Just bought this game, hopefully my 560m plays it okay.
I liek BF3 its a cool game but i want 2 quickscopez so BF3 sucks
[QUOTE=Pandamox;33902310]please stop posting that shitty sniper montage in this thread you've posted it like 3 times[/QUOTE]
2 times actually
Whoa, I finally got better. Thank you, Back2Karkand.
[QUOTE=zeldar;33910208]No, but I hear that it fills up a lot of gaps and backstory that should've been explained in the campaign itself..[/QUOTE]
Kinda, it's more about Dima's story.
Hence the title, "The Russian"
[QUOTE=Daniellynet;33910200]ALMOST.
[img]http://img1.uploadscreenshot.com/images/orig/12/35909120047-orig.png[/img][/QUOTE]
I was just being silly, but now that I think about it you are statistically more likely to lose in sqdm (1/4 chance of winning instead of 1/2) :v:
Also, not sure if it's just me, but..
Some days every server I join turns into auto loss, but sometimes (like today) every server I join, I get on the winning team right away and win shortly after.
[editline]27th December 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=krail9;33910479]I was just being silly, but now that I think about it you are statistically more likely to lose in sqdm (1/4 chance of winning instead of 1/2) :v:[/QUOTE]
You do lose a lot more since.
1. Hackers
2. Clans
3. Clans
4. People not working together vs just ONE squad working together (be it in clans or not, random people work together sometimes) and you already lost.
5. You have to beat 3 other teams compared to one other team.
I need to win 12 games in a row to get 3 WL/R, hm, will be tough.
Speaking of which, what's the deal with squads in sqdm? Sometimes I join but have no one in my squad (green people), even though I have a full 'squad' (blue people).
Other times I may have one or more other people in my squad (green) that I can spawn on, but not everyone in the 'squad' (blue) is part of it.
[QUOTE=Lizzrd;33909985]There is a barret in MP too, the M98B.
As to why there isn't a .50 BMG barret in MP, it's because it would have to be oneshot for the devs to feel like they made it justice, but then it wouldn't be fun.[/QUOTE]
I agree but that's just unfair though. Marine snipers do excellent work with the Barrett .50 as their main battle rifle in the middle east. Why they had to nerf Recon for one-shot is just eughh.
[QUOTE=Darkslicer;33910000]I never played the full singleplayer but could you yourself use a barrett? Or was it an enemy that used it? Also which weapons are used in singleplayer but not accessable in multiplayer?[/QUOTE]
Most of the weapons in Singleplayer are usable in the multiplayer section. There are some like the .50 Barrett rifle with the nightvision and the second-seat jets that you don't get to use in multiplayer. Hopefully in the future they will patch it so jets can take two people one day
[QUOTE=sHiBaN;33911198]I agree but that's just unfair though. Marine snipers do excellent work with the Barrett .50 as their main battle rifle in the middle east. Why they had to nerf Recon for one-shot is just eughh.[/QUOTE]
It's because having a gun that one-hit kills is fucking retarded in any way. Headshots are fine, but having a gun that does it no matter where you hit would be complete bullshit.
i find myself being 1 shotted w/o a headshot anyways
its bullshit
[QUOTE=krail9;33911049]Speaking of which, what's the deal with squads in sqdm? Sometimes I join but have no one in my squad (green people), even though I have a full 'squad' (blue people).
Other times I may have one or more other people in my squad (green) that I can spawn on, but not everyone in the 'squad' (blue) is part of it.[/QUOTE]
Squad Deathmatch is just a mess and seems like they just threw it in right at the end of development.
[QUOTE=simkas;33911254]It's because having a gun that one-hit kills is fucking retarded in any way. Headshots are fine, but having a gun that does it no matter where you hit would be complete bullshit.[/QUOTE]
I know, but in a realistic perspective, any bullet can kill you with one shot. I know it's to balance the game against Recon but how is it fair that an M16 or a FAMAS in burst is able to snipe you better than a bolt-action M40A5 in longer ranges? Assault barely has any bullet drop either compared to Recon class rifles.
I don't think one-shot is OP. If you're gonna run out into the open like Rambo, expect to be killed ye?
Also, I got the PC version of BF3. My gosh it's way better lol. Textures are better-looking, 60+ FPS goodness, awesome motion blur and quick-reflex gameplay. Oh yeah
They should implement some sort of hostage gamemode where a player is a hostage or rescue the VIP or something. There aint enough good gamemodes..
Conquest - Rush - TDM are only worth playing and that's not much sadly.
[QUOTE=Darkslicer;33911365]They should implement some sort of hostage gamemode where a player is a hostage or rescue the VIP or something. There aint enough good gamemodes..
[/QUOTE]
Mmh, SWAT.
That would be fun.
Having to get the VIP first from the enemy base, then transport the VIP to your base, then fly him away in a chopper.
[QUOTE=Darkslicer;33911365]They should implement some sort of hostage gamemode where a player is a hostage or rescue the VIP or something. There aint enough good gamemodes..
Conquest - Rush - TDM are only worth playing and that's not much sadly.[/QUOTE]
BF2 only had conquest and it was plenty
[QUOTE=Darkslicer;33911365]They should implement some sort of hostage gamemode where a player is a hostage or rescue the VIP or something. There aint enough good gamemodes..
Conquest - Rush - TDM are only worth playing and that's not much sadly.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, DICE really failed on that regard. What's good physics and graphics when your core gameplay lacks?
We could use an "escape" gamemode where USMC convoy has to get from point A to B and the Russians/PLR have to ambush them in the city they're supposed to pass through. If they escape, round ends. What about something like a mix between Rush and Conquest? Instead of planting bombs on A and B, the enemy has to secure the location and the opposing team has to retreat to the next base and hold them off? If they get pushed off the map, round ends
[QUOTE=NuclearDwarf;33911475]BF2 only had conquest and it was plenty[/QUOTE]
It wasn't.
I need more FP'ers on my friendslist, add me;
[url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/soldier/Rankzerox/stats/232390168/[/url]
[editline]27th December 2011[/editline]
EDIT (because mine is broken);¨
[url]http://battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3/user/Rankzerox/[/url]
Why did EA remove separate soldiers? My shitty stats will never improve due to me learning the ropes and not being able to start again.
I only think that Dice don't uses the main BF3 base potential, they steer into a wrong direction on the base of the game in my opinion. There is much unused potential like gamemodes and pistol attachements and all that would not take as much time as making complete addons.
[editline]27th December 2011[/editline]
I wish there were pistol only servers on the xbox360 :(
[QUOTE=littlefoot;33912422]Why did EA remove separate soldiers? My shitty stats will never improve due to me learning the ropes and not being able to start again.[/QUOTE]
You stats will improve, it will just take longer.
[QUOTE=sHiBaN;33911508]Yeah, DICE really failed on that regard. What's good physics and graphics when your core gameplay lacks?
We could use an "escape" gamemode where USMC convoy has to get from point A to B and the Russians/PLR have to ambush them in the city they're supposed to pass through. If they escape, round ends. What about something like a mix between Rush and Conquest? Instead of planting bombs on A and B, the enemy has to secure the location and the opposing team has to retreat to the next base and hold them off? If they get pushed off the map, round ends[/QUOTE]
I would like a vip mode. I liked it in CS: S, but not enough servers had it.
How do you change your avatar on battlelog?
The stupid thing is that in bad company they said "rush" is brand new, ok everyones happy. But for BF3 it was "team deathmatch" and that should be implemented from start on, it's nothing that's new.
12-24 player coop is also a cool thing, some sort of bots or zombies, hell I dont know they could make unlimited awesomeness with all the shit they have but they just dont do [B]anything[/B], it's pissin' me off somehow.
[QUOTE=Jmir 54;33912536]How do you change your avatar on battlelog?[/QUOTE]
Gravitar.
Also, Getting one of those dogtags that count kills seems really really hard to do. Is it really like this or am i seeing it wrong.
[QUOTE=Jmir 54;33912536]How do you change your avatar on battlelog?[/QUOTE]
[url]http://en.gravatar.com/[/url]
Use it for the e-mail you use on Battlelog.
[QUOTE=sHiBaN;33911508]Yeah, DICE really failed on that regard. What's good physics and graphics when your core gameplay lacks?
We could use an "escape" gamemode where USMC convoy has to get from point A to B and the Russians/PLR have to ambush them in the city they're supposed to pass through. If they escape, round ends. What about something like a mix between Rush and Conquest? Instead of planting bombs on A and B, the enemy has to secure the location and the opposing team has to retreat to the next base and hold them off? If they get pushed off the map, round ends[/QUOTE]Idea reminds me of that gamemode in Medal of Honor.
They don't like taking risks with new gamemodes.
Is there a lot of newbie players now that it's right after Christmas?
If so, time to increase my KD ratio
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
