Battlefield 3 V8: Where are my guns EA, you promised there would be guns - Games

[QUOTE=waxrock;39913148]Pointing out the obvious here, but you are really bad at this game. [URL]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/soldier/Altimor/stats/241584000/[/URL] [/QUOTE] I'm not sure what that has to do with anything.

[QUOTE=TextQUAKE;39913197]my stats are shit because it took me many months to get used to bf3's graphics now that i can see people i usually top scoreboard if i arrive at the beginning of the match[/QUOTE] How the fuck can graphics impede your gameplay? Unless you try to run the game on a toaster, I can't see how.

[QUOTE=DEMONSKUL;39913245]How the fuck can graphics impede your gameplay? Unless you try to run the game on a toaster, I can't see how.[/QUOTE] All I play besides beff3 is Quake and Tribes on the lowest quality highest visibility settings. I've never before played a game that rapes my eyes as much as BF3. So for the longest time I'd just run around and get shot because I couldn't see enemies

[QUOTE=legolover122;39913160]Hardcore is only fun when it's bolt action sniper TDM. Conquest or any other mode just leads to you getting sniped by a SMG from seven miles away.[/QUOTE] I played some TDM to get easy rocket kill assignments done and I actually thought it was pretty fun. I still don't like how major game systems (mostly spotting and anything that has to do with the UI) support the mode well enough but the minute to minute combat was enjoyable, not to mention refreshing. If the game was made with hardcore in mind and had an alternative mode called Arcade Mode or something, I would probably play Hardcore/standard just because that is what the game was built for.

One of these Battlefield moments again. I shot a rocket at an enemy and quickly ran behind a wall, but of course due to shitty lag I got killed. What's a game without some lag, eh? Meanwhile the rocket didn't even scratch him, even though I aimed it straight at him.

Its close. Edit: Gone.

I think Call of Raidyrduty is going to beat Battlefield Kylen 4

I prefer hardcore because 3D spotting is ridiculous and it kind of sucks shooting a whole mag into a guys face without him dying in normal. Also passive health regeneration on people and vehicles is BALLS

[QUOTE=Zanpa;39912901]I don't think it's specifically toward Swedes, if a guy from a country near Sweden connected it would probably be the same. It must be a server that doesn't want people from countries too far away so that the ping stays correct for everyone.[/QUOTE] But it came up 10 min in the second match in that server, the server was french so had about 35-40 ping.

[QUOTE=Kebab;39913579]it kind of sucks shooting a whole mag into a guys face without him dying in normal[/QUOTE] what sounds like you're using bad inaccurate guns try the m16a4

[QUOTE=Kebab;39913579]Also passive health regeneration on people and vehicles is BALLS[/QUOTE] Though it also sucks that you're hurt by the enemy down to 1% health and you spend your whole time sitting in a bush waiting for a medic until a stray bullet hits you. [editline]14th March 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=TextQUAKE;39913600]what sounds like you're using bad inaccurate guns try the m16a4[/QUOTE] Enough with this crap, please. You're only threadshitting by now.

[QUOTE=KyleN;39913520]Its close. Edit: Gone.[/QUOTE] what's gone

[QUOTE=asXas;39913590]But it came up 10 min in the second match in that server, the server was french so had about 35-40 ping.[/QUOTE] Oh, then there's your answer. You ran into the typical french guy that hates strangers and he happened to be the admin of the server. :v:

[QUOTE=Akasori;39913789]Enough with this crap, please. You're only threadshitting by now.[/QUOTE] i'm giving legitimate advice. if the guy is aiming for the head, firing magazines and missing, that is the work of one of the dark gods of the bf3niverse: random spread. m16a4 has nearly 0 random spread if you leave even a single frame in between bursts

not sure if this has been posted yet, but some Battlefield 4 info may be incoming tomorrow and this is the supposed cover art [img]https://o.twimg.com/1/proxy.jpg?t=FQQVBBgpaHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0cGljLmNvbS9zaG93L2xhcmdlL2NiY2U1dC5qcGcUAhYAEgA&s=AGKp1jvHFG_i9vgmhxftm9ZNZDHeRWPuhUsPcD2E5io[/img] more info here [url]http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=523875[/url]

That 4 looks awful, IMO.

[QUOTE=luckyg;39915060]not sure if this has been posted yet, but some Battlefield 4 info may be incoming tomorrow and this is the supposed cover art [img]https://o.twimg.com/1/proxy.jpg?t=FQQVBBgpaHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0cGljLmNvbS9zaG93L2xhcmdlL2NiY2U1dC5qcGcUAhYAEgA&s=AGKp1jvHFG_i9vgmhxftm9ZNZDHeRWPuhUsPcD2E5io[/img] more info here [url]http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=523875[/url][/QUOTE] Is there any sort of source on that picture? Because anyone could have made it, and I doubt EA/Dice will go for the orange fire burn theme again.

[QUOTE=TextQUAKE;39915015]i'm giving legitimate advice. if the guy is aiming for the head, firing magazines and missing, that is the work of one of the dark gods of the bf3niverse: random spread. m16a4 has nearly 0 random spread if you leave even a single frame in between bursts[/QUOTE] Dude stop. You can take [B]any[/B] gun in the game and top the scoreboard. Tactics and your aim are more important than the stats of your gun. You're just a shit player if you need to go through pages of data to pick out the "best" gun.

[QUOTE=legolover122;39915114]Is there any sort of source on that picture? Because anyone could have made it, and I doubt EA/Dice will go for the orange fire burn theme again.[/QUOTE] source mainly stems from here [url]http://battlefieldo.com/threads/battlefield-4-to-be-shown-soon.9394/[/url] and why wouldn't they go for the orange burn theme anymore? they have used it for the last couple of games and it seems to be their recognizable design now

[QUOTE=JoonazL;39915146]Dude stop. You can take [B]any[/B] gun in the game and top the scoreboard. Tactics and your aim are more important than the stats of your gun. You're just a shit player if you need to go through pages of data to pick out the "best" gun.[/QUOTE] M16A4 will top the scoreboard [b]harder[/b].

[QUOTE=luckyg;39915148]source mainly stems from here [url]http://battlefieldo.com/threads/battlefield-4-to-be-shown-soon.9394/[/url] and why wouldn't they go for the orange burn theme anymore? they have used it for the last couple of games and it seems to be their recognizable design now[/QUOTE] I guess they used it a little in BC2 but it wasn't as much there as it was in BF3. From a developer/publisher standpoint they would probably want to make BF4 look at least a little bit different. Having the same theme and color style could confuse some of the crowd. Look at the WiiU. Some people still think it's an addon for the wii :|

[QUOTE=TextQUAKE;39915167]M16A4 will top the scoreboard [b]harder[/b].[/QUOTE] Yeah but it looks bad, doesn't feel pleasing to use and doesn't have sexy sounds to go with it. And to be fair; the G3A3 is a better choice if you can aim at all.

[QUOTE=JoonazL;39915198]Yeah but it looks bad, doesn't feel pleasing to use and doesn't have sexy sounds to go with it. And to be fair; the G3A3 is a better choice if you can aim at all.[/QUOTE] I fail to see how the G3A3 is better, the accuracy is the same, their TTKs are pretty similar up until about 70 meters then the M16A4 exceeds it The M16A4 also has burst mode which causes the spread to reset instantly between bursts

[QUOTE=TextQUAKE;39915167]M16A4 will top the scoreboard [b]harder[/b].[/QUOTE] Just shut up already, you've been hampering along like those guys who bash any other gun but the m16a3 on the battlelog forums. It's really annoying and is just thread shitting, no one gives a fuck about stats, no one gives a fuck about x being better than y, no one gives a fuck about your opinion after you throw it around like fact, you're like a no life 100 star col who spends over 5000 hours ingame yet you've barely racked up 60. Take your stats, and go out the door.

[QUOTE=TextQUAKE;39915262]I fail to see how the G3A3 is better, the accuracy is the same, their TTKs are pretty similar up until about 70 meters then the M16A4 exceeds it The M16A4 also has burst mode which causes the spread to reset instantly between bursts[/QUOTE] The G3A3 does more damage; both at range and close. It also has a further drop off range and it suppresses more.

[QUOTE=TextQUAKE;39910712]To me fun and winning are the same thing, so I like good weapons.[/QUOTE] That honestly sounds like something a hacker would say to make themselves feel better about how much of a shitty person they're being. Hacks statistically improve your stats, so the obvious thing to do is to buy hacks because why stop at the crutch-weapons and the training wheels class? You reek of someone who would more than love to hack if given the opportunity to do so. Then all yours guns can be good, and you can be good at every class besides Assault.

[QUOTE=luckyg;39915060]not sure if this has been posted yet, but some Battlefield 4 info may be incoming tomorrow and this is the supposed cover art [img]https://o.twimg.com/1/proxy.jpg?t=FQQVBBgpaHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0cGljLmNvbS9zaG93L2xhcmdlL2NiY2U1dC5qcGcUAhYAEgA&s=AGKp1jvHFG_i9vgmhxftm9ZNZDHeRWPuhUsPcD2E5io[/img] more info here [url]http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=523875[/url][/QUOTE] If this is real, what's interesting to me is the jet in the background. It's not like anything that the US or Russia flies because it has canards instead the usual tail planes. It almost looks like the J-20, and if it is then I am very interested. I missed the Chinese units from BF2. [img]http://www.howitflies.com/files/photos/j-20-stealth-fighter-china_full_600.jpg[/img]

[QUOTE=JoonazL;39915367]The G3A3 does more damage; both at range and close. It also has a further drop off range and it suppresses more.[/QUOTE] [url]http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=BHb4NNi2[/url] they both trade off superior TTK until about 50m, then M16A4 wins M16A4 suppression per second sustained fire: 93.3% G3A3 suppression per second sustained fire: 91.6% contrary to your claims M16A4 does better there Recoil M16A4: 0.26 up, 0.075 left, 0.3 right G3A3: 0.45 up, 0.2 left, 0.2 right well look at that the m16a4 has less recoil and has a strong right bias on recoil pattern while g3 jerks equally to both sides Bullet speed M16A4: 650 m/s G3A3: 550 m/s wow look at that shit m16a4 wins by 100 m/s Spread M16A4: 0.1 still 0.5 moving while ADS, 2.5/2.0/1.5 stand/crouch/prone from hip G3A3: 0.1 still 1.5 moving while ADS, 3.5/3.0/2.5 stand/crouch/prone from hip look at that we have a winner again Mag size M16A4 damage per mag cq: 775 G3A3 damage per mag cq: 714 M16A4 damage per mag long range: 570.4 G3A3 damage per mag long range: 462 M16A4 seconds to deplete mag: 2.25 G3A3 seconds to deplete mag: 2.18 m16a4 wins again do not try to bring out the stats on me. [QUOTE=Sharp_Shooter;39915435]That honestly sounds like something a hacker would say to make themselves feel better about how much of a shitty person they're being. Hacks statistically improve your stats, so the obvious thing to do is to buy hacks because why stop at the crutch-weapons and the training wheels class? You reek of someone who would more than love to hack if given the opportunity to do so. Then all yours guns can be good, and you can be good at every class besides Assault.[/QUOTE] yeah no i'm a programmer and i've made pretty solid hacks for MW2, MW3 and TF2. if i wanted to cheat on bf3 i'd do so.

Getting pretty tedious, can we go back to talking about end game now please. That BF4 art looks a little fake, the jet looks out of place to me.

do not try to bring out stats period