Battlefield 3 v2 - Now with 900% more Battlefields - Games

I'm hoping for Squad Deathmatch... I loved that shit, even though it was very prominent in NA servers. Oh by the way, I remember that during E3 they mentioned coop campaigns.

Apparently it is an "extensive coop campaign". Lead Coop Designer is the guy who made Strike at Karkand for BF2 :buddy:

[QUOTE=Raidyr;30366002]Apparently it is an "extensive coop campaign". Lead Coop Designer is the guy who made Strike at Karkand for BF2 :buddy:[/QUOTE] I expect lots of grenades

I want this game so badly now, after seeing the trailer at E3. i can not wait for it. [editline]10th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=MAspiderface;30366009]I expect lots of grenades[/QUOTE] not as many as in COD. thats Grebades central. :P

Hasn't played Karkand.

[QUOTE=usaokay;30366271]Buy Battlefield 2, like, right now.[/QUOTE] NONONONO, Fire up Play4Free instead it's the same

[QUOTE=LittleDogX;30362370]I think the biggest problem with having actual vehicle exit points and entrance points in a game is that it makes them a giant death trap. In a game, people will just charge at the APC and shoot all of the people getting out since they don't care if they get killed because it's a game.[/QUOTE] That's why I love no-respawn gamemodes but that wouldn't work in BF.

Am I the only one who kinda prefers Rush to Conquest? Rush reminds me of Quake Wars a lot, which does an [i]excellent[/i] job at keeping players focused on an objective instead of Conquest (especially BF2) where people just float around the map looking for unguarded flags to cap Conquest can be awesome but only rarely on public servers, you need a good team for that Rush works pretty well even with pubbies

[QUOTE=Zezibesh;30366435]Am I the only one who kinda prefers Rush to Conquest? Rush reminds me of Quake Wars a lot, which does an [i]excellent[/i] job at keeping players focused on an objective instead of Conquest (especially BF2) where people just float around the map looking for unguarded flags to cap [b]Conquest can be awesome but only rarely on public servers, you need a good team for that Rush works pretty well even with pubbies[/b][/QUOTE] Pretty much the reverse here, rush is absolutely awful to play with "pubbies" on most maps, at least conquest turns into team deathmatch if your team is bad. Other than that, on the right circumstances rush really is much more fun, there's alot more action with the team cramped together for a single objective.

Haha oh my god Origin is so shit, it won't even let me install it on a secondary hard drive please tell me you can choose the game install locations because otherwise this is so terrible I can't even begin to comprehend it

[QUOTE=usaokay;30365901]Give me that co-op mode from BC2 and it's all cool[/QUOTE] That mode was ridicilously broken. Most of the time I joined servers I couldn't hit enemies because of some kind of weird hit detection error, including the knife. It also throws you out of the game and into the menu at times.

[QUOTE=usaokay;30366271]Buy Battlefield 2, like, right now.[/QUOTE] I have BF2, I was talking to the person who said CoD had more grenades than Karkand.

[QUOTE=MAspiderface;30366009]I expect lots of grenades[/QUOTE] now all we need is the designer who made the capital ships in 2142

I can't wait to play support in BF3 and suppressing bitches.

do you guys not realize that there is already TDM in BC2? in fact i think the mode is even called Squad Deathmatch or whatever stop complaining about it, if you don't like it then don't play it, i really can't fucking believe people are getting mad that the devs are giving them more options and ways to play the game

having for-money map packs planned before the game is out fuck you, ea

If you're talking about Karkand you get that by buying the game new, it's that project ten dollar shit

[QUOTE=Zezibesh;30367055]If you're talking about Karkand you get that by buying the game new, it's that project ten dollar shit[/QUOTE] was misinformed. [editline]10th June 2011[/editline] the project 10 dollar thing im completely fine with, but i thought people who didn't buy it on origin didn't get the map pack or something.

[QUOTE=Matrix374;30365625]Theres Team Deathmatch? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo I hope the populated servers won't be Team Deathmatch.....[/QUOTE] so what. isn't this a good thing? so you don't get players unwilling to do objectives in your conquest or rush matches?

[QUOTE=Zezibesh;30366581]Haha oh my god Origin is so shit, it won't even let me install it on a secondary hard drive please tell me you can choose the game install locations because otherwise this is so terrible I can't even begin to comprehend it[/QUOTE] [img]http://gyazo.com/c0ee045491b7e1742bdcd1cb555181bb.png[/img]

Well thank god for that, it's still refusing to install though

[QUOTE=-Method;30350569]Sweet, I have a quad, 4 gigs of ram and a relatively small resolution of 1440 x 900, so all I should need is a new GPU. My 9800GTX is getting a long a bit.[/QUOTE] ...and now I get a text at work from my brother saying the PC has died.

[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tLHYLIl-q6s[/url] Watch the first 30 seconds and pay attention to the legs flying in front of the camera for the jumping animation. To jump an ~30cm gap (high or low - i cant tell) the legs come to a near 90degree angle to the pavement. If you jump like that, i... well i'd be pretty fucking impressed

[QUOTE=Cree8ive;30360689]Makes sense as the animation would take way too much time in MP to execute for it to be efficient.[/QUOTE] Thats bollocks, just look at Halo Reach, they pulled it off fine.

[QUOTE=kevlar jens;30367629]so what. isn't this a good thing? so you don't get players unwilling to do objectives in your conquest or rush matches?[/QUOTE] oh yeah.... I guess so but the gaming community here is not that big

[QUOTE=-Method;30347534]I agree, no one has really implemented a way to actually make a player being shot at not want to move or engage because of that. Purely because...well its a game, you dont really feel any danger of being shot at, and theres not really any disadvantage to attempt to pop up and shoot back. I really like the supression idea and how they are using it.[/QUOTE] Try playing darkest hour. [editline]10th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Cree8ive;30360689]Makes sense as the animation would take way too much time in MP to execute for it to be efficient.[/QUOTE] No, not really.

ya even FarCry 2 had animations for getting into vehicles in multiplayer, and we all know how terrible the multiplayer was

[QUOTE=JerryK;30369460]ya even FarCry 2 had animations for getting into vehicles in multiplayer, and we all know how terrible the multiplayer was[/QUOTE] But it wasn't terrible. And the animations were like 2 seconds at most.

Well, things can always change; dragging in MP when from no to maybe it seems, no reason vehicle enter/exit animations can't as well.

Walked into Game today and assked to preorder BF3. The guy on the till questioned whether I wanted it to preorder it for the PS3 or 360. I told him PC. A look of puzzlement appeared on the cashier's face, so he flicked through his catalogue and to his surprise - it was coming out for the PC. He took my card details and I was given my preorder, he then asked what the difference would be for the PC and consoles (something he should know really) I gave him one sentence before I left: "24 max players for consoles, 64 max for PC." Look what consoles have done to the shops these days.... :smith: