Wow the caern and conqueror look just the fucking same. I just bought the conqueror and nearly had a heart attack. Thought I accidentally rebought the caern.
[QUOTE=scout1;40011117]Wow the caern and conqueror look just the fucking same. I just bought the conqueror and nearly had a heart attack. Thought I accidentally rebought the caern.[/QUOTE]
they are pretty much the same tank, since all the FV200 series use the same hull
[QUOTE=PsiSoldier;40011204]they are pretty much the same tank, since all the FV200 series use the same hull[/QUOTE]Except the Conqueror has a very slightly WORSE angled upper front plate.
Just wait 'til you get the WORSE armoured turret for the top gun (Tip, don't equip until top gun researched).
[QUOTE=Rollup;40011268]Except the Conqueror has a very slightly WORSE angled upper front plate.
Just wait 'til you get the WORSE armoured turret for the top gun (Tip, don't equip until top gun researched).[/QUOTE]
but the 2nd turret with the type B barrel gets extra rof and less aim time.
[editline]23rd March 2013[/editline]
then again worse elevation/depression
[t]http://i45.tinypic.com/2iqd995.jpg[/t]
[t]http://i46.tinypic.com/hwj11h.jpg[/t]
[t]http://i47.tinypic.com/27xqo37.jpg[/t]
4552 Damage. 1304 Raw Xp. No Ace Tanker Badge.
Yeah, not winning any gold on this tank. (This supports the analysis Scout linked too. Tier VII is nuts)
[QUOTE=Zakhodit;40011456]
4552 Damage. 1304 Raw Xp. No Ace Tanker Badge.
Yeah, not winning any gold on this tank. (This supports the analysis Scout linked too. Tier VII is nuts)[/QUOTE]
Do you have first class?
I conferred privately with the gentleman who authored that analysis, and I suspect you'll find it easier than you believe.
[editline]23rd March 2013[/editline]
On the NA server anyway.
EU has different variables.
[editline]23rd March 2013[/editline]
Don't know which you are
[QUOTE=scout1;40011470]Do you have first class?[/quote]
Yup.
I'm on NA
I may have a chance in my Pz I c. I've been knocking out 1k XP battles on the regular and all I need is that tiny bit of luck that pushes me into the 1500 range.
That was my best AT 7 round. I might do better later but, not likely.
[QUOTE=Zakhodit;40011515]Yup.
I'm on NA[/QUOTE]
You're fine if current trends hold*
*DISCLAIMER
THIS MATHS WAS DONE AT 9 IN THE MORNING AFTER 36 HOURS OF CONTINUOUS SLEEP DEPRIVATION AND WAS IN NO MEANS FORMAL OR SYSTEMATIC. RESULTS MAY VARY. RESULTS NOT TYPICAL. WE RECOMMEND YOU COMBINE TANKS GRINDING WITH DIET AND EXCERCISE FOR EFFECT.
[QUOTE=scout1;40011526]You're fine if current trends hold[/QUOTE]
Wowzers. Well okay then.
EDIT:
Here is the replay. Could have been better. Killing the T29 was dubious but I was afraid he'd get unstuck and come mash me.
[url]http://mwreplays.com/replay/RXMB5IHFN4DB/[/url]
[QUOTE=Zakhodit;40011542]Wowzers. Well okay then.[/QUOTE]
Please read disclaimer addendum
decide to play a match in the pzIIg
himmelsdorf
[t]http://horobox.co.uk/u/Orkel_1364152362.jpg[/t]
29 out of 30 tanks ingame are tier 5, i'm the only tier 3
best mm
[editline]23rd March 2013[/editline]
and the team was so shit that i still managed to get third most exp on it
[QUOTE=Bbarnes005;40011744][video=youtube;BHSbrp21Q1s]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHSbrp21Q1s[/video][/QUOTE]
If only it was like that for T95 drivers. Just was in a game where our team's M40/M43 hit the enemy T95 for 1700, killing it instantly.
[QUOTE=Ogopogo;40012086]If only it was like that for T95 drivers. Just was in a game where our team's M40/M43 hit the enemy T95 for 1700, killing it instantly.[/QUOTE]
Welcome to artillery, the only class of vehicle that gets easier to play the higher up the branch you because your targets get slower and so big they can't effectively use most cover to hide from you.
This requires skill how?
Had a match just now where an enemy IS-3 bragged how good his tank is, because he has 1200 efficiency in it instead of his average 520. Naturally everyone laughed, so he explains it with "no, I botted a lot on myIS6".
GetSome30[IRE] has 43% WR both average, and in his 2200 games on the IS-6. Screencapped, sent cap and replay to Wargaming with a botting complaint.
rampageturke I regret to inform you that Yes artillery is that easy
[QUOTE=Fyhlen;40012223]Had a match just now where an enemy IS-3 bragged how good his tank is, because he has 1200 efficiency in it instead of his average 520. Naturally everyone laughed, so he explains it with "no, I botted a lot on myIS6".
GetSome30[IRE] has 43% WR both average, and in his 2200 games on the IS-6. Screencapped, sent cap and replay to Wargaming with a botting complaint.[/QUOTE]
Goes to show how useless WG's automatic bot detection is.
The world of tanks community is hilarious.
After I ran a game in my pershing, (not super), a guy sends me this.
[QUOTE]DEVILS_LORD (12:18:39 PM) hahah u cunt i did near as much damage as u in at 8 u in gold tier 8 ahhahaah suck cock much[/QUOTE]
I just noticed something weird with my chinese crew
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/fBFTyvW.jpg?1[/IMG]
It's not Delong Wang, but they really do bang everything.
[t]http://i.imgur.com/6Kw61rS.jpg[/t]
hmmm
[t]http://i.imgur.com/3vTPHtA.jpg[/t]
ah, well then
[QUOTE=rampageturke 2;40012891][t]http://i.imgur.com/6Kw61rS.jpg[/t]
hmmm
[t]http://i.imgur.com/3vTPHtA.jpg[/t]
ah, well then[/QUOTE]
Is the T25 AT any good?
The stats on the 105mm look really great.
[QUOTE=Calkkuna;40012988]Is the T25 AT any good?
The stats on the 105mm look really great.[/QUOTE]
its great, the only thing im not too keen on is the costly shells for the 105mm
[QUOTE=rampageturke 2;40013099]its great, the only thing im not too keen on is the costly shells for the 105mm[/QUOTE]
Hm I'll put it on my To Grind-list then, thanks.
[QUOTE=Calkkuna;40012988]Is the T25 AT any good?
The stats on the 105mm look really great.[/QUOTE]
I fell in fucking love with it. T25 AT with the 105mm was my favorite 'fast' American TD. It absolutely wrecks shit, it's frontal armor/mantlet can randomly eat shells and it's relatively quick. The T28 is a huge fucking shift in play and relatively shit; then the T95 makes it good again once you get the 120mm on it (guess what, you need the treads for that.)
[QUOTE=Calkkuna;40012988]Is the T25 AT any good?
The stats on the 105mm look really great.[/QUOTE]
I think it requires a certain mindset. It's quite mobile, the gun indeed rocks, but it's got no armor except for the mantlet. I would say it plays like a medium tank with no turret.
what the fuck is wrong with this game, I get in a match with a fail platoon consisting of a T18 and a T20, the T18 proceeds to shoot my AMX 13 in the side leading to 150 damage, so I shoot him once and he blows up, whatever.
his friend then drives up and shoots me too and I blow his ass up aswell, and now I'm banned.
a++ wargaming.
[QUOTE=Doom14;40013127]I fell in fucking love with it. T25 AT with the 105mm was my favorite 'fast' American TD. It absolutely wrecks shit, it's frontal armor/mantlet can randomly eat shells and it's relatively quick. The T28 is a huge fucking shift in play and relatively shit; then the T95 makes it good again once you get the 120mm on it (guess what, you need the treads for that.)[/QUOTE]
jagdpanther > t25
Patton is getting suspiciously placed into tier 8-9 matches and I'm just curb stomping the enemy. I'm averaging 4-5k damage.
[QUOTE=Psygo;40013167]what the fuck is wrong with this game, I get in a match with a fail platoon consisting of a T18 and a T20, the T18 proceeds to shoot my AMX 13 in the side leading to 150 damage, so I shoot him once and he blows up, whatever.
his friend then drives up and shoots me too and I blow his ass up aswell, and now I'm banned.
a++ wargaming.[/QUOTE]
And this is why you let the automatic system deal with it instead of taking matters into your own hands; after all, they only shot you what once each, and you team-killed both of them.
Unrelated:
[quote]- it's still too early to consider implementing a Japanese premium tank (which might come before the branch itself like the Type 59 did)
- the new (Russian) voiceover didn't change the voice mechanics, just the voices themselves
- multi-voice voiceover (one voice for driver, one for commander etc.) won't be implemented, Storm says they thought about it but decided not to do it because they thought it was confusing
- there will be some small client optimalisations (SS: not clear from the question when, presumably in 8.5)
- developers are considering the voiceover options at this moment, including the distorted realistic voices (like from radio)
- regarding the argument the T-80 is too weak for tier 4: "you'll see during the test"
- a tip from Storm regardint the new tier 10 Soviet medium: "don't accumulate XP until you see the new tech tree", the same goes for the AMX-30 French branch
- 8.5 will not bring the T-50-2 replacement, the T-60/70/80 branch does not influence the T-50 or T-50-2
- according to Storm, the Chinese tank designations came from the Chinese partners, they are historical
- another ammo type: "not for now"
- there is no additional bonus XP for destroying the whole enemy platoon, nor is it planned
- Soviet captured premium Panther and Soviet premium TG tank will not come in 2013
- trollplatoons are not a reportable offense, nor will they be punished, the matchmaker compensates for the lower tier vehicle MM weight, the devs consider this solution to be enough
- Sixth Sense will not be touched by devs atm, but Storm says that more than a buff this skill needs a nerf
Regarding the Russian "famous actors" voiceover, Storm admits that they screwed it up, there are bugs in it, some phrases are incorrectly dubbed etc., they will fix it. The current voiceover is a test version, not the final one.
However, Storm says that it's "completely possible" each tank will have a voiceover in language of its crew (French crews speak French etc.).
[/quote]
[QUOTE=DaMastez;40013345]And this is why you let the automatic system deal with it instead of taking matters into your own hands; after all, they only shot you what once each, and you team-killed both of them.
[/QUOTE]
the T20 shot me twice, I shot the T18 before he could reload, he still had his gun dug into my side though.
oh well, guess I'll wait it out, kind of annoying that a greifing platoon gets away with that shit though.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.