Vista and 7 are supported. It's XP and down that aren't supported.
[QUOTE=Jrock455;28516045][url]http://gunclub.ea.com/us/intel/blog/bf3-paxeast[/url]
If you have a gunclub account you will be able to play BF3 at PAX East, too bad I won't be able to get there :smithicide:[/QUOTE]
:suicide:
[QUOTE=evilweazel;28514164]I want more incentives for FULL TEAM team work, sure you can always have a damn good squad, but everything outside of yours is all up to luck, hated that about Battlefield.[/QUOTE]
Kind of like how in PR the commander might order more than one squad to attack a possible weapons cache position and the two squad leaders would collaborate an attack? I loved that about PR.
Well commander is gone so there is no hope for that :/
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;28504969].44 mag[/QUOTE]
:downs: S&W .500 magnum
[img]http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQKyRJBmBTvPcj_d_kXgnU-u4mnzvuKXDK61yNZ6LjEnftuveWBog[/img]
[editline]9th March 2011[/editline]
clocks.
[QUOTE=Del91;28521172]:downs: S&W .500 magnum
[img_thumb]http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQKyRJBmBTvPcj_d_kXgnU-u4mnzvuKXDK61yNZ6LjEnftuveWBog[/img_thumb]
[editline]9th March 2011[/editline]
clocks.[/QUOTE]
No, that is huge for the sake of huge.
If you're going to do that then 45-70 is the way to go
[media]http://www.chuckhawks.com/magnum_research_BFR.jpg[/media]
:smug:
why don't they just give beta invites to BF veterans
what's the point of taking so much time setting it up if they're not even going to use it
I hope they'll bring back to squad spawn system to what it was in BF2, Only on squad leader.
[QUOTE=JerryK;28521747]why don't they just give beta invites to BF veterans
what's the point of taking so much time setting it up if they're not even going to use it[/QUOTE]
It would also make perfect sense. Veterans probably know what they want and how BF should play/work. They also care more so would give more/better feedback.
[QUOTE=Oxu365;28511647]256 players actually worked pretty well in MAG, I had some epic battles in it.
[editline]9th March 2011[/editline]
Why wouldn't it be possible on a computer if they pulled it off on a console?[/QUOTE]
PR mod for BF2 tested 128 players on a server: [url]http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f10-pr-bf2-general-discussion/93978-pr-128-player-server-test-official.html[/url]
problem, EA? :smug:
Of course by the time this is released i'll only just have enough money for windows 7 then by the time i get enough for bf3 i'll have missed out on all the launch fun :(
[QUOTE=hypno-toad;28521425]No, that is huge for the sake of huge.
If you're going to do that then 45-70 is the way to go
[media]http://www.chuckhawks.com/magnum_research_BFR.jpg[/media]
:smug:[/QUOTE]
You might as well put a stock on it. :v:
[QUOTE=Kill001;28522703]PR mod for BF2 tested 128 players on a server: [url]http://www.realitymod.com/forum/f10-pr-bf2-general-discussion/93978-pr-128-player-server-test-official.html[/url]
problem, EA? :smug:[/QUOTE]
Too bad it's a shit mod.
[QUOTE=Bird;28523582]Launch fun? You mean endless glitches, broken server, unbalanced shit etc.. I might be exaggerating, and we don't know how bad it will be, but most games aren't gold on launch day.[/QUOTE]
That is part of the fun, bitchin' and whinin' because you have a reason. :v:
[QUOTE=Raidyr;28523328]Too bad it's a shit mod.[/QUOTE]
The mod itself is not shit at all. It has much more content than BF2 and they are always adding more, they have many military advisors to try and make vehicles, weapons, etc realistic, and they do all this on the BF2 engine... If you don't like the mod, you don't like it. Doesn't make the mod shit.
Sidney is playable in online BF3 Dice just said!
[QUOTE=Spetzaz;28524086]Sidney is playable in online BF3 Dice just said![/QUOTE]
Battlefield 3 has now been banned from import in Australia due to severe anti-govermental propaganda and violence not suited for mature people.
No but they posted a pic of a map taking place in Australia.
And while they were at it they also banned all battlefield games because they had the audacity to breach national Australian laws, this ban is stated to be lifted in 2999
Here I found it:
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1467131/Sidney.jpg[/img]
How dare they use our great country as a terrorist-trainer shooter designed to make young kids homicidal maniacs
[QUOTE=Spetzaz;28524125]Here I found it:
[img_thumb]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1467131/Sidney.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE]
I wonder how many wont get this.
256 player MP Battlefield games?
I WANT IT I DON'T CARE IF IT DOESN'T WORK SHUT UP AND DO IT ANYWAY
[QUOTE=The very best;28524177]256 player MP Battlefield games?
I WANT IT I DON'T CARE IF IT DOESN'T WORK SHUT UP AND DO IT ANYWAY[/QUOTE]
I know right, Arma with it's 256+ limit it totally not fun.
/s
[sp]I know, arma is different, but that's the point. BF3 not being simulator means the more players the merrier.[/sp]
[sp]I hope someone mods it in if we ever get SDK :v [/sp]
[QUOTE=maqzek;28524843]I know right, Arma with it's 256+ limit it totally not fun.
/s
[sp]I know, arma is different, but that's the point. BF3 not being simulator means the more players the merrier.[/sp]
[sp]I hope someone mods it in if we ever get SDK :v [/sp][/QUOTE]
maqzek, You forget how horrible arma2 is at handling even >50 players, whilst BF3 probably handles it fine
Tried the BF2 mod Forgotten Hope 2 with 126 players. It was a lot more fun than 32 vs 32. Teamwork actually increased.
The more the merrier.
What? Dice said their engine can take 256 players, and yet they still haven't released a game with 1024 players. I WANT 1024!!
[QUOTE=Spetzaz;28525573]What? Dice said their engine can take 256 players, and yet they still haven't released a game with 1024 players. I WANT 1024!![/QUOTE]
:psyduck:
The more the merrier doesn't always apply, but in Battlefield games it almost always does.
Anyone know where I can find the hilarious movie compilations with all the battlefield 1942 sounds added in? They had shitload of scenes from different movies.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
