[QUOTE=Vmonkey;33082965]Hate this phone sometimes, attachments on the SPAS-12 in MW2[/QUOTE]
Uh, the silencer silences it, the grip increases hipfire accuracy, and the FMJ attachment lets it penetrate cover, and extended mags gives it more capacity.
I mean, besides that it doesn't make a difference, no.
I don't find extended mags useful especially with a pump shotgun. And the grip isn't being used to it's full potential with re-zero speed since again it's a pump. Attachments are not as helpful on this weapon as they are on other weapons.
[QUOTE=Vmonkey;33082854]God I hate ignorance...my IRL friends are trying to convince me that attachments on the MW2 have a noticible difference...[/QUOTE]Yeah the undermounted shotgun was the same thing as the grenade launcher. In other words what are you talking about?
[QUOTE=Vmonkey;33083042]I don't find extended mags useful especially with a pump shotgun. And the grip isn't being used to it's full potential with re-zero speed since again it's a pump. Attachments are not as helpful on this weapon as they are on other weapons.[/QUOTE]
It still does something though. It may not be all that useful but it's at least a little more helpful than if you had absolutely nothing on it.
[QUOTE=Vmonkey;33082854]God I hate ignorance...my IRL friends are trying to convince me that attachments on the MW2 have a noticible difference...[/QUOTE]having 2 scopes now instead of 1 is a noticable difference
For some reason MW3 is the first cod game I have wanted in a long time. I've bought the other versions but they were normally because friends asked me. Seeing the developers make steps to improve the pc version and the new game modes seem like fun. I plan on buying MW3 day one and if I enjoy it upgrade to elite before the first DLC.
Mainly want it because it's an FPS I do not have to think to much to enjoy myself. Worth it just for that imo.
[QUOTE=Vmonkey;33082854]God I hate ignorance...my IRL friends are trying to convince me that attachments on the SPAS-12 in MW2 have a noticible difference...[/QUOTE]
Actually the only attachments that actually do anything useful are the extended mags and the silencer.
The grip doesn't do anything more then take a bit recoil out of it.
The sights are useless as you know.
The silencer at least hides your presence but hinders your range.
FMJ is hardly useful at all.
The extended mags at least take the need to reload off of you for some time.
(taken from the wiki)
No M1014 in mw3... Loved it with extended mags :(
Can i get my steam account disabled for buying from [url=http://www.cjs-cdkeys.com/products/Call-of-Duty%3A-Modern-Warfare-3-Steam-Key-Scan.html]here[/url] (i would buy EU key)
Wow that's cheap...
Don't think so...
Also, I really hope the MP9 handles exactly like the TMP. I loved it, except it had a very small magazine which wouldn't be soo bad if it didn't have such thick sights to look through to aim...
Apparently has the rear sight open in the top.
This probably gon be good.
[QUOTE=dass;33093621]Also, I really hope the MP9 handles exactly like the TMP. I loved it, except it had a very small magazine which wouldn't be soo bad if it didn't have such thick sights to look through to aim...
Apparently has the rear sight open in the top.
This probably gon be good.[/QUOTE]
It's the same gun. The gun in MW2 was the MP9, they just called it the TMP. Basically they just changed the name.
Ok, CoD n00b here.
If I wanted to start the series right, which one should I go for?
I heard CoD4 is the best of the series, but I do like WW2 shooters.
[QUOTE=SlappyBag;33094396]Ok, CoD n00b here.
If I wanted to start the series right, which one should I go for?
I heard CoD4 is the best of the series, but I do like WW2 shooters.[/QUOTE]
The only thing good about WaW is the bolt action guns.
WaW was alright, but if you want a WW2 CoD game, get CoD2. CoD4 is a good one to start out with, because it really was the most innovative and fresh of the series.
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33094247]It's the same gun. The gun in MW2 was the MP9, they just called it the TMP. Basically they just changed the name.[/QUOTE]
And the sights and ammo count :buddy:
[editline]2nd November 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=SlappyBag;33094396]Ok, CoD n00b here.
If I wanted to start the series right, which one should I go for?
I heard CoD4 is the best of the series, but I do like WW2 shooters.[/QUOTE]
If you like WW2 type of games, go for CoD 1, 2 and WaW.
If you like more modern settings, MW1, MW2, MW3 and BO.
I went straight to CoD4 because I'm tired of even hearing about nazis in video games...
[QUOTE=dass;33094844]And the sights and ammo count :buddy:[/QUOTE]
Uh, where is it shown to have different ammo and sights? I've only seen one screenshot of it and it looks to pretty much be the same gun.
[QUOTE=dass;33094844]If you like WW2 type of games, go for CoD 1, 2 and WaW.
If you like more modern settings, MW1, MW2, MW3 and BO.
I went straight to CoD4 because I'm tired of even hearing about nazis in video games...[/QUOTE]
so pretty much every call of duty
if you want GOOD WWII gameplay you go cod2 or cod:united offensive (if you can find servers that aren't that crouch-only rifles-only garbage). world at war can suck an egg
MW1 is p much the only decent modern call of duty with a fairly large player base yet for what it's worth
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33095222]Uh, where is it shown to have different ammo and sights? I've only seen one screenshot of it and it looks to pretty much be the same gun.[/QUOTE][url]http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/MP9[/url]
32 rounds instead of 15 (HOPEFULLY on MP) and the top of the rear sight is open instead of a closed circle.
Is it just me or 3rd person tactical is back?
Oh no, just spectating... Oh...
[QUOTE=dass;33095331][url]http://callofduty.wikia.com/wiki/MP9[/url]
32 rounds instead of 15 (HOPEFULLY on MP) and the top of the rear sight is open instead of a closed circle.
Is it just me or 3rd person tactical is back?
Oh no, just spectating... Oh...[/QUOTE]
That could be extended mags or something. It strikes me as odd that they'd give a secondary weapon a 32 round magazine default. That seems kind of overpowered.
I know a lot of people who have been bitching that the MW3 engine is showing age and "looks like crap compared to modern games"
Who gives a fuck about [I]Graphics[/I] when you can have [B]Framerate. 60 per second to be exact.[/B]
ALERT EVERYONE: Avoid 4chan or the internet in general if you don't want the game spoiled, I've just had the ending spoiled for my by some cunt on /v/...
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33096020]That could be extended mags or something. It strikes me as odd that they'd give a secondary weapon a 32 round magazine default. That seems kind of overpowered.[/QUOTE]
I heard similar rumors same thing, they probably added a little recoil to it or something.
Also what is your source on the fact that the MW2 AK-47s recoil is merely aesthetic?
[editline]2nd November 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Scotty.;33096223]ALERT EVERYONE: Avoid 4chan or the internet in general if you don't want the game spoiled, I've just had the ending spoiled for my by some cunt on /v/...[/QUOTE]
I've already had one mission spoiled
you save the[sp]russian president[/sp]or something like that because of that achievement video on respawn...
Framerate is not a problem when running on a modded Quake engine.
Not trolling, just saying the engine is kinda showing its age. However it is a good engine, unlike people who bash it for being old. Its like DICE's old Refractor engine. Not exactly cutting edge, but it works great.
Just wondering but what are the types of attachments as far as aiming devices. I have seen ACOGs, EOTECHs,both the of red dot sights from MW1 and 2, and that zoom scope for the EOTECH. Any sights Im missing.
[QUOTE=Vmonkey;33096295]I heard similar rumors same thing, they probably added a little recoil to it or something.
Also what is your source on the fact that the MW2 AK-47s recoil is merely aesthetic?
[editline]2nd November 2011[/editline]
I've already had one mission spoiled
you save the[sp]russian president[/sp]or something like that because of that achievement video on respawn...[/QUOTE]
That (And the above poster's experience) was spoiled awhile ago.
As in, before MW3 was even announced.
[QUOTE=Scotty.;33096223]ALERT EVERYONE: Avoid 4chan or the internet in general if you don't want the game spoiled, I've just had the ending spoiled for my by some cunt on /v/...[/QUOTE]
Wasn't the entire plot of MW3 Leaked several months ago?
[QUOTE=Scotty.;33096223]ALERT EVERYONE: Avoid 4chan or the internet in general if you don't want the game spoiled, I've just had the ending spoiled for my by some cunt on /v/...[/QUOTE]
Can you PM me about it? I just want to know In case I cant play it.
Well, I mean a week before, but that was the reason MW3 was announced. To cover up the leak and spoilers.
[QUOTE=certified;33096214]
Who gives a fuck about [I]Graphics[/I] when you can have [B]Framerate. 60 per second to be exact.[/B][/QUOTE]
...On consoles
[QUOTE=certified;33096373]That (And the above poster's experience) was spoiled awhile ago.
As in, before MW3 was even announced.[/QUOTE]
Yeah I managed to avoid the story spoiers a few months back, but this is bad.
WARNING: MAJOR SPOILER. DO NOT READ. CANNOT STRESS THIS ENOUGH. seriously.
[SP]Soap dies, last words are "Makarov knows Yuri".[/SP]
Is that the same as what you guys heard?
[QUOTE=RaxaHax;33096395]...On consoles[/QUOTE]
If you are not getting 60FPS on an IW PC COD then I firmly say it's time to upgrade. Seriously.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
