Call of Duty v9 - Still not as shit as BF3! - Games

Using the ratings system as part of an argument just smacks of pettiness. JUST SAYING PEOPLE. Only rate dumb if you're not going to present a counter-argument

[QUOTE=doonbugie2;33378853]Because you're a console gamer. You are the majority of the XxCODfanboisxX (1337)[/QUOTE] yes, because I play console that means i'm part of the stupid xXx420w33d4lyfexXx so can i assume you have a big ass ego who thinks PC is superior because you play on PC..?--oh wait...

[QUOTE=doonbugie2;33378853]Because you're a console gamer. You are the majority of the XxCODfanboisxX (1337)[/QUOTE] I thought we went over (at some point) that it's the loud minority?

[QUOTE=PyroCraz3d;33378918]yes, because I play console that means i'm part of the stupid xXx420w33d4lyfexXx so can i assume you have a big ass ego who thinks PC is superior because you play on PC..?--oh wait...[/QUOTE] I like how you infer the opposite of what I'm saying and then turn it around and project it as my opinion. I feel PC gamers were neglected in MW3 because of the obvious problems, such as random freezing and many more PC only issues(such as mouse controls fuck up). I never said PC was a superior platform, I just enjoy it more because I think its more capable then consoles, hardware and software wise.

[QUOTE=doonbugie2;33378961]I like how you infer the opposite of what I'm saying and then turn it around and project it as my opinion. I feel PC gamers were neglected in MW3 because of the obvious problems, such as random freezing and many more PC only issues(such as mouse controls fuck up). I never said PC was a superior platform, I just enjoy it more because I think its more capable then consoles, hardware and software wise.[/QUOTE] Because PC gamers ARE the neglected group because CoD became a consolized franchise. This is public knowledge after CoD 3 i believe (definitely before 4 for sure).

[QUOTE=doonbugie2;33378584]The last 3 patches I've downloaded have had no changelog, I've looked through Steam update news etc, as the official, and only PC distribution platform they should include this. It has nothing to do with the release version of the game as you said vmonkey. I'm sorry Sledgehammer/IW are retarded and don't know how to cater to the PC Gaming community.[/QUOTE] Not releasing patch notes right away means they are retarded and don't know how to cater to the PC gaming community. You heard it here first folks, patch notes make or break your game.

[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33379139]Not releasing patch notes right away means they are retarded and don't know how to cater to the PC gaming community. You heard it here first folks, patch notes make or break your game.[/QUOTE] Why do you insist on manipulating my words, I never said patch notes = broken game.. source this please. Yes they're retarded and full of neglect for not doing it but it does not break the game. What breaks the game are constant and completely random freezing issues on the PS3 and PC.

Hey break it up n00bs this is a MW3 thread not a "who's got a bigger dick" festival I would know, I handed out the fliers

Fuck can they not fuck up the spawns in at least one of their fucking games for fucking once, I'm fucking sick of fucking being fucking spawncamped by a bunch of fucking assholes who exploit this fucking shitty spawn system holy fuck FIX THIS FUCKING SPAWN SYSTEM OR SO GOD HELP ME

Take a chill pill or stop playing till it's fixed...other games exist. [editline]21st November 2011[/editline] And they've acknowledged the issue

[QUOTE=PyroCraz3d;33379429]Fuck can they not fuck up the spawns in at least one of their fucking games for fucking once, I'm fucking sick of fucking being fucking spawncamped by a bunch of fucking assholes who exploit this fucking shitty spawn system holy fuck FIX THIS FUCKING SPAWN SYSTEM OR SO GOD HELP ME[/QUOTE] Fuck fuck fuckity fuck fuck.

[QUOTE=Vmonkey;33379462]Take a chill pill or stop playing till it's fixed...other games exist. [editline]21st November 2011[/editline] And they've acknowledged the issue[/QUOTE] I have been trying but MW3 is pulling me back and it keeps pissing me off. Okay, this happened twice in one match. I spawned in a sniper's scope. Seriously. He wasn't standing behind a corner, he wasn't walking, he was out in the open, aiming at a corner, and I spawned dead center of the scope. TWICE this happened. Holy crap.

People in this thread complain like they're forced to play the game, and like, got AIDS as a result. Calm the fuck down. It's a game meant for your enjoyment. If you're not enjoying it, do something that is more enjoyable. If you have a complaint, take it up with the devs. They're legitimately listening to community feedback this time around. Don't like the spawns? Tell them you don't like the spawns! Think they should include patch notes? Tell them that you think they should include patch notes! They're a whole hell of a lot likely to read your complaints if you send it to them directly instead of bitching on an internet forum about it.

[QUOTE=ILY;33374312]Whiteboy7thst is the only way to roll with commentators. (Tejbz is pretty cool too if he still does it)[/QUOTE] Whiteboy7thst: "Before I show you this AMAZING video make sure you like and favourite the video because it really helps me out. If you don't know how you like and favourite videos you stupid fuck heres a little guide, you push this button that says like, then you push this button that says favourite. Make sure you like and favourite the video because it does really help me out."

[QUOTE=Pat.Lithium;33379963]Whiteboy7thst: "Before I show you this AMAZING video make sure you like and favourite the video because it really helps me out. If you don't know how you like and favourite videos you stupid fuck heres a little guide, you push this button that says like, then you push this button that says favourite. Make sure you like and favourite the video because it does really help me out."[/QUOTE] taking that seriously

Okay, NOW this game is starting to piss me off. Times like this make me glad I have Saints Row 3 and Battlefield 3. Thank God. MW3 is just downright unbalanced to say the least, and this is coming from a (former) huge cod fan.

[QUOTE=jbthekid;33380004]Okay, NOW this game is starting to piss me off. Times like this make me glad I have Saints Row 3 and Battlefield 3. Thank God. MW3 is just downright unbalanced to say the least, and this is coming from a (former) huge cod fan.[/QUOTE] I wouldn't say it's unbalanced. There are definitely good guns and bad guns, but to be honest if you're decent at the game it shouldn't make much of a difference. None of the guns are good enough to make a bad player beat out a good player.

[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33380014]I wouldn't say it's unbalanced. There are definitely good guns and bad guns, but to be honest if you're decent at the game it shouldn't make much of a difference. None of the guns are good enough to make a bad player beat out a good player.[/QUOTE] I'm good at the game, I win the majority of my matches and hold a 2.22 K/D. I've just been putting up with the cons of the series for too long that they're starting to eat me up. I gotta quit. [editline]21st November 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Grim Joker;33380014] None of the guns are good enough to make a bad player beat out a good player.[/QUOTE] Type 95.

[QUOTE=jbthekid;33380096]Type 95.[/QUOTE] Okay. Please explain why you think it's overpowered.

It would've been a neat feature if they had 2 killcams at the end of the game: The final kill, and the best kill. Could be a triple or a quad, idk.

[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33380127]Okay. Please explain why you think it's overpowered.[/QUOTE] I never said "overpowered" At 16.67 rounds per second and 1,000 rounds per minute it is the game's fastest firing assault rifle. Tied with the FAD that is. 2 bullets to kill at close range and 5 at long range. That is 1-2 bursts at max, providing you're decently accurate with the gun. You can unlock the rapid fire attachment which only makes it even faster. It does 55 damage at close range and 20 at long range. It's not the problem that it's "overpowered", the gun is just downright unjust.

[QUOTE=jbthekid;33380227]I never said "overpowered" At 16.67 rounds per second and 1,000 rounds per minute it is the game's fastest firing assault rifle. Tied with the FAD that is. 2 bullets to kill at close range and 5 at long range. That is 1-2 bursts at max, providing you're decently accurate with the gun. You can unlock the rapid fire attachment which only makes it even faster. It does 55 damage at close range and 20 at long range. It's not the problem that it's "overpowered", the gun is just downright unjust.[/QUOTE] It takes one less bullet to kill at close range than most other assault rifles. This is redundant, seeing as how it fires in bursts, and it's kind of improbable you'd hit with two of the rounds and miss with one. 5 shots at long range is also pretty average for the Assault Rifle class. Rapid fire means you have to take up an attachment that could probably be spent on something more useful, like a sight or extended mags, so anyone who really pulls the trigger so fast that they need the fire cap removed can probably kill you with a pistol. Considering it's firerate is offset by it's burst firing mode, if you're in close range with someone who's using the Type 95, you'd be better off with an SMG or another full-auto gun. Since the FAD only requires one more bullet at close range, but has the same fire rate and is in fact full auto, by your logic the FAD is even more overpowered. It's fine. I asked for an example of a gun that will make a bad player completely trump a good player. The FAD requires you to be pretty accurate, since it's a burst-firing weapon. It takes one less bullet to kill at close range than most other guns, oh no, you're right, so unjust. If only it took one more bullet, then it would be completely fine! People are only bitching about the Type 95 because it's common and so they get killed by it a lot, not because it's legitimately that much better than any other gun. [editline]21st November 2011[/editline] Plus that damage dropoff is crazy. That's the same damage dropoff as SMGs. The other assault rifles have better ranged damage than that.

I see it all the goddamn time, you're probably right. It pisses me off a lot, but it is not really OP. I just wish people would use OTHER GUNS. If they opened their eyes, they'd realize that there is more than the Type 95.

[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33380341]It takes one less bullet to kill at close range than most other assault rifles. This is redundant, seeing as how it fires in bursts, and it's kind of improbable you'd hit with two of the rounds and miss with one. 5 shots at long range is also pretty average for the Assault Rifle class. Rapid fire means you have to take up an attachment that could probably be spent on something more useful, like a sight or extended mags, so anyone who really pulls the trigger so fast that they need the fire cap removed can probably kill you with a pistol. Considering it's firerate is offset by it's burst firing mode, if you're in close range with someone who's using the Type 95, you'd be better off with an SMG or another full-auto gun. Since the FAD only requires one more bullet at close range, but has the same fire rate and is in fact full auto, by your logic the FAD is even more overpowered. It's fine. I asked for an example of a gun that will make a bad player completely trump a good player. The FAD requires you to be pretty accurate, since it's a burst-firing weapon. It takes one less bullet to kill at close range than most other guns, oh no, you're right, so unjust. If only it took one more bullet, then it would be completely fine! People are only bitching about the Type 95 because it's common and so they get killed by it a lot, not because it's legitimately that much better than any other gun. [editline]21st November 2011[/editline] Plus that damage dropoff is crazy. That's the same damage dropoff as SMGs. The other assault rifles have better ranged damage than that.[/QUOTE] Quit throwing around the word Overpowered. I'm simply talking about the fire rate. If you didn't think about it, you can unlock 2 attachments for a gun meaning you can have rapid fire and still be just as accurate with a red dot attached. I've seen plenty of low levels rape me at point blank range with a Type 95 simply because it serves almost as any gun. Meanwhile I shot them in the face with a SPAS 12. It's an assault rifle, SMG at close range, sniper at long range (easy as fuck to pick people off). Hell, might as well be a shotgun too, right? The FAD is accurate itself. You could spray with that thing and easily get a kill. Shit, the hit detection in general is offset in MW3. Yeah, that is how powerful it is. 55. My intention is not to argue, simply just throwing my opinion about the gun out there. Seeing as it's the internet though, opinions aren't accepted. [url]http://modernwarfare3news.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/mw3-weaponstats.jpeg[/url] Those are the official statistics of all of the weapons in MW3. Released by IW and Sledgehammer themselves.

[QUOTE=jbthekid;33380004]Okay, NOW this game is starting to piss me off. Times like this make me glad I have Saints Row 3 and Battlefield 3. Thank God. MW3 is just downright unbalanced to say the least, and this is coming from a (former) huge cod fan.[/QUOTE] Besides machine pistols being a little silly and shotguns being pretty useless without leveling them for ages I'd say the games decently balanced.

[QUOTE=Raidyr;33380483]Besides machine pistols being a little silly and shotguns being pretty useless without leveling them for ages I'd say the games decently balanced.[/QUOTE] Don't forget shooting someone 15 times and being killed by being shot once.

[QUOTE=jbthekid;33380509]Don't forget shooting someone 15 times and being killed by being shot once.[/QUOTE] Yeah you're right getting into a laggy game man this game is so unbalanced. [editline]21st November 2011[/editline] Pretty much everything you said about the Type 95 can apply to other assault rifles. The ACR is pinpoint accurate with almost no recoil. Three shots a close range, four from a distance, I believe. FAD has the same exact fire rate as the Type 95, except even faster because it's full-auto. It also has very little recoil, and has about the same damage. You're saying the gun is so much better than every other gun, but really, it's not, at all. It's good, but it's not the be-all end-all gun of the game. If it was, literally every single person would use it and you wouldn't be able to win unless you were using it. Coming from someone who has yet to use it for any extended amount of time, and has prestiged twice, [B]it's not that good[/B].

[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33380815]Yeah you're right getting into a laggy game man this game is so unbalanced.[/QUOTE] Oh, that's without lag. Why don't you stop defending it and just go and play it? I like/dislike it for my own reasons. Just because you don't agree doesn't mean I'm wrong. My posts are opinionated. Play your game and I'll play mine. No need to act like a smartass. I say that in a non-insulting way just because I don't like to bad mouth people over the internet. I'm done here. I don't want to keep checking back for your replies. This is getting out of hand. After all, it's fucking Call of Duty. I have times where I hate it and love it. But in the end, does it all really matter [B]AT ALL[/B]? No, so this supposed argument is essentially meaningless.

[QUOTE=jbthekid;33380830]Oh, that's without lag. Why don't you stop defending it and just go and play it? I like/dislike it for my own reasons. Just because you don't agree doesn't mean I'm wrong. My posts are opinionated. Play your game and I'll play mine. No need to act like a smartass. I say that in a non-insulting way just because I don't like to bad mouth people over the internet.[/QUOTE] Uh, you are going into the game's thread, making really silly comments (shooting someone 15 times with any gun, even a pistol, will fucking kill them.) and claiming that the Type 95 is the be-all end-all gun (which it obviously is not) and then complaining when I defend it and refute your claims? I like how you say you're entitled to your opinion, yet I'm not allowed to disagree with you and state why.

[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33380872]Uh, you are going into the game's thread, making really silly comments (shooting someone 15 times with any gun, even a pistol, will fucking kill them.) and claiming that the Type 95 is the be-all end-all gun (which it obviously is not) and then complaining when I defend it and refute your claims? I like how you say you're entitled to your opinion, yet I'm not allowed to disagree with you and state why.[/QUOTE] I never said you could not disagree, I said just because I have an opinion doesn't mean I'm wrong. Jesus Christ, why is it that you give such a shit what I think about the Type 95? Whether or not my theory is off or completely accurate it's just what I [B]personally[/B] fucking believe. No need to get so offended. I've had to sit here and here you talk about how you think of it also. Again, this is just a waste of time. It's CoD, it's a video game, it's not our life, it's the internet. Let's just agree to disagree and drop the whole fucking thing. There are better things to do than sit here and argue about one stupid gun. I've tried to settle it already but you keep replying. I'm done and offline.