Call of Duty v9 - Still not as shit as BF3! - Games

[QUOTE=Goz3rr;33186714][thumb]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/594701250513042840/5CEF30858179129386181853BA1A882D88DDFDF7/[/thumb] ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME. WHAT IS THAT.[/QUOTE] RUN! Don't look back, don't stop. Just run.

[QUOTE=EliteGuy;33186964]What happened to the dedicated servers?[/QUOTE] [I]"Fuck you and your gamer demands, that's what happened"[/I] -Activision

Just traded an unusual for MW3, I don't really care about shitty hats in a game. I just hope it's worth it and not badly optimized like black ops.

[QUOTE=Ganerumo;33187229][I]"Fuck you and your gamer demands, that's what happened"[/I] -Activision[/QUOTE] [url]http://sledgehammergames.com/blog/view/98[/url]

[QUOTE=Raidyr;33187272][url]http://sledgehammergames.com/blog/view/98[/url][/QUOTE] Yes, but they are still unranked right? If so then they are basically useless, other than for practice.

What is wrong with the textures? Settings all maxed up. [IMG]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/614967448826942254/2ACFFD6DEEBF4E3233EAD3488648E66293114AEA/[/IMG] Original [URL="http://steamcommunity.com/id/lenzi/screenshot/614967448826942254/?"]here[/URL].

There's nothing wrong with them, they're just low-res as shit.

They are still in the game and the unranked nature lets the admin mess with every setting imaginable.

Got this when the game crashed and I started it back up. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/KKv5u.png[/IMG] A++ game. Not rehashed at all.

[QUOTE=silentjubjub;33187388]Got this when the game crashed and I started it back up. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/KKv5u.png[/IMG] A++ game. Not rehashed at all.[/QUOTE] That is brilliant.

[QUOTE=Lenzikus;33187374]What is wrong with the textures? Settings all maxed up. [IMG]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/614967448826942254/2ACFFD6DEEBF4E3233EAD3488648E66293114AEA/[/IMG] Original [URL="http://steamcommunity.com/id/lenzi/screenshot/614967448826942254/?"]here[/URL].[/QUOTE] Your team is losing.

[QUOTE=Chrille;33187386]There's nothing wrong with them, they're just low-res as shit.[/QUOTE] This truck got copy-pasted from MW2 (Scrapyard) and the textures were better there. What the hell...

[QUOTE=silentjubjub;33187388]Got this when the game crashed and I started it back up. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/KKv5u.png[/IMG] A++ game. Not rehashed at all.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=Lenzikus;33187411]This truck got copy-pasted from MW2 (Scrapyard) and the textures were better there. What the hell...[/QUOTE] Game is looking better and better.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;33187387]They are still in the game and the unranked nature lets the admin mess with every setting imaginable.[/QUOTE] Well a simple solution would be to set parameters on what admins can set on a ranked server...

[QUOTE=Chrille;33187470]Game is looking better and better.[/QUOTE] [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/CE79v.png[/IMG]

The error message thing is funny but not too offensive.

[QUOTE=silentjubjub;33187388]Got this when the game crashed and I started it back up. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/KKv5u.png[/IMG] A++ game. Not rehashed at all.[/QUOTE] Haha, oh wow.

Oh you silly guys complaining about stuff we have already known for months.(reused assets)

whats with the shitty matchmaking,i cant get put in a game for some reason

[QUOTE=bionic0n3;33187692]Oh you silly guys complaining about stuff we have already known for months.(reused assets)[/QUOTE] So many games re-use assets that I don't understand why it's a sticking point when CoD does it. Its pretty common, especially as games become more expensive.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;33187717]So many games re-use assets that I don't understand why it's a sticking point when CoD does it. Its pretty common, especially as games become more expensive.[/QUOTE] It's problematic when the reused assets become lower resolution.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;33187717]So many games re-use assets that I don't understand why it's a sticking point when CoD does it. Its pretty common, especially as games become more expensive.[/QUOTE] A lot of games re-use assets, sure, but not THAT much.

If you guys expected a game that gets a new installment every year to be revolutionized every reincarnation you all need to a reality check.

[QUOTE=simkas;33187772]A lot of games re-use assets, sure, but not THAT much.[/QUOTE] Every time you talk about CoD it's hyperbole. I am not going to get into an argument and setup a measurement technique for what games re-use shit more or less than other games. All games do it and to point CoD out especially is disingenuous.

[QUOTE=windwakr;33187883]Wow, I love everything about this game....except one. Knives. They've been nerfed way too much. I mean yeah, they needed to be toned down, but not this much. I rarely get a kill when I try to knife someone now, and I spent 30 seconds dancing with a guy while we tried knifing each other.[/QUOTE] Wait, they toned down the knifes? Holy shit, that sounds amazing, in what way are they toned down?

[QUOTE=bionic0n3;33187816]If you guys expected a game that gets a new installment every year to be revolutionized every reincarnation you all need to a reality check.[/QUOTE] Every two years, innit? I mean for the same devs. They swap between devs so they have two years to make each installment. It took the same amount of time between MW2 and MW3 as it did Call of Duty 2 and Call of Duty 4. [IMG]http://www.fpsteam.it/img2006/call_of_duty_2/call_of_duty_2_09.jpg[/IMG][IMG]http://image.jeuxvideo.com/images/pc/c/o/cod4pc003.jpg[/IMG]

60$ = WALLET rape Does anybody knows where can i get a DIGITAL copy Cheaper?

I'm giving it a month. Gonna put all of my tesco vouchers together and get liek £25 off the game near christmas

[QUOTE=bionic0n3;33187816]If you guys expected a game that gets a new installment every year to be revolutionized every reincarnation you all need to a reality check.[/QUOTE] I'm not entirely convinced that we are wrong in expecting that "The best-selling first person action series of all-time" should at least avoid re-using a disproportionate amount of art assets, or re-using the exact same program. They are expecting us to pay 60 dollars in large droves for their game, and we have already payed 60 dollars in large droves for their last game in the series, AND their one of the biggest and richest game companies in existence. I don't think that asking that they re-invest the fuck-tons of money we paid to them for the last game into the sequel and try to make it better, or at least to try to maintain the quality of design that was in the last game, is too much too ask. TL;DR revolution wasn't expected, minor improvements were, but they didn't deliver.

[QUOTE=Xain777;33188098]I'm not entirely convinced that we are wrong in expecting that "The best-selling first person action series of all-time" should at least avoid re-using a disproportionate amount of art assets, or re-using the exact same program. They are expecting us to pay 60 dollars in large droves for their game, and we have already payed 60 dollars in large droves for their last game in the series, AND their one of the biggest and richest game companies in existence. I don't think that asking that they re-invest the fuck-tons of money we paid to them for the last game into the sequel and try to make it better, or at least to try to maintain the quality of design that was in the last game, is too much too ask. TL;DR revolution wasn't expected, minor improvements were, but they didn't deliver.[/QUOTE] From what I hear the gameplay has received some minor and not so minor improvements. The reaction to the point streak system has been overwhelmingly positive atleast. [editline]8th November 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=windwakr;33188110][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsXjvCY60yc[/media] Sorry about the quality, the ingame renderer sucks ass.[/QUOTE] That's actually pretty awesome, it looks like you don't automatically charge 5 feet into someone before stabbing them instantly.