[QUOTE=Jurikuer;35581793]Gotta love it when they run out of ideas so badly that they have to copy my little pony.[/QUOTE]
keldeo isn't a lone pokemon, dummy
[img]http://cdn.bulbagarden.net/media/upload/1/10/Legendary_Musketeers.png[/img]
[quote]The legendary musketeers is a collective term to refer to the quartet of Cobalion, Terrakion, Virizion, and Keldeo.
The group is based on the French novel The Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas, père. Cobalion represents Athos, the oldest and de facto leader of the group. Terrakion represents Porthos, the strongest, heaviest, and largest member of the group. Virizion represents Aramis, the most feminine, vain, and romantic member of the group. Keldeo represents d'Artagnan, the youngest by far and the latest addition to the group. The group has challenged humans in legends in order to protect other Pokémon from losing their homes to human expansion.
All of the Pokémon share a secondary type, Fighting-type, and all share the ability Justified. Many of their moves refer to swordplay, something the musketeers specialized in, such as Swords Dance and their signature move, Sacred Sword.[/quote]
Virizion is my one true love, he'll fuck you up.
I fail to see how or why you all continue to fight my opinion on these new Pokemon. It's not nostalgia, it's obvious. Most of them just don't look cool. Terrakion looks bad-ass. But the others don't. And for every post I make regarding my opinion there are 5 or so of you who reply with nothing more than "you're wrong, and they are based off of X". I don't care what they're based off of. The art style is not excusable because they are based off unreal creatures of myth. I know I'm not the only one, all of my friends agree with me, especially when I say that Keldio looks like a MLP reject.
[QUOTE=Jurikuer;35582315]I fail to see how or why you all continue to fight my opinion on these new Pokemon. It's not nostalgia, it's obvious. Most of them just don't look cool. Terrakion looks bad-ass. But the others don't. And for every post I make regarding my opinion there are 5 or so of you who reply with nothing more than "you're wrong, and they are based off of X". I don't care what they're based off of. The art style is not excusable because they are based off unreal creatures of myth. I know I'm not the only one, all of my friends agree with me, especially when I say that Keldio looks like a MLP reject.[/QUOTE]
thats nice
you can stop now
[QUOTE=Jurikuer;35582315]I fail to see how or why you all continue to fight my opinion on these new Pokemon. It's not nostalgia, it's obvious. Most of them just don't look cool. Terrakion looks bad-ass. But the others don't. And for every post I make regarding my opinion there are 5 or so of you who reply with nothing more than "you're wrong, and they are based off of X". I don't care what they're based off of. The art style is not excusable because they are based off unreal creatures of myth. I know I'm not the only one, all of my friends agree with me, especially when I say that Keldio looks like a MLP reject.[/QUOTE]
We don't care about your opinion. Stop shitting this thread. We made obvious we didn't care about your opinion. Stop spamming about it.
[QUOTE=Jurikuer;35582315]I fail to see how or why you all continue to fight my opinion on these new Pokemon. It's not nostalgia, it's obvious. Most of them just don't look cool. Terrakion looks bad-ass. But the others don't. And for every post I make regarding my opinion there are 5 or so of you who reply with nothing more than "you're wrong, and they are based off of X". I don't care what they're based off of. The art style is not excusable because they are based off unreal creatures of myth. I know I'm not the only one, all of my friends agree with me, especially when I say that Keldio looks like a MLP reject.[/QUOTE]
[b]OK[/b]
[QUOTE=Jurikuer;35582315]I fail to see how or why you all continue to fight my opinion on these new Pokemon. It's not nostalgia, it's obvious. Most of them just don't look cool. Terrakion looks bad-ass. But the others don't. And for every post I make regarding my opinion there are 5 or so of you who reply with nothing more than "you're wrong, and they are based off of X". I don't care what they're based off of. The art style is not excusable because they are based off unreal creatures of myth. I know I'm not the only one, all of my friends agree with me, especially when I say that Keldio looks like a MLP reject.[/QUOTE]
Cobalion is the shit.
Cobalion best musketeer
While I do think that the older Gens had better designs, the new gens are by no means HORRIBLE.
I just wish they were a little less complicated.
Not everything needs a million stripes and hornes and various little doo-dads cluttering it up.
Look at some of the best designs from the older games: Charizard, Snorlax, the Eeveelutions.
All nice, simple designs.
Now look at some of the best designs from the newer games: Scrafty, Litwik, Joltik.
Again, nice, simple designs.
Anyone have that picture that shows Charizard as it was designed in Gen I, then shows what it would look like if it was introduced in Gen V?
as the graphics get better, the designs can get more intricate
that's just how it is
even still, none of them has "a million stripes and hornes and various little doo-dads" anyway, so stop using that one stupid comic with the talking gameboys as your source information because that whole argument is bullshit
Oh god what if this happens...
[img]http://content.screencast.com/users/Spah/folders/Jing/media/13677c73-d2ae-4b5e-9f55-326d2b8c6a96/2012-04-15_1534.png[/img]
a few posts down...
[img]http://content.screencast.com/users/Spah/folders/Jing/media/a71629e1-abd7-48cb-a053-c08bcee48319/2012-04-15_1530.png[/img]
[QUOTE=salty peanut v2;35583759]as the graphics get better, the designs can get more intricate
that's just how it is
even still, none of them has "a million stripes and hornes and various little doo-dads" anyway, so stop using that one stupid comic with the talking gameboys as your source information because that whole argument is bullshit[/QUOTE]
Easy bro, chill out.
I'm just saying, some of them ARE a little too cluttered.
Look at Garchomp.
Very cool design.
However, does it REALLY need those kneepads and whatnot?
I'm just saying, less is more.
Also, I've never seen this talking Gameboys comic, care to provide a link?
Garchomp is a shark, your example is invalid please enter a new one
[QUOTE=KStyleAzure;35584201]Garchomp is a shark, your example is invalid please enter a new one[/QUOTE]
And sharks have kneepads?
or... knees?
Another example, Emboar.
It just looks cluttered, I feel like it'd look a lot nicer if they cleaned it up a bit.
It's not a BAD design, but it could be better.
[QUOTE=BanthaFodder;35584426]It's not a BAD design, but it could be better.[/QUOTE]
>3rd generation Fire/Fighting in a row
>not bad design
dude no shut up sharks are the greatest
[QUOTE=biodude94566;35584503]>3rd generation Fire/Fighting in a row
>not bad design[/QUOTE]
Oh yeah, fuck that, I'm talking pure asthetics here.
No reason at all that thing should be Fire/Fighting.
It's like, we get it, Fire and Fighting are the two most edgy tacticool types in the game, you can stop making them into starters now.
If anything, it should have been Fire and Ground, or Fire and Dark, or hell, just FIRE.
[editline]15th April 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=KStyleAzure;35584524]dude no shut up sharks are the greatest[/QUOTE]
We need more shark-based Pokemon.
I got some amusement out of naming my Gible "Candygram", but we need something more, a Hammerhead or something.
[editline]15th April 2012[/editline]
Also, on the topic of Sharkemon, did anyone else die a little inside when they realised that Sharpedo has no tail, so he's just kinda like a stump with a face?
it's shaped like a torpedo
[QUOTE=BanthaFodder;35584655]Oh yeah, fuck that, I'm talking pure asthetics here.
No reason at all that thing should be Fire/Fighting.
It's like, we get it, Fire and Fighting are the two most edgy tacticool types in the game, you can stop making them into starters now.
If anything, it should have been Fire and Ground, or Fire and Dark, or hell, just FIRE.
[editline]15th April 2012[/editline]
We need more shark-based Pokemon.
I got some amusement out of naming my Gible "Candygram", but we need something more, a Hammerhead or something.
[editline]15th April 2012[/editline]
Also, on the topic of Sharkemon, did anyone else die a little inside when they realised that Sharpedo has no tail, so he's just kinda like a stump with a face?[/QUOTE]
Fire/Water
Fire/Steel
Fire/Electric
IMAGINE THE POSSIBILITES
Next starters' secondary typing should trump the original trump.
[editline]15th April 2012[/editline]
Fire / Electric
Water / Poison
Grass / Ground
Ground resists Poison, Fire/Electric is 4x weak to the STAB of the starter it is supposed to beat. Grass Starter is overpowered.
Better yet:
Grass/Dark
Fire/Psychic
Water/Fighting
black looks so nice in the DSiXL, its the first game i play on it that actually looks better instead of just resized
[QUOTE=salty peanut v2;35584837]it's shaped like a torpedo[/QUOTE]
and this is what i read
"it's shaped like a potato"
sharpotato
whats not to like
the shark part
i like to eat potaoes
sharks like to eat me
i dun wanna be eateded yet!!
Just beat FireRed
pretty epic fight considering the only ones alive by Gary were my
54 Venosaur
50 Polywrath
54 Snorlax
40 Lapras
Polywrath got ko'd pretty early on, before Charizard too. So the whole time I was using Toxic/Leech seed and bouncing to Snorlax to tank. An epic finish with Lapras' Perish Song on his Gyarados made me champion on [I]my first try[/I].
nuzlocke?
not enough revives :u
[QUOTE=Vmonkey;35586904]the shark part
i like to eat potaoes
sharks like to eat me
i dun wanna be eateded [b]yet!![/b][/QUOTE]
huh?
I'm working on getting a DW sharpedo atm.
I'm at about 5k DW points. Once I get a female I'll be happy to share with you lovely friendly people :D
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
