Kerbal Space Program, or: "How many rockets can I slap onto this thing?" - Games

[QUOTE=Winstonn;32633436]Kyle and I have plans for a winged orbiter of sorts with a cargo bay for satellites or station modules.[/QUOTE] If there is anyway to help you just ask i will see what i can do

How the hell does one use timewarp?

[QUOTE=dije;32636790]How the hell does one use timewarp?[/QUOTE] Period for faster, comma for slower.

Does the experimental version have some collision problems or something? The attachment strength reminds me of jelly welded Gmod stuff, it can't even sit on a launch pad without wobbling over and exploding.

[QUOTE=Zovox;32635578]Guys, I'm not sure, but I think I just [B]won[/B] the game... [IMG]http://i51.tinypic.com/15d5tmb.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] ftfy

[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/2668640/continent.jpg[/img] New goal, reach a new continent by traveling across the sea!

I'd like someone to make non landing gear tires. I could finally have Kerbal Rocket Car Program. [editline]5th October 2011[/editline] [IMG]http://img14.imageshack.us/img14/8442/screenshot1aq.png[/IMG] The most fabulous landing craft [i]ever~[/i]

What's up with the red textures? I have that problem on some of my addon parts.

[QUOTE=Used Car Salesman;32640684]What's up with the red textures? I have that problem on some of my addon parts.[/QUOTE] Know problem. I've heard you can fix it by opening and resaving the pictures with Paint.

[QUOTE=LarparNar;32640802]Know problem. I've heard you can fix it by opening and resaving the pictures with Paint.[/QUOTE] Iseewhatyoudidthere...

I can't wait to have the bug where your ship is destroyed when warping time forward fixed.

[QUOTE=wootmonster;32641109]I can't wait to have the bug where your ship is destroyed when warping time forward fixed.[/QUOTE] Are you sure that's not parts of your rocket over-heating quickly?

[QUOTE=DrasarSalman;32641200]Are you sure that's not parts of your rocket over-heating quickly?[/QUOTE] I'm sure, even if all engines are off it'll disappear. Even the parachute on top of the pod disappears. It's a bug. [editline]woop[/editline] Also, this is the selected craft that has been chosen for the honorable task of taking me to the moon for the first time: [thumb]http://i.imgur.com/Q7QRX.png[/thumb] It's really reliable and good for reaching orbit with plenty of fuel left.

Did your ship go over 88mph? (I have no I idea what that is in m/s) [editline]11th November 2011[/editline] Google gave me the answer; almost 40m/s

[QUOTE=LarparNar;32640802]Know problem. I've heard you can fix it by opening and resaving the pictures with Paint.[/QUOTE] Wait why was this funny. Mega mind-derp, but I seem to have made a joke by coincidence. (Also a typo, does that have anything to do with it?) Btw, by "pictures" I mean the texture files. Is it Paint? I don't get my own joke what the hell.

[QUOTE=LarparNar;32641287]Wait why was this funny. Mega mind-derp, but I seem to have made a joke by coincidence. (Also a typo, does that have anything to do with it?) Btw, by "pictures" I mean the texture files. Is it Paint? I don't get my own joke what the hell.[/QUOTE] Paint doesn't support transparency or save pngs properly! :v:

[QUOTE=LarparNar;32641287]Wait, why was this funny?[/QUOTE] Because me and "MC3craze" pressed a little icon that looks like a pacman on your post. Through, some people become more upset about tiny brown boxes.

[QUOTE=MC3craze;32641334]Paint doesn't support transparency or save pngs properly! :v:[/QUOTE] I know? I'm serious though, some people on the KSP-forums have said that if you open and re-save the textures in paint, it will solve it. There's also some settings you can select in Photoshop to make it right. I haven't tried.

[QUOTE=DrasarSalman;32641368]Because me and "MC3craze" pressed a little icon that looks like a pacman on your post. Through, some people become more upset about tiny brown boxes.[/QUOTE] I sent you a box with a present inside... :q:

Instant download.

Pe = 141,372m Ap = 143,562m Did I do good?

[QUOTE=Dacheet;32644119]Pe = 141,372m Ap = 143,562m Did I do good?[/QUOTE] Pretty good. That's a very normal orbit.

After 6:12:20, the air ran out in the capsule, and despite the crew's pleads for help, Mission Control never responded (AKA KSP crashed)

[img]http://i.imgur.com/j6Whr.png[/img] New skybox. No more stretched stars. The sun also gets a sort of HDR-effect, it fades out close stars (I don't think it does in the map view, but it was supposed to do in regular view). The thing in the background was either a nebulae or the galaxy seen from the side. Thing is it looks too thick to be a galaxy seen from the side, and too large to be a far away nebulae, so I'm not entirely sure.

[QUOTE=LarparNar;32644905][img]http://i.imgur.com/j6Whr.png[/img] New skybox. No more stretched stars. The sun also gets a sort of HDR-effect, it fades out close stars (I don't think it does in the map view, but it was supposed to do in regular view). The thing in the background was either a nebulae or the galaxy seen from the side. Thing is it looks too thick to be a galaxy seen from the side, and too large to be a far away nebulae, so I'm not entirely sure.[/QUOTE] maybe its a close by nebula? it is kerbin after all

Perhaps.

I would like to see if anyone is able to get an orbit that is <10,000M off the ground.

[QUOTE=ultra_bright;32645475]I would like to see if anyone is able to get an orbit that is <10,000M off the ground.[/QUOTE] You would need an incredibly powerful engine because of air resistance, and if you turn it off you would fall back down. Not really an orbit.

[QUOTE=LarparNar;32645609]You would need an incredibly powerful engine because of air resistance, and if you turn it off you would fall back down. Not really an orbit.[/QUOTE] Well strap 500 rockets onto the damn thing and blast past the speed of light.

[QUOTE=ultra_bright;32645778]Well strap 500 rockets onto the damn thing and blast past the speed of light.[/QUOTE] Which is then escape velocity, aka bye bye Kerbal. Also going round the planet at <10,000m isn't orbiting, its flying.