Kerbal Space Program, or: "How many rockets can I slap onto this thing?" - Games

[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;33583676]This guy raises valid (and obvious) points, but he sounds so butthurt for some reason that I can't take him seriously: [url]http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/forum/index.php?topic=4570.msg54208#msg54208[/url] I mean, sure, I did make some choices that could've been done differently, but I have my reasons. The video originally had 1h30 and covered every single step with pauses to place huge walls of text but let's be honest, who the fuck would watch that? And about me not spending a shitload of time in the Mun and not being able to get back to Kerbin: my previous lander (the one I use in regular missions is perfectly capable of landing, deploying payload, taking off, placing another payload in the surface, land [I]again[/I] just for the hell of it and going back home. But who the fuck would care to see me for 5 minutes doing nothing but moving the camera quickly and saying "so yeah guys this is the mun... p cool huh" - instead I decided to cut down the video's length and make a lighthearted joke. jeez some people take shit way too seriously, it's supposed to act as a superficial guide and hopefully slightly entertaining video, thats all /rant[/QUOTE] I remember watching a tutorial on how to get to the moon w/ stock parts after I hadn't played KSP for months. It showed how to make the rocket and said fuck that and made my own with mods.

Searches got nothing. At least anything easy to find. He mostly likely is that guy, he opposes a lot of additions.

[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;33584678]My first round trip was with stock parts only (wasn't home). I also left a whole stage there because it was full and I wouldn't need it at all. The guy talks of me like I have no clue of what I'm doing, and it pisses my inner aspie off.[/QUOTE] My first landing was a piece of cake, I'd practiced so much it didn't even matter if I made a mistake.

[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;33585368]I mastered going to the Mun and back already. My next goal in KSP is setting up a [I]huge[/I] space station and deploying a huge Munbase aswell.[/QUOTE] I am making a Munbase with C7 Hardpoints and Space station bits.

[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;33583676]This guy raises valid (and obvious) points, but he sounds so butthurt for some reason that I can't take him seriously: [url]http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/forum/index.php?topic=4570.msg54208#msg54208[/url] I mean, sure, I did make some choices that could've been done differently, but I have my reasons. The video originally had 1h30 and covered every single step with pauses to place huge walls of text but let's be honest, who the fuck would watch that? And about me not spending a shitload of time in the Mun and not being able to get back to Kerbin: my previous lander (the one I use in regular missions is perfectly capable of landing, deploying payload, taking off, placing another payload in the surface, land [I]again[/I] just for the hell of it and going back home. But who the fuck would care to see me for 5 minutes doing nothing but moving the camera quickly and saying "so yeah guys this is the mun... p cool huh" - instead I decided to cut down the video's length and make a lighthearted joke. jeez some people take shit way too seriously, it's supposed to act as a superficial guide and hopefully slightly entertaining video, thats all /rant[/QUOTE] If you ask me he seemed overcritical of what wasn't exactly a tutorial. I think he was right about the mods/vanilla parts thing though.

[QUOTE=MC3craze;33585396]I am making a Munbase with C7 Hardpoints and Space station bits.[/QUOTE] I never figured out how to use those.

[QUOTE=MC3craze;33585396]I am making a Munbase with C7 Hardpoints and Space station bits.[/QUOTE] What are these parts you speak of?

Kerbal Space Program summed up in 7 seconds: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=88bQZl5Pac8[/media]

[QUOTE=Pelf;33586118]What are these parts you speak of?[/QUOTE] Elaborate.

Conspiracy theory #1: The space-thing says 11A [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/2HUQU.jpg[/IMG] ...yet there's only one on all of Kerbin. This can only mean one thing. [sp]Kerbals did 9/11[/sp]

Space station parts: [url]http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/forum/index.php?topic=2161[/url] [url]http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/forum/index.php?topic=2707[/url] [url]http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/forum/index.php?topic=3891[/url] Most are cfg edited to be other parts for my useage. [editline]5th December 2011[/editline] FUCKING AUTOMERGESTOP

[QUOTE=Pelf;33586118]What are these parts you speak of?[/QUOTE] [url]http://kerbalspaceprogram.com/forum/index.php?topic=1172.0[/url] Ctrl-F 'hard points'

How do I use them hard points? never figured that out [editline]5th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=mac338;33586286]Conspiracy theory #1: The space-thing says 11A [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/2HUQU.jpg[/IMG] ...yet there's only one on all of Kerbin. This can only mean one thing. [sp]Kerbals did 9/11[/sp][/QUOTE] [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_Canaveral_Air_Force_Station_Launch_Complex_11]Nope[/url]

[QUOTE=Dacheet;33586406]How do I use them hard points? never figured that out[/QUOTE] Place them and put allow sfr-attach parts on.

[QUOTE=Oicani Gonzales;33584678]My first round trip was with stock parts only (wasn't home). I also left a whole stage there because it was full and I wouldn't need it at all. The guy talks of me like I have no clue of what I'm doing, and it pisses my inner aspie off.[/QUOTE] I took the liberty of getting very angry at this Tim_Barrett guy, saying a bunch of unnecessarily angry things to him because he is a jerk and deserves to be taken down a notch. [quote] Decent post and acceptable diction, but you should probably remove it because you look like an asshole. You and your types destroy the friendly atmosphere of this forum by starting arguments about nothing with everyone you see. I could make a list of all of your posts, your pony nonsense and your Luddite obsession with vanilla KSP but here are my main problems with your post. First off, making blanket criticisms of a video that is not yours, to a person you do not know, about things that do not matter in the slightest, and doing all of this while playing the “Trust me, I know things” card is simply inexcusable. You know nothing of psychology; you know nothing of other people’s definition of fun. Who are you to say what other people should enjoy? Maybe I enjoy overpowered rockets so I can play with the orbital mechanics just as you enjoy a television show made for eight year old girls. Nowhere in the video did he claim that rocket was the only or even the best choice. He simply said “basic rocket” and showed the basics of finding orbit of the moon. He is not saying that everyone should use the rocket, simply that it you need some chutzpah behind your kerbals if you want them on the moon. He just gave them a craft file they can play with so that they can understand the mechanics on their own. Nobody ever gave a freshman engineering student a submersible with the expectation that they would understand every part instantly, but it would certainly help them understand their own mistakes in submersible design. There was no need to provide every viewer with a Ph.D. in astrophysics. If you look at the actual comments you will find that every single one liked it. So much for trolling. People who play this game as of now are intelligent enough to figure out how to build a rocket on their own. So yes, I thought this was quite a disappointment from a posting standpoint, being almost entirely devoid of useful thought or anything meaningful. To your post’s credit you did make some effort to provide useful suggestions, but you seem to have forgotten that this is not Film & Composition 203. Nobody cares about ridiculous suggestions. You did not make your point “vivid” you just railed on a guy who did something that was helpful to literally 100% of the people who commented on it/liked it. He did a nice thing and you did a rude and silly thing. In conclusion you seem to pretend to know a lot about everything when in reality you know little about anything. I don’t know if it’s because you are drunk or because you are just genuinely mean, bit I apologize if it is the former.[/quote] Should I throw in some more potshots at ponies for the end?

[QUOTE=bobsmit;33586618]I took the liberty of getting very angry at this Tim_Barrett guy, saying a bunch of unnecessarily angry things to him because he is a jerk and deserves to be taken down a notch. Should I throw in some more potshots at ponies for the end?[/QUOTE] You made him look like a total asshole, good job. :v: But he'll probably just go "lol ponyhater ill get the huurd on u XD"

Theory #2: There is not a [I]single[/I] Kerbal on the entire planet, outside Bob, Bill, Jeb and whoever is in the Assembly Building. [sp]JFK from the future assassinated JFK[/sp]

[QUOTE=mac338;33587483]Theory #2: There is not a [I]single[/I] Kerbal on the entire planet, outside Bob, Bill, Jeb and whoever is in the Assembly Building. [sp]JFK from the future assassinated JFK[/sp][/QUOTE] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=APH1LIJaq7A[/media]

We now tune in to Roce University where President John F Kerman is giving a speech: [quote]Many years ago the great Kerbish explorer George Kerman, who was to die on Mount Jebediah, was asked why did he want to climb it. He said, "Because it is there." Well, space is there, and we're going to climb it, and the Mun and the planets are there, and new hopes for knowledge and peace are there. And, therefore, as we set sail we ask Gud's blessing on the most hazardous and dangerous and greatest adventure on which kerbals has ever embarked. ... We choose to go to the Mun in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too.[/quote]

OH SHIT ITS FUCKING SNOWING ON FACEPUNCH. [editline]5th December 2011[/editline] FUCK YOU DACHEET, BREAKING MY AUTOMERGE

[QUOTE=MC3craze;33587564][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=APH1LIJaq7A[/media][/QUOTE] Actually making JFK not assassinate JFK will create a paradox. [video=youtube;W6naJ08Tskk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6naJ08Tskk[/video]

Oooh. it moves to my mouse! And it doesn't brutalize my FPS like last time! [editline]5th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=MC3craze;33587629]OH SHIT ITS FUCKING SNOWING ON FACEPUNCH. [editline]5th December 2011[/editline] FUCK YOU DACHEET, BREAKING MY AUTOMERGE[/QUOTE] :h:

OH SHIT THE SNOW IS BIGGER [editline]5th December 2011[/editline] SOMEONE CALL FOX NEWS

IT'S COMING AT ME IT WANTS MY WARMTH!

Garry you need to buy some anti-dandruff lotion, this is horrible.

Also, some more relevant KSP music: [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FH2EgYq_NCY[/media]

[QUOTE=mac338;33587831]Garry you need to buy some anti-dandruff lotion, this is horrible.[/QUOTE] Got a clue? Get the blue (members.)

[QUOTE=MC3craze;33587875]Got a clue? Get the blue (members.)[/QUOTE] :smug:

[QUOTE=mac338;33587679]Actually making JFK assassinate JFK will not create a paradox.[/QUOTE] [quote=Wikipedia]A time traveler goes to the past, and does something that would prevent him from time travel in the first place.[/quote]

[QUOTE=MC3craze;33587986]quote[/QUOTE] What would cause that? Would you just disappear from existence if you tried to fuck with something?