I just hope they ship it with good enough weapons that are all around balanced. I know it's hard too, but when a game ships and people all flock over to a other country or opposite team just for the weapon/heli/jet, it'll get annoying.
I really wish they don't fuck up BF3, BF2 was a good game, despite it's numerous bugs and glitches(Fuck you dolphins). I sincerely hope they take the good examples in 2142, and bring it back down to a modern level.
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;28498880][B][U]NO[/U][/B]! Men do not dual wield revolvers, go sit in the corner and think about what you did :colbert:
If it's not used single action and not above or equal to .357 in caliber then manly men do-not-use it; the same manly men that have beards and smoke corncob pipes. Single action revolvers are godly because you need to time your shots and reload carefully, so the awesomeness is increased tenfold when some [I]punk[/I] comes around the corner with his acog laser sight grenade launcher equipped XM8 and you fucking shoot him straight in the face with your single action revolver, and then pull the hammer back manually to waste his noob-ass buddies with your remaining 5 cylinders. If god existed he would have made the S&W Model 29 for mortals to smite their pissant enemies, and he'd choose- [I]nay[/I], he'd command all mortal beings that such a magnificent weapon be fired single action, and only single action; and only the infidels and dissolute who will spend eternity in hell will choose to fire double action or dual wielded. Instead of those commandments, he would have given Moses a Smith and Wesson at Mount Sinai to go defeat the Romans and kill all the Dinosaurs that plagued their lands.
In BF:V on the Green beret maps, I would get the Car15 class, and change away from the primary weapon to use the 44 magnum revolver the class came with to terrorize the Viet Cong team with six-shooter glory. I miss those days :saddowns:[/QUOTE]
jesus christ chill out
stop trying to prove to everyone you're not a faggot - it's got the opposite effect
Just been wondering, how are the Beta codes going to reach the people who bought MOH Limited Edition?
[QUOTE=Beak Doctor;28507629]Just been wondering, how are the Beta codes going to reach the people who bought MOH Limited Edition?[/QUOTE]
Singing fat baby with red heart arrows deliver them with poetry sung in tune with Kindergarden made tunes.
[sp]mail. How else?[/sp]
B- but how will they know where to mail it to? :ohdear:
[QUOTE=Wiggles;28501519]DICE should allow you to whip off your helmet and lob it at the enemy. You'd be exposed to instant headshots but the amount of XP and credibility you'd get for a kill would make it all the more sweeter.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIwlc6AfspI[/url]
[QUOTE=Beak Doctor;28507863]B- but how will they know where to mail it to? :ohdear:[/QUOTE]
Email
[QUOTE=Profanwolf;28506522][url]http://www.computerandvideogames.com/292614/news/battlefield-3-multiplayer-can-handle-up-to-256-players/[/url][/QUOTE]
So according to them it's not fun to have 256. Fine, but give us the option to raise the cap on servers if we so want to then.
I hate it when developers say "So yeah we had this awesome feature, but we didn't think it would be fun so we'll block it.", I hope DICE doesn't do that and gives server owners the choice to have up to 256 if they want (official servers would stay at a count equal or less than 64).
Just had an awesome dream. Was playing battlefield 3 in a habor-in-a-bay sort of map, probably in Tokyo, with 2x2 apache dogfights, vehicle instant respawn, infinite tickets. This is the best game-related dream I've ever had.
:frogc00l:
I never dream games, I always dream weird symbolism or sex.
[editline]9th March 2011[/editline]
See [url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1067408-post-your-weirdest-dreams?p=28508143&viewfull=1#post28508143[/url] for symbolism.
Maybe it's a signal and we're getting a map with two apaches per team :gizz:
Aerial battles with choppers? Sign me up.
There will never be a map with two apaches per team, just sayin'.
That earthquake video looks amazing.
[QUOTE=Batmoutarde;28506907]Altee al mousalef[/QUOTE]
howill
[QUOTE=Lizzrd;28508824]There will never be a map with two apaches per team, just sayin'.[/QUOTE]
But it would be fucking awesome to see.
[QUOTE=hexpunK;28509080]But it would be fucking awesome to see.[/QUOTE]
Well the map would be destroyed within the few seconds it takes for them to fly past :gonk:
[QUOTE=Lizzrd;28508824]There will never be a map with two apaches per team, just sayin'.[/QUOTE]
And I doubt the rebels have access to apaches.
.
I hope you can wear parade uniforms if you reach some general rank. THAT would be MANLY
and [i]fabulous[/i]
[QUOTE=Scar;28509200]I hope you can wear parade uniforms if you reach some general rank. THAT would be MANLY
and [i]fabulous[/i][/QUOTE]
Damn it! I should be able to rate Winner AND agree!
[QUOTE=acds;28508314]So according to them it's not fun to have 256.[/QUOTE]
DICE is just trying to hide the fact that they don't want to spend more money on supporting 256-player games, so they came up with that particular excuse, whether or not it's entirely true.
[QUOTE=God's Pimp Hand;28509566]DICE is just trying to hide the fact that they don't want to spend the money on that many more servers to support 256-player games.[/QUOTE]
That many more servers?.. what the fuck are you on about
[QUOTE=EXoDUSFLT;28491551]I just realized: who the hell even uses pistols in CoD?[/QUOTE]
I do. And pretty well.
it also amuses me when people shout i have an autoclicker.
[editline]9th March 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Wiggles;28501519]DICE should allow you to whip off your helmet and lob it at the enemy. You'd be exposed to instant headshots but the amount of XP and credibility you'd get for a kill would make it all the more sweeter.[/QUOTE]
Saving Private Ryan too much.
Two attack helicopters per team, well, a BIT more possible atleast.
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;28504969][I]This[/I] is a [B]man's[/B] revolver
[media]http://www.operatorchan.org/k/arch/src/k55640_pistol%20US%20Smith%20_and_%20Wesson%20Model%20629-3%20.44%20Magnu.jpg[/media][/QUOTE]
Yet it was so fucking awful in New Vegas compared to .357.
[QUOTE=acds;28508314]So according to them it's not fun to have 256. Fine, but give us the option to raise the cap on servers if we so want to then.
I hate it when developers say "So yeah we had this awesome feature, but we didn't think it would be fun so we'll block it.", I hope DICE doesn't do that and gives server owners the choice to have up to 256 if they want (official servers would stay at a count equal or less than 64).[/QUOTE]
You don't seem to realize that a huge amount of players would also increase the system requirements for a game, mostly on the CPU side. Not only that, it would become a death fest. Hundreds of people mean you will die MUCH more. Besides the balancing issues from weapons or classes alone with that many people, the maps would also have to be large enough to support that many players, which will also present more balancing issues. It would also mean less servers would be populated. 4 64 slot servers or 1 256 slot server.
Dunno if it's late or not but there is a tv-spot in France for "Intermarché".
Just listen at the music. :v:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2YUb_e8Tnc[/media]
[QUOTE=Dark RaveN;28510424]Yet it was so fucking awful in New Vegas compared to .357.[/QUOTE]
Uh, nope.
[QUOTE=LittleDogX;28510967]You don't seem to realize that a huge amount of players would also increase the system requirements for a game, mostly on the CPU side. Not only that, it would become a death fest. Hundreds of people mean you will die MUCH more. Besides the balancing issues from weapons or classes alone with that many people, the maps would also have to be large enough to support that many players, which will also present more balancing issues. It would also mean less servers would be populated. 4 64 slot servers or 1 256 slot server.[/QUOTE]
256 players actually worked pretty well in MAG, I had some epic battles in it.
[editline]9th March 2011[/editline]
Why wouldn't it be possible on a computer if they pulled it off on a console?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
