• Mass Effect Megathread - GAVORN'S TRICKS EDITION
    5,024 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Takuat;29358229]I see a 2 not a 3.[/QUOTE] Hmm. Maybe it's just my vision. Well then, all that's left to wonder about is the color scheme.
[QUOTE=phaedon;29358339]Bigger one: [img_thumb]http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/yhst-51568362379717_2155_612964579.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] What's that icon to the left of the SR2? Looks like an A.
[QUOTE=phaedon;29358339]Bigger one: [img_thumb]http://ep.yimg.com/ca/I/yhst-51568362379717_2155_612964579.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] Okay, now THAT'S the Normandy I was hoping for. Now all that's really left to question is the color scheme and the odd amounts of segmenting. [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Makol;29358372]What's that icon to the left of the SR2? Looks like an A.[/QUOTE] If I'm not mistaken, that's the Systems Alliance logo.
[QUOTE=Makol;29358372]What's that icon to the left of the SR2? Looks like an A.[/QUOTE] It's the Alliance insignia. [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] Also, here is Garrus' new model. [img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21437198/garrus_model.png[/img]
So the Normandy is now a ship version of Garrus.
yeah [img]http://images.wikia.com/masseffect/images/1/15/Systems_Alliance_Codex_Image.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Wiggles;29358404[img_thumb]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21437198/garrus_model.png[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] Liking the new armor. [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Arachnidus;29358388]If I'm not mistaken, that's the Systems Alliance logo.[/QUOTE] Ah ok.
I wonder if the Alliance will let EDI continue existing :ohdear:
[QUOTE=Arachnidus;29358366]Hmm. Maybe it's just my vision. Well then, all that's left to wonder about is the color scheme.[/QUOTE] The Alliance painted their blue over Cerberus' gold.
[QUOTE=Wiggles;29358404]It's the Alliance insignia. [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] Also, here is Garrus' new model. [img_thumb]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/21437198/garrus_model.png[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] :damn: No really though, I love the new armor.
[QUOTE=lexus04;29358452]I wonder if the Alliance will let EDI continue existing :ohdear:[/QUOTE] Unless the Alliance wants to go against Citadel law, they'd destroy her.
Well, it's been confirmed for a while that Tricia Helfer is returning, so unless she voices someone new, EDI is back. [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] [url]http://masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/EDI#Mass_Effect_3[/url]
So what would be your face when [media]http://www.ponychan.net/chan/oat/src/130349208326.png[/media]
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;29358570]Unless the Alliance wants to go against Citadel law, they'd destroy her.[/QUOTE] Well they've done it before and maybe they were prepared to get rid of her but didn't get the chance too before the Reapers began attacking and Shepherd takes off in the Normandy.
Get your pony mess out of here.
[QUOTE=Pascall;29358749]Get your pony mess out of here.[/QUOTE] Okay, i apologize.
Is Anderson a confirmed companion or is that just a rumor/speculation?
[QUOTE=Takuat;29358773]Is Anderson a confirmed companion or is that just a rumor/speculation?[/QUOTE] He's confirmed as being in the game. Don't know if it's been said whether or not he'll be in your party. Perhaps as a temporary member.
[QUOTE=Zezibesh;29349875]The point of the Spectres is that they do not have the red tape.[/QUOTE] Depending on your actions in ME, he can be considered for the Spectres. He eventually leaves the program because he doesn't like how much of a say politics has in the matter. He won't be a Spectre in ME 3 because he dislikes the way they are run. It fits more with his character if he stays with Shepard on the Normandy and fights the Reapers that way.
[QUOTE=Takuat;29358773]Is Anderson a confirmed companion or is that just a rumor/speculation?[/QUOTE] [media]http://i.imgur.com/ATvse.jpg[/media]
Spectre in my opinion is, for one thing, not bound by boundaries of laws.
[QUOTE=Nitro836;29358713]So what would be your face when [media]http://www.ponychan.net/chan/oat/src/130349208326.png[/media][/QUOTE] deploy cleansing unit [img]http://warseer.com/images/articles/40kadvanced/2.6%2040k%20Advanced%20Net%20Version_html_5f691113.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Nitro836;29358713]So what would be your face when [media]http://www.ponychan.net/chan/oat/src/130349208326.png[/media][/QUOTE] [img]http://soundportal.at/uploads/pics/guttenberg.jpg[/img] Also 1250 th post. I need a life
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;29358570]Unless the Alliance wants to go against Citadel law, they'd destroy her.[/QUOTE] To the contrary; [sp]after what happened in the first ME book, what Kahlee was working on, I'm not sure the Alliance would scrap EDI.[/sp] [editline]22nd April 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=XanaToast.;29358837]deploy cleansing unit [img_thumb]http://warseer.com/images/articles/40kadvanced/2.6%2040k%20Advanced%20Net%20Version_html_5f691113.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] Correction; [img]http://images.wikia.com/masseffect/images/e/ec/Blood_Pack_Pyro.png[/img]
To remove EDI would probably be bad from a strategic point. She has proved herself useful, and now that at least some in the Alliance have seen/Believes that the Reapers are coming they hopefully know that every edge is needed
[QUOTE=Arachnidus;29358945]To the contrary; [sp]after what happened in the first ME book, what Kahlee was working on, I'm not sure the Alliance would scrap EDI.[/sp] [/QUOTE] Yeah I doubt they'd get rid of EDI, however the events of the first ME book [sp]took place way before Humanity possibly becomes a bona-fide member of the Council.[/sp]
[QUOTE=Thom12255;29358421]So the Normandy is now a ship version of Garrus.[/QUOTE] when mass effect 3 launches, people should swap normandy with garrus. and garrus with normandy.
[QUOTE=Dronaroid;29359057]when mass effect 3 launches, people should swap normandy with garrus. and garrus with normandy.[/QUOTE] Saying I had sex with the Normandy last night doesn't sound so great.
[QUOTE=Canuhearme?;29359046]Yeah I doubt they'd get rid of EDI, however the events of the first ME book [sp]took place way before Humanity possibly becomes a bona-fide member of the Council.[/sp][/QUOTE] True, true. But, if anything, considering the horrible events that are currently happening, it'd seem as if [sp]being a council member would just be a way to hold power and to keep EDI around[/sp].
[QUOTE=BreenIsALie;29359027]To remove EDI would probably be bad from a strategic point. She has proved herself useful, and now that at least some in the Alliance have seen/Believes that the Reapers are coming they hopefully know that every edge is needed[/QUOTE] Killing off EDI wouldn't simply be bad from a strategic standpoint. It would be plain suicide and make the battle an easy win for the Reapers.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.