Battlefield 3 - Games - Facepunch Forum

[QUOTE=MendozaMan;27326394]Battlefield NEEDS better physics. They were planning to add a hovercraft that could carry tanks in BF2, but they cut it out at the last moment. Just imagine these sort of things, it would improve the teamplay aspect a LOT. Whoa, I did'nt realize I'm now one post away from yachtzee gold![/QUOTE] It was in battlefield vietnam :3:

[QUOTE=acds;27326588]I want a big map with tonnes of vehicles and all three (or whatever number) factions at the same time (of course this would require a high player count). I want to see the whole sky lit up by tracers and explosions, with missiles, bombs, shells, debris and bullets flying all over the place and so much chaos I wouldn't be able to hear a M107 firing next to my ear. I'm really hoping we get a very high max playercount.[/QUOTE] I like the feeling, but I don't want the game to be all effects and fancyness. The games I've played the longest are games like Battlefield 1942 and CS 1.6 because they were fun to play and required skills. No fancyness is required.

They should add airlifting and fast-roping from helicopters.

I cant wait for this.

I know it's been said many times already, but they really do need to bring back planes. Also, the amphibious APCs were awesome! :buddy: [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] It's been years since I've played B2, but what was the map were the Marines spawned on an aircraft carrier? It was a bright, desert map as I do recall.

[QUOTE=lead_farmer;27326807]I know it's been said many times already, but they really do need to bring back planes. Also, the amphibious APCs were awesome! :buddy: [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] Gulf of Oman. It's been years since I've played B2, but what was the map were the Marines spawned on an aircraft carrier? It was a bright, desert map as I do recall.[/QUOTE] [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] Gulf of Oman. [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] Incredible editing.

[QUOTE=Mercenary-;27326835][editline]10th January 2011[/editline] Gulf of Oman.[/QUOTE] Oh yeah, that's right. Thanks. That was definitely my favorite map.

God, I love that you recognized what the "core" Battlefield games are. I seriously love BF2, infantry only maps were the best. Road to Jalalabad or whatever it was called, probably my favorite map along with Karkland. I put a lot of time into that game a few years back. Never been a fan of Bad Company, it just doesn't feel the same to me. It's great for a console FPS but I'm much more interested in Battlefield 2.

The fools sold themselves out to the devil.

[QUOTE=xxdeadb0ltxx;27327122]God, I love that you recognized what the "core" Battlefield games are. I seriously love BF2, infantry only maps were the best. Road to Jalalabad or whatever it was called, probably my favorite map along with Karkland. I put a lot of time into that game a few years back. Never been a fan of Bad Company, it just doesn't feel the same to me. It's great for a console FPS but I'm much more interested in Battlefield 2.[/QUOTE] We are the same. Lets be Battlefield bros. :h:

-Snipped in good taste, see below for original post-

[QUOTE=leach139;27327455]Those of you who are bitching about "bawww they removed / altered / added (insert feature here), game is ruined, bawwwww" need to shut the fuck up and wait for official confirmation, it's way too easy to go overboard on rumors. Be informed before you post.[/QUOTE] Hardly any of us are doing this, the fuck are you on about.

Man I hope that if they have health regen in BF3, it'll be very slow and none of this "10 seconds out of battle, feeling better already." or have a cap on how much you're regenerating yourself, so medics would actually have a use except reviving.

Healing also kept the squads together instead of using them as mobile spawn points to run off somewhere.

[QUOTE=glennman94;27311575][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cw92-xvxMMc[/media][/QUOTE] Wow, that is one sexy voice.

[QUOTE=FuzzyPoop;27310833]Hahaha... any less than 64 will be a complete failure, seriously. One of the major points of battlefield is the player amount, if they don't rise it to at least 50x50 I'll be quite disappointed.[/QUOTE] 32x32 would be plenty I'm so sick of these obsessive idiots screaming LOL WTF Y PLAYER COUNT SO LOW?!?! That said, I certainly wouldn't mind 64X64 games, But games with more than 64 people in them (Which were modded servers) were downright unplayable.

i like XP :saddowns: i would however switch to windows 7 if i know how to get my wifi working on that OS [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] do any of you guys know who to make Windows 7 look like Windows XP the icons are huge [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] i really hate how windows 7 looks like

[QUOTE=Matrix374;27328578]i really hate how windows 7 looks like[/QUOTE] Then make it look like XP or 98, easy peasy. [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=martijnp3000;27327909]Healing also kept the squads together instead of using them as mobile spawn points to run off somewhere.[/QUOTE] Pretty much this is why I loved non-regen health. Also, I liked having to change tactics based upon my health level, added even more variety to the combat. [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=TraderRager;27328354]a[/QUOTE] -Snipped for bad reading-

[QUOTE=Lizzrd;27327689]Man I hope that if they have health regen in BF3, it'll be very slow and none of this "10 seconds out of battle, feeling better already." or have a cap on how much you're regenerating yourself, so medics would actually have a use except reviving.[/QUOTE] They should just not put it in, BF should be slower paced than Bc2 and the cod series. Get shot, you don't just hide and recover, you get to a medic and get patched up. [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Spetzaz;27329132]Then make it look like XP or 98, easy peasy. [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] Pretty much this is why I loved non-regen health. Also, I liked having to change tactics based upon my health level, added even more variety to the combat. [editline]10th January 2011[/editline] Have you played Battlefield 2? It shipped with 64 players (same with 'nam, 2142 and 1942). There was a huuuge difference in playing 64 and 32 players, and the chaos and 'reality' of it all really immersed you. 64, much more fun then 32 and 100% playable. (See: Any core Battlefield game)[/QUOTE] Scratch the it was put in in a patch, i don't actually remember.

[QUOTE=Spetzaz;27329132] Have you played Battlefield 2? It shipped with 64 players (same with 'nam, 2142 and 1942). There was a huuuge difference in playing 64 and 32 players, and the chaos and 'reality' of it all really immersed you. 64, much more fun then 32 and 100% playable. (See: Any core Battlefield game)[/QUOTE] I said 64. 32 vs 32

[QUOTE=TraderRager;27329275]I said 64. 32 vs 32[/QUOTE] You are correct and I are misread. I are apologize.

I can't take the wait, gonna need one of you to freeze me in carbonite until release.

[QUOTE=Profanwolf;27329207]BF should be slower paced than Bc2 and the cod series.[/QUOTE] it never was though especially on smaller maps, when you had 64 players going it was extremely fast paced

[QUOTE=Guniv;27327217]Sorry guys, like I said we got to talk to zh1nt0, and they have some sort of licensing agreement with Even Balance (Punkbuster). EA would have issues with VAC being on Valve's servers. I'm also pretty sure PB has some sort of Frostbite integration.[/QUOTE] What. NOOOOOOOOOO That means I can't get the game then. Because of the way my computer was built, punkbuster detects multiple copies of directx and always kicks me after a few minutes.

[QUOTE=markfu;27337347]What. NOOOOOOOOOO That means I can't get the game then. Because of the way my computer was built, punkbuster detects multiple copies of directx and always kicks me after a few minutes.[/QUOTE] bullshit, call up EA and complain

I swear to God if they use Punkbuster again I will still buy the game, bitch about it for a little bit then speak nothing of it again.

[QUOTE=redonkulous;27337693]I swear to God if they use Punkbuster again I will still buy the game, bitch about it for a little bit then speak nothing of it again.[/QUOTE] I just plain wont buy it. Punkbuster is a stuttering bitch.

[QUOTE=The_Marine;27312050]Not PC exclusive? Confirmed for shit. Still modern day? Only 2 factions? Only 8 maps on release? Confirmed for shit x2.[/QUOTE] Factions probably won't matter for shit, for some reason I can't see them going back to limiting players to faction specific weapons after all they've done so far, which pretty makes having more than 2 pointless.

I'm ok with urban, but damn I am tired of eastern sand cities.

[QUOTE=clanratc;27326671]They should add airlifting and fast-roping from helicopters.[/QUOTE] Well, that would be better than having to jump out. [editline]11th January 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Guniv;27327217]Sorry guys, like I said we got to talk to zh1nt0, and they have some sort of licensing agreement with Even Balance (Punkbuster). EA would have issues with VAC being on Valve's servers. I'm also pretty sure PB has some sort of Frostbite integration.[/QUOTE] :saddowns: