• Call of Duty v9 - Still not as shit as BF3!
    7,753 replies, posted
[QUOTE=certified;33096422]If you are not getting 60FPS on an IW PC COD then I firmly say it's time to upgrade. Seriously.[/QUOTE] If I can get a constant 60 on PC for BF3, MW3 shouldnt be an issue.
[QUOTE=N-12_Aden;33096393]Can you PM me about it? I just want to know In case I cant play it.[/QUOTE] Why wouldn't you be able to play it? :L
[QUOTE=Scotty.;33096452]Why wouldn't you be able to play it? :L[/QUOTE] Time. Something I do not have a lot of. I stay on campus at this college till the weekend and still have work to do in the weekends. I cant keep my console here because I dont have component cables and its distracting as hell. The PC I left at home so my brother would have something to play on (he doesnt play much on consoles).
[QUOTE=RaxaHax;33096395]...On consoles[/QUOTE] are you serious? On my shitty nine year old computer I could probably pull 60 FPS on a Call of Duty game. The graphics aren't that demanding, and according to the devs, this one is really well optimized.
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33096020]That could be extended mags or something. It strikes me as odd that they'd give a secondary weapon a 32 round magazine default. That seems kind of overpowered.[/QUOTE] Extended mags with red dot sight? I found it weird aswell, especialy now that its alot more useful with those reworked sights. [editline]3rd November 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Grim Joker;33096559]...and according to the devs, this one is really well optimized.[/QUOTE] Lovely. I have said it and I'll say it again, what killed BO for me was the bad optimization. Everything else was ok or even great. Also, why does it looks like the L118A might be the new intervention? I saw a video of it in action and everything about it reminded me of the intervention, like the fast bolt pulling it had.
IGN's youtube page has a 3 part video of Single Player footage from some Live stream, they did. [editline]3rd November 2011[/editline] Oh never mind its just footage of "Mind the Gap"
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wi3tpuvkj9Y[/media] ahahahaha
"Bf3 is stoopid!"
[QUOTE=Pat.Lithium;33098972][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wi3tpuvkj9Y[/media] ahahahaha[/QUOTE] I love when little kids make hate videos about bf3/mw3/ any game, it's so funny to see the flaming.
I usually see alot of people complaining that cod has too many kids spamming the mic, but I never really hear that many. Then I hear this.
When people say MW3 looks like MW2, why do they associate that as a bad thing? People wanted MW3 to look like MW2 and play like COD 4, and guess what? It looks like MW2 and will most likely play like COD4, and hopefully have long-lasting enjoyment like COD4.
[QUOTE=PyroCraz3d;33105721]When people say MW3 looks like MW2, why do they associate that as a bad thing? People wanted MW3 to look like MW2 and play like COD 4, and guess what? It looks like MW2 and will most likely play like COD4, and hopefully have long-lasting enjoyment like COD4.[/QUOTE] Huh now that you mention it... I never really asked anyone if that was a bad or a good thing... Most likely would say a bad thing, because of the usual bandwagon.
[QUOTE=dass;33106405]Huh now that you mention it... I never really asked anyone if that was a bad or a good thing... Most likely would say a bad thing, because of the usual bandwagon.[/QUOTE] Or the fact that MW2 was actually shit, but had so many bad things they made the game fun for example the riot shield, OMA, danger close or throwing knives... Or people have opinions.
[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33106431]Or the fact that MW2 was actually shit, but had so many bad things they made the game fun for example the riot shield, OMA, danger close or throwing knives... Or people have opinions.[/QUOTE] Theres opinions and opinions. Some opinions are plausible, others are just rambling about everything the game has, no matter if its good or bad. Hell, theres people who just rated it 1 out of 10 just because of not having dedicated servers or for having something wrong here or there and probably even without playing it. Its like "no fun allowed, fuck you, it sucks and you suck for liking something that sucks, and my opinion is right and yours is wrong, fuck you for liking and buying mw2". MW2 wasn't that bad at start. The no dedicated servers thing did fuck it up in the end, but otherwise, it isn't that bad. To be honest, I've sort of had a worse experience with BO then with mw2. And yea, the perks and the "bad" things like those you mentioned there made the game very fun. Something that BO lacked a bit because of too much balance.
([B]Rumor Inbound[/B]) Apparently there's going to be a new Nuke [I]esque[/I] killstreak. It's called the M.O.A.B or Massive Ordnance Air Blast, and kills everyone on the field, only once, and shuts down enemy electronics.
[QUOTE=Zillamaster55;33107398]([B]Rumor Inbound[/B]) Apparently there's going to be a new Nuke [I]esque[/I] killstreak. It's called the M.O.A.B or Massive Ordnance Air Blast, and kills everyone on the field, only once, and shuts down enemy electronics.[/QUOTE]Late :v: Don't really care. Maybe wont even see it if killstreaks don't count towards it. Nukes in mw2 were already rare, this wont even be seen probably. At least on PC...
In the stream they said the highest killstreak was 15 or 18 kills. They specifically mentioned the Osprey Gunner or the Assault Juggernaut. People also asked them if they had any killstreaks kept secret and they said no.
[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33106431]Or the fact that MW2 was actually shit, but had so many bad things they made the game fun for example the riot shield, OMA, danger close or throwing knives... Or people have opinions.[/QUOTE] Game ruining additions= fun, without game ruining additions the game is shit right
[QUOTE=PyroCraz3d;33108275]Game ruining additions= fun, without game ruining additions the game is shit right[/QUOTE] Yes, because it would've been the same shit as CoD4 otherwise, i'm glad they made the shitty perks and weapons. Don't blindly defend the game, it was shit even with the perks, but they were the only thing that you could have fun with in the game.
[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33108289]Yes, because it would've been the same shit as CoD4 otherwise, i'm glad they made the shitty perks and weapons. Don't blindly defend the game, it was shit even with the perks, but they were the only thing that you could have fun with in the game.[/QUOTE] DUnno about you, but people running around w/ OMA/scavenger+danger close was pretty damn annoying.
[QUOTE=PyroCraz3d;33108331]Dunno about you, but MW2 would've been a shitton better w/o people noobtubing with OMA/scavenger+ danger close. [b]Game ruining additions= fun, without game ruining additions the game is shit[/b] right[/QUOTE] Opinions that differ with others on FP= not allowed, opinions people agree with=not going to happen.
MW2 was a fine game it just suffered from balancing issues, and it showed depending on who you were playing with. If you were playing with fine players and/or just casual guys, it was fine and the cracks wouldn't show as much. But if someone was trying to troll and/or there were tryhards about, the lack of balancing would be painfully obvious. Whether or not MW2 was a fun game was really all on the luck of the draw. [editline]3rd November 2011[/editline] Also everyone calm the fuck down seriously it's not worth arguing about.
[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33108348]Opinions that differ with others on FP= not allowed, opinions people agree with=not going to happen.[/QUOTE] your opinion= cod is shit, and yet you still come in this thread a lot so yeah your opinion really does not matter here, considering, it's a COD thread and you shit in it often.
This game is going to be shit. literally the guns sound like someones taking a shit [highlight](User was banned for this post ("Trolling." - Seiteki))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=PyroCraz3d;33108396]your opinion= cod is shit, and yet you still come in this thread a lot so yeah your opinion really does not matter here, considering, it's a COD thread and you shit in it often.[/QUOTE] Shit in it, I just said the game was fun and I said MW2 was shit despite the fun perks and things you can do, I enjoy WaW, CoD 3,4 and Blops they're pretty fun, so please don't be a retard all your life and remember there's more than one game called "CoD".
[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33108444]Shit in it, I just said the game was fun and I said MW2 was shit despite the fun perks and things you can do, I enjoy WaW, CoD 3,4 and Blops they're pretty fun, so please don't be a retard all your life and remember there's more than one game called "CoD".[/QUOTE] You don't see it, not gonna bother explaining.
[QUOTE=PyroCraz3d;33108482]You don't see it, not gonna bother explaining.[/QUOTE] Yes I see it, you think just because [I]I think[/I] MW2 is shit without the game ruining perks means for everyone it's the same, no I enjoy the CoD's I posted more than MW2, but MW2 is a time waster if you have nothing to do, drunk or in an annoying trollish mood. so please again stop blindly defending your shitty little game.
[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33108522]so please again stop blindly defending your shitty little game.[/QUOTE] Stop.
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33108546]Stop.[/QUOTE] If you say please I will, be nice.
[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33108522]Yes I see it, you think just because [I]I think[/I] MW2 is shit without the game ruining perks means for everyone it's the same, no I enjoy the CoD's I posted more than MW2, but MW2 is a time waster if you have nothing to do, drunk or in an annoying trollish mood. so please again stop blindly defending your shitty little game.[/QUOTE] the thing I find funny about this argument is that you think you've never shitted on cod in this thread. that alone makes me laugh out loud, quite literally. Anyway, to break this.. "argument".... Is anybody else excited for the new killstreaks? It seriously looks like they upped their game here. I mean, now you get killstreaks for being a team player, and if you use the support tier of streaks, you can die and keep your streak. Even though assault looks promising, support will definetly be worth using for awhile. I like to help my teammates, whether it be defending them or going after the objective. This will be good.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.