S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Series Megathread - Faction Warfare Edition - Games

[QUOTE=holdenmcclure;30716943]Static lighting looking like aids as per usual. Yeah I can see some issues on there but it doesn't look like anything that hasn't been addressed inadvertently or not with what we're doing right now. Other then static looking like crap.[/QUOTE] Static looks great if you don't have shitty weapon textures and bad weather configs :\

[QUOTE=Lyoko774;30717010]Static looks great if you don't have shitty weapon textures and bad weather configs :\[/QUOTE] I would say that the weather is nice in lurk except for being darker than a black hole at night, and the other weapon textures look nice, its just that one is broken.

[QUOTE=Lyoko774;30717010]Static looks great if you don't have shitty weapon textures and bad weather configs :\[/QUOTE] Or if it's not made for Static lighting, obviously. I dunno what you're on about with weapon tex. [editline]26th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=GuyWithTheName;30716951]static makes minature glocks with 0 value and shiny guns? [/QUOTE] I don't remember saying that homebro. EDIT: Trying out some FAL export by some russian dude using lurk animations, seems pretty cool. [url]http://i.imgur.com/wW0zV.jpg[/url] Did they change the thumbnail tag? I always thought it was [img_thumb.][/img_thumb.] (minus the dots) Texture on the stock is pretty bad though.

If I remember correctly, DX9 rendering uses the weapon texture's normal map's alpha channel (if available) for specular, while DX8/Static lighting uses the alpha channel of the texture's diffuse texture for specular/reflections..It causes that "silver weapon" bug as seen in the F2000 texture used in LURK. [editline]26th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=holdenmcclure;30717055]Or if it's not made for Static lighting, obviously. I dunno what you're on about with weapon tex. [editline]26th June 2011[/editline] I don't remember saying that homebro. EDIT: Trying out some FAL export by some russian dude using lurk animations, seems pretty cool. [url]http://i.imgur.com/wW0zV.jpg[/url] Did they change the thumbnail tag? I always thought it was [img_thumb.][/img_thumb.] (minus the dots) Texture on the stock is pretty bad though.[/QUOTE] img_thumb is fucked, you have to put it in quote tags now.. Like this. [quote][img_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/wW0zV.jpg[/img_thumb][/quote]

[QUOTE=Lyoko774;30717156]If I remember correctly, DX9 rendering uses the weapon texture's normal map's alpha channel (if available) for specular, while DX8/Static lighting uses the alpha channel of the texture's diffuse texture for specular/reflections..It causes that "silver weapon" bug as seen in the F2000 texture used in LURK.[/QUOTE] Well we can all see it's not acting the way it should. [editline]26th June 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Lyoko774;30717156] img_thumb is fucked, you have to put it in quote tags now..[/QUOTE] Das mad gay yo

[QUOTE=holdenmcclure;30717172]Well we can all see it's not acting the way it should. [editline]26th June 2011[/editline] Das mad gay yo[/QUOTE] Your grasp of the english language is disintergrating before my eyes...

[QUOTE=GuyWithTheName;30717190]Your grasp of the english language is disintergrating before my eyes...[/QUOTE] I'm being ironic /glasses

[QUOTE=holdenmcclure;30717172]Well we can all see it's not acting the way it should. [editline]26th June 2011[/editline] Das mad gay yo[/QUOTE] Seems to work fine to me.. The F2000 tex's alpha channel isn't properly made.. [url=http://i.imgur.com/VH8QA.jpg][quote][img_thumb]http://i.imgur.com/VH8QA.jpg[/img_thumb][/quote][/url] (for some reason under DX8 white = not shiny, black = shiny) Photoshop imported the mipmaps, sorry about the weird tiling :v:

[QUOTE=holdenmcclure;30717205]I'm being ironic /glasses[/QUOTE] I know, I can barely complain I read over my posts and instantly realise I made a tonne of mistakes, but still urrkkk.

[QUOTE=GuyWithTheName;30717213]realize a tonne of mistakes.[/QUOTE] Yeah like saying 'ton' like a Frenchie.

[QUOTE=holdenmcclure;30717222]Yeah like saying 'ton' like a Frenchie.[/QUOTE] from wiki answers: "A ton is a unit of weight used almost exclusively in the U.S. It's 2000 lbs. A tonne is the related unit of weight used everywhere else in the world. It's 1000 kg. 1 kg is about 2.204 lbs so one tonne is about 2,204 lbs." I'm in the Australia which is part of the Commonwealth "yo" so it's not Imperial "bro".

Holy crap never knew that.

Also, I'm writing something up, and what is the most common +health artifact in Call of Pripyat guys?

Well I just had Wolf give me an FN2000 and I had no such texture issue with it, and I haven't done anything to it since. [url]http://i.imgur.com/IYmJy.jpg[/url] I'm looking at the alpha channel and I don't see what you're talking about Lyoko.

[QUOTE=holdenmcclure;30717295]Well I just had Wolf give me an FN2000 and I had no such texture issue with it, and I haven't done anything to it since. [url]http://i.imgur.com/IYmJy.jpg[/url] I'm looking at the alpha channel and I don't see what you're talking about Lyoko.[/QUOTE] Wolf gave you an F2000? wut?

[QUOTE=GuyWithTheName;30717310]Wolf gave you an F2000? wut?[/QUOTE] I told him to give me an FN2000 in the script just to see what you were talking about. Obviously it's a test and not something that's intended for any distribution version, silly willy.

[QUOTE=holdenmcclure;30717320]I told him to give me an FN2000 in the script just to see what you were talking about. Obviously it's a test and not something that's intended for any distribution version, silly willy.[/QUOTE] Oh lol. [editline]26th June 2011[/editline] okay, I really need to know, what is the least rare artifact that heals the player or is +health in CoP, this wiki if fucking useless! [editline]26th June 2011[/editline] no-one knows?

The xbox hueg recoil in LURK 1.1 is a bug on my part due to the engine handling accumulating recoil in a retarded manner. I've fixed it for 1.2.

just use soc's soul you goof

[QUOTE=chutney;30717430]just use soc's soul you goof[/QUOTE] I'm designing a quest system suggetion for WoTW, I have to use CoPs.

[QUOTE=GuyWithTheName;30717440]I'm designing a quest system suggetion for WoTW, I have to use CoPs.[/QUOTE] Firefly then wait it was soul I knew it

[QUOTE=holdenmcclure;30717295]Well I just had Wolf give me an FN2000 and I had no such texture issue with it, and I haven't done anything to it since. [url]http://i.imgur.com/IYmJy.jpg[/url] I'm looking at the alpha channel and I don't see what you're talking about Lyoko.[/QUOTE] In LURK 1.1's textures, the alpha channel for F2000_new isn't made right.. And the shiny bug only happens under static lighting as far as I know.

[QUOTE=Lyoko774;30717523]In LURK 1.1's textures, the alpha channel for F2000_new isn't made right.. And the shiny bug only happens under static lighting as far as I know.[/QUOTE] Yeah I don't think anyone tested under static.

[QUOTE=chutney;30717512]Firefly then[/QUOTE] thanks, it's weird though, the stalker wiki says this: [I]Firefly is extremely rare[/I] then for kobolok: [I]A rare artifact[/I] and for soul, I was only able to find a mention about rarity in the SoC category which was: [I]Very rarely found artifact[/I] so huh. Thanks for that wiki. I'm going to go with soul though because it CoP it has the least effect, meaning it's probably the worst form.

WotW will use the artifacts from Redux, just fyi.

Expression : fatal error Function : CScriptEngine::lua_error File : E:\priquel\sources\engine\xrServerEntities\script_engine.cpp Line : 73 Description : <no expression> Arguments : LUA error: ....t.a.l.k.e.r. - clear sky\gamedata\scripts\_g.script:979: bad argument #2 to 'format' (string expected, got nil) TFW with patch and zip's mod. [editline]26th June 2011[/editline] My failed tfw reloaded merge didn't get this error, but pasting the _g.script from it doesn't fix it.

[QUOTE=Thorny;30718011]WotW will use the artifacts from Redux, just fyi.[/QUOTE] Will you be able to repair/modify weapons?

[QUOTE=Rexen;30718394]Will you be able to repair/modify weapons?[/QUOTE] Of course.

[QUOTE=Rexen;30718394]Will you be able to repair/modify weapons?[/QUOTE] I'm kind of hoping we'd use the Clear Sky style upgrade tree :allears: . [QUOTE=Thorny;30718610]As in trading one stat for another?[/QUOTE] Well, a bit like that, yeah. Maybe having the downsides little less drastic than in CS but something to make you think your choices so that you don't end up with a GOD-Tier ubercannon which is great in everything so fast. But you should be able to upgrade the scope mount, underbarrel grenade launcher and silencer without having them exclude each other. Whatever it is you've decided on the upgrade system, I'll bet it'll be interesting nonetheless.

As in trading one stat for another?