• Battlefield 3 v2 - Now with 900% more Battlefields
    3,000 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Frying Dutchman;30328768] And slightly sad about the regenerative health but if it works okay like only regenerating the half of your life instead of the whole 100% it should be good.[/QUOTE] Your health only regenerates when you're not in a combat area, so when you're walking somewhere that's when it will work.
I come here for the fact that everyone is completely obvious to CoD.
As far as I know, they've changed the health regeneration so that it only happens so many meters away from combat, and even then, at a very slow rate, slower than in BC2. I think they're trying to finesse it by making it so that if you're really close to death, and stay in cover for 8 seconds, you'll get to half-health, but to get the rest you'll have to retreat out of the combat area or find a medic.
[QUOTE=Beafman;30328854]So don't care about it. Is that the people you want playing this game? Shitty kids that can't teamwork? They better stay in their COD world if that's the case.[/QUOTE] I take offense to that. Cod Will not beat battlefields sales because of kids. They will beat battlefields sales because CoD is the best overall game there is. Action-packed storyline,crisp-graphics,and the fact that CoD accounts for more then half of all x box live players. Battlefield is a simple foot-note in comparison. [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Trolling" - Swebonny))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=vampspongebob;30330261]I come here for the fact that everyone is completely obvious to CoD.[/QUOTE] what did i just read. If obvious was meant to be oblivious, then you are especially retarded. [editline]8th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=vampspongebob;30330469]I take offense to that. Cod Will not beat battlefields sales because of kids. They will beat battlefields sales because CoD is the best overall game there is. Action-packed storyline,crisp-graphics,and the fact that CoD accounts for more then half of all x box live players. Battlefield is a simple foot-note in comparison.[/QUOTE] get out before you are murdered
Hope theres a hardcore mode, or a way to turn regenerative health off in server settings or something, that shit sucks.
[QUOTE=vampspongebob;30330469]I take offense to that. Cod Will not beat battlefields sales because of kids. They will beat battlefields sales because CoD is the best overall game there is. Action-packed storyline,crisp-graphics,and the fact that CoD accounts for more then half of all x box live players. Battlefield is a simple foot-note in comparison.[/QUOTE] Compare MW3 graphics to BF3. BF3 wins. The action packed storyline is the same each time. No improvements are made with COD. It has been the same since MW1.
[QUOTE=Glorbo;30328821]I'm going to say this right here, right now Fuck commorose Fuck every little inch of screen that little bastard took when I pressed Q[/QUOTE] Why? It was awesome.
[QUOTE=vampspongebob;30330469]I take offense to that. Cod Will not beat battlefields sales because of kids. They will beat battlefields sales because CoD is the best overall game there is. Action-packed storyline,crisp-graphics,and the fact that CoD accounts for more then half of all x box live players. Battlefield is a simple foot-note in comparison.[/QUOTE] Action-packed storyline? You mean no depth whatsoever, blatantly unrealistic and silly for the sake of having massive scripted events that "look cool" yet any part of the game you are actually playing on foot is terribly bland and repetitive. Crisp graphics my arse, Battlefield 3 has it beat by miles and you know it. They've cut massive corners in MW3 by reusing assets and engine because they know people like you will eat it up and not look twice. COD accounts for half of XBL players because the main market on Xbox is a childish one at that, not to mention its people who really aren't into gaming that much nor are they particularly that good. COD sells so well because anyone can pick it up and beat the game/do good on MP because its too damn easy, there is no challenge involved.
[QUOTE=vampspongebob;30330469][img]http://static.tumblr.com/noiu98j/gUplb4j88/trollface.jpg[/img][/QUOTE] He can't be serious...
[QUOTE=Blueplastic;30330725]He can't be serious...[/QUOTE] If he is then he is being completely ignorant, and has been brainwashed by the CoD franchise.
[QUOTE=Duckmeister;30330468]As far as I know, they've changed the health regeneration so that it only happens so many meters away from combat, and even then, at a very slow rate, slower than in BC2. I think they're trying to finesse it by making it so that if you're really close to death, and stay in cover for 8 seconds, you'll get to half-health, but to get the rest you'll have to retreat out of the combat area or find a medic.[/QUOTE] Didn't they also say that when you're taking suppressive fire you won't regen health?
[QUOTE=spekter;30330640]Action-packed storyline? You mean no depth whatsoever, blatantly unrealistic and silly for the sake of having massive scripted events that "look cool" yet any part of the game you are actually playing on foot is terribly bland and repetitive. Crisp graphics my arse, Battlefield 3 has it beat by miles and you know it. They've cut massive corners in MW3 by reusing assets and engine because they know people like you will eat it up and not look twice. COD accounts for half of XBL players because the main market on Xbox is a childish one at that, not to mention its people who really aren't into gaming that much nor are they particularly that good. COD sells so well because anyone can pick it up and beat the game/do good on MP because its too damn easy, there is no challenge involved.[/QUOTE] MW1 had a pretty nice plot, MW2 had that action B movie feel that made it enjoyable for me (for renting only), I'd imagine MW3 is going to be another rent and single player only deal for me. The graphics obviously show console bias though, and even Kotick commented on how BF3 looks more PC oriented and implied that MW3 is going to be better because it's evened out through all the platforms. Of course, the only way MW3 is evened out is in the sense that they've made the graphics shit, the levels will probably be glorified corridors (small maps) and it will have the same consolized mechanics. So in a way BF3 is more balanced out for platforms in the sense that it does the best it can on each platform. Unlike MW3, it wont remove functions from the PC version because the console doesn't support them, each platform will just have what it can.
[QUOTE=vampspongebob;30330469]I take offense to that. Cod Will not beat battlefields sales because of kids. They will beat battlefields sales because CoD is the best overall game there is. Action-packed storyline,crisp-graphics,and the fact that CoD accounts for more then half of all x box live players. Battlefield is a simple foot-note in comparison.[/QUOTE] If you were from, where I am from, you'd be soap by now!
I don't give two shits about MW3, but B3 is looking awesome! It's definitely going to my my war game for at least 2 years.
[QUOTE=vampspongebob;30330469]I take offense to that. Cod Will not beat battlefields sales because of kids. They will beat battlefields sales because CoD is the best overall game there is. Action-packed storyline,crisp-graphics,and the fact that CoD accounts for more then half of all x box live players. Battlefield is a simple foot-note in comparison.[/QUOTE] [img]http://i43.tinypic.com/1fd5pc.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=vampspongebob;30330469]I take offense to that. Cod Will not beat battlefields sales because of kids. They will beat battlefields sales because CoD is the best overall game there is. Action-packed storyline,crisp-graphics,and the fact that CoD accounts for more then half of all x box live players. Battlefield is a simple foot-note in comparison.[/QUOTE] [img]http://filesmelt.com/dl/2e184gl.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=jaybuz;30329942]Your health only regenerates when you're not in a combat area, so when you're walking somewhere that's when it will work.[/QUOTE] I think it should work a bit like l4ds pills, the health you regenerate is temporary or something and only goes half way etc. the Thing I want most for regen though is for the blood on your screen to go away I hate it when I'm sniping and get shot then cant see shit because of all the blood, not getting actual health back is fine but let me wipe the blood out of my eye for Christ sake.
I'll just play MW3's SP once, and play the shit out of BF3.
I'll not play MW3, and play the shit out of BF3
[QUOTE=wewt!;30330854]even Kotick commented on how BF3 looks more PC oriented and implied that MW3 is going to be better because it's evened out through all the platforms.[/QUOTE] Here's the news article and a video, if anyone was curious about this: [url]http://www.develop-online.net/news/37937/Kotick-doubts-Battlefield-3-console-credentials[/url] This is the first time I have heard Kotick's voice - I would've thought it'd be more snobby.
[QUOTE=vampspongebob;30330469]I take offense to that. Cod Will not beat battlefields sales because of kids. [B]I refuse to believe this because I am a kid and will buy MW3 because I am a kid[/B][/QUOTE] fixed
[QUOTE=vampspongebob;30330469]I take offense to that. Cod Will not beat battlefields sales because of kids. They will beat battlefields sales because CoD is the best overall game there is. Action-packed storyline,crisp-graphics,and the fact that CoD accounts for more then half of all x box live players. Battlefield is a simple foot-note in comparison.[/QUOTE] [img]http://4gifs.com/gallery/d/185842-1/Urkel_reactions.gif[/img]
[QUOTE=spawn camp3r;30332165]I think it should work a bit like l4ds pills, the health you regenerate is temporary or something and only goes half way etc. the Thing I want most for regen though is for the blood on your screen to go away I hate it when I'm sniping and get shot then cant see shit because of all the blood, not getting actual health back is fine but let me wipe the blood out of my eye for Christ sake.[/QUOTE] You're saying that the player should regenerate [I]temporary[/I] health? :wtc:
[QUOTE=Dr Bob;30332307]Here's the news article and a video, if anyone was curious about this: [url]http://www.develop-online.net/news/37937/Kotick-doubts-Battlefield-3-console-credentials[/url] This is the first time I have heard Kotick's voice - I would've thought it'd be more snobby.[/QUOTE] "where the bulk of the business is" BS the only reason he is saying that is because he chopped of most of the support for PC in his products. [editline]8th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=wewt!;30332427]You're saying that the player should regenerate [I]temporary[/I] health? :wtc:[/QUOTE] what I meant to say was give the player something like pills (bc1 epee pen)
[QUOTE=spawn camp3r;30332480] what I meant to say was give the player something like pills (bc1 epee pen)[/QUOTE] But the soldier's thing was a a normal heal, not temporary, wasn't it?
Wait can't image macros get you banned in these sections? :psyduck:
[QUOTE=Matrix374;30332757]Wait can't image macros get you banned in these sections? :psyduck:[/QUOTE] Image macros are pictures with words on them iirc
Can we stop talking about CoD in a Battlefield thread? Christ. I hope recons don't have to wear ghillie suits in BF3.
i've always been a fan of CoD and BF, and i've always liked BF better, but MW3 is going to be absolute horse shit it's literally just MW2 with some newly textured weapons and in a new setting, the singleplayer isn't going to be good, the multiplayer isn't going to be good, nothing about it is good they didn't even bother to update the engine, graphically Black Ops looked better than MW3
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.