FPS's with good singleplayer AND multiplayer? - Games

Even though the multiplayer is a seperate game, Half-Life 2: Deathmatch is a pretty good, and not much appreciated nowadays. In no other game can you nail an enemy with a toilet.

Good xbox shooters hmm. lets see Bioschock Rainbow six vegas 1,2 ghost recon advanced warfighter 1,2 gears of war 1,2 Army of two 1,2 Fallout 3 Mass effect 1,2 halo 1/2/3/odst/reach/ battlefield modern warfare/ bad company/bad company 2 Hitman blood money Gta 4 lost planet 1/2

Far cry 2

Halo reach, Minecraft, Gmod, or CoD4. To those who rate me dumb because of Halo Reach, stop band-wagoning and actually play the damn game.

Halo Reach

[QUOTE=superm0ney;24944786]Far cry 2[/QUOTE] Far Cry 2's singleplayer AND multiplayer both sucked, and i never got interested in them because of how boring it was.

Not much for 360 but I would say the 1st Bad Company. Multiplayer has quite a few less features than 2 but IMO it has better maps and the singleplayer takes a lot longer and to me, is better than Bad Company 2's. [editline]09:05PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Flubadoo;24835603]BC1. The singleplayer is fantastic. [editline]06:58AM[/editline] oh and the multiplayer.[/QUOTE] Ah dammit, I only read the first page.

[QUOTE=K1ngo64;24835512]That's because Unreal Tournament doesn't have a story you twat. Same with Quake 3, no story.[/QUOTE] Eh? It definitely has a campaign mode, just not a particularly good one

Gears of war 2.

[QUOTE=SteeleCratos;24834647]Gears of War[/QUOTE] Thats not an FPS.

Kill zone 2 looks pretty nice in multi-player.

[QUOTE=nath2009uk;24837419]Battlefield Bad Company [B]1[/B]. Great Singleplayer, and multiplayer was pretty damn good. Doubt anyone still plays it though. Bad Company 2's SP is a MW2 rip off, and the MP is just plain laggy with horrible hit boxes and weapon damage.[/QUOTE] BC2 Is perfectly fine!

[QUOTE=Tigerius;24944759] Rainbow six vegas 1,2 ghost recon advanced warfighter 1,2 gears of war 1,2 Army of two 1,2 halo 1/2/3/odst/reach/ Modern Warfare 1 / bad company [/QUOTE] All of this, minus the fact a couple are 3RD person. Honestly, Bad Company 2 is laggy and is like CoD4 is damage wise, except with worse hitboxes. I highly recommend GRAW, even though it is third person. It is a great SP game, but no one plays MP anymore.

[QUOTE=Woovie;24834794]Minecraft.[/QUOTE] :frog: just because something is in first person, doesnt mean its a fps

Halo: Reach is fantastic

[QUOTE=Delta616;24945434]BC2 Is perfectly fine![/QUOTE] but 1 is so much better so he should get that, since people still play multiplayer.

[QUOTE=Woovie;24834794]Minecraft.[/QUOTE] To all those who rated agree: :frog: This thread is about FPSs on the 360. Take your :bandwagon: elsewhere. [editline]06:12PM[/editline] [QUOTE=Shortyish;24945721]:frog: just because something is in first person, doesnt mean its a fps[/QUOTE] Damn, beat me to it.

[B]NOT[/B] MW2. I would say CoD:WaW though. Great multi-player, and a pretty damn good single player campaign that I found sucks you in to the story.

[QUOTE=Pachengo;24941574]CoD4: MW Is good. not sure if many people play it still, though[/QUOTE] Lots of people still play it, but it's mostly the buttnuggets who think quick-scoping/ no-scoping is the only way to earn a real kill, or people who enjoy using overpowering weapons. Still not as hard to avoid being killed on as MW2, but still full of jackasses.

[QUOTE=evilweazel;24945761]but 1 is so much better so he should get that, since people still play multiplayer.[/QUOTE] The only thing I see that's better about 1's multiplayer is the maps. Everything else I like better in 2. Also in 1 I remember the VSS is overpowered as fuck.

[QUOTE=thisispain;24945748]Halo: Reach is fantastic[/QUOTE] this

[QUOTE=Meller Yeller;24953668]The only thing I see that's better about 1's multiplayer is the maps. Everything else I like better in 2. Also in 1 I remember the VSS is overpowered as fuck.[/QUOTE] Let me get out my tactical shield... And dual Winchesters... How about we throw on some instant-kill sniper that's fucking accurate as shit while we're at it? ...tactical nukes.

[QUOTE=SuperHoboMan;24946515][B]NOT[/B] MW2. I would say CoD:WaW though. Great multi-player, and a pretty damn good single player campaign that I found sucks you in to the story.[/QUOTE] This. Campaign missions are great (First Russian mission is awesome) except for the Reichstag level, that was annoying. The multiplayer is the best CoD MP I've played, not a not of people play it though. [editline]12:35AM[/editline] And Reznov is awesome.

Rainbow 6 Vegas 2.

[QUOTE=MegaJohnny;24945017]Eh? It definitely has a campaign mode, just not a particularly good one[/QUOTE] He means that there's no story attached to it, literally. Like HL2's story is with the combines and that you must stop them etc. UT3 does not have such thing, the campaign is playing matches so you become the best team as far as I recall. No story doesn't have to be bad, but in this case, it pretty much is.

Halo: Reach looks amazing. [editline]01:16PM[/editline] Even tho i dont like the halo series that much, it looks good.

The Halo series, especially Reach.

I'd say Halo Reach. Multiplayer is awesome, and campaign can be awesome if you got someone to play with. Story is amazing too. All this is my own opinion anyway.

[QUOTE=Zally13;24953825]Let me get out my tactical shield... And dual Winchesters... How about we throw on some instant-kill sniper that's fucking accurate as shit while we're at it? ...tactical nukes.[/QUOTE] The game in general is way more balanced than MW2 but VSS still pissed me off.

[QUOTE=ChestyMcGee;24956071]Rainbow 6 Vegas 2.[/QUOTE] Single-Player was really dull though. The game was alright but could have been alot better, the thing that really made it playable was the character costumization in my opinion.