[img]http://i.minus.com/i95AhPgtoT10H.gif[/img]
blood on the screen so ~badass~
DNF
[editline]11th October 2011[/editline]
[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;32734426][img]http://www.familyfriendlygaming.com/Reviews/2008/Pics/Gran%20Turismo%205%20Prologue-5.jpg[/img]
nothing special[/QUOTE]
lol that's prologue dipppppp
Fallout: New Vegas.
[quote][img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/595824610692799406/67F468AD3E1E9A55A154524DE1E57D5C42A99F3E/[/img]
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/595824610727421131/3DF695653BB2CDC89BEC89C8B686DD438A49B91D/[/img]
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/595824610727422478/6431A9F0B477896D6DF23BD6D1DA7A61FC8C6751/[/img]
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/595824610727419757/71037E92F47405F18A04AFF82A2824277AA03A71/[/img]
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/595824610727419060/AE8DD91FC89E5F4BEB28AE447BF2F119845D1B8C/[/img]
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/595824610727418300/EBD51411329BADB9F36474DEE0C733ECF457A2EE/[/img][/quote]
[QUOTE=nath2009uk;32734150]They just gave everything ugly specular maps. I think even the characters are piss shiny too.[/QUOTE]
I always thought the characters were made of plastic or something, like toys filled with jelly.
[img]http://img1.uploadscreenshot.com/images/orig/10/28319265272-orig.jpg[/img]
This gonna be fun! [sp]Might&Magic VI[/sp]
[QUOTE=Watevaman;32734837]
lol that's prologue dipppppp[/QUOTE]
what's the difference
[QUOTE=RawrBullet;32730301]That's an intro at the start about the end of the game.. it says "2 Months earlier" or something after that bit, and you go to chapter 1[/QUOTE]
8 Days i think.
Honestly I think RAGE has set new standards graphically, maybe not in terms of raw graphics tech but in terms of aesthetic, character design and animations it's unmatched. My opinion on this game has really turned itself around.
[img]http://u.cubeupload.com/GenericMonk/Rage2011101118015811.png[/img]
[img]http://u.cubeupload.com/GenericMonk/Rage2011101119045919.png[/img]
[img]http://u.cubeupload.com/GenericMonk/Rage2011101119342835.png[/img]
[img]http://u.cubeupload.com/GenericMonk/Rage2011101120581693.png[/img]
[img]http://u.cubeupload.com/GenericMonk/Rage2011101121343714.png[/img]
[img]http://u.cubeupload.com/GenericMonk/Rage2011101123535486.png[/img]
[img]http://u.cubeupload.com/GenericMonk/Rage2011101200000002.png[/img]
And yes, I do have to justify liking this game each time I post screenshots of it.
[editline]12th October 2011[/editline]
I get 60FPS with AA at 8x, maybe I can afford to ramp it up to 16x.
[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;32736125]Honestly I think RAGE has set new standards graphically, maybe not in terms of raw graphics tech but in terms of aesthetic, character design and animations it's unmatched.
[/QUOTE]
I agree.
[QUOTE=SweFox*;32736151]I agree.[/QUOTE]
Hopefully Carmack will release a hires texture pack at some point, though considering the size of the game to begin with the hires textures would probably be bigger than the average HDD in 2004.
It wouldn't bother me much to be honest. I would happily do a second play through with updated textures.
[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;32736125]Honestly I think RAGE has set new standards graphically, maybe not in terms of raw graphics tech but in terms of aesthetic, character design and animations it's unmatched. My opinion on this game has really turned itself around.
And yes, I do have to justify liking this game each time I post screenshots of it.
[editline]12th October 2011[/editline]
I get 60FPS with AA at 8x, maybe I can afford to ramp it up to 16x.[/QUOTE]
It would be nice if my game looked like this :(
[QUOTE=David Tennant;32728736]Remember when BF2's graphics were amazing and you had to buy a sweet 7600 GT to play it?
Those were the days.[/QUOTE]
Psshhh BFG 7800GTX's were the top dog.
Remember... BFG?
inb4 "DUKE SUCKS CASUAL SHIT WOMEN'S RIGHTS"
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/559796448336761501/1B1415B8769175C08FE8DC22051CDDF5942FF9E5/[/img]
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/559796448336763390/04B518AE24DD8893DEB1FBC669259AF276CCAE72/[/img]
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/559796448336765644/F5D6141878349CEAD83FDDFC64569706E541B18B/[/img]
the best part is that there really are hats everywhere on this map
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/559796448336768108/56CE114E01215CCC549A717C25377701060CB955/[/img]
360 NO SCOPE XxBADASSxX
[img]http://cloud.steampowered.com/ugc/559796448336769768/7B7600272824FDDD5B31F2B67171BEFA958F8F3A/[/img]
[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;32731703]name me one person who can manage 30FPS with ubersampling on and you win money[/QUOTE]
*Raises hand*
[QUOTE=redBadger;32736305]It would be nice if my game looked like this :([/QUOTE]
if it helps I followed the nvidia blog post so I'm forcing the highest res textures possible and also some anisotropic filtering
([url]http://www.geforce.com/News/articles/how-to-unlock-rages-high-resolution-textures-with-a-few-simple-tweaks[/url])
Someone needs to fix the ghost pages problem... Anyway, I think I've got some content. Give me a second.
[img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/4010779/GT5/Grand%20Valley%20East_1.jpg[/img]
It's a bit old, but I think it looks nice.
[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;32736125]Honestly I think RAGE has set new standards graphically, maybe not in terms of raw graphics tech but in terms of aesthetic, character design and animations it's unmatched. My opinion on this game has really turned itself around.
And yes, I do have to justify liking this game each time I post screenshots of it.
[editline]12th October 2011[/editline]
I get 60FPS with AA at 8x, maybe I can afford to ramp it up to 16x.[/QUOTE]
16x runs off a different algorithm I think. Perhaps not MSAA but something else. I prefer 16x because there is a slight soft focus that really works significantly better than 8x for me. 16x at 1920x1080 only used like 70% of my 580.
16x: [url]http://filesmelt.com/dl/rage_2011-10-09_00-06-45-20.png[/url]
8x: [url]http://filesmelt.com/dl/rage_2011-10-09_00-06-30-60.png[/url]
[QUOTE=Brt5470;32736398]*Raises hand*[/QUOTE]
really should have thought that one through since even my single 570 manages to get about 25fps with ubersampling turned on
maybe a few years into the future I'll be able to turn it on and enjoy a perfectly smooth, jaggy free experience
My understanding is that ubersampling renders the scene is many various ways and blends it together. Does that line up with what you've heard? That makes me understand the kind of power it needs to run at decent speeds.
[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;32736438]if it helps I followed the nvidia blog post so I'm forcing the highest res textures possible and also some anisotropic filtering
([url]http://www.geforce.com/News/articles/how-to-unlock-rages-high-resolution-textures-with-a-few-simple-tweaks[/url])[/QUOTE]
This doesn't seem to work for me.
[QUOTE=Brt5470;32736467]16x runs off a different algorithm I think. Perhaps not MSAA but something else. I prefer 16x because there is a slight soft focus that really works significantly better than 8x for me. 16x at 1920x1080 only used like 70% of my 580.
16x: [url]http://filesmelt.com/dl/rage_2011-10-09_00-06-45-20.png[/url]
8x: [url]http://filesmelt.com/dl/rage_2011-10-09_00-06-30-60.png[/url][/QUOTE]
wow, no jaggies at all
I like how RAGE doesn't spam blur shaders too, it contributes greatly to the noble pursuit of not hurting my eyes. Also it doesn't have that annoying as piss mouse acceleration which is nice.
GT5 2.0 is out. You know what that means!
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/mQOdl.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/EJnn1.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/5S1UO.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/eIZsi.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/34srZ.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/824EQ.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/iMTYr.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/E6Zbp.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/cY3sk.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/DUogX.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/MZOtg.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/5ANf8.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/ZoDbu.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/wzFrz.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/iMxdc.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/SnP3x.jpg[/IMG]
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/Ruj4F.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=MosIPos;32736526]This doesn't seem to work for me.[/QUOTE]
if your game's ready working fine then it's only gonna be a very minor improvement; the textures just don't exist for most objects. You can see in my screenshots the metalwork especially is embarassingly low res.
[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;32736617]if your game's ready working fine then it's only gonna be a very minor improvement; the textures just don't exist for most objects. You can see in my screenshots the metalwork especially is embarassingly low res.[/QUOTE]
Mine looks to be on the very lowest, I was hoping I could get it to at least look a little bit better.
[QUOTE=Generic.Monk;32735920]what's the difference[/QUOTE]
It's a different game.
On my way to Madrid :v:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/SVkqq.jpg[/IMG]
Passenger Satisfaction: 100%
What, are you giving them all handjobs to keep them that happy?
[QUOTE=D3vils Buddy;32737542]Passenger Satisfaction: 100%
What, are you giving them all handjobs to keep them that happy?[/QUOTE]
Music before take off, drinks and hot meals. Keeps 'em nice and happy.
[QUOTE=H4wkeye;32737492]On my way to Madrid :v:
[/QUOTE]
What aircraft is that? It looks like the default 738 at first, but the panel color doesn't match.
Average GT5 standard car
[t]http://i.imgur.com/ByK0W.jpg[/t]
Demonstrating Gt5s AI, I made a blockade on the road and they swerved to dodge it :v:
[t]http://i.imgur.com/9MQBt.jpg[/t]
Two friends and I doing online race
[t]http://i.imgur.com/UwFD9.jpg[/t]
And then the dickery began
Going 275 km/h backwards in a Fiat
[t]http://i.imgur.com/bpubX.jpg[/t]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/YlWHT.jpg[/t]
Going 400 km/h backwards in a IS 7
[t]http://i.imgur.com/kGVXy.jpg[/t]
:v:
[t]http://i.imgur.com/2pMrO.jpg[/t]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/rfK5A.jpg[/t]
And average scene from the game
[t]http://i.imgur.com/oMyGe.jpg[/t]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
