[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;28239498]I'd rather have a physical copy of such a grand game.[/QUOTE]
Me too, it will go on my shelf next towards 1942, Vitenam, BF2, 2142, and BC2.
oh and speaking of attachments, It looks like you are the only solider In the entire world that put anything on his Gun.
Don't we feel special?.
[QUOTE=Cuon Alpinus;28239626][url]http://forums.steampowered.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1765424[/url]
:cawg:[/QUOTE]Ahahaha that sure made me lol. :laugh:
[QUOTE=marlkarxv2;28238992]Are you a graphics whore? I'm sure BF2's gameplay will be put to shame by BF3.
DICE wouldn't make money.[/QUOTE]
I like games to look good, I've played hundreds of shooters and to be honest they're all starting to blur together, graphics and, even better, destructability are some of the only things that keep me playing shooters.
[QUOTE=GaLm121;28231122]OH HELL YES:
[url]http://www.ea.com/battlefield3/videos/gameplay-debut[/url][/QUOTE]
This can replace my porn
[img]http://i.cubeupload.com/JTbJh6.gif[/img]
Do I see UAVs?
Do i see an M240 with a holographic sight?
I don't want weapon attachments or perks.
There's a picture of an M240 with no attachments, and one with a holographic sight.
[QUOTE=Hattiwatti;28240537][img_thumb]http://i.cubeupload.com/JTbJh6.gif[/img_thumb]
Do I see UAVs?[/QUOTE]
I think its just helicopters, if they use those unrealistic whirly jigs for uavs again...
[QUOTE=Mercenary-;28240580]Do i see an M240 with a holographic sight?
I don't want weapon attachments or perks.[/QUOTE]
Wah I don't want perks that only slightly change gameplay for each soldier, and attachments that let us customize our guns.
Really, "perks" in BC2 barely changed gameplay and were very minor, the weapon attachments went as far as sights and grenade launcher/underbarrel shotguns.
I'm fine with it in BF3 as long as they don't go too crazy with tactic00l attachments and perks that make you reload 10x faster, which they didn't in BC2 so i doubt they will now.
[QUOTE=Mercenary-;28240580]Do i see an M240 with a holographic sight?[/QUOTE]
Holosight is used in real modern wars, there's no reason it shouldn't be included.
Why would you not want weapon attachments?
[QUOTE=wombo;28240668]Wah I don't want perks that only slightly change gameplay for each soldier, and attachments that let us customize our guns.
Really, "perks" in BC2 barely changed gameplay and were very minor, the weapon attachments went as far as sights and grenade launcher/underbarrel shotguns.
I'm fine with it in BF3 as long as they don't go too crazy with tactic00l attachments and perks that make you reload 10x faster, which they didn't in BC2 so i doubt they will now.[/QUOTE]
Guess you're right, but at least no Magnum Ammo or Body Armor.
Lightning looks amazing in the GIFs, feels like a huge change from BC2.
[QUOTE=Pandamobile;28240738]Why would you not want weapon attachments?[/QUOTE]
Unfair advantages I guess.
I mean, sights are cool - just don't have stupid shit like attatchable noobtubes and tactic00l shit.
I don't see what the problem with weapon attachments is. They exist in real life, so I don't see why they shouldn't in a game that tries to emulate modern war.
[QUOTE=Mercenary-;28240580]Do i see an M240 with a holographic sight?
I don't want weapon attachments or perks.
There's a picture of an M240 with no attachments, and one with a holographic sight.[/QUOTE]
It's single player ffs, and why?
[editline]23rd February 2011[/editline]
Also I see civilians, in SP of course.
[QUOTE=Pandamobile;28240738]Why would you not want weapon attachments?[/QUOTE]
I'd be fine if they didn't make the gun look so damn ugly half the time, like when they take the iron sights off. And anyone who uses them always comes across as an asshole to me, no idea why. Personally I wish CoD would have never started this whole hurfdur sights craze. Was fine with how they worked in BF2, where only a few weapons had special sights, so if you wanted a red dot or something you could use those.
[QUOTE=Hattiwatti;28240537][img_thumb]http://i.cubeupload.com/JTbJh6.gif[/img_thumb]
Do I see UAVs?[/QUOTE]
Nah, those are probably [URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MH-6_Little_Bird[/URL] helicopters, at least I hope so.
[QUOTE=Hattiwatti;28240537][img_thumb]http://i.cubeupload.com/JTbJh6.gif[/img_thumb]
Do I see UAVs?[/QUOTE]
Those choppers look like MH-6s instead of those odd BC2 UAVs.
[media]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/43/MH6_at_NASCAR.jpg[/media]
[QUOTE=Mercenary-;28240750]Guess you're right, but at least no Magnum Ammo or Body Armor.[/QUOTE]
If they [i]really[/i] have to add that shit in BF3, then atleast make those two available from the start. Fucking annoying to have to grind hours and hours of bad company 2 before you get the same weapon power than the rest of the players.
[QUOTE=evilweazel;28240934]I'd be fine if they didn't make the gun look so damn ugly half the time, like when they take the iron sights off. And anyone who uses them always comes across as an asshole to me, no idea why. Personally I wish CoD would have never started this whole hurfdur sights craze. Was fine with how they worked in BF2, where only a few weapons had special sights, so if you wanted a red dot or something you could use those.[/QUOTE]
I never had that "come across as an asshole" experience, and since BF3 takes place in the modern day, where real soldiers use red dot sights and such, there's no reason not to have them. It's people like you that make them seem stupid, but really it's just realistic and an addition to the game.
[QUOTE=Spetzaz;28240763]Unfair advantages I guess.
I mean, sights are cool - just don't have stupid shit like attatchable noobtubes and tactic00l shit.[/QUOTE]
The way BC2 had it was fine, you can attach a grenade launcher, smoke launcher or shotgun, they weren't overpowering, had shit all ammo, and took ages to reload. But where still useful.
[QUOTE=evilweazel;28240934]I'd be fine if they didn't make the gun look so damn ugly half the time, like when they take the iron sights off. And anyone who uses them always comes across as an asshole to me, no idea why. Personally I wish CoD would have never started this whole hurfdur sights craze. Was fine with how they worked in BF2, where only a few weapons had special sights, so if you wanted a red dot or something you could use those.[/QUOTE]
Or you could give players a choice of what sight they want to use on whatever class they want to use, there is no point limiting sights to specific weapons, not everybody likes using iron sights, or the specific sight of their class. Sights don't give you any advantages if you are a bad aimer anyway, and it allows people to play more to their playstyle. Just because CoD has it doesn't mean that it is copying it.
[QUOTE=Mercenary-;28240580]Do i see an M240 with a holographic sight?
I don't want weapon attachments or perks.
There's a picture of an M240 with no attachments, and one with a holographic sight.[/QUOTE]
What's wrong with attachments?
Also while playing BC2 i rarely even find people using body armor, magnum ammo and the thing that makes your gun more accurate, and when I do It's still a fair match against other players.
Man the game is looking damn fine
[QUOTE=Hattiwatti;28240537][img_thumb]http://i.cubeupload.com/JTbJh6.gif[/img_thumb]
Do I see UAVs?[/QUOTE]
little birds i think
Sometimes BC2 animation, gun model, whatever, looks wrong. For example, I have a Sight attached to my assault rifle in assault class. Whenever I switch to grenade launcher, the sight magically disappears. Wat.
I like attachments provided they don't make it too ridiculous and they streamline it to where you can select your layout in the menu, rather than before you spawn (it would be nice if you could select before you spawn too, i just don't like having to go ingame to change my layout for each class).
What i miss most about battlefield is the wide open environments, i hope they improve destruction and make decent story but otherwise i don't even care of they change that much from the original.
I also prefer the bullet system for BF2 over BFBC2 (projectiles having velocity and moving slower than any bullet ever conceived by man), they speed up the velocity a bunch to where hits occur more instantly and I'll enjoy it.
[QUOTE=Pandamobile;28238244]
[img]http://i.cubeupload.com/4IOwr0.gif[/img]
[/QUOTE]
Oh god, look at his arm when he grabs the chopper. It looks terrible.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
