay.

[QUOTE=Pj The Dj;23513858]What do you do when you make one of the worst games ever? MAKE A SPINOFF! GENIUS![/QUOTE]Have you only played like 5 games or something?

It seems fun.

[QUOTE=Nohj;23512641]Oh. Fucking. Christ. It's what spore was going to be before EA fucked it in the ass.[/QUOTE] what the fuck it's an action rpg instead of an evolutionary sim how are they similar in any way whatsoever besides the name

...I'm ok with this. I'd buy it.

I was expecting Spore, but much darker, bloodier and better. Also, only the beast levels.

Looks like a shitty spin-off of Spore. What is it even supposed to be? A co-op RPG with an advanced character editor? No new gameplay elements? Seriously, what does this game even have going for it besides the spore character editor? More than likely, the entire idea for this game was made based off the character editor. You should never, ever, [I]ever[/I], use something that is considered a detail, as the main base of your game. (Or movie, or book, or any kind of art) The quality of the game is probably going to be bad, which is pretty apparent from the video.

I got kinda pissed when playing Spore and the manual walking stage ended. From there it was RTS and I was all :geno:. The only fun I have from it now is sending the GOD AWFULLY SLOW WALKING hologram from the spaceship, and even then, there's no real environment like the one from the beginning. I enjoyed the creation part alot though. The campaign, not so much. It's a nice game to look at, that's all really. [editline]01:32PM[/editline] Darkspore looks like a combination of both however. It could be good.

May I ask why is Spore(2005-6) better then 2008 when it released for you? I have not played the game myself but I don't see the differend.

Oh god I hope it isn't as shit as Spore. In fact because there is nothing I can use relating to shit to mix with Spore's name, then I'll just call it Shit.

Fight evil aliens, as an alien, with alien guns. Too bad this looks like some Ben 10 shit. They should have just remade the microbial stage, added in a water stage and remade the creature stage, make it red in tooth and claw like something off the National Geographic channel or Walking with Dinosaurs. Too bad the designers are all brainless idiots making toys for tots.

I refuse to hype this game because I don't want to be disappointed again.

It seems like they just slapped random science words on stuff like quantum and nuclear to make it sound more science-ish.

Looks pretty good.

Yeah, this is nothing special it's just a "reskin" of a common genre. I think Alien Swarm is going to steal a lot of Darkspore's thunder just by virtue of being a free.

[QUOTE=RR_Raptor65;23520555]Fight evil aliens, as an alien, with alien guns. Too bad this looks like some Ben 10 shit. They should have just remade the microbial stage, added in a water stage and remade the creature stage, make it red in tooth and claw like something off the National Geographic channel or Walking with Dinosaurs. Too bad the designers are all brainless idiots making toys for tots.[/QUOTE] They should make a game that spans from the cell stage ro the creature stage, and everything inbetween. Also it should be advanced and complex, giving your creature an arm should be a lot more complex than just dragging and dropping. Fuck it really pisses me off that they are missing so many opportunities to make awesome and deep games.

Yes, exactly. It's not that fucking hard to design a good game and not make it overly complicated to create. Every problem has a simple solution that can be solved with a tiny bit of logic and creative thinking.

Looks pretty dull. Doesn't bring anything new to the table, nor does it improve on much. To me it seems like a feeble attempt to reach out to the more "hard core" players.

I bet it's just going to be a game where you go around mindlessly killing people, hardly any plot involved and with some sort of hurr durr genetic upgraed i so smart xD system. Nice try, EA.

[QUOTE=Nohj;23512694]Gritty, dark, rpg. Yes it is.[/QUOTE] Spore was never gonna be dark (at most, realistic) and much less an rpg, you don't know what you're saying. end of story.

It doesn't look that good, I can't see myself playing it.

It looks kind of dull to be honest. It's Diablo with a creature creator and no loot drops.

I hope this turns out good, but all I see is a co-op version of the Galactic Adventures expansion. I'm going to follow it anyway.

The Darkspore is going to be all the penis creatures from spore.

Looks AWARRRSOWME

[QUOTE=PowerBall v1;23520057]May I ask why is Spore(2005-6) better then 2008 when it released for you? I have not played the game myself but I don't see the differend.[/QUOTE] They turned a serious, scientific game with actual gameplay into a child's game.