[QUOTE=declan;22894679]They're both shit.[/QUOTE]
Absolutely this.
Neither?
[QUOTE=Numidium;22896035]Did i read strategic at MW2?[/QUOTE]
All games are a bit strategic...
Gears 2.
I got so fed up with MW2 i quit playing entirely and went back to COD4.
[QUOTE=Gummylamb;22896179]All games are a bit strategic...[/QUOTE]
You already said that.
[QUOTE=DeVotchKa;22896246]Gears 2.
I got so fed up with MW2 i quit playing entirely and went back to COD4.
You already said that.[/QUOTE]
seriously if there were bots in mw2 mp then i would atleast play it for a few minutes because
1:bots wont whine when i kill them with a pistol and whine like i used an aimbot or some dumb shit
2:bots arent 12 year old kids cussing and camping everywhere
3:they would atleast play the gamemode right and wont use hacks all the damn time
[QUOTE=DireAvenger;22894389]Why did you mention strategic for EITHER of them?
[b]MW2 and GOW2 are NOT strategic. AT ALL.[/b][/QUOTE]
gears is more strategic because in modern warfare 2 i see at least 1 person a match going around tac-knifing
Thats like Comparing Little Big Planet and Battlefield, you can't do it.
[editline]09:07AM[/editline]
So, I didn't vote. Also, both are shit.
For some fucked up reason I thought MW2 was Call of duty 4.
MW2's campaign was more fun than GOW2's campaign, and the multiplayer is more fleshed-out in MW2, but I like the gameplay in Gears alot more
[QUOTE=amazer97;22893972]You can't really compare them.
Edit: But in my opinion Gears of War 2 is better.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Ranger149;22893965]I own and love both games, But I honestly think Gears of war has the edge when it comes to online play. And The fact that the map packs are so expensive on MW2. I mean I get like 4 maps for 1500 or something microsoft points while I can get 19 maps and a bonus level for GOW2 for only 800 points! I have bought both map packs. I know people say COD: MW2 is strategy also cause you need to learn the maps, but come on, most the time in real war you have no idea how the place you are fighting is going to look!
--MW2--
The good: Decent ammount of gamemodes. Many weapons, Strategic, Many players, good campaign, campaign has many unexpected twists.
The bad: Many little kids, Noobtoobing, Expensive addons.
--GOw2--
The good: Many gamemodes. Violent, Stragetic yet simple, Many players, decent campaign, cheap addons.
The bad: Over chainsawing, unexpected frustrating deaths by the Hammer of dawn and Mortar.
What do you guys think? which one is better?? I think a rating would be 8.6 for MW2 and 9.5 for GOW2[/QUOTE]
Both of you are too young to even play these games. :eng101:
Neither one is really awesome. There are better multiplayer FPS/TPSs.
Don't care about either. Make an option in the poll for that.
I could never get into GoW2, so I'm just going to stick with MW2.
OP is 13
:downs:
[QUOTE=Ranger149;22893965] most the time in real war you have no idea how the place you are fighting is going to look!
[/QUOTE]
Haha.
I enjoyed MW2 a lot more than GoW2 so I say go for MW2.
About MW2 map packs:
I was thinking about it, and if you [were stupid enough] to buy/bought the map packs for 1200 points or whatever it is on the PS3, that's the same price as 3 map packs for WaW, for example.
Also, GOW2 is infinitely better than MW2, although whoever posted about the shotgun rolling multiplayer is completely true.
Multiplayer in GoW2 is better. Although I think that game is shit.
[QUOTE=Gummylamb;22895836]Bandwagon some more.
MW2 is better than most games out there.[/QUOTE]
I don't think so.
Otherwise I wouldn't complain about it.
Halo2 :colbert:
Are these the only options we have?
MW2 is better
Bandwagons, lol.
To all those saying MW2 doesn't require strategies, I dare you to play something other than pubs. Just because you own ass at pubs camping/rushing (who doesn't?) doesn't mean shit when you're going up against a coordinated team.
Applies to all games.
[QUOTE=Joppari;22900961]OP is 13
:downs:[/QUOTE]
I am 13, however im not one of the whining little kids who cry about everything either, I have a deep voice for my age and am more mature for my age then most (I even hang out with high school seniors).
Two different games.
Only a idiot would try to compare them.
[editline]09:07PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Ranger149;22907581]I am 13, however im not one of the whining little kids who cry about everything either, I have a deep voice for my age and am more mature for my age then most (I even hang out with high school seniors).[/QUOTE]
If your 13 you shouldnt be on Xbox live.
[QUOTE=ejonkou;22907807]Two different games.
Only a idiot would try to compare them.
[editline]09:07PM[/editline]
If your 13 you shouldnt be on Xbox live.[/QUOTE]
Try not to look like an idiot yourself and fix your grammar.
I can't stand both of those fucking games.
But I would say MW2 because the multiplayer is ok I guess.
[QUOTE=waxrock;22907379]Bandwagons, lol.
To all those saying MW2 doesn't require strategies, I dare you to play something other than pubs. Just because you own ass at pubs camping/rushing (who doesn't?) doesn't mean shit when you're going up against a coordinated team.
Applies to all games.[/QUOTE]
I've seen those clans n teams tryin', weapon balance wrecks their tactics on mw2.
[QUOTE=Ranger149;22907973]Try not to look like an idiot yourself and fix your grammar.[/QUOTE]
hahahahahahahaha
[editline]11:22PM[/editline]
[QUOTE=Ranger149;22907581]I am 13, however im not one of the whining little kids who cry about everything either, I have a deep voice for my age and am more mature for my age then most (I even hang out with high school seniors).[/QUOTE]
hahahahahhahahahaha
Neither.
[QUOTE=waxrock;22907379]Bandwagons, lol.
To all those saying MW2 doesn't require strategies, I dare you to play something other than pubs. Just because you own ass at pubs camping/rushing (who doesn't?) doesn't mean shit when you're going up against a coordinated team.
Applies to all games.[/QUOTE]
as if a console gamer, or 13 year old for that matter, knows what a pub is
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
