So... which seems to be more [B]fun[/B]? BF3 or MW3?
lol shit post
Anyone need a spec ops partner?
What the fuck is up with the title?
[QUOTE=Kirby106;33188942]A code for what?[/QUOTE]
those mountain dew/doritos codes, for XP boost.
[QUOTE=jrj996;33189017]What the fuck is up with the title?[/QUOTE]
Garry is.
[QUOTE=PyroCraz3d;33188480]What we need.. is for you to LEAVE. You made it extremely evident you don't like COD, multiple times, and you are still here. Leave, seriously. This is the COD thread, not the make-fun-of-cod-because-we-can- thread.[/QUOTE]
Oh no don't get me wrong, I used to love CoD. CoD1 was my best friend when I was in a clan. I'm just saying the FPS genre is in need of an overhaul. Just like the transformers movies, but hey I loved all 3 anyway.
[editline]8th November 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Logic Studio;33188975]So... which seems to be more [B]fun[/B]? BF3 or MW3?[/QUOTE]
Both.
Running around and shooting people in 3d environments has been fun to me since '02. Still is.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;33188513]Yeah I don't really understand this criticism either, I got spawnkilled plenty of times in both games.
My friend who has the game says it's the same sounds but beefier. I don't know about worse than CoD4, I'd say similar or slightly better from videos I've seen.
They are both derivative and dumb action movie schlock and sometimes that's fine.
Out of context quote specifically referring to the singleplayer, which is fair criticism of BF3.
It got a 9.2, still less but not end of the world. They are both good games, great entries for their series and both deserve high scores and praise.
Why do you keep telling these reviewers that give both games good reviews to go to hell?[/QUOTE]
When it's biased theres defintely a good reason to say go to hell.
I swear, this game is MW1.9, not even 2.5, the game looks worse, hasn't changed and still gets a better review? c'mon.
[QUOTE=jrj996;33189109]When it's biased theres defintely a good reason to say go to hell.
I swear, this game is MW1.9, not even 2.5, the game looks worse, hasn't changed and still gets a better review? c'mon.[/QUOTE]
The game looks worse but hasn't changed, stunning logic.
Also it was a .1 point different stop crying.
Finished the singleplayer, easiest CoD game yet on hardened. Lasted exactly four hours. A bit disappointing, really.
Also the soundtrack is shit.
I found out the only way to properly use the toy helicopter killstreak:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUj1H1CukS4[/media]
You're welcome.
[QUOTE=Zezibesh;33189217] A bit disappointing, really.
[/QUOTE]
I'd suggest Deus Ex 1 & 3 if you would like a great story with hours of play. They both do a really good job.
[editline]8th November 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Fawkbawkz;33189258]I found out the only way to properly use the toy helicopter killstreak:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUj1H1CukS4[/media]
You're welcome.[/QUOTE]
The newest way to deal with campers.
[QUOTE=Fawkbawkz;33189258]I found out the only way to properly use the toy helicopter killstreak:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUj1H1CukS4[/media]
You're welcome.[/QUOTE]
And thus, the community started to abuse a harmless toy helicopter as a flying obstacle that blocks small corridores and causes lots of death, for the lols
[QUOTE=Kirby106;33188831]This game is really fun. Haters gonna hate.[/QUOTE]
Enjoy your $60 expansion pack that could and should get sold at $25 at most
[editline]8th November 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Fawkbawkz;33189258]I found out the only way to properly use the toy helicopter killstreak:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUj1H1CukS4[/media]
You're welcome.[/QUOTE]
Holy fucking shit the original voice for French soldiers is AWFUL
I mean jesus that doesn't even sound like any sort of French accent
Call of duty V10 - "Omg! That small pixel on that guy's ass which can only be seen once a year is so low res! Game sucks!"
And as usual, the people who actually like it or tolerate all games are the only ones not giving boxes, unlike the haters who probably don't even play mw3 at all.
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;33189362]Enjoy your $60 expansion pack that could and should get sold at $25 at most
[/QUOTE]
You know what they say, haters gunna hate and gamers gunna gaem
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;33189362]
Holy fucking shit the original voice for French soldiers is AWFUL
I mean jesus that doesn't even sound like any sort of French accent[/QUOTE]
I know what you mean, I don't think he was saying "I Surrender" or "I Give Up" at all. Maybe it's an American undercover agent? That would explain why he's actually trying to fight...
Disappointing. Finished the Story on hard in about 4 and a half hours, cliche after cliche really. Never really felt like I was being challenged or surprised.
Especially when...
Nevermind, just play....
I knew the engine wouldn't change much, but most of the models are the exact same. It really does feel like MW2.5, the Survival mode it a bit of fun, but not really much beyond camp and kill. The little MP iv'e played feels the exact same, idk, maybe i was expecting a new game or something, but luckily I got a free copy and my money went elsewhere... Battl.... eh nevermind. Its clearly obvious which Dev team put in more time and made a new experience rather then rehashing the same ole.
The story was wrapped up in a friggen bow and the repetitive nature of the shooting became all to clear.
That being said their are some minor graphical additions a long with having two scopes on a gun, whcih i never even needed... Idk.
Just disappointed I guess.
6.5/10
I said it and I'll say it again. People wouldn't give a fuck at all about the graphics if this wasn't cod.
[editline]8th November 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=King of Limbs;33189524]Disappointing. Finished the Story on hard in about 4 and a half hours, cliche after cliche really. Never really felt like I was being challenged or surprised.
Especially when...
Nevermind, just play....
I knew the engine wouldn't change much, but most of the models are the exact same. It really does feel like MW2.5, the Survival mode it a bit of fun, but not really much beyond camp and kill. The little MP iv'e played feels the exact same, idk, maybe i was expecting a new game or something, but luckily I got a free copy and my money went elsewhere... Battl.... eh nevermind. Its clearly obvious which Dev team put in more time and made a new experience rather then rehashing the same ole.
The story was wrapped up in a friggen bow and the repetitive nature of the shooting became all to clear.
That being said their are some minor graphical additions a long with having two scopes on a gun, whcih i never even needed... Idk.
Just disappointed I guess.
6.5/10[/QUOTE]
?
models have all changed actually. I have a hard time figuring out who is who sometimes :v:
This is why gamefly exists imo.
Im sure Ill have some fun with it.
What Seano said earlier about COD needing a big change is true. I remember my reaction to COD4 to this day. What we need is a complete overhaul. They just need to take a few years to make the next game.
Im starting to like support. SAM Turrets and shit. Constant +50 for shooting down UAV's and then getting raging people in (voice)chat :v:
[QUOTE=dass;33189531]I said it and I'll say it again. People wouldn't give a fuck at all about the graphics if this wasn't cod.
[editline]8th November 2011[/editline]
?
models have all changed actually. I have a hard time figuring out who is who sometimes :v:[/QUOTE]
Are you blind? Literally every thread has people griping about graphics.
[QUOTE=N-12_Aden;33189586]This is why gamefly exists imo.
Im sure Ill have some fun with it.
What Seano said earlier about COD needing a big change is true. I remember my reaction to COD4 to this day. What we need is a complete overhaul. They just need to take a few years to make the next game.[/QUOTE]
That's what I am hoping. A break from the series for a bit then come back strong with a next-gen Call of Duty 5 in a World War 2 setting with the same fast-paced arcade gameplay on an amazing engine.
[QUOTE=King of Limbs;33189524]Disappointing. Finished the Story on hard in about 4 and a half hours, cliche after cliche really. Never really felt like I was being challenged or surprised.
Especially when...
Nevermind, just play....
I knew the engine wouldn't change much, but most of the models are the exact same. It really does feel like MW2.5, the Survival mode it a bit of fun, but not really much beyond camp and kill. The little MP iv'e played feels the exact same, idk, maybe i was expecting a new game or something, but luckily I got a free copy and my money went elsewhere... Battl.... eh nevermind. Its clearly obvious which Dev team put in more time and made a new experience rather then rehashing the same ole.
The story was wrapped up in a friggen bow and the repetitive nature of the shooting became all to clear.
That being said their are some minor graphical additions a long with having two scopes on a gun, whcih i never even needed... Idk.
Just disappointed I guess.
6.5/10[/QUOTE]
"Hello, I saw a trailer of this game and thought that BF3 is way better. Then I went to facepunch and started to bash the game. Did I mention that I like battlefield more? Because I do, and that is because Battlefield is better. You wanna know why? I will tell you why, because MW3 is just a MW2.5 and BF3 is better. I like it better because its less worse than being better than, and Bf3 is best/ter my final verdict is a solid average and I like BF3 better,?"
[QUOTE=seano12;33189273]I'd suggest Deus Ex 1 & 3 if you would like a great story with hours of play. They both do a really good job.[/QUOTE]
Been there, done that. I wasn't even particularly interested in the MW story anymore, I just wanted to see it through to the end.
[QUOTE=Raidyr;33189637]That's what I am hoping. A break from the series for a bit then come back strong with a next-gen Call of Duty 5 in a World War 2 setting with the same fast-paced arcade gameplay on an amazing engine.[/QUOTE]
Maybe not WW2, but maybe Korea or god willing they actually do the Vietnam War some justice. In Black Ops, there wasnt the feel of the actual Vietnam War imo.
Maybe all the anchorisms didnt help. A 2010 Jeep Model with a early 70's TOW Missile Launcher at Khe Sahn 1968, M60E4 look alikes in 1963, and AK-74 prototypes in the hands of Viet Cong.
They dont have to be 100% realistic, but at least have the equipment right.
[QUOTE=Logic Studio;33189709]"Hello, I saw a trailer of this game and thought that BF3 is way better. Then I went to facepunch and started to bash the game. Did I mention that I like battlefield more? Because I do, and that is because Battlefield is better. You wanna know why? I will tell you why, because MW3 is just a MW2.5 and BF3 is better. I like it better because its less worse than being better than, and Bf3 best?"[/QUOTE]
How amazing is it that almost every single counter-argument to someone disliking MW3 I saw so far was basically "you're a bf3 fanboy get out" ?
[QUOTE=Ganerumo;33189768]How amazing is it that almost every single counter-argument to someone disliking MW3 I saw so far was basically "you're a bf3 fanboy get out" ?[/QUOTE]
I really dont know
[QUOTE=Logic Studio;33189709]"Hello, I saw a trailer of this game and thought that BF3 is way better. Then I went to facepunch and started to bash the game. Did I mention that I like battlefield more? Because I do, and that is because Battlefield is better. You wanna know why? I will tell you why, because MW3 is just a MW2.5 and BF3 is better. I like it better because its less worse than being better than, and Bf3 is best/ter my final verdict is average and I like BF3 better, and?"[/QUOTE]
He didn't even mention BF3, get off your high horse
[QUOTE=Logic Studio;33189709]"Hello, I saw a trailer of this game and thought that BF3 is way better. Then I went to facepunch and started to bash the game. Did I mention that I like battlefield more? Because I do, and that is because Battlefield is better. You wanna know why? I will tell you why, because MW3 is just a MW2.5 and BF3 is better. I like it better because its less worse than being better than, and Bf3 is best/ter my final verdict is average and I like BF3 better, and?"[/QUOTE]
Now your pulling stuff out your ass. How can you assume they didnt play it?
[QUOTE=N-12_Aden;33189760]Maybe not WW2, but maybe Korea or god willing they actually do the Vietnam War some justice. In Black Ops, there wasnt the feel of the actual Vietnam War imo.
Maybe all the anchorisms didnt help. A 2010 Jeep Model with a early 70's TOW Missile Launcher at Khe Sahn 1968, M60E4 look alikes in 1963, and AK-74 prototypes in the hands of Viet Cong.
They dont have to be 100% realistic, but at least have the equipment right.[/QUOTE]
Actually the AK-74 didn't appear in Viet-Cong hands. It only appeared near the end of the campaign, in some Spetsnaz Labs.
I don't really get people who complain about re-hashed gameplay. I mean, the gameplay has been pretty much the same since CoD4. Right now they pretty much said they're trying to find a sweet spot with gameplay so that everyone can play and have fun before they start experimenting. Black Ops experimented and people didn't like it. MW2 experimented and people didn't like it. They're trying to perfect their current style of gameplay before shifting to a new one.
I don't really see why it's such a bad thing anyways. It's more of the same gameplay with some new features and weapons. If you like Call of Duty, you'll like this game, pretty much.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
