[QUOTE=wraithcat;32180876]Official pictures have issues with copyright, hence fan pictures as long as they fit aren't problematic. So I don't see an issue with it.
Also - a number of BL books do have female guardsmen on the cover. Secondly many more are described in fluff and there's a female LT in a GW sanctioned game now.
[/QUOTE]
I don't have a problem with Female Guardsman, i just have a problem with fan pictures. I can draw whatever i want and add it to the wiki by that Logic. It's nothing to do with copyright, as they use plenty of other official images.
What also annoys me is that it isn't even a picture of a Harakoni Warhawk, that is not the colours they use.
So space marine is released tomorrow right? Is it immedietly at 00:01 or like 20:00 pacific time?
Neither. It's released in 7 hours.
I'm stuck at singleplayer.
[sp]After the chaos lord kills sidonis you have to fight to the capital spire, after reaching another platform with some sorcerers i can't go any, there seems to be a lift pad, but no way to active it.[/sp]
Is my game bugged?
Are there any trainers for DOW 2
Turns out the person running the W40K wiki is an idiot. I removed the picture of the supposed Female Harakoni Warhawk which was not a Harakoni Warhawk as it was completely the wrong colours, so he tells me "don't remove pictures" and then puts it back.
Now he has removed the part where i told him on his profile it's not a Harakoni Warhawk.
Ok have i got this wrong? He is now saying that one of their schemes IS white and blue...
[QUOTE=nightlord;32183222], so he tells me "don't [B]remove[/B] pictures" and then puts it back....[/QUOTE]He said nothing about... CHANGE FOR THE CHANGE GOD!
[QUOTE=nightlord;32178160]The W40K wiki is Pathetic, and lexicanum has lots of stuff missing.
The W40K wiki has ALOT of Fan-made/unofficial pictures which really annoys me, and alot of the articles completely negate the point of other stuff - E.g the Article on Imperial Guard means the articles on things like the Leman Russ aren't needed as it is all in the Imperial guard one.
And they use things like this...
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/yrLna.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Yeah, WH40kwiki sucks, Lexicanum for life..
[QUOTE=acds;32183442]Yeah, WH40kwiki sucks, Lexicanum for life..[/QUOTE]
Yeah, think i'll just start editing Lexicanum instead. Problem with Lexicanum is it doesn't get edited enough though.
[QUOTE=nightlord;32183222]Turns out the person running the W40K wiki is an idiot. I removed the picture of the supposed Female Harakoni Warhawk which was not a Harakoni Warhawk as it was completely the wrong colours, so he tells me "don't remove pictures" and then puts it back.
Now he has removed the part where i told him on his profile it's not a Harakoni Warhawk.
Ok have i got this wrong? He is now saying that one of their schemes IS white and blue...[/QUOTE]
I thought the only vaguely canon source for their colour scheme was on DoW?
[QUOTE=Etcetera;32183492]I thought the only vaguely canon source for their colour scheme was on DoW?[/QUOTE]
The old Imperial Guard collectors guide has a picture.
Either way, the wiki is horribly organized, run by a bad admin and uses tons of unofficial pictures which defeats the point in saying use Canon stuff only.
Does anyone know what this is from? It's on the W40K, apparantly it's a lasgun version.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/O0vhx.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=nightlord;32183222]Turns out the person running the W40K wiki is an idiot. I removed the picture of the supposed Female Harakoni Warhawk which was not a Harakoni Warhawk as it was completely the wrong colours, so he tells me "don't remove pictures" and then puts it back.
Now he has removed the part where i told him on his profile it's not a Harakoni Warhawk.
Ok have i got this wrong? He is now saying that one of their schemes IS white and blue...[/QUOTE]
What's your source of information on this? I've never heard of these "Warhawks" myself, although it's certainly suspicious of him to remove that part of his profile.
[QUOTE=Cone;32180812]So what exactly happens to someone if they're accused of being a heretic? I know it's bad - like, really bad - but I've never actually heard of what can happen after the Inquisition catches you.[/QUOTE]
Ever seen Hellraiser?
[editline]8th September 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Nikota;32181486]Anyone else feel like there could have been THQ meddling with the game seeing how it went from a really good concept to a point a to b action game?[/QUOTE]
Try one more company up, which is the same reason Nids are so boring in Dow2.
[QUOTE=Cone;32183737]What's your source of information on this? I've never heard of these "Warhawks" myself, although it's certainly suspicious of him to remove that part of his profile.[/QUOTE]
Harakoni Warhawks are a low Grav-world Elite Imperial Guard Drop regiment. Was in the 3rd edition Codex.
Colours are shown in the 3rd edition Imperial Guard collectors guide. I've asked him for a source on the Blue colours.
[QUOTE=nightlord;32183498]The old Imperial Guard collectors guide has a picture.
Either way, the wiki is horribly organized, run by a bad admin and uses tons of unofficial pictures which defeats the point in saying use Canon stuff only.
Does anyone know what this is from? It's on the W40K, apparantly it's a lasgun version.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/O0vhx.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
I guess they saw the standard pattern lasgun and figured they'd make their own awful version out of a G36C and just paste the Imperial Eagle on.
[QUOTE=markg06;32184790]I guess they saw the standard pattern lasgun and figured they'd make their own awful version out of a G36C and just paste the Imperial Eagle on.[/QUOTE]
And then add it on the wiki and claim it's an actual version.
[QUOTE=markg06;32184790]I guess they saw the standard pattern lasgun and figured they'd make their own awful version out of a G36C and just paste the Imperial Eagle on.[/QUOTE]I am looking at that picture and the magazine is annoying me. I can't take my eyes off it.
[QUOTE=nightlord;32183498][IMG]http://i.imgur.com/O0vhx.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
I've seen this one. It's Photoshop Pattern lasgun, from the forgeworld of Jpegia.
[QUOTE=Fippe;32184991]I've seen this one. It's Photoshop Pattern lasgun, from the forgeworld of Jpegia.[/QUOTE]
I hear their Artifacts are legendary.
[QUOTE=Mr. Scorpio;32185066]I hear their Artifacts are legendary.[/QUOTE]
The Artifacts which suddenly and mysteriously dissapeared a short while after the blood Ravens reputedly took a vacation there.
[QUOTE=RayvenQ;32185314]The Artifacts which suddenly and mysteriously dissapeared a short while after the blood Ravens reputedly took a vacation there.[/QUOTE]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/TnbJZ.png[/img]
[QUOTE=GetBent;32178814]Oh god, the censor list for Space Marine is hilarious:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oA-HWL2kTdA[/media]
A sample:
[code]bitchwrinkle
buttpirate
dickgoblin
nigeria
puddinghatch
hamwallet
rumpleforeskin
cocksplinter
porksteeple
turdburgler
boinkswatter
gutlocker
lap rocket
fiddlecove[/code][/QUOTE]
I like this version more.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdmyKZ_DP6k[/media]
Hnng 3-4 hours to wait and see if i can even play it, time is going so damn slowly.
[QUOTE=nightlord;32183498]The old Imperial Guard collectors guide has a picture.
Either way, the wiki is horribly organized, run by a bad admin and uses tons of unofficial pictures which defeats the point in saying use Canon stuff only.
Does anyone know what this is from? It's on the W40K, apparantly it's a lasgun version.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/O0vhx.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
If its from that guys wiki then its just fan made stuff. Anything from the 40k wiki can be regarded as weeabo neckbeard wish listing 40k.
Here are some more fluffy guns
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/11648828/1307288130550.jpg[/img]
[QUOTE=Ninja_Blue;32185365][img]http://i.imgur.com/TnbJZ.png[/img][/QUOTE]
I've seen this pic a number of times yet it keeps amusing me.
Never trust your parents with 40k
I built two tacticool muhreens today and when I returned from school I noticed there were two more next to the ones I already built
Turns out my mother got interested and built one marine with a boltgun and a sergeant with a mk5 shoulderpad and beakie helmet
Love her for the beakie
[QUOTE=Zezibesh;32186367]Never trust your parents with 40k
I built two tacticool muhreens today and when I returned from school I noticed there were two more next to the ones I already built
Turns out my mother got interested and built one marine with a boltgun and a sergeant with a mk5 shoulderpad and beakie helmet
Love her for the beakie[/QUOTE]
THats actually quite fucking awesome. You should actually talk to her and get her to get into doing her own army/own models (if only to get her to leave yours alone.)
[QUOTE=Zezibesh;32186367]Never trust your parents with 40k
I built two tacticool muhreens today and when I returned from school I noticed there were two more next to the ones I already built
Turns out my mother got interested and built one marine with a boltgun and a sergeant with a mk5 shoulderpad and beakie helmet
Love her for the beakie[/QUOTE]
Reminds me of the good old days when my Dad and I played Space Hulk
[QUOTE=Zezibesh;32186367]Never trust your parents with 40k
I built two tacticool muhreens today and when I returned from school I noticed there were two more next to the ones I already built
Turns out my mother got interested and built one marine with a boltgun and a sergeant with a mk5 shoulderpad and beakie helmet
Love her for the beakie[/QUOTE]
Yeah my friend got his mom some Sisters of Battle (she works as an art professor). She painted them her school's colors.
[QUOTE=Angua;32186210]I've seen this pic a number of times yet it keeps amusing me.[/QUOTE]
the face and the blatent ultramarine logo just gets me
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
