Call of Duty V10 - Hop in, there's still room in the bandwagon! - Games

Got Cod:MW3 for free. Friend got it for me, then suddenly, once I installed it, started that Spec Ops when you storm a plane on veteran difficulty. [b]No preparation for me.[/b] What came out: - WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON, WHO ARE THOSE PEOPLE SHIT MAN SHOOT OH GOD WHY NO GRENADES, WAIT SHIT I AM FLYING THROUGHT THE PLANE! - Man we are on a plane about to save the president and it is veteran difficulty. - HOLY FUCK OH SHIT REVIVE ME GOD RUN GOD GOD GOD SHIT WAIT. Wait... I killed the president. - Nice shot.

but you're supposed to capture not kill him silly billy...

[QUOTE=MrJazzy;34130269]I wouldn't count magicka or terraria though. Neither magicka or terraria are very heavy on theme, especially not terraria. Magicka is a little on fantasy I suppose but it's main theme focus is simply comedy. But yeah, I think you can disregard a game because of it's theme. For example, if you don't like fantasy, you're probably not going to like Fable or TES because they are so heavy on the fantasy theme while you on the other hand may enjoy Magicka or Unreal. Gameplay is not 100% of a game.[/QUOTE] yeah I have done that. But there are so many WWII games that you simply can't discount a game because of the theme, especially when it's like CoD where the majority of the gameplay is similar how can people like modern warfare but not like WWII is WWII really that different?

Calll of Duty? Never heard of it... Did you mean Call of Duty by any chances?

[QUOTE=dass;34128891]It is a strategy like every other, but its too easy and too destructive, in its own way. I don't really condone it, but I sure hate to be minding my own business, make a turn and some guy hidden takes a shot at me and kills me because he's been sitting there the whole match. Its increadibly annoying. One thing is having recons in games like BF, another is having some guy sitting on the dark corner of a place in a small map, quiet as a mouse, looking straight at the place where you are coming from and killing you.[/QUOTE] Killcam makes it pretty easy to quickly learn where to throw a nade or go in spraying in my opinion :)

I wonder why trotskygrad rated me late, as I didn't see a single post about the misspelling... Well, my eyes are in my asshole anyways so...

[QUOTE=trotskygrad;34131779]yeah I have done that. But there are so many WWII games that you simply can't discount a game because of the theme, especially when it's like CoD where the majority of the gameplay is similar how can people like modern warfare but not like WWII is WWII really that different?[/QUOTE] ...yes Its like living in a house with no central heat and internet, and then changing to one that has that and more. I also have had enough of nazis. A game where you kill.... NAZI'S! And then another where you kill... NAZI'S! And so on... What else.... Trench warfare isn't really fun to me, I don't really like the weapons from WWII (thats right guys, come at me (; ) and who knows what else. what you're saying is kinda like looking at a game for its graphics other than gameplay, story and actual things that matter. I usually look for modern shooters because they feel alot more fun to me and guns don't look like their made of steel that came from a rock and wood that came from the nearest tree 20 minutes ago. And the stories seem to usually be the same. Nazis, kill them. Nazis, kill them. MW has some made up conflict that even though its sort of gimicky, it feels refreshing compared to nazis. I just don't like the theme to it and how everything is.

[QUOTE=MuffinZerg;34131482]Got Cod:MW3 for free. Friend got it for me, then suddenly, once I installed it, started that Spec Ops when you storm a plane on veteran difficulty. [b]No preparation for me.[/b] What came out: - WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON, WHO ARE THOSE PEOPLE SHIT MAN SHOOT OH GOD WHY NO GRENADES, WAIT SHIT I AM FLYING THROUGHT THE PLANE! - Man we are on a plane about to save the president and it is veteran difficulty. - HOLY FUCK OH SHIT REVIVE ME GOD RUN GOD GOD GOD SHIT WAIT. Wait... I killed the president. - Nice shot.[/QUOTE] Silly simon, you don't save him or kill him. You stand behind him and hold X, or square, or F to 'capture' him

[QUOTE=manian112;34132926]I wonder why trotskygrad rated me late, as I didn't see a single post about the misspelling... Well, my eyes are in my asshole anyways so...[/QUOTE] I think theres one right on the first page. [editline]9th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=kaskade700;34132883]Killcam makes it pretty easy to quickly learn where to throw a nade or go in spraying in my opinion :)[/QUOTE] Means nothing. It depends on alot of variables. You could even know where he is, and he could be in such a place that the only way to get to him is going through his line of fire. Meanwhile, he eats up alot of people, and theres always the sniper scope trick. Don't zoom out and you wont give them your position so easily. Its hell in Crossfire. Sometimes you can't even see their heads on the balcony.

[QUOTE=dass;34132968]...yes Its like living in a house with no central heat and internet, and then changing to one that has that and more. I also have had enough of nazis. A game where you kill.... NAZI'S! And then another where you kill... NAZI'S! And so on... What else.... Trench warfare isn't really fun to me, I don't really like the weapons from WWII (thats right guys, come at me (; ) and who knows what else. what you're saying is kinda like looking at a game for its graphics other than gameplay, story and actual things that matter. I usually look for modern shooters because they feel alot more fun to me and guns don't look like their made of steel that came from a rock and wood that came from the nearest tree 20 minutes ago. And the stories seem to usually be the same. Nazis, kill them. Nazis, kill them. MW has some made up conflict that even though its sort of gimicky, it feels refreshing compared to nazis. I just don't like the theme to it and how everything is.[/QUOTE] You missed the Imperial Army, there's a whole lot of Imperial Army killing. I guess developers aren't allowed to make a game where you play as the nazis?

[QUOTE=RubberFruit;34133059]You missed the Imperial Army, there's a whole lot of Imperial Army killing. I guess developers aren't allowed to make a game where you play as the nazis?[/QUOTE] I'm just saying I'm tired of even hearing about WW2. It was 60 or 70 years ago (correct me if I'm wrong instead of boxing it up, but I really don't feel like "wikiing" it right now...) And yet, people are still making games about it. What makes it funnier is how people never whined about it and suddenly 2 games that are alike begin a shitstorm of nerd rage. And they call people dumb for buying mw series games after buying maybe all WW2 series of cod... As I said, its an opinion. I'm tired of even hearing about WW2 games after 6 titles based on that. (again, correct me if I'm wrong)

[QUOTE=dass;34133164]I'm just saying I'm tired of even hearing about WW2. It was 60 or 70 years ago (correct me if I'm wrong instead of boxing it up, but I really don't feel like "wikiing" it right now...) And yet, people are still making games about it. What makes it funnier is how people never whined about it and suddenly 2 games that are alike begin a shitstorm of nerd rage. And they call people dumb for buying mw series games after buying maybe all WW2 series of cod... As I said, its an opinion. I'm tired of even hearing about WW2 games after 6 titles based on that. (again, correct me if I'm wrong)[/QUOTE] I have to say I agree. The only WW2 game I'd play is one that is very polished and has had a lot of time spent on it, I like the look of RO2 but Call of Duty 5: WAW multiplayer felt like it had been rushed. Not a lot of game developers look at Vietnam war, I guess BO had a little bit of it, but that was thoroughly twisted and fucked 3 times treyarch and its atrocious plotline, I think a Vietnam game would be refreshing from the usual WW2 stuff

[QUOTE=dass;34133030]I think theres one right on the first page. [editline]9th January 2012[/editline] Means nothing. It depends on alot of variables. You could even know where he is, and he could be in such a place that the only way to get to him is going through his line of fire. Meanwhile, he eats up alot of people, and theres always the sniper scope trick. Don't zoom out and you wont give them your position so easily. Its hell in Crossfire. Sometimes you can't even see their heads on the balcony.[/QUOTE] Then do as they do, throw a smoke or something. All I'm saying is that it's easy to not get killed by the same camper twice ;)

[QUOTE=trotskygrad;34131779]yeah I have done that. But there are so many WWII games that you simply can't discount a game because of the theme, especially when it's like CoD where the majority of the gameplay is similar how can people like modern warfare but not like WWII is WWII really that different?[/QUOTE] I suppose, if you're into modern warfare (as in WWI to present or a bit in the future) you'll probably have preferables. I for example love the WWII era and think it's really interesting while I on the other hand find modern (90s-now) and futuristic warfare boring and bland. [editline]9th January 2012[/editline] That is, for the most part, I can still cope with modern and futuristic warfare, I do enjoy the MW cods for example.

aaaaauuuugh started terribly for the first 4 games then my non-fps playing joins and i start getting 2.0+ KDRs...wtf...

The suckers just bought Blackops2.com I'm wondering what name will they come up for the next CoD?

[QUOTE=irukandji;34136065]The suckers just bought Blackops2.com I'm wondering what name will they come up for the next CoD?[/QUOTE]White Ops [sp]kill me[/sp]

Black ops was shit enough Nevermind MW3 [sp]I did enjoy the SP in MW3 though :v: [/sp]

[QUOTE=dass;34132968]...yes Its like living in a house with no central heat and internet, and then changing to one that has that and more. I also have had enough of nazis. A game where you kill.... NAZI'S! And then another where you kill... NAZI'S! And so on... What else.... Trench warfare isn't really fun to me, I don't really like the weapons from WWII (thats right guys, come at me (; ) and who knows what else. what you're saying is kinda like looking at a game for its graphics other than gameplay, story and actual things that matter. I usually look for modern shooters because they feel alot more fun to me and guns don't look like their made of steel that came from a rock and wood that came from the nearest tree 20 minutes ago. And the stories seem to usually be the same. Nazis, kill them. Nazis, kill them. MW has some made up conflict that even though its sort of gimicky, it feels refreshing compared to nazis. I just don't like the theme to it and how everything is.[/QUOTE] just btw it's "nazis" not "nazi's" also trench warfare is WWI. you don't like the guns from WWII? I find them by far the same hell, M14 basically looks like a WWII gun, snipers look very much the same, and the StG44 basically IS modern assault rifles. a fair criticism of your point though is that I find WWII storylines seem MUCH more varied than those of the MW series. Even the [b]individual[/b] objectives of the missions seem way more varied and purposeful. In WWII storylines you can have legit espionage and sneaking as resistance members in all the cities of Europe (in their full vintage glory, without all the modern buildings). You can travel from the fjords of Norway, to the fields of France, to the deserts of North Africa, to the steaming jungles of Singapore, to freezing Manchuria at Khalkhin Gol, all while fighting the same war, while still making sense. Modern is usually set in the US, Central/Western war-torn Europe, former USSR, and Middle East. In WWII storylines you can fight Germans, Vichy French, Italians, Romanians (with their funky helmets and Orita SMGs), Hungarians, Japanese, Finns, and more. Modern? OMG RUSSIANS AND ARABS THEY BE KILLIN US. You can face armored vehicles of great variety and type, other than just the usual BMP, BTR, T72, and T80. [QUOTE=dass;34132968] I also have had enough of russianss. A game where you kill.... RUSSIANS! And then another where you kill... RUSSIANS! And so on... What else.... Urban warfare isn't really fun to me, I don't really like the weapons from the modern era (thats right guys, come at me (; ) and who knows what else. what you're saying is kinda like looking at a game for its graphics other than gameplay, story and actual things that matter. I usually look for WWII shooters because they feel alot more fun to me and guns don't look like they're fresh out of a factory from China that decided to add on lots of extra crap. And the stories seem to usually be the same. Russians, kill them. Russians, kill them. Medal of Honor has some made up operation that even though its sort of gimicky, it feels refreshing compared to russians. I just don't like the theme to it and how everything is.[/QUOTE] [editline]9th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=dass;34133164]I'm just saying I'm tired of even hearing about WW2. It was 60 or 70 years ago (correct me if I'm wrong instead of boxing it up, but I really don't feel like "wikiing" it right now...) And yet, people are still making games about it. What makes it funnier is how people never whined about it and suddenly 2 games that are alike begin a shitstorm of nerd rage. And they call people dumb for buying mw series games after buying maybe all WW2 series of cod... As I said, its an opinion. I'm tired of even hearing about WW2 games after 6 titles based on that. (again, correct me if I'm wrong)[/QUOTE] there were essentially 2 WWII CoD games for PC: CoD1 and CoD2. CoD2 was a vast graphical improvement over CoD1, so people didn't whine/bitch much. Also, it added an entire theater of operations that was never done before in the series, North Africa, and a whole lot of other stuff. The SP was vastly expanded and improved.

i want another WWII game tyvm

[QUOTE=Vmonkey;34137521]i want another WWII game tyvm[/QUOTE] I wouldn't trust IW or treyarch to do a good one tbh. They would make some ridiculous shit like hipfiring M2 brownings.

I want an alternate history WWII game. With that weirdy EM-2 assault rifle that was a wood-furniture L85 pretty much.

[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;34137663]I want an alternate history WWII game. With that weirdy EM-2 assault rifle that was a wood-furniture L85 pretty much.[/QUOTE] lol no... mechanisms are very different though I'd totally be down for an alternate history where the war runs until 1950 with the nuking of berlin and tokyo simultaneously in a mass blitz

[QUOTE=trotskygrad;34136607]just btw it's "nazis" not "nazi's" [b]whatever, I'm sick, and whenever I try to think it gives me one hell of a headache along with a feeling of throwing up and blurry thoughts[/b] also trench warfare is WWI. [b]I meant fighting in dirty looking places... not the best way to say it, but, its about the scenery and stuff...[/b] you don't like the guns from WWII? [b]nope[/b] I find them by far the same [b]nope[/b] hell, M14 basically looks like a WWII gun, snipers look very much the same, and the StG44 basically IS modern assault rifles. [b]but they feel old, they look old, and they are old, arrest me for it but I'd rather use a raily M4, well not completely full of rails, or mw1's m4, but yeah... And the StG seems like it was made from an old tank[/b] a fair criticism of your point though is that I find WWII storylines seem MUCH more varied than those of the MW series. Even the [b]individual[/b] objectives of the missions seem way more varied and purposeful. [b]they feel too beaten up to the ground, as its always nazis this nazis that[/b] In WWII storylines you can have legit espionage and sneaking as resistance members in all the cities of Europe (in their full vintage glory, without all the modern buildings). You can travel from the fjords of Norway, to the fields of France, to the deserts of North Africa, to the steaming jungles of Singapore, to freezing Manchuria at Khalkhin Gol, all while fighting the same war, while still making sense. Modern is usually set in the US, Central/Western war-torn Europe, former USSR, and Middle East. [b]you also go to different places, like Brazil[/b] In WWII storylines you can fight Germans, Vichy French, Italians, Romanians (with their funky helmets and Orita SMGs), Hungarians, Japanese, Finns, and more. Modern? OMG RUSSIANS AND ARABS THEY BE KILLIN US. [b]but they are always related to the nazis in some way, russians feel cooler to me :v:[/b] You can face armored vehicles of great variety and type, other than just the usual BMP, BTR, T72, and T80. [b]helicopters?[/b] [editline]9th January 2012[/editline] there were essentially 2 WWII CoD games for PC: CoD1 and CoD2. CoD2 was a vast graphical improvement over CoD1, so people didn't whine/bitch much. Also, it added an entire theater of operations that was never done before in the series, North Africa, and a whole lot of other stuff. The SP was vastly expanded and improved.[/QUOTE] There are alot more titles than that, and there are more WW2 games, its not just in the cod series.

Oddly enough, I hear people say cod MW3 is shit and that black ops was the best call of duty. Reverse a year and it was "Black ops is shit and mw2 was the best call of duty"

[QUOTE=thelurker1234;34143469]Oddly enough, I hear people say cod MW3 is shit and that black ops was the best call of duty. Reverse a year and it was "Black ops is shit and mw2 was the best call of duty"[/QUOTE] MW3 > Bops

[QUOTE=thelurker1234;34143469]Oddly enough, I hear people say cod MW3 is shit and that black ops was the best call of duty. Reverse a year and it was "Black ops is shit and mw2 was the best call of duty"[/QUOTE] It's almost like individuals have different opinions.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;34143958]It's almost like individuals have different opinions.[/QUOTE] HERESY!

[QUOTE=dass;34143194]There are alot more titles than that, and there are more WW2 games, its not just in the cod series.[/QUOTE] idk, scenery seems a lot "cleaner" at times, more beautiful than the regular grimy urban warfare. As for you criticism of objectives? what? I just don't think you've played that many of the games, nor know enough about the subjects to have a fair criticism of it. In modern warfare games, yeah you can go other places, but the storylines that bring you there are almost always uber-contrived. In a WWII storyline it all makes sense. in WWII you can fight helicopters too. I was saying armored vehicles had more variety since the roles of light tank, armored car, APC, medium tank, infantry support tank, heavy tank, infantry tank, cruiser tank, etc. had not been merged into the current IFV/APC and MBT in modern warfare. Warfare was simply more varied. You could turn tractors into tanks and still have them be marginally effective, unlike in modern warfare. I'm not saying you can't have your own opinion, I'm just saying your criticism is not justified.

[QUOTE=thelurker1234;34143469]Oddly enough, I hear people say cod MW3 is shit and that black ops was the best call of duty. Reverse a year and it was "Black ops is shit and mw2 was the best call of duty"[/QUOTE] it's possible that the trend will continue, lets wait for the next cod and see what people say about MW3.