Call of Duty v9 - Still not as shit as BF3! - Games

[QUOTE=kaskade700;33813487]I'm sorry but it sounds like you just don't know how to play CSS rule one: Never play on a server not on your continent(ever) rule two:Never ever spray(that the croshair doesn't get much bigger doesn't mean your cone of fire doesn't) rule three: aim for the head then you solly gun won't only do 30dmg[/QUOTE] Guess what: I was playing in a server in my country. I sprayed at less then 5 meters away from him, while crouching, but that doesn't even matters because even if I spray a meter away from them, the bullets seem to disappear and in 10, only 1 or 2 seem to have hit. Ffs, I've seen a guy bleed to death through 2 seconds straight, which is alot when you are firing about 10 bullets, and only a bunch of them actually registring. AND, on top of that, I shot the guy STRAIGHT IN THE HEAD. If I were to do a real life presentation, I'd be hitting the guy in the head with the barrel of the AK, shoving it into his head down to his brain, through his helmet and firing it. I literally pointed a gun at his head, kind of like how someone puts a gun to their own head to shoot themselves, fired it, and it didn't kill him. It did 30 damage and he managed to kill me. Thats bullshit. Thats not me being a bad player. Thats the hitboxes being a piece of shit as always. Heck, theres even a video on youtube showing how fucked up the hitboxes can get.

[QUOTE=TheWhiteFox1;33815532]Well that was a bit uncalled for. Anyway, all the video was stating is that people should really stop complaining about overpowered weapons. It's the players own choice to use them, and the people complaining can choose to use them, even if others dislike it.[/QUOTE] Why should we be forced to use overpowered weapons to make the game fairer for us, when we ourselves have seen how much they ruin the fun people who don't want to use them have? The old, "oh, you can use it too1!!!!" argument is flawed, and you should feel bad for agreeing with it. If everybody thought that way, it would literally cause every player to use the one gun that wins, sure it would be "balanced" that way, but hella boring.

[QUOTE=TheWhiteFox1;33815394][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1D0oG9Ml7A&feature=g-u&context=G2e09a79FUAAAAAAAGAA[/media] Couldn't agree with this guy more, although I know it's quite an unpopular opinion.[/QUOTE] this man doesn't get why people complain about OP guns. i don't want to run around with an over powered gun and just kill people and get no sense of accomplishment. the exact reason why the FMG9s are OP is because the damn thing is so accurate at long range and the damage output is ludicrous. plus I cant stand the fact that they returned machine pistols back as secondaries. Especially when half of them are better than the damn primary guns. the whole point why black ops had no machine pistols and shotguns as secondaries is because they thought it was giving the player way too much firepower, which it does. I mean why have overkill on if you can just have what is basically a sub machine gun as a secondary. it only really annoys me if they use it all the time and don't even try to use their primary. gun.

[QUOTE=TheWhiteFox1;33815394]Couldn't agree with this guy more, although I know it's quite an unpopular opinion.[/QUOTE] The problem with his opinion is the "me" aspect of it. He might like it, but other people might not, because it basically lets him win 95% of the times, but also doesnt lets anyone else win. Its like someone goes to your house, a friend of yours for example, and you sit down playing games on a console. You hand him a controller that is close to get sent into the garbage bin or just a simple controller, and his controller has turbo and tricky crap to it. And while he presses one button and does some sort of finisher to you, you have to press a whole combination of them, as usual, to do the same thing. Its kind of like piting a naked man with a knife made of wood against a heavily armored man with a sword that could rape you after you've been raped before. 5 times before. Better yet, its like putting a warrior, proficient with close combat, in a fight with an archer, except the archer has to fight close to the warrior, and therefor can't use range to his advantage. It kills the fun to everyone else and you are basically lying to yourself. "Hurr I can kill you, I win against everyone!" So what? Its as if you were competing with paraplegics in the paralimpics and you weren't handicapped like everyone else. You'd win, but, would it feel right? Sure, its different, but I bet nobody, neither in said paralimpics nor in mw3, would enjoy someone with an obvious and huge advantage above everyone else to win. It takes the fun away from the game. Makes it too easy for the user and increadibly annoying for its enemies. He also has a bad point. According to him, if someone is having fun and that fun doesn't fits the definition of "fun" to other people, they shouldn't be allowed to do so. So, if I were to burn all of his things and was having fun with it, he couldn't deny me of doing so?

Black Ops on PC is suprisingly fun.

[QUOTE=TheWhiteFox1;33815394][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1D0oG9Ml7A&feature=g-u&context=G2e09a79FUAAAAAAAGAA[/media] Couldn't agree with this guy more, although I know it's quite an unpopular opinion.[/QUOTE] What he's saying is the old "I paid money for this so I can do whatever I want" argument, it's stupid. Yeah, you can tell us how much you paid for this however long you want, but, everyone else has paid the same amount of money for the game. As soon as you step into multiplayer, everyone else has the same right to selfsatisfaction with a game that you claim, and your claim is thus pretty much void. Setting aside the fact that OJ draws some very, very stupid metaphors about religion and some western world view about giving yourself up for others, he's also pulling the "ohh, its only fun and for enjoyment", "its only a gaem" card. Yeah, it's a game, but it's a PvP multiplayer game. You're playing against people, you're competing with them. And in order to have a proper competitive environment, everyone should start on the same foot and then let their success be determined by their personal skill. You can't have that if a portion of the playerbase is fielding less gear by default, if a portion of the playerbase has an objective disadvantage. Because multiplayer is as much a game as it is a competition, and that's where players supposedly derive their fun from. Now OJ obviously can't do that, so he's trying to tell us that because we paid 60 bucks for this, just like everybody else, we're somehow entitled to abuse that objective advantage over our opponent, who ALSO paid 60 bucks, and who, by OJ's logic, should have the same rights to fun with the game. Doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me.

also his girl argument is pretty flawed. if everyone had the same pretty girl, the standard would be significantly lower. everyone would have the same girl and the world would be very boring with the same tits and pussy and personality.

His girl analogy (HURRRR) is the stupidest part of the video.

I wonder what he would say after playing against a team all with FMG's...

[QUOTE=TheWhiteFox1;33815394][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1D0oG9Ml7A&feature=g-u&context=G2e09a79FUAAAAAAAGAA[/media] Couldn't agree with this guy more, although I know it's quite an unpopular opinion.[/QUOTE] Ahaha, so I bring up a real argument, and pretty much counter his stance on OP weapons. I manage to make one reply (split into two because of character limits), and a reply to another user. I got back to check a response someone made to my comment, to receive this; [img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6003122/ahahaohman.PNG[/img] totally not upset that I proved his thoughts are not final and that he's a jackass at all.

[QUOTE=hexpunK;33817347]Ahaha, so I bring up a real argument, and pretty much counter his stance on OP weapons. I manage to make one reply (split into two because of character limits), and a reply to another user. I got back to check a response someone made to my comment, to receive this; [img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6003122/ahahaohman.PNG[/img] totally not upset that I proved his thoughts are not final and that he's a jackass at all.[/QUOTE] He might aswell turn comments off, unless there are enough idiots to kiss his ass.

[QUOTE=hexpunK;33817347]Ahaha, so I bring up a real argument, and pretty much counter his stance on OP weapons. I manage to make one reply (split into two because of character limits), and a reply to another user. I got back to check a response someone made to my comment, to receive this; [img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/6003122/ahahaohman.PNG[/img] totally not upset that I proved his thoughts are not final and that he's a jackass at all.[/QUOTE] which comment is yours?

Just sent a well worded, rather formal, message. I expect nothing short of "u mad" as a response mind.

oh nvm i found it :D

[QUOTE=Vmonkey;33817474]which comment is yours?[/QUOTE] Basically anything under the name "hexpunK1" (someone took my name :( )

[quote]"Everybody likes to win at some point, but picking an easy way* to win is nowhere near as fun" WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU TO SAY THAT? Blocked.[/quote] What the fuck? I don't know what to feel. Agree, disagree, mad, sad, dumb, funny... I don't know what he meant with that. So basically, if using hacks was allowed, he'd use them, no matter how ridiculously easy it would be? Just win for the sake of winning, no matter what? I don't get it. Is it even FUN to play like that? I have LOTS of fun with the MK14 which is basically the exact opposite of the FMGs.

[QUOTE=dass;33815553]Guess what: I was playing in a server in my country. I sprayed at less then 5 meters away from him, while crouching, but that doesn't even matters because even if I spray a meter away from them, the bullets seem to disappear and in 10, only 1 or 2 seem to have hit. Ffs, I've seen a guy bleed to death through 2 seconds straight, which is alot when you are firing about 10 bullets, and only a bunch of them actually registring. AND, on top of that, I shot the guy STRAIGHT IN THE HEAD. If I were to do a real life presentation, I'd be hitting the guy in the head with the barrel of the AK, shoving it into his head down to his brain, through his helmet and firing it. I literally pointed a gun at his head, kind of like how someone puts a gun to their own head to shoot themselves, fired it, and it didn't kill him. It did 30 damage and he managed to kill me. Thats bullshit. Thats not me being a bad player. Thats the hitboxes being a piece of shit as always. Heck, theres even a video on youtube showing how fucked up the hitboxes can get.[/QUOTE] Well then he was just faster than you. You seem to discard the fact that everybody has the same handicap as you and that sometimes you're just simply unlucky. In other news I've just gotten onto the top 1000 of Team Defender, feels good man :D

[QUOTE=kaskade700;33818256]Well then he was just faster than you. You seem to discard the fact that everybody has the same handicap as you and that sometimes you're just simply unlucky. In other news I've just gotten onto the top 1000 of Team Defender, feels good man :D[/QUOTE] What?... Now you're just ignoring my facts...

[QUOTE=TheWhiteFox1;33815394][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1D0oG9Ml7A&feature=g-u&context=G2e09a79FUAAAAAAAGAA[/media] Couldn't agree with this guy more, although I know it's quite an unpopular opinion.[/QUOTE] This guy plays all his games on easy. [editline]20th December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=dass;33818334]What?... Now you're just ignoring my facts...[/QUOTE] your facts sounds like the story of a rage quit, I have no counter argument because I quite frankly can't relate the CSS you're typing about to my CSS ;)

[QUOTE=kaskade700;33818370]your facts sounds like the story of a rage quit, I have no counter argument because I quite frankly can't relate the CSS you're typing about to my CSS ;)[/QUOTE] Youre right. It was a rage quit. Because of something that happened hundreds of times before and now happened again in the most stupid of ways possible. I've seen lots of people ingame, whinning about how the guys they hit and didn't die had blood on their heads or were painted in blood/shit stain and still had a large portion of their health. This wasn't a story of "I hit him in the foot because I suck" kind of story. This was a "I hit him in the head with a huge ass nail and he didn't even stumble". just to be sure, we are talking about the shitty hitboxes right? Now about one's personal skill level? Because unless that actually counts towards the damage you do... And that is sarcasm btw.

I don't think the guy in that video knows the satisfaction of killing OP gun people with crappy guns like the L85 or P99.

Dunno why but I inserted MW3 into my Xbox360 yesterday, turned on TDM checked scoreboard in match and only names like "xXeLiite Sn1perXx" popped up, pulled out MW3 and put back in skyrim.

[QUOTE=Darkslicer;33821426]Dunno why but I inserted MW3 into my Xbox360 yesterday, turned on TDM checked scoreboard in match and only names like "xXeLiite Sn1perXx" popped up, pulled out MW3 and put back in skyrim.[/QUOTE] yeah I don't get why people customize their names like that I got over that when I was 12 likewise I don't see why people copy names of other characters if I had a penny for every Dovakhiin I saw... I'd have $1

[QUOTE=Live2becool;33821325]I don't think the guy in that video knows the satisfaction of killing OP gun people with crappy guns like the L85 or P99.[/QUOTE] Do you mean the L86?

[QUOTE=Live2becool;33821325]I don't think the guy in that video knows the satisfaction of killing OP gun people with crappy guns like the L85 or P99.[/QUOTE] What about a KSG 12 with a silencer?

[QUOTE=dass;33819675]Youre right. It was a rage quit. Because of something that happened hundreds of times before and now happened again in the most stupid of ways possible. I've seen lots of people ingame, whinning about how the guys they hit and didn't die had blood on their heads or were painted in blood/shit stain and still had a large portion of their health. This wasn't a story of "I hit him in the foot because I suck" kind of story. This was a "I hit him in the head with a huge ass nail and he didn't even stumble". just to be sure, we are talking about the shitty hitboxes right? Now about one's personal skill level? Because unless that actually counts towards the damage you do... And that is sarcasm btw.[/QUOTE] I am aware that the hitboxes in CSS can be inconsistent, I am just saying that everybody is playing the same game and that there's nothing to do about it.

[QUOTE=Live2becool;33821325]I don't think the guy in that video knows the satisfaction of killing OP gun people with crappy guns like the L85 or P99.[/QUOTE] P99 is not crappy, son.

Oh wow, you can actually hit people with ADS on the PM-9 with kick and silencer equipped. Still recoily as fuck. Might as well not aim but it still rapes close quarters [editline]20th December 2011[/editline] And I love the P99. Favorite pistol right now.

IMO MW3 is just shit. It has its few fun things, but it's not worth it. I'm SO glad i got it as a gift instead of buying it. Sold it today and got Skyrim. After that back to Black Ops.

[QUOTE=Darkslicer;33821426]Dunno why but I inserted MW3 into my Xbox360 yesterday, turned on TDM checked scoreboard in match and only names like "xXeLiite Sn1perXx" popped up, pulled out MW3 and put back in skyrim.[/QUOTE] Good thing MW3 on PC uses the Steam name as your name, so you can't have stupid names like that unless you want a stupid name like that to show to your friends :v: [editline]21st December 2011[/editline] [QUOTE=Ogopogo;33822313]What about a KSG 12 with a silencer?[/QUOTE] No damage/range proficiency aswell. Good god, if you actually rule everyone with that, you have to be called a god.