Kerbal Space Program, or: "How many rockets can I slap onto this thing?" - Games

Computer crashed. Trying to launch KSP again. It just gets stuck at the loading screen :(

Currently having my pod float through space, I'm at 2150 K right now. Travelling at 1965 m/s

It is very difficult to acheive a perfect orbit. So far all of mine have been eliptical to various degrees. The perfectionist in me absolutely hates that. :argh:

Awesome, almost made it up to 2000km. Bad news, I was trying for an orbit, not height.

Adding the ability for things to burn up in kearths atmosphere would be cool.

Need additional navigational info.

Anyone having an issue in 8.3 where the fuel tanks cant have anything attached to the bottoms, same with the Tri-coupler? Tried reinstalling it several times, and doesn't appear to fix it. Saw nothing in the past few pages of the thread, and nothing on their forums, maybe its just me?

It annoys me how unstable radial decouplers are. Why are they so floppy?

[QUOTE=Jawalt;31101595]Sadly this works perfectly with Wine, except nothing but mouse1 is detected as far as mouse clicks.[/QUOTE] Why sadly?

[QUOTE=R2zoo;31102490]Anyone having an issue in 8.3 where the fuel tanks cant have anything attached to the bottoms, same with the Tri-coupler? Tried reinstalling it several times, and doesn't appear to fix it. Saw nothing in the past few pages of the thread, and nothing on their forums, maybe its just me?[/QUOTE] Having the same issue. But I can't attach any fuel based engines on either.

[QUOTE=kepper;31102569]Having the same issue.[/QUOTE] Least Im not alone. Solid thrusters seem fine as well as all the other parts. Dont have the addons installed, so no idea what could be conflicting.

[QUOTE=Sir Colton;31102562]Why sadly?[/QUOTE] Your DP is damaging my ability to concentrate on the actual discussions in the boobs [editline]14th July 2011[/editline] *in the thread

Official non-experimental 0.8.3 released.

[QUOTE=sltungle;31101957]Woah. 3km/s. Highest speed I've ever achieved. Yeah but [b]I[/b] haven't yet reached escape velocity (I don't think (I accidentally quit the program last night and I had drifted pretty far) and [b]I[/b] I want to achieve it (on vanilla too).[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/(.png[/IMG] How do you attach 3 thrusters or fins at once, like he did in the blog video?

[QUOTE=Zackin5;31102673]Official non-experimental 0.8.3 released.[/QUOTE] What's new?

I hit 550,000m on my giant rocket. Edit: 650,000m

[QUOTE=Sir Colton;31102707][IMG]http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/(.png[/IMG] How do you attach 3 thrusters or fins at once, like he did in the blog video?[/QUOTE] Again with the boobs! Also I decided a long time ago to only use a single, closing parenthesis because if you end up with like 7 nested sets of bracketed information it ends up finishing like this, ")))))))". And now KSP is crashing all of the time on take-off :( Wry?

[QUOTE=R2zoo;31102490]Anyone having an issue in 8.3 where the fuel tanks cant have anything attached to the bottoms, same with the Tri-coupler? Tried reinstalling it several times, and doesn't appear to fix it. Saw nothing in the past few pages of the thread, and nothing on their forums, maybe its just me?[/QUOTE] I have the same problem...

0.8.4 uploading now! stacking bug fixed. Damn, after all that testing... :rolleyes: Cheers

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/bchpr.png[/IMG]

I just downloaded this game. It's amazing. How do I map controls for the SAS module?

the new update broke fuel tanks

600km altitude, still travelling at 3.4km/s. Hopefully this run doesn't crash while I go to the dentist. I wanna return in an hour or two and see it at like 20K km up.

EDIT: oh stacking bug already found and fixed apparently

[QUOTE=Mattk50;31102929]the new update broke fuel tanks[/QUOTE]Yes we know that, same with the Tri-Coupler too.

I think we should have a little competition, i propose this: Lowest time to get to 100000m with a rocket that uses only vanilla parts, and has three phases tops.

0.8.4 released! Should be good now (here's hoping) Cheers

[QUOTE=latin_geek;31103008]I think we should have a little competition, i propose this: Lowest time to get to 100000m with a rocket that uses only vanilla parts, and has three phases tops.[/QUOTE]Including with or without the Command & Control phase? Because I made it to 30k m in under 7 minutes or so. :v:

I issue a challenge to you all: Using [I]only[/I] SRB's (as far as launchers go, at least; decouplers, couplers, etc are allowed), reach the at least 100 km with a velocity of at least 3175.81 m/s (escape velocity for 100 km as listed [url=https://gist.github.com/1073201]here[/url]). I dare you (not going to lie, I don't think it's possible) Hard mode: get a stable orbit with only SRB's

[QUOTE=kamikaze470;31103096]Including with or without the Command & Control phase? Because I made it to 30k m in under 7 minutes or so. :v:[/QUOTE] Command and control phase?