Call of Duty v9 - Still not as shit as BF3! - Games

[QUOTE=Raidyr;33768707]Steam says 125 hours in multiplayer but that seems a little short. Of course people complained about the FAMAS everyone complains about every gun. I've seen people complain about shotguns in MW3 even. But it was no where near the tears the Type 95 generates.[/QUOTE] The only guns I have problems with in Mw3 are type 95, PP90M1 and the striker...

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33768239]We're infinity ward and sledgehammer games we make good games... lol joke, we make shit games with overpowered weapons, patch them then add a new gamemode which introduces more camping then search and destroy... good job at fucking CoD up for another year.[/QUOTE] I don't think "camping" describes dropzone. You either participate or you don't get XP, period. You can sit in the corner, but if you're not near that drop zone you may as well just be playing something else. I must say though, Drop Zone definitely has some terrible spawns. But I guess that's how it's supposed to be. I die a lot in drop zone, but I also get a lot of kills. [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Raidyr;33768604]I don't remember people bitching about the MW2 FAMAS as much as the Type 95 in MW3, considering it's a near exact clone statistically. Also the "best" weapon is a versatile assault rifle? I totally wouldn't have realized that after my experiences playing all the other CoD games oh wait.[/QUOTE] I remember more people bitching about how OP the UMP was, not much with the FAMAS though. To be honest, I rarely saw the FAMAS used in MW2. Maybe not that rare, but definitely not enough to be considered OP.

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33768239]We're infinity ward and sledgehammer games we make good games... lol joke, we make shit games with overpowered weapons, patch them then add a new gamemode which introduces more camping then search and destroy... good job at fucking CoD up for another year.[/QUOTE] Hi, we are Valve, and in our hit multiplayer game called Counter Strike, you win by just using the M4, the AK47, the Deagle and, above all the others, the AWP. Don't bother with anything else, because those are the only guns worth using. Nothing else works at all unless you don't play our oficial game modes which are the only game modes that don't really include camping because if you play dust2, you bet you will get shot if you go through the middle of the map. Hi, we are DICE, and on our games, our guns are soo balanced that you might aswell only use one of them and nothing else. Hell, we could just remove all of them and just leave 1 or 2 because their all the fucking same. Our games are also copies of previous games, but, since we give them a slightly shinnier look + a few planes + a few inches of map so you can run 50% of the time, die of a sniper or some guy in the bushes/tank/roadkilled/mined 49% of the times and actually do something 1% of the times. Oh, guess what, the game modes are the exact same. Attacking cod only on those grounds and nothing else just shows the little hater you are that came into this thread today just to troll and stir up a shitstorm. Get out. Also, the FAMAS was FAR from being OP, and so is the type95, unless youre talking about hip firing it. Still, the FAMAS was FAR from OP. For that matter, you'd be better off calling the AK47 or the ACR OP. I've seen people complaining about the MK14. FFS its a semi auto rifle, is it THAT hard to kill me?

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33768564]That's funny cause that's the idea..., like the higher levels you get the better the weapons, like it is in CoD, but then you get the weapons like the type 95 which seems to be stupid over any weapon, long range, high power and no recoil what so ever.[/QUOTE]Couldn't be further from the truth. That's how ranking's supposed to be in MMOs, not in FPSes. In FPSes it's the other way around, with you getting more specialized items later on, like say, a semi auto only 5.56 rifle, or a pistol with larger mag less damage higher firerate.

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33768721]The only guns I have problems with in Mw3 are type 95, PP90M1 and the striker...[/QUOTE] Be a very active person. Don't stand around like a lazy fat guy and people wont kill you with it. Maybe only at range. Deal with it, OR, actually spot them first and be fast enough to kill them, which happens with everything else. Get range on him. Just had a fight with a guy using the striker, he was good at close range, but you couldn't even call him awful at medium ranges because it was like hitting a dummy with a can of spray.

[QUOTE=dass;33769536]Hi, we are Valve, and in our hit multiplayer game called Counter Strike, you win by just using the M4, the AK47, the Deagle and, above all the others, the AWP. Don't bother with anything else, because those are the only guns worth using. Nothing else works at all unless you don't play our oficial game modes which are the only game modes that don't really include camping because if you play dust2, you bet you will get shot if you go through the middle of the map. Hi, we are DICE, and on our games, our guns are soo balanced that you might aswell only use one of them and nothing else. Hell, we could just remove all of them and just leave 1 or 2 because their all the fucking same. Our games are also copies of previous games, but, since we give them a slightly shinnier look + a few planes + a few inches of map so you can run 50% of the time, die of a sniper or some guy in the bushes/tank/roadkilled/mined 49% of the times and actually do something 1% of the times. Oh, guess what, the game modes are the exact same. Attacking cod only on those grounds and nothing else just shows the little hater you are that came into this thread today just to troll and stir up a shitstorm. Get out. Also, the FAMAS was FAR from being OP, and so is the type95, unless youre talking about hip firing it. Still, the FAMAS was FAR from OP. For that matter, you'd be better off calling the AK47 or the ACR OP. I've seen people complaining about the MK14. FFS its a semi auto rifle, is it THAT hard to kill me?[/QUOTE] I guess you're another retard that completely missed what I said, I didn't say anything about other games not having OP weapons 1 because it's a CoD thread and 2 CoD usualy has about 3 OP weapons every time they release a game and end up having to patch it.

[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33747903]They patched it so that it doesn't stop killstreaks, I believe.[/QUOTE] Are you shitting me? I loved it when the trophy system just poofs a pred out of the sky..... That is something that shouldn't even be nerfed.

[QUOTE=dass;33769595]Be a very active person. Don't stand around like a lazy fat guy and people wont kill you with it. Maybe only at range. Deal with it, OR, actually spot them first and be fast enough to kill them, which happens with everything else. Get range on him. Just had a fight with a guy using the striker, he was good at close range, but you couldn't even call him awful at medium ranges because it was like hitting a dummy with a can of spray.[/QUOTE] And trust me the strikers range at the moment is still silly, my friends use it all the time on SND and seem to always shoot people from stupid ranges that they wouldn't normaly kill and the weapon I usualy use is M14 with a silencer so I can sneak around the enemy lines so I wouldn't really say I camp that much. [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=dass;33769536]Hi, we are Valve, and in our hit multiplayer game called Counter Strike, you win by just using the M4, the AK47, the Deagle and, above all the others, the AWP. Don't bother with anything else, because those are the only guns worth using. Nothing else works at all unless you don't play our oficial game modes which are the only game modes that don't really include camping because if you play dust2, you bet you will get shot if you go through the middle of the map. Hi, we are DICE, and on our games, our guns are soo balanced that you might aswell only use one of them and nothing else. Hell, we could just remove all of them and just leave 1 or 2 because their all the fucking same. Our games are also copies of previous games, but, since we give them a slightly shinnier look + a few planes + a few inches of map so you can run 50% of the time, die of a sniper or some guy in the bushes/tank/roadkilled/mined 49% of the times and actually do something 1% of the times. Oh, guess what, the game modes are the exact same. Attacking cod only on those grounds and nothing else just shows the little hater you are that came into this thread today just to troll and stir up a shitstorm. Get out. Also, the FAMAS was FAR from being OP, and so is the type95, unless youre talking about hip firing it. Still, the FAMAS was FAR from OP. For that matter, you'd be better off calling the AK47 or the ACR OP. I've seen people complaining about the MK14. FFS its a semi auto rifle, is it THAT hard to kill me?[/QUOTE] And I meant the famas from MW2... the thing that killed you with ease while hipfiring.

Why is everyone bitching and insulting CoD again? If you don't like CoD, don't post in the thread and try to convince people who do like it that it's a shitty game. It's just a douchey thing to do. That's like if you went into a Starbucks and started yelling about how the coffee tastes like piss. The new game mode is interesting. It's really chaotic, and you should expect to die A LOT. It's basically headquarters, except you get care packages for holding the HQ, essentially. I only played it twice and both times I had really horrible teams (One guy on our team was 0 - 40) but I feel like if the teams were evenly matched and it was on a good map, it would be really fun and intense.

This thread was behaving for a good long bit, here we go again.

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33770821]And I meant the famas from MW2... the thing that killed you with ease while hipfiring.[/QUOTE] That's how it was in CoD4. The burst weapons have always killed really quickly and been pretty good. The bad side to them is the fire rate and how, unless you have steady aim, they're pretty bad in close quarters.

Apparently pointing out flaws of a game... well that in my [b]opinion[/b] are flaws is a bad thing, I don't hate the game just the shitty situations that happen constantly, I enjoy the game just them 3 weapons that seem to be over-used and seem to out match some weapons that are faster and shot a mili-second before the guy with said OP weapons seems to turn and hip fire and kill me in 3 bullets.

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33770865]Apparently pointing out flaws of a game... well that in my [b]opinion[/b] are flaws is a bad thing, I don't hate the game just the shitty situations that happen constantly, I enjoy the game just them 3 weapons that seem to be over-used and seem to out match some weapons that are faster and shot a mili-second before the guy with said OP weapons seems to turn and hip fire and kill me in 3 bullets.[/QUOTE] Really You said they fucked it up another year earlier. That seems to imply you, gasp, don't like the game! If you think the Type 95 is OP I'd recommend you play the other Modern Warfare games, and Black Ops. You probably think ALL of the burst weapons are OP.

[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33770907]Really You said they fucked it up another year earlier. That seems to imply you, gasp, don't like the game! If you think the Type 95 is OP I'd recommend you play the other Modern Warfare games, and Black Ops. You probably think ALL of the burst weapons are OP.[/QUOTE] No it means in my opinion all the CoD games i've played have about 3 OP weapons all the time, not that I like the game, but good job at trying to carry on the arguement. And the M16 wasn't so bad in MW2, just the famas.

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33771002]No it means in my opinion all the CoD games i've played have about 3 OP weapons all the time, not that I like the game, but good job at trying to carry on the arguement. And the M16 wasn't so bad in MW2, just the famas.[/QUOTE] The M16 was [I]better[/I] than the FAMAS in MW2. It has a slightly slower fire rate, but it had a tighter spread and better damage. Also, I'm trying to carry on an argument because I pointed out that you said something. Yeah okay.

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33770794]I guess you're another retard that completely missed what I said, I didn't say anything about other games not having OP weapons 1 because it's a CoD thread and 2 CoD usualy has about 3 OP weapons every time they release a game and end up having to patch it.[/QUOTE] No need to come in here to say that. We already probably had half of facepunch in here for that alone, and to say the game is shit and so on.

[QUOTE=dass;33771359]No need to come in here to say that. We already probably had half of facepunch in here for that alone, and to say the game is shit and so on.[/QUOTE] 3 weapons=/=the game in a whole. [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Grim Joker;33771078]The M16 was [I]better[/I] than the FAMAS in MW2. It has a slightly slower fire rate, but it had a tighter spread and better damage. Also, I'm trying to carry on an argument because I pointed out that you said something. Yeah okay.[/QUOTE] Yeah thanks for pointing out, [I]I[/I] totaly wouldn't realise or know something I posted would I?

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33770821]And trust me the strikers range at the moment is still silly, my friends use it all the time on SND and seem to always shoot people from stupid ranges that they wouldn't normaly kill and the weapon I usualy use is M14 with a silencer so I can sneak around the enemy lines so I wouldn't really say I camp that much. [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] And I meant the famas from MW2... the thing that killed you with ease while hipfiring.[/QUOTE] With steady aim maybe, and even then thats a long shot. I have NEVER heard anyone talking about the famas as OP. Only on Blops, where it had a fucked up fire rate along with a huge ass hip fire accuracy, and that was EXTREMELY different from the type95 and mw2's famas. [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33770865]Apparently pointing out flaws of a game... well that in my [B]opinion[/B] are flaws is a bad thing, I don't hate the game just the shitty situations that happen constantly, I enjoy the game just them 3 weapons that seem to be over-used and seem to out match some weapons that are faster and shot a mili-second before the guy with said OP weapons seems to turn and hip fire and kill me in 3 bullets.[/QUOTE] [QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33768239]We're infinity ward and sledgehammer games we make good games... lol joke, we make shit games with overpowered weapons, patch them then add a new gamemode which introduces more camping then search and destroy... good job at fucking CoD up for another year.[/QUOTE] Sure buddy. Now get out. [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33771002]No it means in my opinion all the CoD games i've played have about 3 OP weapons all the time, not that I like the game, but good job at trying to carry on the arguement. And the M16 wasn't so bad in MW2, just the famas.[/QUOTE] And just btw, you could easily beat people hipfiring with the famas if you had decent aim and awareness. They would also lose against a group of 2 enemies if they were at least a bit awake.

[QUOTE=dass;33771456]With steady aim maybe, and even then thats a long shot. I have NEVER heard anyone talking about the famas as OP. Only on Blops, where it had a fucked up fire rate along with a huge ass hip fire accuracy, and that was EXTREMELY different from the type95 and mw2's famas. [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] [b]Sure buddy. Now get out.[/b] [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] And just btw, you could easily beat people hipfiring with the famas if you had decent aim and awareness.[/QUOTE] Apparently now we're supposed to post flaws or opinions on CoD in thread other than CoD, ok I'll go do that now in the BF3 thread.

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33771531]Apparently now we're supposed to post flaws or opinions on CoD in thread other than CoD, ok I'll go do that now in the BF3 thread.[/QUOTE] Face it, you came in here to troll, and your comment was the most obvious of troll comments.

[QUOTE=dass;33771571]Face it, you came in here to troll, and your comment was the most obvious of troll comments.[/QUOTE] No I came here to express my opinion on 3 weapons that I dislike and atleast need some stats nerfed, but you have to be the typical over protective cod fan and cry because I dislike something about a game just like any other game that has flaws.

[url=http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1097783?p=33771557&viewfull=1#post33771557]Ok, so now he is legitamately complaining about CoD in the BF3 thread.[/url]

[QUOTE=Fhenexx;33771604][url=http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1097783?p=33771557&viewfull=1#post33771557]Ok, so now he is legitamately complaining about CoD in the BF3 thread.[/url][/QUOTE] Did I not say above in this page I was going to? [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33771531][b]Apparently now we're supposed to post flaws or opinions on CoD in thread other than CoD, ok I'll go do that now in the BF3 thread.[/b][/QUOTE] Bolded the part where I said exactly that.

[QUOTE=Fhenexx;33771604][url=http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1097783?p=33771557&viewfull=1#post33771557]Ok, so now he is legitamately complaining about CoD in the BF3 thread.[/url][/QUOTE] How did he know I was crying Tears are flowing from my face like Niagara Falls over here because someone doesn't like Call of Duty

[QUOTE=Grim Joker;33771630]How did he know I was crying [b]Tears are flowing from my face like Niagara Falls[/b] over here because someone doesn't like Call of Duty[/QUOTE] Whilst accidentaly pressing the dumb button on every post.... don't worry mommy will be there for you. [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] Also if I hated CoD or thought the game was shit, would I keep playing it? despite the fact I hate just them 3 weapons and not the game?

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33771662]Whilst accidentaly pressing the dumb button on every post.... don't worry mommy will be there for you. [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] Also if I hated CoD or thought the game was shit, would I keep playing it? despite the fact I hate just them 3 weapons and not the game?[/QUOTE] No, see, I rated you dumb, because what you're saying is dumb. That's how the dumb rating works, you see. I was actually caught between rating you funny or dumb, but I felt like you weren't being funny on purpose, so, I gave you a dumb.

[QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33771589]No I came here to express my opinion on 3 weapons that I dislike and atleast need some stats nerfed, but you have to be the typical over protective cod fan and cry because I dislike something about a game just like any other game that has flaws.[/QUOTE] Yup, thats exactly what you said when you came in here 4 hours ago and posted this: [QUOTE=SoUl_ReApEr2;33768239]We're infinity ward and sledgehammer games we make good games... lol joke, we make shit games with overpowered weapons, patch them then add a new gamemode which introduces more camping then search and destroy... good job at fucking CoD up for another year.[/QUOTE] Must I post it again in the future? [editline]17th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Fhenexx;33771604][URL="http://www.facepunch.com/threads/1097783?p=33771557&viewfull=1#post33771557"]Ok, so now he is legitamately complaining about CoD in the BF3 thread.[/URL][/QUOTE] And Zeldar quoted my post about DICE aswell there. The butthurt with these guys is immense. Where is a mod when we need one... ONTOPIC: just had the most awesome game. I grabbed a jugg suit and was facing some guy. He ran away from me into an alley in Bakaraa and also got himself a jugg suit. We then had a 1on1 against each other. We felt like turtles. I won because... I sort of cheated... IMS drop ftw :v:

Would reducing the RoF of the Type 95 be a sufficient nerf? Like 30-50 RPM?

[QUOTE=Vmonkey;33771989]Would reducing the RoF of the Type 95 be a sufficient nerf? Like 30-50 RPM?[/QUOTE] Yeah, that'd be pretty good. I mentioned earlier that the rate of fire is really the only thing you can nerf that wouldn't make it completely useless.

I've got to say, I much prefer black ops over MW3, it's just a much more fun game.