[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;39449272]Tips for Stug3? I have the 10cm and it's helping a lot.[/QUOTE]
get the l/70, it's decent
great turn speed and ROF
I didn't even think I spotted anyone.
[img]http://localhostr.com/files/JvmDErn/shot_099.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;39449272]Tips for Stug3? I have the 10cm and it's helping a lot.[/QUOTE]
Shoot shit and shit..
Na, but use HEAT if you want to be able to kill things with the 10,5cm.
[quote]- the controversial "Stalinec" tank decal won't be removed from the game
[B]- Storm considers reworking the ingame hangar chat, no details yet[/B]
[B]- premium British and Chinese heavies? "Definitely this year"[/B]
- El-Halluf doesn't have a higher chance to drop than other maps (SS: by "drop" I mean "to be chosen when selecting a map for next random battle" - sorry, WoW slang)
- the "in development" section will be updated before the 8.4 test begins (SS: the question was "can we expect the 8.4 test within 2 weeks, as 8.4 is scheduled for Feb/March? Might be a hint that the 8.4 is delayed"
- the ceiling height of each maps is very high, SerB doesn't tell how exactly, but "it's sufficient for any ballistic purposes"
- confirmed: no extra regular gold/XP per medals planned
- there are 3 "sizes" of ingame tracers, depending on the caliber
- regarding the placing of the M62-T2 gun on the vehicles, "historically, the gun was designed to replace the D-25T, wherever it was installed (IS-4, SU-122-54, T-10...) but by the time it was ready, the heavy tanks were declared obsolete
- the Indien-Panzer was confirmed to be a logical part of the new medium tank German branch
- a year is taken into consideration too, when introducing new tanks (SS: it is thus possible to find a vehicle that would fit into the game technologically, but it's "too new") (SS: so the Japanese Type 74 and the Merkava prototypes from the 70's won't fit apparently)
- with the introduction of tier 10 arties, the company allowed arty tiers will most likely change (eg. higher tier arties will be allowed for different modes), but the total company weight most likely won't. Basically there is some time limit ("and we determine what that limit is")
- SerB doesn't see any FPS issues with the sniper scope anymore
- Chinese Vickers has the engine in the back, but the transmission in the front
- Generally (SS: if I understood this correctly, not 100 percent sure), the AP shell normalisation does not depend on the caliber of the gun if the caliber is 2x as big as the thickness of the armor hit - and if the caliber is 3x as big as the thickness of the armor hit, the angle of impact counts as 90 degrees.
[B]- SerB stated that Evilly (SS: that guy I translated the answers from) might have screwed up some of the answers, namely the one about Wargaming buying the mods.[/B]
- regarding the T-62B introduction: Q: "And what about the T-62B? It's if the same age as the Leopard" A: "Well, the Leopard will be introduced..."
Regarding the "Stalinist" issue (quick background: a player started a thread where he complains about the game promoting the dictator Stalin): Ectar (community organizer, WG employee) passed his concern to the developers directly. Developers told him to sod off: "EU community manager can express his concern regarding the issues of some individuals over certain aspects of the game. This concern is very important to us." (SS: to explain this: SerB uses the expression "very important opinion" ("OBM") ironically, as in "yea, your personal opinion is very important to us..."). And under it, SerB pasted this picture:[img]http://i.imgur.com/VPxl6lv.jpg[/img][/quote]
Only have modules from the Tiger II? No problem!
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Dsk1Ejr.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZgSqUfa.jpg[/IMG]
Still 75 xp away from the 128mm, though.
[QUOTE=DaMastez;39450110][/QUOTE]
Anyone have a picture of the T-62B?
[img]http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y245/Tim_rich/Europe%202010/T62J.jpg[/img]
Supposedly a model of one
I like how any problem anyone has with the game performance wise, SerB just brushes it off and doesn't give a fuck. Mainly the 100% GPU usage in the garage which I happen to have all the time. Fuck him and his ideas of how game development works.
[QUOTE=DaMastez;39450110]
- premium British and Chinese heavies? "Definitely this year"[/QUOTE]
Tanks that print money for WG? Takes a month to model, "balance" and a single test to release.
Actual tanks that go in the trees? 2014.
[QUOTE=Squarebob;39450552]I like how any problem anyone has with the game performance wise, SerB just brushes it off and doesn't give a fuck. Mainly the 100% GPU usage in the garage which I happen to have all the time. Fuck him and his ideas of how game development works.[/QUOTE]
Ever since Adobe added hardware acceleration for Flash, shit has been fucking up all around.
I can see why SerB blames it, but then again who the fuck uses Flash to make a god damn UI in a game.
Oh Hai
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoLN_-B284Y&feature=youtu.be[/media]
[QUOTE=C0MMUNIZT;39450206]Anyone have a picture of the T-62B?[/QUOTE]
[img]http://alternathistory.org.ua/files/users/user1884/0_4e590_33bcf13e_XL.jpeg[/img]
It's the ancestor of T-72, T-62 equiped with 125mm smoothbore gun.
My dad just saw me looking at this thread and told me that when he was in army he got into a T-55 once. Though he admitted he hated it since there was not much space.
[QUOTE=Azaz3l;39450953]
It's the ancestor of T-72, T-62 equiped with 125mm smoothbore gun.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]Recognizing that the T-55/T-62 lineage had finally exhausted its potential for improvement, the USSR embarked upon the development of an [B]entirely new tank design[/B] that could defeat new Western tanks like the British Chieftain and resist new Western anti-tank weapons.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-64A[/url]
and
[QUOTE]While the T-64 was perhaps the world's most advanced battle tank design when introduced, it was too expensive to equip all the Soviet tank armies, let alone Warsaw Pact (WARPAC) allies. Therefore the parallel development of a so-called "mobilization model" was ordered, while T-64 development and production continued.[/QUOTE]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-72[/url]
So no, T-62 is not an ancestor to T-72.
what wonders is wot hiding for me today? lets find out
[img]http://i49.tinypic.com/2q3cisg.jpg[/img]
hmm
[img]http://i49.tinypic.com/5zkv0h.jpg[/img]
jesus christ no
1 friendly drowned tank later, decided to take a swim as well
[img]http://i47.tinypic.com/2m2f9jr.jpg[/img]
wot(tm)
having this much fun should be against the rules
[t]http://i.imgur.com/LPKO1z1.png[/t]
[QUOTE=acidcj;39451738]having this much fun should be against the rules
[t]http://i.imgur.com/LPKO1z1.png[/t][/QUOTE]
Stop using HEAT and being an annoying dick against everyone you shoot at.
[QUOTE=acidcj;39451738]having this much fun should be against the rules
[t]http://i.imgur.com/LPKO1z1.png[/t][/QUOTE]
Fun? In american tanks? Please!
Howitzer on this tank for some reason only goes up to 50 damage on same tier tanks, and this hellcat pos with the best gun penetrates for no damage
literally got a round with 10 shots , 7 pens, 0 damage
Enemy team has three KV-1s as top tiers. In a platoon. From a clan.
Yeah no wonder how that match ended.
Defeat.
Friendly arty shoots at me for 900 damage at the beggining of the match. H e writes '' L2P NOOB'':suicide:
Fuck it im out!
[QUOTE=acidcj;39451738]having this much fun should be against the rules
[t]http://i.imgur.com/LPKO1z1.png[/t][/QUOTE]
you're like an arty player
[QUOTE=Calkkuna;39451820]Stop using HEAT and being an annoying dick against everyone you shoot at.[/QUOTE]
The funny thing is I'm still making a profit because of the special. Get your own, while they're still on sale
[QUOTE=acidcj;39451942]The funny thing is I'm still making a profit because of the special. Get your own, while they're still on sale[/QUOTE]
Sorry, EU is too busy having a AMX 38, SAu-40 and ARL V39 50% credit increase.
FUCK YEAH.
[QUOTE=Calkkuna;39451820]Stop using HEAT and being an annoying dick against everyone you shoot at.[/QUOTE]
No. Gotta use it while we still can.
Replace communists with HEAT users, and you have my reaction.
[video=youtube;MoATWN68IZA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoATWN68IZA[/video]
[QUOTE=Uzkanda;39451532][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-64A[/url]
and
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-72[/url]
So no, T-62 is not an ancestor to T-72.[/QUOTE]
The first T-72 "Ural" (obr. 1973) was actually reusing the same gun (2A26) and optics mounted on object 167 (or T-62B).
[url]http://alternathistory.org.ua/tank-obekt-167-dedushka-urala[/url]
Also the T-64 isn't an ancestor to T-72 either, since it was pretty much a cheaper and more reliable version of the T-64.
[QUOTE=Uzkanda;39451532][url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-64A[/url]
and
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-72[/url]
So no, T-62 is not an ancestor to T-72.[/QUOTE]
If you really want to use wikipedia as the ultimate truth source, then you should also check the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-62]T-62 page.[/url]
[quote]Models
Former Soviet Union
T-72 – A further development of T-62 with some features of the T-64A.[/quote]
[QUOTE=Skwee;39445249]should I get gun laying drive or vents on my t34, i already have rammer and vert stab[/QUOTE]
Gun laying drive is a must for the t34.
And personally I would switch out that vert stab with a camo net or binocs, but heck if I know.
How does the vert stab work out for you on that tank?
[QUOTE=Wiseman400;39452924]Gun laying drive is a must for the t34.
And personally I would switch out that vert stab with a camo net or binocs, but heck if I know.
How does the vert stab work out for you on that tank?[/QUOTE]
It has a long aiming time. so going after something that moves a little faster the vert stab will help a bit there when you need to move your gun quickly and wont get as large of a aiming circle...hopefully.
babies
[img]http://i.imgur.com/eTRYTZx.jpg[/img]
The US Medium tanks seem fun.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
