[QUOTE=Fables;31101428]For 'duh mudda' land.[/QUOTE]
For Uncle Sam!
what do they say
it sounds like shoot his ass as i say fore
Have it on 'er nose!
[editline]13th July 2011[/editline]
SLUZHI KOMMANDER
[QUOTE=Killerjc;31101598]what do they say
it sounds like shoot his ass as i say fore[/QUOTE]
Just a few extra syllables there.
Shoot as I say four.
[QUOTE=Mbbird;31103360]Just a few extra syllables there.
Shoot as I say four.[/QUOTE]
but he never says four!
[QUOTE=Killerjc;31103898]but he never says four![/QUOTE]
bUT he definitely says fore !!
Shoot his ass A4!
[QUOTE=Killerjc;31101598]what do they say
it sounds like shoot his ass as i say fore[/QUOTE]
I think its either "Shoot as I say four", or "Shooters; SA4"
Perhaps SA4 is a sector in their defence or something.
I figured it as "shoot as I say fore", as in 'shoot when I tell you to'
I find Men of War a really easy game to learn because it's so logical. The micro-management with each soldier and tank came naturally to me but other people just seem to take a squad and send it somewhere to die, expecting it to be like CoH or something :v:
[editline]14th July 2011[/editline]
Also, JIZZ SIR
[QUOTE=MrJazzy;31109637]I find Men of War a really easy game to learn because it's so logical. The micro-management with each soldier and tank came naturally to me but other people just seem to take a squad and send it somewhere to die, expecting it to be like CoH or something :v:
[editline]14th July 2011[/editline]
Also, JIZZ SIR[/QUOTE]
Very true. Inversely, I find games like WiC and Starcraft hard as almighty [I]fuck[/I] because no "good" tactic follows any sort of real life tactical logic at all.
[QUOTE=Mbbird;31109678]Very true. Inversely, I find games like WiC and Starcraft hard as almighty [I]fuck[/I] because no "good" tactic follows any sort of real life tactical logic at all.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, I try to tell my friend to "follow your instincts and common sense", you know, an AT gun is obviously good against tanks, but HE rounds are good against infantry, grenades can be used against infantry in cover and so on.
But they just keep sending in hordes of infantry straight on my machine gun and when they fail they try to send up a Puma against my Churchill :v:
Got to play as Germans vs Japs today.
My, was it glorious.
[QUOTE=MrJazzy;31109712]Yeah, I try to tell my friend to "follow your instincts and comic sense", you know, an AT gun is obviously good against tanks, but HE rounds are good against infantry, grenades can be used against infantry in cover and so on.
But they just keep sending in hordes of infantry straight on my machine gun and when they fail they try to send up a Puma against my Churchill :v:[/QUOTE]
Comic sense? :v:
That's a pretty grand spelling of common sense
Common sense* shit, I was talking to my mom when writing it gosh
[QUOTE=MrJazzy;31109712]Yeah, I try to tell my friend to "follow your instincts and common sense", you know, an AT gun is obviously good against tanks, but HE rounds are good against infantry, grenades can be used against infantry in cover and so on.
[b]But they just keep sending in hordes of infantry straight on my machine gun and when they fail they try to send up a Puma against my Churchill :v:[/b][/QUOTE]
when russians do this im just all like
i cant stop killing them i cant stop
wont stop
dont know how to stop
and then they curse at me in broken cyrillic, spam some tanks then rage quit
One time some russian guy PM'd me some cyrillic rage after a 1vs1, managed to get it translated and it came out as "susie dick faggot"
[QUOTE=MrJazzy;31109712]Yeah, I try to tell my friend to "follow your instincts and common sense", you know, an AT gun is obviously good against tanks, but HE rounds are good against infantry, grenades can be used against infantry in cover and so on.
But they just keep sending in hordes of infantry straight on my machine gun and when they fail they try to send up a Puma against my Churchill :v:[/QUOTE]
Puma is the shit in Men of War, until they patched it up, the Puma rushes of the old days are still whispered in the dark corners with horror in their voices.
[IMG]http://i53.tinypic.com/2sb0iko.jpg[/IMG]
Let us remind our children of those days, so that mankind shall not repeat it's horrible history ever again.
Just destroyed a priest feeling pretty good until I noticed something
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/8682580/HORROR.JPG[/img]
huh^
anyways
imagine men of war
NOW IMAGINE IT WITHOUT RIDICULOUS IMBALANCES, RUSSIANS, TANK SPAMMERS, RUSSIAN TANK SPAMMERS, AND FAGGOTS WITH THE NAME TRANNYSURPRISING!
a game worth 35 dollars, hell, 50 dollars
if not even 60!!!
seriously literally every way to win mow is by spamming tanks
any form of a vehicle when spammed in mow = victory
atr spam can not stop it
other tanks can not stop it
at guns can not stop it
artillery guns can not stop it
nothing can stop tank spam
If you say so.
whats wrong with men of war:
skirmish, its shitty
tank spam
russians
lack of ai even after 8 years - infantry being autistic - ai not using at rockets effectively at all
lack of maps
small maps which ruin gameplay and all that jazz and inabilities to flank stuff in general
usa's lack of units, effective units, and every unit it has sucking donkey dick
-shotgunners wow useful
-wow ok shotgunners but no ATR THIS IS NICE THIS MAKES SENSE YES
-LOL BAR COST AS MUCH AS OTHER MGS BUT IS SO SHIT IT MAKES YOU WANNA CRY
-ALMOST literally no units that are useful against anything with higher than 10mm of armor and a 12.7mm (T29 needs to return. it was not made past experimental designs but neither were half the japanese tanks in men of war which stomp even the pershing frontally at longish distances. not to mention the is3 wasn't used in ww2 either and the germans whole company of heroes dumbshit 'VETERAN TIGER' and the king tiger being a NORMALLY PURCHASABLE UNIT LIKE THE IS3)
Adding on to the lack of effective units: Wheres an M3 75MM GMC when you NEED it, or a T48.
shit like THIS should be in game
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M6_heavy_tank[/url]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T28_Super_Heavy_Tank[/url]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T14_Heavy_Tank[/url]
[B]WHICH REMINDS ME WHY DID THEY REMOVE THE T29 AAAAAAA[/B]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T20_Medium_Tank[/url]
so on SHIT that could be added to the united states so they aren't [B]postal's ball sack stretched out like a plastic bag over Instinct's face[/B]
some factions are so SHIT and no one plays them (usa, which i played as almost exclusively when possible in vanilla mow)
flaregun hitting stuff that isn't ground breaks flare and makes it disappear
LACK of smokes for mortar but the fucking 155mm spg for the us has smoke WHY
HMGs are literally the epitome of over powered. 360 degrees of fighting capabilities, sets up instantly and becomes invincible with sandbags instantly, wHICH ALSO CAN TAKE LIKE 15 75MM HE SHELLS BEFORE DYING
[editline]14th July 2011[/editline]
ALSO DMS BANNING PEOPLE FROM THE GAME FOR CRITICIZING IT ON FACEPUNCH
[QUOTE=W0w00t;31124295]whats wrong with men of war:
skirmish, its shitty
tank spam
russians
lack of ai even after 8 years - infantry being autistic - ai not using at rockets effectively at all
lack of maps
small maps which ruin gameplay and all that jazz and inabilities to flank stuff in general
usa's lack of units, effective units, and every unit it has sucking donkey dick
-shotgunners wow useful
-wow ok shotgunners but no ATR THIS IS NICE THIS MAKES SENSE YES
-LOL BAR COST AS MUCH AS OTHER MGS BUT IS SO SHIT IT MAKES YOU WANNA CRY
-ALMOST literally no units that are useful against anything with higher than 10mm of armor and a 12.7mm (T29 needs to return. it was not made past experimental designs but neither were half the japanese tanks in men of war which stomp even the pershing frontally at longish distances. not to mention the is3 wasn't used in ww2 either and the germans whole company of heroes dumbshit 'VETERAN TIGER' and the king tiger being a NORMALLY PURCHASABLE UNIT LIKE THE IS3)
Adding on to the lack of effective units: Wheres an M3 75MM GMC when you NEED it, or a T48.
shit like THIS should be in game
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M6_heavy_tank[/url]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T28_Super_Heavy_Tank[/url]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T14_Heavy_Tank[/url]
[B]WHICH REMINDS ME WHY DID THEY REMOVE THE T29 AAAAAAA[/B]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T20_Medium_Tank[/url]
so on SHIT that could be added to the united states so they aren't [B]postal's ball sack stretched out like a plastic bag over Instinct's face[/B]
some factions are so SHIT and no one plays them (usa, which i played as almost exclusively when possible in vanilla mow)
flaregun hitting stuff that isn't ground breaks flare and makes it disappear
LACK of smokes for mortar but the fucking 155mm spg for the us has smoke WHY
HMGs are literally the epitome of over powered. 360 degrees of fighting capabilities, sets up instantly and becomes invincible with sandbags instantly, wHICH ALSO CAN TAKE LIKE 15 75MM HE SHELLS BEFORE DYING
[editline]14th July 2011[/editline]
ALSO DMS BANNING PEOPLE FROM THE GAME FOR CRITICIZING IT ON FACEPUNCH[/QUOTE]
mowas in a nutshell
[QUOTE=W0w00t;31124295]
shit like THIS should be in game
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M6_heavy_tank[/url]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T28_Super_Heavy_Tank[/url]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T14_Heavy_Tank[/url]
[B]WHICH REMINDS ME WHY DID THEY REMOVE THE T29 AAAAAAA[/B]
[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T20_Medium_Tank[/url]
so on SHIT that could be added to the united states so they aren't [B]postal's ball sack stretched out like a plastic bag over Instinct's face[/B]
[/QUOTE]
so world of tanks but rts and physics
also .30 cals and shit and mg42s could seriously kill light tanks like the ha-go and shit.
Kinda, the one up side USA has is infantry!
But, mowAS is balanced little different than normal mow.
As that being said, realism mods should fix this which i haven't seen yet.. but they are yet to come?
Also the dlc is donkey! I didn't buy it but still the gamemode is meh its basicly victory flag with a new name... well thats all it really is
[QUOTE=the_killer24;31124380]so world of tanks but rts and physics[/QUOTE]
pretty much because thats the only real way to fix the usa being anal sex
banning people what
[QUOTE=the_killer24;31124380]so world of tanks but rts and physics[/QUOTE]
they dont really have any tanks that can deal with any tank
[QUOTE=laxplayer77alt;31124398]Kinda, the one up side USA has is infantry!
But, mowAS is balanced little different than normal mow.
As that being said, realism mods should fix this which i haven't seen yet.. but they are yet to come?
Also the dlc is donkey! I didn't buy it but still the gamemode is meh its basicly victory flag with a new name... well thats all it really is[/QUOTE]yeah
use your steam summer camp tickets for a shitty dlc that adds 5 maps and re-adds victory flag but on 5 shitty maps no one has or pay 5 dollars for the shit
WHICH RE-ADDS VICTORY FLAG BUT TOTALLY FUCKED UP AND ON THE 5 SHITTY DLC MAPS !!
and were PRETTY MUCH REUSED FROM THE OTHER 3 GAMES
[editline]14th July 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Killerjc;31124421]banning people what[/QUOTE]
not saying names but he is a facepuncher and did indeed criticize dms or mow on FACEPUNCH and was later banned temporarily FROM the game for it.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.