• Halo: Reach
    257 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Karlos;20208045]Halo: The most overrated piece of shit in gaming history.[/QUOTE] If it was shit no on would play it
[QUOTE=sltungle;20200805]You could say the same about Call Of Duty. This is the last Halo game they're ever going to make. After that it's completely and 100% in Microsoft's hands. Bungie's moving on to new IP after Reach. I like the look of Reach a lot. It looks good. They look like they've really captured those huge environments like they originally did in Halo: CE and made it look as aesthetically beautiful as the environments in Halo 3.[/QUOTE] Yeah, well, since Bungie have gotten this far into the Graphical aspect of gaming and the gameplay aspect, they could make a game which would be much better and much more realistic than any Call of Duty game. [editline]05:24PM[/editline] [QUOTE=XxLiquidxX;20211170]O-V-E-R RATED!!! Halo has been over hyped since after Halo 2[/QUOTE] It actually hasnt, but yeah people did expect a lot out of Bungie, but unlike IW, BUNGIE DELIVERED. [editline]05:25PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Karlos;20208045]Halo: The most overrated piece of shit in gaming history.[/QUOTE] If you don't like it why post? why are you even looking at this thread? [editline]05:28PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Stickmna;20206836]My god after Halo 3 I really hadn't gotten my hopes up. Looking at Reach again makes me yell in rage that Shitrosoft refuses to make game consoles that aren't made of balsa wood and sand. I had a first generation 360 since it came out, and then one day it died. Bought a 360 elite, and it didn't last four months. What the flying fuck. I also have to figure out a way to get a hold of my old gamertag and a router in order to play the MP beta. The assassination kill looks really awesome, far better then Modern shitcrap 2's insta-knife bullshit. I just hope the marksman rifle has a decent rate of fire.[/QUOTE] For Xbox 360's you pay a considerable amount each year for LIVE, and you get really bugger all except for the fact you can download demos and go online. For PS3 you don't pay anything for online (technically) and you get an internet browser capability, and a much more adult community. Not saying im a PS3 fanboy, just saying that ever since that day I got bored and played on my PS3, i soon saw why so many people play it instead of Xbox.
[QUOTE=Second-gear-of-mgear;20199565]:dance: Each time his right hand goes down, a new Halo is made. What I mean is, they need to stop milking this, it's annoying.[/QUOTE] They're really not, only 5 games have been released sense 2001. Call of duty has had 11 (Across all platforms) games sense 2003. Lets tell them to stop milking the title.
[QUOTE=MR-X;20212834]They're really not, only 5 games have been released sense 2001. Call of duty has had 11 (Across all platforms) games sense 2003. Lets tell them to stop milking the title.[/QUOTE] [img]http://www.primotechnology.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/kotickinvst.jpg[/img]
Maybe this one will run at an HD resolution.
[QUOTE=Facehugger88;20207249] You must be really unlucky. Or buying used ones.. or ones in mexico or some other country that's not america or uk. But, all of that has happened since the 360 came out. I won't complain because the 360 is superior, so far, to the p(of)s3 or the wiitard, in my opinion (better graphics, proven, more stuff possible, better controller, yadda yadda.) SIRE, RAISE THE SHIELDS! FLAMING POSTS INBOUND.[/QUOTE] Uhhh what? How is having a first gen 360 for almost two or three years (whenever it came out) unlucky? I had no problems with it at all until for whatever reason it just stopped working. I bought both right from Gamespot new, so I have no idea what you are talking about. The 360 has ALWAYS had a terrible track record in terms of something or other fucking up hardware wise, or even software wise. It's a fact, not 'bad luck'. I also don't really understand who the hell you are talking to in the last part of your post since no one said anything about the Wii or PS3. Unless you were trying to prove how much of a console fanboy you are... so I guess that's ok. [editline]06:11PM[/editline] [QUOTE='[GMOB] Luke;20212081'] For Xbox 360's you pay a considerable amount each year for LIVE, and you get really bugger all except for the fact you can download demos and go online. For PS3 you don't pay anything for online (technically) and you get an internet browser capability, and a much more adult community. Not saying im a PS3 fanboy, just saying that ever since that day I got bored and played on my PS3, i soon saw why so many people play it instead of Xbox.[/QUOTE] Why the fuck does everyone think I was comparing PS3 to the 360? I was merely stating that I was excited about this game, had to dig up my gamertag, and that I was pissed my 360E broke after only 4 months! [editline]06:13PM[/editline] [QUOTE=The freeman;20211457]Halo 1: Great Halo 2: Great Halo 3: Single player is great Halo Wars: OK Halo ODST: Shit Halo Reach: Great[/QUOTE] What the hell are you talking about? The Halo 3 campaign was fucking terrible. I agree with the rest, other than the ODST campaign.
[QUOTE=Turkey72;20204236]Well shit, this makes me want to get a 360 JUST for this.[/QUOTE] Ahhh good times, that what they said about Halo CE, it's come full circle now. As far as I see Halo 1, and 2 are best out of series. ODST wasn't too bad but it wasn't worth 60 bucks, 3 was just not what we all waited for, halo wars doesn't exist to me. This looks very promising, and it would be a hundred times better if they included a map maker like the one in far cry, and addable NPC's
What I don't understand is the fact that they have these new models for weapons for stuff that is supposed to have happened before halo 1, such as the assault rifles, are we supposed to accept that if they could've done that in halo 1, that is what they would look like? or does this model just get forgotten...
Halo was shit after the first, doubt this will any good either, they concentrate too much on the shitty multi-player aspect now, back in halo 1, the mp just happened to be good...
The problem with halo 3 was that everything was too colorful
[QUOTE=TheChantzGuy;20213384]The problem with halo 3 was that everything was too colorful[/QUOTE] If you haven't noticed the whole trilogy is pretty damn colorful, what do you want, more brown and gray?
[QUOTE=TheChantzGuy;20213384]The problem with halo 3 was that everything was too colorful[/QUOTE] you want Gears of War
[QUOTE=gbtygfvyg;20206292]The assassination animation needs to be fixed, it's too choppy.[/QUOTE]It's still an alpha.
[QUOTE=Tha Baroni;20199339]This makes me want to get halo: reach really bad now, this game is going to a huge hit.[/QUOTE] Well good job falling for the same mass marketing ad campaigns that have been conning us into buying crap/half-baked games for years now. Not saying that Halo:Reach will suck, I just don't like trailers like this anymore. They are designed to get you "stoked" and not notice any down sides to the game, and only how sparkly the new detail maps are. Just kinda frustrating, since everything they are saying, won't really be in the game. It's not going to be any more immersive than the other Halos, probably just run through the linear levels killing aliens. I think they need to try a drastically different angle, or stop the series now. But they're still to greedy / out of new ideas for different series.
[QUOTE=l2ic3;20214870]Well good job falling for the same mass marketing ad campaigns that have been conning us into buying crap/half-baked games for years now. Not saying that Halo:Reach will suck, I just don't like trailers like this anymore. They are designed to get you "stoked" and not notice any down sides to the game, and only how sparkly the new detail maps are. Just kinda frustrating, since everything they are saying, won't really be in the game. It's not going to be any more immersive than the other Halos, probably just run through the linear levels killing aliens. I think they need to try a drastically different angle, or stop the series now. But they're still to greedy / out of new ideas for different series.[/QUOTE] That's called marketing and it's everywhere.
[QUOTE=A Glitch;20213164]What I don't understand is the fact that they have these new models for weapons for stuff that is supposed to have happened before halo 1, such as the assault rifles, are we supposed to accept that if they could've done that in halo 1, that is what they would look like? or does this model just get forgotten...[/QUOTE] When the first one was released you couldnt allocate millions of polygons to one model, but now since we've advanced technologically, we can dedicate millions of polygons to re-create older weapons. [editline]07:53PM[/editline] [QUOTE=_Mythic;20213624]you want Gears of War[/QUOTE] Yeah, the only colour on that game was red...EVERYWHERE. (Not dissing the game)
Holy shit thats sexy, might actually make up for the fail of ODST
[QUOTE=Humberjini;20215222]Holy shit thats sexy, might actually make up for the fail of ODST[/QUOTE] Fail of ODST? what do you mean.
[QUOTE='[GMOB] Luke;20215029']When the first one was released you couldnt allocate millions of polygons to one model, but now since we've advanced technologically, we can dedicate millions of polygons to re-create older weapons. [/QUOTE] so am i to take it that that is what i should imagine the old weapons to look like their newer counter parts? fair enough I was under the impression that the technology of the weaponry was changing as the series went on
[QUOTE=A Glitch;20215565]so am i to take it that that is what i should imagine the old weapons to look like their newer counter parts? fair enough I was under the impression that the technology of the weaponry was changing as the series went on[/QUOTE] You also have to think about Halo 1 as the fact that the Pillar of Autumn has been in space for a while, then slipspace jumped, then you showed up on the Halo with years (decades?) old equipment. So they aren't going to have the newest weapons the furthest in the storyline per say.
Gee, it sure is Valve fanboy in here... Anyway, I'm really looking forward to this. The engine revamps they're making show that they really are trying to go out with a bang, seeing as this is Bungie's last Halo game and all.
[QUOTE=The freeman;20211457]Halo 1: Great Halo 2: Great Halo 3: Shit. Halo Wars: OK Halo ODST: Great Halo Reach: Great[/QUOTE] Fixed it for you.
I can't wait for the Beta, it's in May sometime isn't it? Glad I picked up ODST even if that was mildly disappointing.
[QUOTE=MisterM;20215337]Fail of ODST? what do you mean.[/QUOTE] Avatar fits
[QUOTE=nERVEcenter;20211024]It's a matter of story. All of the SPARTAN-II's besides John, Linda, and I think Liu are defending the MAC generators and get absolutely slaughtered. That woudn't make for a very good game.[/QUOTE] In a nutshell...In you explore the story of spartens you will find that they were kids that were kidnapped and experimented on by the UNSC. This makes me wanna punch those marines
[QUOTE=PVTdrone536;20217501]In a nutshell...In you explore the story of Spartans you will find that they were kids that were kidnapped and experimented on by the UNSC. This makes me wanna punch those marines[/QUOTE] You are fucking dumb. This game isn't about the formation of the SPARTAN program, its about the fall of reach. [editline]10:21PM[/editline] [QUOTE=PVTdrone536;20217501]In a nutshell...In you explore the story of spartens you will find that they were kids that were kidnapped and experimented on by the UNSC. This makes me wanna punch those marines[/QUOTE] Also, everyone knew that Spartans were kids. We knew that goddamn [I]years[/I] ago.
And they weren't really experimented on. They knew what they were doing, although there was risks with the augmentation.
[QUOTE=tnecromancer;20206614]I like halo, dont get me wrong, but this just makes too much sense. Ok, they have gone off numbering the halo series now, but watch this: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzUGHXwHUmI[/media][/QUOTE] Honestly COD is more likely to become that than Halo. Halo is a PC and Xbox only game, while COD, is PC, XBox, PS3, Wii and DS game. Reach looks like fun, I hope they really do bring back the Halo: CE feel. I spent more time playing those maps in reverse on legendary than I've put into MW1 and MW2 combined.
I think Halo: Reach is the new Halo: CE. This game looks really awesome. I don't like Halo 3. It was fun for the first time, but because of the map packs, and other addons they released, it just wasn't fun anymore. I hated forge. It was such a bad idea. The community was just full of maps that people put their soul into, and it just sucked. This game, looks really cool. The graphics are just amazing. I do remember that feeling of openness in halo, and it seems as they added on the the franchise it got worse and worse, and then they realized they were doing something 'not good'. I really hope this game comes out for the PC, there's no way this could run really well on the xbox.
[QUOTE=Daniellynet;20201143]I love the fact that you go back in story, but you have better weapons, never stuff than in CE.[/QUOTE] Remember that the further back you go, humans had more tech available. The war would've made them lose most of the tech (prototypes included), not being able to remake them due to lack of resources. Reach was a major military planet, so of course they're gonna have most of their tech there (It's also where they raised and trained the Spartans). Another reminder, all of the human weapons and vehicles in CE were only weapons that were on the ship to begin with.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.