[QUOTE=sa2fan;40052864][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAkmMF8P5bQ[/media]
Here's some bad quality teaser for the moment.
By the way, water looks great.[/QUOTE]
is that some rihanna dubstep shit?
[editline]27th March 2013[/editline]
And an M32 or something similar, this will be lots of fun in multiplayer :v:
[QUOTE=Zanpa;40052930]
And an M32 or something similar, this will be lots of fun in multiplayer :v:[/QUOTE]
Considering how grenade launchers act in BF3, I imagine they wouldn't be.
I'm taking all these Commander rumors and the like with a grain of salt since there was widespread talk like that for BF3 too.
[QUOTE=sa2fan;40052864][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAkmMF8P5bQ[/media]
Here's some bad quality teaser for the moment.
By the way, water looks great.[/QUOTE]
17 minutes of gameplay? Not bad.
Also, hopefully water will play a bigger part in MP now, and not just be an animated texture above ground with nothing beneath it.
[QUOTE=Sharp_Shooter;40053054]17 minutes of gameplay? Not bad.
Also, hopefully water will play a bigger part in MP now, and not just be an animated texture above ground with nothing beneath it.[/QUOTE]
Seeing as the teasers more or less confirmed sea combat, it will hopefully be the case
needs more lens flare
Can't wait for the next trailer, "Prepare 4 Battle: Rihanna"
[video=youtube;xb4iJFRS4Mw]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xb4iJFRS4Mw[/video]
17 min gameplay video coming very soon.
0:18 AIRCRAFT CARRIERS CONFIRMED GET HYPE
I refuse to get hyped until I see MP gameplay.
[QUOTE=Zanpa;40053293]0:18 AIRCRAFT CARRIERS CONFIRMED GET HYPE[/QUOTE]
It's not like there wasn't a fullsize aircraft carrier in BF3's campaign. The sea stuff looks promising, but singleplayer is singleplayer.
Water needs to be like that in MP maps.
[img]http://puu.sh/2oHGh[/img]
goddammit why
Here's the US trailer:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMB0BXIIcU4[/media]
[QUOTE=Leather Belt;40053517]Here's the US trailer:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMB0BXIIcU4[/media][/QUOTE]
Is it because of the black guy.
That one still says Battlefield.com/UK at the end.
I find it ridiculous that because DICE has to change shit on Battlelog it prevents me from playing singleplayer. If Battlefield 4 doesn't have an ingame browser I'm going to cry
[QUOTE=Carbon123;40053544]If Battlefield 4 doesn't have an ingame browser I'm going to cry[/QUOTE]
It won't.
wait never mind it is back up
I REALLY liked the BC2 Battlefield moments. 2 minutes of just gameplay that (as scripted as it might have been) showed off what the game was about.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xWimI71HlRQ[/media]
[editline]26th March 2013[/editline]
Also,
Battlefield 4: Particles, The Game
[editline]26th March 2013[/editline]
I'm confused as to why people are suprised it looks graphically similar. Pretty much all the BF games worked like this. Vietnam looked similar to 1942, 2142 looks similar to 2, BC2 looks similar to BC.
[editline]26th March 2013[/editline]
only thing different between those (save BC) is that the setting is the same.
Wait so whose March 27th does EA run on
[editline]26th March 2013[/editline]
wait it's 11pm PDT nvm
only 2 hours woot woot
[QUOTE=sa2fan;40052864]
By the way, [B]water looks great[/B].[/QUOTE]
BF3's water also looked much better in the SP then it did in MP.
Then again, they have naval combat so maybe there will be decent water this time
Have they actually confirmed naval combat, unless it's just RHIB combat.
"ur all fucking chumps. never play again" -a col 100 getting very mad about pub match teams
[QUOTE=zeldar;40053561]It won't.[/QUOTE]
i don't see why not, warfighter had an ingame browser and battlelog as well.
Hype Level: ~30/100
Looks like BF3 with new maps
woot 1 hour
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.