The UnReal World-Way Better Than Stranded - Games

To all who complain about graphics - It's a roguelike bitches.

[QUOTE=Str4t0s;13736199]To all who complain about graphics - It's a roguelike bitches.[/QUOTE] Even if so, pain graphics and crappy photos don't cut it

Nah, Stranded is better.

[B]FUCK[/B] immersion. This game is pretty good. If I had a credit card I would buy it.

Wow, this game looks awesome. It also reminds me of a bandit-like game that I used to play. Also lol at the equipment picture where the crotch has a generally higher than average protection than the rest of the body

stranded is open source. you can make all the mods you want!! a bunch of nerd created this i bed they playing he guys on the screen >.> this is just crap, so i rate 'bad' stranded rulezzz *waiting for online multiplayer* no WAY better then stranded

and again. its 55 $ -_- you can get cheaper. but then you get a fu*** up version of it so when a new version is out (like every 3 days) then you have to pay again and again

I like how every game thread with extremely outdated or no graphics at all instantly becomes a hive of graphics whores. This sounds like it would be a good free game, but not one you have to pay for, no matter how low the price.

I dont know why you people see stranded more appealing? I enjoy to hunt a bear which is some of challenge instead of punching a tree to get 1 vine for my sentry tower that kills lions.

[QUOTE=Str4t0s;13737405]I dont know why you people see stranded more appealing? I enjoy to hunt a bear which is some of challenge instead of punching a tree to get 1 vine for my sentry tower that kills lions.[/QUOTE] Maybe people just have different opinions of what is fun? Is that so hard to believe?

[QUOTE=ThePuska;13734749]because graphics determine whether a game is good or bad [/QUOTE] Idiot, do you think Stranded has good graphics? Stop going with this shit bandwagon "graphics doesn't make a game good". I play what I like and by the way where the heck did I say that the graphics made Stranded better than this? I quoted him and replied in the same way.

[QUOTE=stealth_camo;13737513]Maybe people just have different opinions of what is fun? Is that so hard to believe?[/QUOTE] I dislike how you're attacking him with that argument. You're misusing it. The argument itself says that people are entitled to their own opinions. You make it seem as if that only applied as long as their opinions were similar to yours.

[QUOTE=ThePuska;13737830]I dislike how you're attacking him with that argument. You're misusing it. The argument itself says that people are entitled to their own opinions. You make it seem as if that only applied as long as their opinions were similar to yours.[/QUOTE] Where did he state that the opinion had to be similar as his.

I'm amused at how quickly this thread brought on such raw hate, especially from those who have never played both games. [QUOTE=Tetsmega;13724854]OP is an idiot, you can't compare 2 different genre's of games. It's like comparing F.E.A.R. 2 to Age of Empires 2.[/QUOTE] Luckily, I can invalidate your opinions right with your first line of incorrect failure. Both game's are in the survival genre of games, UnReal World is simply more slanted with RPG elements. Notrium looks nothing like Stranded, yet it is also in the Survival genre. Your player's viewpoint does not necessarily indicate the genre. If Stranded 2 was turn based, isometric, or top down it would be the same game at it's core. [QUOTE=cheesedelux;13737230] This sounds like it would be a good free game, but not one you have to pay for, no matter how low the price.[/QUOTE] It should give you a lower $/enjoyable hr ratio than most huge company games. [QUOTE=sami-pso;13735011]you can't get the survival feel with 2D games.[/QUOTE] Rogue-likes are the true survival games, and they are almost all 2D games. [QUOTE=darth-veger;13736641]stranded is open source. you can make all the mods you want!! a bunch of nerd created this i bed they playing he guys on the screen >.>[/QUOTE] Not going to argue with you on the mod point, mods are great, but here's a newsflash for you: Every game you've ever played was made by nerds. At least these guys weren't 300lb ones. [QUOTE=darth-veger;13736691] its 55 $ -_- you can get cheaper. but then you get a fu*** up version of it so when a new version is out (like every 3 days) then you have to pay again and again[/QUOTE] The current version is a very mature product and you will should never need any further upgrades. All this three dollar hate is really making me think people in this thread are living on a parental allowance. [QUOTE=Ickylevel;13734326]It would have tested it if it was free.[/QUOTE] You can test it with a demo, which is free. The time limit on the demo is extremely long and if you don't want to play it past then it probably wasn't something worth purchasing for you. What's with all this graphics bickering? Both games have bad graphics. Stranded's 3d is actually so bad that the game might have actually benefited from a 2d/isometric approach. The Stranded bashing wasn't really meant to be the focus of this thread since they are slightly different ends of the genre. It was more my surprise of not seeing a thread on URW, but a ten page one on Stranded.

I tried this game and it's worse than DF. Sound isn't exciting, combat is bashing button combinations t skip through the menu's and everything else is just weird. [quote]Rogue-likes are the true survival games, and they are almost all 2D games.[/quote] Like i care. Games like wurm and stranded obviously surpassed the old roguelike.

[QUOTE=sami-pso;13737902]I tried this game and it's worse than DF. Sound isn't exciting, combat is bashing button combinations t skip through the menu's and everything else is just weird. Like i care. Games like wurm and stranded obviously surpassed the old roguelike.[/QUOTE] I'm going to take it that you've never played a roguelike judging by your comparisons. Wurm and stranded have essentially no/few roguelike qualities. They share only the survival themes with most roguelikes. I'm going to assume you are trying to refer to "Wilderness survival", a subgenre of survival.

[QUOTE=ZestyLemons;13732363]Ahem. Stranded II is a better game AND is 3D AND has little/no bugs. Your arguement is still invalid[/QUOTE] 3D does not mean a game is good. Look at any of the Sonic games.

[QUOTE=Swebonny;13737827]Idiot, do you think Stranded has good graphics? Stop going with this shit bandwagon "graphics doesn't make a game good". I play what I like and by the way where the heck did I say that the graphics made Stranded better than this? I quoted him and replied in the same way.[/QUOTE] You judged URW by its screenshots by calling it unappealing. [QUOTE=Swebonny;13737861]Where did he state that the opinion had to be similar as his.[/QUOTE] He didn't. I said his post comes out as such and that's thanks to the last sentence of his post. He's accusing him of not respecting others' beliefs. Read Str4t0s's post, it's actually quite polite when compared to some earlier opinions in this thread. Since there's nothing really wrong with the format of Str4t0s's post, the only thing that could be wrong in his post is its actual content - his opinion.

Let me end this argument at once This game is shit.

[QUOTE=Icerain;13738029]Let me end this argument at once This game is shit.[/QUOTE] Lets end this for realz. Everyone who doesn't like [B]The Game[/B] gtfo.

[QUOTE=ThePuska;13738006]You judged URW by its screenshots by calling it unappealing. [/QUOTE] Yes, I did, it just didn't look interesting. I thought it really looked ugly to be honest([I]stranded is pretty ugly as well[/I]), It would be much better if maybe turned into a rougelike. Also, I think it kinda drifts away from the whole "Stranded" style. You know, being on an island etc... Also game sounds really like Dwarf Fortress and finally I wouldn't pay for such a game. However these are just my opinions, I hope I don't sound like a douche xD.

[QUOTE=Swebonny;13738252] It would be much better if maybe turned into a rougelike. [/QUOTE] URW is a wilderness survival roguelike.

op just admit it the game is shit. i play dwarf fortress so graphics are not a problem for me. but this game just looks nasty

While I like the sound of the game, something about the menu at the side of this really puts me off, and I'm not sure what it is

[QUOTE=sami-pso;13737902]I tried this game and it's worse than DF.[/QUOTE] [b]Everything[/b] is worse than DF. If you don't like it you're just not OCD enough.

[QUOTE=ZestyLemons;13730424]Looks shit imo Would not play. Plus stranded is 3-D, your argument is invalid[/QUOTE] Yes and becouse a game has better graphics it means it's better. Your logic is flawed.

Well your dumbass bumping is flawed.

No, A Game that actually seems to have taken a long time then something like this in which it could've been made within a week, Is better. We don't want to be clicking on a 2-D Game that looks like it's been made on a browser coolsiideri.

[QUOTE=Keyblockor;19780125]No, A Game that actually seems to have taken a long time then something like this in which it could've been made within a week, Is better. We don't want to be clicking on a 2-D Game that looks like it's been made on a browser coolsiideri.[/QUOTE] 1. This is a 2 man project so it has been done very slowly. 2. This game has a shitload of content. 3. You cant really say that a game is good or bad with just screenshots now can you?

[QUOTE=coolsiideri;19780443]1. This is a 2 man project so it has been done very slowly. 2. This game has a shitload of content. 3. You cant really say that a game is good or bad with just screenshots now can you?[/QUOTE] To quote my good friend swebonny. [QUOTE=Swebonny;13724912]I'd rather have an OK free open source 3D survival game than a unappealing game that costs 3 bux.[/QUOTE] [editline]03:51PM[/editline] The LARP images ruin it for me. [editline]03:52PM[/editline] ITT: People defending are raging fanboys.