My my, another (has text too, just like Trunk's!)
[url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1152069?p=34256433&viewfull=1#post34256433[/url]
[editline]18th January 2012[/editline]
Well anyways, everyone get the amx13
[editline]18th January 2012[/editline]
like, now
As cute as it is that you think you know how this forum runs amplar, i'm sorry to tell you that lmao pics is a-okay for image macros as it always has been. But if you're really this eager to help do feel free to take advantage of our wonderful report feature so we can help prevent instances like this from happening again :)
I don't see anything in the rules stating the LMAO pics thread is exempt, sorry. But I'm cool with mods bending the set-in-stone rules about it though!
PM it to garry. Telling Postal that he makes shit rulings and has double standards out the ass [del]'s indeed a shit mod[/del] won't do anything but inflate his ego.
We didn't say he was a shit mod
[QUOTE=postal;34275235]As cute as it is that ylou think you know how this forum runs amplar, i'm sorry to tell you that lmao pics is a-okay for image macros as it always has been. But if you're really this eager to help do feel free to take advantage of our wonderful report feature so we can help prevent instances like this from happening again :)[/QUOTE]
Whatever happened to mod discretion? I thought you guys were here primarily to deal with any negative presence ie shitposters/trolls/flamers etc.
This is just you going 'lolrules' even though you can't ascribe any of the aforementioned traits which you are generally on the look out for.
Postal is right though
Why didn't anyone bitch at me when I banned saza for an image macro?
[QUOTE=Orkel;34275420]Postal is right though
Why didn't anyone bitch at me when I banned saza for an image macro?[/QUOTE]
Because it was some obvious image macro.
Anyways back to thread. That IS-4 driver's hatch has some black magic around it, sometimes it bounces T28's 120mm, sometimes it gets penetrated by D-25T gun.
Just spend the 2 minutes in photoshop to make your own image macro if you really feel the need to use one, its guaranteed to be 10x funnier if it doesn't look like total shit
IE:
[IMG]http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h4/timebmb757/ammorack.gif[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;34275486]Just spend the 2 minutes in photoshop to make your own image macro if you really feel the need to use one, its guaranteed to be 10x funnier if it doesn't look like total shit
IE:
[IMG]http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h4/timebmb757/ammorack.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Yep, self made aren't bannable.
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;34275486]Just spend the 2 minutes in photoshop to make your own image macro if you really feel the need to use one, its guaranteed to be 10x funnier if it doesn't look like total shit
IE:
[IMG]http://i60.photobucket.com/albums/h4/timebmb757/ammorack.gif[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Teach me to griff
[QUOTE=BradB;34275310]PM it to garry. Telling Postal that he makes shit rulings and has double standards out the ass [del]'s indeed a shit mod[/del] won't do anything but inflate his ego.[/QUOTE]
So far the only explanation you've given as to why my ban was wrong are these goofy exemptions you guys have made up yourself. If you really want to hear it from the rest of the mod team that image macros are something we've banned for for YEARS then ok
A reply with an image macro, with other text or without, is bannable, unless you made the image macro yourself.
Always been.
asdf
[QUOTE=Asaratha;34276050]Image Macros will get you banned [B]in any section[/B], regardless of what you say, or think. You guys can't make your own rules, the forum rules are the forum rules and if somebody can't follow them they will be punished.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=postal;34275235]As cute as it is that ylou think you know how this forum runs amplar, i'm sorry to tell you that [B]lmao pics is a-okay for image macros as it always has been[/B]. But if you're really this eager to help do feel free to take advantage of our wonderful report feature so we can help prevent instances like this from happening again :)[/QUOTE]
If you are going to gang to show how consistent and supportive of each other you are, at least get your shit consistent.
Like "WELL, there are exceptions but they actually aren't". That would set everything straight.
Wait it wouldn't. Ooops.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;34276115]If you are going to gang to show how consistent and supportive of each other you are, at least get your shit consistent.
Like "WELL, there are exceptions but they actually aren't". That would set everything straight.
Wait it wouldn't. Ooops.[/QUOTE]
It's called lmao pics. This should be common sense, do you really need us to spell it out for you or are you just arguing for the sake of arguing?
[QUOTE=Asaratha;34276121]LMAO pics is a thread made for image macros and the sorts.[/QUOTE]
[quote]adjective
1.
one, a, an, or some; one or more without specification or identification: If you have any witnesses, produce them. Pick out any six you like. [/quote]
Point is that you said that it's a rule set in stone while it obviously isn't, and in reasonable cases, is ignored (even though LMAO pics [B]doesn't[/B] have an exception from the rule, does it?)
This means reasonable exceptions happen.
This means that you might as well consider the meaning of the rule and it's reason, before you ban.
dude are you serious it's a thread made for image macros of course it would be stupid to ban there for it
this is a really shitty argument
[QUOTE=postal;34276157]It's called lmao pics. This should be common sense, do you really need us to spell it out for you or are you just arguing for the sake of arguing?[/QUOTE]
He killed a tank with critical hit with an underpowered gun. He posted a picture which implies that tank has been killed by a critical hit with an underpowered gun.This should be common sense.
And I am arguing because I believe this should be allowed exception, granted by common sense.
Just drop it, I already shot down their logic, nothing more needs to be said
they're right in banning him, but that doesn't stop them from looking like dipshits
add to the official rules that lmao pics is accepted, or start following your own rules and ban ALL for image macros
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;34276191]He killed a tank with critical hit with an underpowered gun. He posted a picture which implies that tank has been killed by a critical hit with an underpowered gun.This should be common sense.
And I am arguing because I believe this should be allowed exception, granted by common sense.[/QUOTE]
Except that it was an image macro and they're bannable [I]unless self made[/I] as evident by the [I]rules[/I] (except for lmao pics)
[QUOTE=Asaratha;34276186]but it does have an exception[/QUOTE]
[url]http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1152069?p=34012430&viewfull=1#post34012430[/url]
[quote]Normal FP rules apply.
No gore, distasteful, racist, STUFF YOU WOULDN'T POST IN FRONT OF THE MOD TEAM, etc
No OFFTOPIC...[/quote]
No exception mentioned.
[quote]Image Macros
Image macros are stupid and will get you banned - with the following exception
• You won't get banned if you personally have made an image macro especially for that reply
What this is saying basically is don't post image macros from image macro sites. They're not funny.[/quote]
Only exception mentioned is the "original macro thing"
No written exception for lmao => unwritten exceptions can apply in reasonable cases => rule doesn't have to be enforced to the last word without considering the context.
[editline]18th January 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Orkel;34276235]Except that it was an image macro and they're bannable [I]unless self made[/I] as evident by the [I]rules[/I] [B](except for lmao pics)[/B][/QUOTE]
Which is what I am talking about.
No written exception for lmao => unwritten exceptions ...
[QUOTE=Amplar;34276213]
they're right in banning him, but that doesn't stop them from looking like dipshits[/QUOTE]
Yeah i'm the one being unreasonable. Not you guys for flipping out at me for doing what I'm supposed to do ahaha
No-one gives a fuck => He got banned => Deal with it
...the title of the thread exempts it
pictures with captions can be considered funny pics, which belong in that thread
[QUOTE=postal;34276261]Yeah i'm the one being unreasonable. Not you guys for flipping out at me for doing what I'm supposed to do ahaha[/QUOTE]
well, to be honest i only stated the fault with the rules (the ban was a bit silly); the others are seeming to drag it out a bit (but they're right)
whatever, it's just a day ban
[QUOTE=Amplar;34276283]well, to be honest i only stated the fault with the rules; the others are seeming to drag it out a bit (but they're right)[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Amplar;34273745]what a terrible ban, seriously[/QUOTE]
You said ban, not rule.
This thread really is gonna need some more attention holy hell lol.
[QUOTE=Amplar;34276213]Just drop it, I already shot down their logic, nothing more needs to be said
they're right in banning him, but that doesn't stop them from looking like dipshits
add to the official rules that lmao pics is accepted, or start following your own rules and ban ALL for image macros[/QUOTE]
Did you miss this part
[quote][B]Most rules are common sense[/B] and it would therefore be impossible to list all the things you could to to get yourself banned.[/quote]
Allowing macros in a thread about posting funny images falls under common sense in my eyes
[QUOTE=Amplar;34276213]add to the official rules that lmao pics is accepted, or start following your own rules and ban ALL for image macros[/QUOTE]
hi
you don't actually have any authority in this matter okay
[QUOTE=Asaratha;34276262]doesn't have to be written if it has gone over 100 versions of the thread with no lockings
i think anybody should be able to piece that together[/QUOTE]
As it shouldn't have to be written anywhere that it's acceptable in such cases as the original discussed post.
I am done, anyway. Amplar is right from the beginning, and this is pointless.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
