[QUOTE=Pat.Lithium;32803275]They're back, not sure if they are in multiplayer however they are in the game.[/QUOTE]
Yea I get what you mean, like how the dragunov was in mw2 singleplayer but not in multiplayer.
Never forgave those bastards.
[QUOTE=1chains1;32803206]Any word if theyre bringing back tactical knifes? Those things were hilarious, I loved being dragged 10 ft by my knife into their face while they were shooting me.[/QUOTE]
That was more the fault of Commando than the Tac. Knife itself. The Tac. Knife just had a raised RoF compared to the default melee.
Commando isn't going to be in MW3 thankfully.
[QUOTE=Pat.Lithium;32803275]They're back, not sure if they are in multiplayer however they are in the game.[/QUOTE]
They're in multiplayer.
[QUOTE=hexpunK;32803692]That was more the fault of Commando than the Tac. Knife itself. The Tac. Knife just had a raised RoF compared to the default melee.
Commando isn't going to be in MW3 thankfully.[/QUOTE]
What hexpunK said. Basically it's just going to allow you to stab a lot faster, but since commando isn't back in, you're nerfed back to default range.
Played a nice match of CoD4 last night, still was fun. :D
This is what happens when a Battlefag decides to ask a troll question (HURR MW3 VS BF3) in Steam chat (Read at your own discretion, but be warned, reading it will probably send your IQ into Downs Syndrome territory):
[QUOTE]Never tell your password to anyone.
[TG]CommandoDucky: hey
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: yeh
[TG]CommandoDucky: cod mw3 or bf3?
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: MW3
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: And by BF3 you mean Bad Company 3
[TG]CommandoDucky: No
[TG]CommandoDucky: retard
[TG]CommandoDucky: bad company 2 was part of the bad company series
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: It's the exact same gameplay as BFBC2, but with jet camping
[TG]CommandoDucky: bf3 is part of the bf series
[TG]CommandoDucky: like bf 1942
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: BF3 is not a true BF game.
[TG]CommandoDucky: bf 2142
[TG]CommandoDucky: bf2
[TG]CommandoDucky: Yes it is
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: Its BC2 with jets and 64 players
[TG]CommandoDucky: ITS BF2 but diffrent maps
[TG]CommandoDucky: and better engine
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: ...
[TG]CommandoDucky: Your fucking stupid
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: How exactly?
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: I played the beta
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: It was BC2 all over again
[TG]CommandoDucky: its a beta....
[TG]CommandoDucky: its supposed to suck retard
[TG]CommandoDucky: i dont see mw3 releasing a beta
[TG]CommandoDucky: cod releases the same shit every year, and is like, where just gonna put a new number and ad some graphics and let them fucking retards buy it
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: ...
[TG]CommandoDucky: iw=6 year olds spinning on chairs
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: [URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5hfYJsQAhl0[/URL]
[TG]CommandoDucky: DICE= People who dont sleep all night and listen to the community to improve there game and have an ongoing support to there games
[TG]CommandoDucky: [URL]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=coOHjF4_apI&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL[/URL]
[TG]CommandoDucky: take taht
[TG]CommandoDucky: and shove it in your ass
[TG]CommandoDucky: far up your ass
«SG.Mem» รραятαŋ¹¹7: No.
[/QUOTE]
Idiot's name is left unfiltered just out of the fact of how retarded his incoherent ramblings were. I mean if you are going to go into the dumb BF3 vs MW3 debate, atleast bring: Good grammar, good arguments, and not bullshit responses.
MW3 all the fucking way. I mean, how dumb and desperate is the BF3 community to increase their E-Peen size? They continually troll our thread, and now they are randomly troll messaging us on Steam.
[highlight](User was banned for this post ("Brewing a shitstorm / Trolling / Terrible grammar" - Craptasket))[/highlight]
[QUOTE=certified;32806312]This is what happens when a Battlefag decides to ask a troll question (HURR MW3 VS BF3) in Steam chat (Read at your own discretion, but be warned, reading it will probably send your IQ into Downs Syndrome territory):
Idiot's name is left unfiltered just out of the fact of how retarded his incoherent ramblings were. I mean if you are going to go into the dumb BF3 vs MW3 debate, atleast bring: Good grammar, good arguments, and not bullshit responses.
MW3 all the fucking way. I mean, how dumb and desperate is the BF3 community to increase their E-Peen size? They continually troll our thread, and now they are randomly troll messaging us on Steam.[/QUOTE]
Guess what.
It goes both ways.
Battlefag? Way to help your own argument there.
That's odd, I don't see anyone here trolling COD players, most people here respect each other enough, or just doesn't care. Calling us "Battlefags" makes you the troll, not anyone in the BF3 who are guilty because we prefer BF3. I thought you were a decent poster Certified, until not.
[QUOTE=Delta616;32806715]That's odd, I don't see anyone here trolling COD players, most people here respect each other enough, or just doesn't care. Calling us "Battlefags" makes you the troll, not anyone in the BF3 who are guilty because we prefer BF3. I thought you were a decent poster Certified, until not.[/QUOTE]
Your first mistake was thinking Certified was a decent poster.
Just so you (and anyone else from the BF3 thread) know, us CoD guys have nothing against Battlefield or the people who play it. We don't shit talk you guys in here, and we hate it when fanboy arguments go on.
We like our game, and you guys like your game. Hell, half of us (including me) like both.
No hard feelings towards you guys in the slightest.
When has anyone come from the BF thread into this thread to troll? It never happens, nor has it happened on the last few fucking pages.
Are you really that fucking stupid?
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;32806763]Your first mistake was thinking Certified was a decent poster.
Just so you (and anyone else from the BF3 thread) know, us CoD guys have nothing against Battlefield or the people who play it. We don't shit talk you guys in here, and we hate it when fanboy arguments go on.
We like our game, and you guys like your game. Hell, half of us (including me) like both.
No hard feelings towards you guys in the slightest.[/QUOTE]
Same here, we are all gamers, I respect all gamers, hate the concept of fanboyism, and HATE to see people trash talking all because they don't like your game.
And you're a fucking douchebag, certified. You start a conversation with someone with what intent? It seems like you just wanted to troll them and make them angry.
[QUOTE=Pat.Lithium;32588676]Who do you think you are, the Q&A guy?[/QUOTE]
YEAH! LET'S RATE HIM DUMB TO ASSERT OUR DOMINANCE OVER THE INTERNEEEET
gtfo this thread
if I see the words BF3 vs. MW3 from this point on, I will be pissed and go on full flame/report mode.
[QUOTE=AlexGT;32806873]YEAH! LET'S RATE HIM DUMB TO ASSERT OUR DOMINANCE OVER THE INTERNEEEET[/QUOTE]Excuse me?
Certified, good job for ruining both the Call of Duty and Battlefield thread. You're insulting BF3 of being "BC3" than you are bitching that we're insulting MW3.
:downs:
[QUOTE=sa2fan;32806919]than you are bitching that we're insulting MW3.[/QUOTE]
We are?
In my opinion, Battlefield is superior to Modern Warfare 6.
Well, not really us, FP. The people of Youtube, etc.
[editline]16th October 2011[/editline]
And he said the BF3 community, so basically us and those others.
[QUOTE=doonbugie2;32806951]In my opinion, Battlefield is superior to Modern Warfare 6.[/QUOTE]
It's pretty much a fact that Battlefield 3 is running on a technologically superior engine, and has superior features, but that doesn't make COD a bad game.
[QUOTE=Delta616;32806970]It's pretty much a fact that Battlefield 3 is running on a technologically superior engine, and has superior features, but that doesn't make COD a bad game.[/QUOTE]
I think 'superior features' is kind of an opinion, but I will admit it's a prettier and more capable engine. CoD doesn't really need to upgrade their engine too much though, it's fine at what it does.
Oh well, back to Call of Duty.
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;32806985]I think 'superior features' is kind of an opinion, but I will admit it's a prettier and more capable engine. CoD doesn't really need to upgrade their engine too much though, it's fine at what it does.[/QUOTE]
When I say superior features, I am speaking about graphical features, and the destruction system.
[QUOTE=Grim Joker;32806985]I think 'superior features' is kind of an opinion, but I will admit it's a prettier and more capable engine. CoD doesn't really need to upgrade their engine too much though, it's fine at what it does.[/QUOTE]
yeah, it's got better hitreg than BC2/BF2 imo
BF games have always had funky hitreg
I agree, Call of Duty is okay for what it is.. a more advanced counter-strike-like game. Though I think publisher, Activision are dumb. I play MW2 once and awhile when I'm bored etc but I'm not a hardcore fan of the series.
I certainly do want to play the campaign.
[QUOTE=trotskygrad;32807036]yeah, it's got better hitreg than BC2/BF2 imo
BF games have always had funky hitreg
[editline]16th October 2011[/editline]
yeah, it's got better hitreg than BC2/BF2 imo
BF games have always had funky hitreg[/QUOTE]
Well yeah, when you have 64 players, vehicles and destruction aswell as multiple flags or MCOM stations its going to eat up alot of bandwidth. So they have to make everything as efficient as possible, not excluding hitreg.
[QUOTE=doonbugie2;32807047]I agree, Call of Duty is okay for what it is.. a more advanced counter-strike-like game. Though I think publisher, Activision are dumb. I play MW2 once and awhile when I'm bored etc but I'm not a hardcore fan of the series.[/QUOTE]
nopenopenope
CoD is not like CS, at all
they feel very different, I would argue that it's not a matter of advanced, but casual vs. hardcore.
[editline]16th October 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=doonbugie2;32807060]Well yeah, when you have 64 players, vehicles and destruction aswell as multiple flags or MCOM stations its going to eat up alot of bandwidth. So they have to make everything as efficient as possible, not excluding hitreg.[/QUOTE]
yeah, well the large size of the maps and the vehicles themselves screw with the hitreg.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
