it's kinda like an officer has a choice to not be a dick and let a driver off with a warning for a simple infraction, but what they did [i]was[/i] illegal so they are allowed to punish them.
[QUOTE=Orkel;34276314]Did you miss this part
Allowing macros in a thread about posting funny images falls under common sense in my eyes[/QUOTE]
HNNNNNG SO DOES THE TANK THING FFFFF... ccchrist
I will just... go play tnaks... or something
[QUOTE=Amplar;34276323]it's kinda like an officer has a choice to not be a dick and let a driver off with a warning for a simple infraction, but what they did [i]was[/i] illegal so they are allowed to punish them.[/QUOTE]
Bans are the warnings.
[QUOTE=Amplar;34276323]it's kinda like an officer has a choice to not be a dick and let a driver off with a warning for a simple infraction, but what they did [i]was[/i] illegal so they are allowed to punish them.[/QUOTE]
yes but the problem with this analogy is that a ban is a warning
[QUOTE=Orkel;34276353]Bans are the warnings.[/QUOTE]
our mod senses were tingling
I suppose
my idea of the "warning" was just "not do anything" or Orkel saying something
but whatever, DROP it tlak about horrific grinds or something
Holy shit what has this thread become.
nah
[QUOTE=ayaki;34276382]Is the point I'm making here not to be addressed?[/QUOTE]
What is it I'm supposed to address? Your point doesn't have any meaning on the fact it's still an over-used image macro that breaks the rules and I am supposed to ban for it.
[QUOTE=ayaki;34276382]Is the point I'm making here not to be addressed?[/QUOTE]
No, because mods are always right, etc etc.
Quality of Facepunch mods is generally legendary, so there's nothing new coming out of this thread. Just drop it and get grinding.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;34276404]No, because mods are always right, etc etc.
Quality of Facepunch mods is generally legendary, so there's nothing new coming out of this thread. Just drop it and get grinding.[/QUOTE]
It blows my mind how you guys really are blaming us for the rules set up on this forum, you two really just don't get how this place works lol.
[QUOTE=Azaz3l;34276367]Holy shit what has this thread become.[/QUOTE]
Funny
I wish i had some kind of image to represent my feelings towards this...
[IMG]http://i890.photobucket.com/albums/ac109/XanderKarbine/Gmod%202/0ce7a3e716ebba94814a495e4d602805.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=postal;34276403]What is it I'm supposed to address? Your point doesn't have any meaning on the fact it's still an over-used image macro that breaks the rules and I am supposed to ban for it.[/QUOTE]
It just reads as more of an 'image macro autoban' as opposed to an actual evaluation of what the post was.
[QUOTE=Amplar;34276433]Funny
I wish i had some kind of image to represent my feelings towards this...
[img]http://gyazo.com/0ce7a3e716ebba94814a495e4d602805.png[/img][/QUOTE]
inb4 Image macro.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("inb4" - Orkel))[/highlight]
dumb mods hehe can't get theyre rules right
why are we debating about rules on an internet forum
Getting wins in the KT has been utterly impossible for me lately.
[img]http://f.static.memegenerator.net/cache/instances/400x/12/13042/13355714.jpg[/img]
aka ~shut the fuck up~
[QUOTE=postal;34276343]-SNIP-[/QUOTE]
People disagree with you and your response is an indignant 'get a load of these guys' post?
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Gold forum rule #3" - postal))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=ayaki;34276555]People disagree with you and your response is an indignant 'get a load of these guys' post?[/QUOTE]
I don't think you understand what the gold forum is.
Let's just hold the thought at the mods were both right [I]and[/I] wrong.
Right in that they follow their rules, wrong because the victim's crime is diddly squat, it's trite.
On-topic, I believe the first thing that will recieve the almighty wargaming nerfhammer will be the AMX tanks. Not because they are powerful, but because they are useful. And we can't have that can we?
ban for leaking gmf content!!!
[QUOTE=ayaki;34276555]People disagree with you and your response is an indignant 'get a load of these guys' post?[/QUOTE]
Uh leaking this post can be bannable
[QUOTE=ayaki;34276555]People disagree with you and your response is an indignant 'get a load of these guys' post?[/QUOTE]
why wouldn't it be.
get a load of you guys.
this forum has had 'mod discretion' as part of the rules since fucking forever
~live and learn~
So instead of arguing about mods and whatnot how about we all go back to arguing about how shitty wargaming is.
so how bout that world of tanks, i hear there are a lot of tanks
lmao
[QUOTE=BradB;34275310]PM it to garry. Telling Postal that he makes shit rulings and has double standards out the ass [del]'s indeed a shit mod[/del] won't do anything but inflate his ego.[/QUOTE]
please, go right ahead.
the only thing you'll hear from garry is what you're hearing from the rest of us; image macros are bannable. read into this ban as much (or as little) as you like, but regardless of what you think image macros are bannable, and this ban was legit.
[QUOTE=Azaz3l;34276454]inb4 Image macro.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("inb4" - Orkel))[/highlight][/QUOTE]
omg demod orkel
Just got a Top Gun and reaper in my 13 75... then I ran out of rounds, hahaha.
[editline]18th January 2012[/editline]
[QUOTE=Azaz3l;34276454]inb4 Image macro.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("inb4" - Orkel))[/highlight][/QUOTE]
Also, completely unexpected. SUDDENLY, the slightest deviations from the most obscure rules get used to ban the arguing people. Nope not suspicious at all.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
