[QUOTE=SB141;33090281]GTA V, Powered by Frostbite 2![/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/44722719/GTAVForstbite2.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Sergeant Turtle;33090623]Addressing the disagrees here, why? Theres no proof it includes the whole state. The trailer only showed LS. People keep going on about Mt. Chiliad, forgetting that the area around LA(and SoCal in general) is very mountainous. I've also seen people saying that the oil derricks are proof of Venturas, even though LA sits on one of the biggest oilfields in the world and has drills everywhere, and LS is quite clearly visible in the background.
Take of the super-optimist glasses, its just Los Santos + SoCal countryside[/QUOTE]
For it to only be Los Santos would be the biggest mistake Rockstar could make.
Refer to the previous pages for the reasons it would be illogical and a bad move.
[QUOTE=mac338;33090652][IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/44722719/GTAVForstbite2.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
those lights, those irritating lights.
The cars in the game looks like a bit like the style of Midnight Club LA.
[QUOTE=mac338;33090652][IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/44722719/GTAVForstbite2.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Not enough shit smeared over the goggles that should be covering the screen, you got it all wrong.
I hope they "keep" the physics in the car's handling from GTA 4. While they were a little bouncy and floppy, I DO NOT even want to THINK of incredibly arcade'y Saint's Row 2 handling.
And I hope for a mix of Red Dead Redemption and GTA4 Euphoria. RDR's was great in shootouts, but I couldn't push people down the stairs the same way anymore.
[QUOTE=mac338;33090652][IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/44722719/GTAVForstbite2.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Looks just like GTA IV if you turn the contrast and brightness all the way up.
Please oh please let us die if we stay in the desert sun for too long
[QUOTE=Pretty Obscure;33090725]looks just like GTA V if you turn the contrast and brightness all the way up.[/QUOTE]
uhh, what?
Do you mean that BF3 looks like GTA V if you do so?
[QUOTE=tratzzz;33090747]uhh, what?
Do you mean that BF3 looks like GTA V if you do so?[/QUOTE]
he must've gotten an advanced alpha copy and played it!!!!!!!!!
[QUOTE=Lucario;33090741]Please oh please let us die if we stay in the desert sun for too long[/QUOTE]
there's such a thing as too realistic
[QUOTE=tratzzz;33090747]uhh, what?
Do you mean that BF3 looks like GTA V if you do so?[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=SPESSMEHREN;33090761]he must've gotten an advanced alpha copy and played it!!!!!!!!![/QUOTE]
I missed the I key, shut up.
It looks like GTA IV (4) with the contrast and brightness all the way up.
[QUOTE=Pretty Obscure;33090725]Looks just like BF3 if you turn the contrast and brightness all the way up.[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/44722719/Contrasty.jpg[/IMG]
My eyes burn.
[QUOTE=RedStar;33090769]there's such a thing as too realistic[/QUOTE]
and then there's this little thing called immersion, too
Xbox 360 version must be compressed to the max.
[QUOTE=mac338;33090790][IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/44722719/Contrasty.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
I didn't fucking say Battlefield 3 Jesus Christ people, I meant GTA IV. Fuck.
[QUOTE=Killer900;33090830]Fuck nooooooo :([/QUOTE]
To be honest, I'm indifferent.
If its any hint, I think the amount of freeways and expressways in the game is a sign that maybe the game world is going to be very large.
In the trailer I saw four different ones... I-5, I-2 (which doesn't exist... odd), and two unnumbered freeways. The shot that shows a person everyone thinks is Nico Belic holding a sign appears to be on the real-world State Route 110/Interstate 110 in just before the [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judge_Harry_Pregerson_Interchange]Judge Harry Pregerson Interchange[/url] (which was featured in GTA:San Andreas as the [url=http://gta.wikia.com/Mulholland_Intersection]Mullholland Intersection[/url])
I just saw the trailer. It was good.
By the way: [img]http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/4303/trailerpp.png[/img]
This is gonna be a long read.
I'm hoping for at least 1.3x the size of SA
heard this was in San Andreas and blew out my sphincter
If it is all 3 cities, I hope they use them better than in GTASA, most of SF and LV were never used by any part of the story, and were noticeably underdetailed
This all reminds me of when the first GTA IV trailer was released... wild speculation, trailer analysis, just general excitement...
I love it :)
I hope CJ will have a reference. Too bad Rockstar told us they would never do something like that.
Oh wait;
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrYOfcbnz5I[/media]
[editline]2nd November 2011[/editline]
CROSSING MY FINGERS AND TURNING ON CAPS.
Oh hey, I always played as Claude in SA-MP :v:
He has one of the best skins, seriously.
This reminds me of my hype for GTA III. I remember I had a neoseeker account and dial-up internet back then. I would patiently wait 10 minutes to load a single picture and trailers were just out of the question. Then there would be all the speculation threads about weapons, characters, places, etc. Good times.
[QUOTE=MisterSjeiks;33090942]I hope CJ will have a reference. Too bad Rockstar told us they would never do something like that.
Oh wait;
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrYOfcbnz5I[/media]
[editline]2nd November 2011[/editline]
CROSSING MY FINGERS AND TURNING ON CAPS.[/QUOTE]
Yeah but that was in GTA 3 timeline. As I explained before, the timeline goes like this.
GTA 3 timeline: Vice city - San Andreas - GTA 3
GTA 4 timeline: GTA 4 - EFLC (take place at the same time)
GTA 5 timeline: GTA 5 - ????
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
