Pro Gaming stuff - STOP IT. - Games

[QUOTE=RayDark;25613342]bar3t 450 calribtlern r theb est cirbluer inew whole of caowsowsol of dp0oteqy[/QUOTE] What the fuck, you lost me at Barret.

[QUOTE=I ARE REPTAR;25613377]What the fuck, you lost me at Barret.[/QUOTE] I know.

[QUOTE=wolfalt;25611853]I have friends who will buy these. [editline]24th October 2010[/editline] :smith:[/QUOTE] Are you joking? I'm speechless. Just... What? How?!?

And yet they're cheaper than prescription glasses.

[QUOTE=kamikaze470;25611913]And then they probably won't even do anything.[/QUOTE] Probably?

You dont need a Barret 50. cal to kill effectively. Just a VSS Vintorez.

[QUOTE=dass;25613547]Are you joking? I'm speechless. Just... What? How?!?[/QUOTE] Obviously you have never played MW2 on a console

[QUOTE=PunchedInFac;25613624]You dont need a Barret 50. cal to kill effectively. Just a VSS Vintorez.[/QUOTE] That is my favourite weapon in any Stalker game. It also looks way better than the Barret, imo.

What is happening with the world? This is just sad!

Yay, finally I can see the brown/yellow tint in RL!

[QUOTE=markg06;25613553]And yet they're cheaper than prescription glasses.[/QUOTE] Should've gone to specsavers.

[QUOTE=agentgamma;25612181][img_thumb]http://moneysavingmom.com/images/old/6a00e552792fa288330128767b8003970c-pi.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] I have this one too, not the gamer one thou.

[IMG]http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/9/2010/09/500x_jeep.jpg[/IMG] "In what could be part of the ultimate collector's edition for Black Ops, Chrysler will soon be rolling out a limited Call of Duty edition of the Jeep Wrangler. Forget the Halo: Reach Legendary Edition, how legendary would it be if Activision bundled a copy of Call of Duty: Black Ops together with a limited edition Jeep Wrangler? Since the Jeep Wrangler is the "hero vehicle" in the upcoming shooter, Chrysler will be rolling out a special Call of Duty edition of the rugged vehicle, sure to become the ultimate collectible for fans of the series. The standard 2011 Jeep Wrangler (pictured above) is one sexy beast. I can't wait to see the special touches that make it a Call of Duty special. And if Activision doesn't offer a bundle, I'm sure you haggle the price of the vehicle down $60 to compensate." Yeah, all the 12 year olds can use a jeep.

hey at least prescription glasses do something.

I don't need it, I have a turian pro gaming visor [img]http://fc09.deviantart.net/fs51/f/2009/308/a/f/ME2_Garrus_by_mrglow.jpg[/img]

Ugh, this also makes me sick. Real pro's don't need "pro" stuff. That's only companies milking the cash cow into thinking that inexperienced players need special equipment to win. Exhibit A: "Turtlebeach" headphones. I don't get it. I constantly hear people bragging about their overpriced headphones. I use a [I]standard[/I] headset just fine.

'Tis how you play, not what you've bought. [editline]24th October 2010[/editline] But if you've bought that you're a cunt.

I've tried a pair of these. They are made of shit

Hipster pros

At least they're not as retarded as these: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKYKyIObXyM[/media]

Reminds me of Gamer fuel Gatorade. Would you like Premium fuel or unleaded?

Aren't they those glasses you wear at night while driving to stop glare from car headlights? [editline]24th October 2010[/editline] [img]http://www.maximumeyewear.com/productfolder/shooting-glasses/yellow-lens-night-driving-glasses.jpg[/img] Yes, they are.

Somebody coax a soldier into buying a pair to sue the company for not allowing him to see key mission objectives better.

[QUOTE=acds;25612072]Maybe I should make [B]PR0 G4M1NG GL0V35[/B] that [B]ENCHANCE YOUR PR0 GAMING PERFORMANCE[/B] and will allow you to [B]BE THE ALPHA GAMER IN ANY GAME[/B], by [B]ACCELERATING YOUR GAMING REFLEXES[/B] and [B]BOOSTING YOUR GAMING SENSE[/B] so that you can [B]DISTINGUISH YOURSELF FROM THE MASS AND ASCEND TO 1337 G4M1ING STATUS[/B]. Costs 120$ shipping not included.[/QUOTE] L8 m8. [img]http://www.applelinks.com/news/gifs/glove1.jpg[/img] Game hand glove. "Pro-Gaming" is an oxymoron. [editline]24th October 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=FlashFireSix;25614089][img_thumb]http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/9/2010/09/500x_jeep.jpg[/img_thumb][/QUOTE] Jeep, eugh.

[QUOTE=General J;25614783]Ugh, this also makes me sick. Real pro's don't need "pro" stuff. That's only companies milking the cash cow into thinking that inexperienced players need special equipment to win. Exhibit A: "Turtlebeach" headphones. I don't get it. I constantly hear people bragging about their overpriced headphones. I use a [I]standard[/I] headset just fine.[/QUOTE] ... Some "Overpriced" Headphones are awesome once you get the right tools to drive them. E.G: Sennheisers, Audio technicas, Grados.

Those are not overpriced if you are getting the quality you're paying for.

Now keyboards and especially mice do make a difference, but glasses, wtf. Too many people looking to cash in on bullshit. When it comes to things like mice though, it's important to get a good one.

I have a "pro gaming" mouse, only difference is that it's not unnecessary bullshit like the rest of this thread. 30 bucks. [img]http://cache.gizmodo.com/assets/resources/2007/11/speedlink_styx.jpg[/img] Not all "pro gaming" stuff is useless.

[QUOTE=PunchedInFac;25616504]... Some "Overpriced" Headphones are awesome once you get the right tools to drive them. E.G: Sennheisers, Audio technicas, Grados.[/QUOTE] Right, but none of those are "Pr0-GaymuR" headsets, they are headsets of genuine quality. Shit like turtle beach, Astro and other cheap plastic shit are the kind of headsets that poster was probably aiming for. [editline]24th October 2010[/editline] [QUOTE=Jallen;25616543]Now keyboards and especially mice do make a difference, but glasses, wtf. Too many people looking to cash in on bullshit. When it comes to things like mice though, it's important to get a good one.[/QUOTE] keyboards barely make a difference, but mice can due to the shape and sensors they have.

[QUOTE=n00bman;25615288]I've tried a pair of these. They are made of shit[/QUOTE] What, literally?