[QUOTE=RaxaHax;31873901]Was in CoD:WaW[/QUOTE]
Fair enough, but the pro version gives you fireproof, so it's more like the combined the two perks into a new one with the same name.
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;31874637]Fair enough, but the pro version gives you fireproof, so it's more like the combined the two perks into a new one with the same name.[/QUOTE]
Fireproof doesnt come in handy hardly ever. At flamethrower range, you will still die from the second hit and if you run through napalm, chances are you will be in it long enough for it to hit you again and kill you anyway.
[QUOTE=Nohj;31874679]Fireproof doesnt come in handy hardly ever. At flamethrower range, you will still die from the second hit and if you run through napalm, chances are you will be in it long enough for it to hit you again and kill you anyway.[/QUOTE]'
I didn't say it was useful, I'm just saying they combined the two perks and kept the name of one of them. I think Flak Jacket is one of the least useful Blue perks.
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;31874965]'
I didn't say it was useful, I'm just saying they combined the two perks and kept the name of one of them. I think Flak Jacket is one of the least useful Blue perks.[/QUOTE]
I find it useful on nuketown but thats only because everyone uses it and spams explosives.
I've never been killed by napalm strikes with flak jacket pro.
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;31858949]He's making videos for Activision's Elite service now. If you pay for the Elite membership, you get weekly weapon guides from him, in addition to other stuff.
He's gonna start making a new series covering guns from a bunch of different games now though.[/QUOTE]
So we'll have to pay for someone to read out callofduty.wikia.com?
Fuck Deathstreaks man, seriously...
So many people are gonna grief and troll doing that...
[editline]22nd August 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=SteveUK;31877360]So we'll have to pay for someone to read out callofduty.wikia.com?[/QUOTE]
at least we get a radio voice out of it?
Well if the deathstreaks are real, what makes them think being a suicide bomber is better than getting a ten second hp boost? They want you to kill yourself AGAIN?
Same for the perks. 6 kills= 6 perks. Since the killstreaks reset without you dying, 12 kills=9 perks, 18 kills= 12 perks, ect. You'll be a fucking juggernaut before you even get the actual killstreak.
The only thing i like out of that supposed "leak" are the perks, which look useful as fuck.
[QUOTE=PyroCraz3d;31872705][url]http://www.mw3info.com/mw3-leaked-perks-and-killstreaks/[/url]
That might be late, fake, or whatever, but if it's real, then holy shit MW3 will be the single most frustrating game in the entire history of gaming.[/QUOTE]
that looks very fake, "Dead Mans Hand"? Such a terrible name
Answer now: Why i cannot get good FPS at Black Ops. canyourunit site says i can run it fast?
[QUOTE=LaTrefle;31883250]canyourunit site says i can run it fast?[/QUOTE]
Always never bet on Sysreqslab
[QUOTE=certified;31883339]Always never bet on Sysreqslab[/QUOTE]
Crysis 2 runs at 60 fps
[QUOTE=LaTrefle;31883250]Answer now: Why i cannot get good FPS at Black Ops. canyourunit site says i can run it fast?[/QUOTE]
This question is easy, the game is poorly optimized like everything that has Call of Duty infront of it
[QUOTE=Spearman;31883891]This question is easy, the game is poorly optimized like everything that has Call of Duty infront of it[/QUOTE]
MW2, poorly optimized.
You should do stand up.
[QUOTE=Spearman;31883891]This question is easy, the game is poorly optimized like everything that has Call of Duty infront of it[/QUOTE]
As much I now hate to defend the CoD franchise, Black Ops is the only one poorly optimized.
I have never had a problem with running any CoD title and I have bought all of them since CoD4 on the day of release.
Black Ops had a nasty stuttering bug for a week or two but after that was fixed it was smooth sailing.
Yeah, the only one I had slight performance problems with was Blops too. I had some stutter until the shader warming thing was implemented.
[QUOTE=Harry3;31884651]As much I now hate to defend the CoD franchise, Black Ops is the only one poorly optimized.[/QUOTE]
W@W was also very poorly optimized compared to optimization central that was CoD4.
Hm.
Yeah, I had lag issues with W@W.
World at Warcraft wasn't anything special IMO, it was quite literally the definition of a reskin game.
[QUOTE=certified;31886339]World at Warcraft wasn't anything special IMO, it was quite literally the definition of a reskin game.[/QUOTE]
But I loved World at Warcraft. :smith:
[QUOTE=certified;31886339]World at Warcraft wasn't anything special IMO, it was quite literally the definition of a reskin game.[/QUOTE]
Not really. It didn't have any of the guns from the previous addition of the series, so it was very far from a reskin. The gameplay was just bland, because there are so many semi-automatic weapons that you just get bored very quickly.
I liked W@W, personally, it had nice maps and responsive weapons.
World at War wins purely by having a 4 player cooperative campaign with its own sets of stats and challenges.
You think MW3 will top Black Ops?
[QUOTE=xZippy;31889765]You think MW3 will top Black Ops?[/QUOTE]
Yes. Unless MW3 is a legitimately bad game then whatever the fuck they put out will be better than black ops.
Every COD game needs SP coop.
Oh and what ever happened to that coop campaign in BO that Treyarch talked about at E3 2010? They talked about it several times and then when BO released...
Oh its not there have fun kthxbai!
[QUOTE=certified;31891168]Every COD game needs SP coop.
Oh and what ever happened to that coop campaign in BO that Treyarch talked about at E3 2010? They talked about it several times and then when BO released...
Oh its not there have fun kthxbai![/QUOTE] It's boring completing the campaign in singleplayer and then doing it into multiplayer. So you either have a choice of beating the game with random people, taking more time, or doing it in singleplayer, often taking less time..
[QUOTE=certified;31891168]Every COD game needs SP coop.
Oh and what ever happened to that coop campaign in BO that Treyarch talked about at E3 2010? They talked about it several times and then when BO released...
Oh its not there have fun kthxbai![/QUOTE]
They said it would be different from the regular campaign. I'm pretty sure they were talking about Zombies. You should probably think before you post.
[editline]22nd August 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=nige111;31890077]Yes. Unless MW3 is a legitimately bad game then whatever the fuck they put out will be better than black ops.[/QUOTE]
Why exactly is Black Ops bad?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.