Kerbal Space Program Kanuary Edition: von Braun ain't got nothing on this v2! - Games

Just make sure to not quote them. :v:

Looking through the roleplay threads is painfully sad. I mean, how much dick do you have to suck to get to a point as low as roleplay?

[IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/2012-01-08_000011.jpg[/IMG] :-) I'll post the rocket that made it as well EDIT: [IMG]http://filesmelt.com/dl/2012-01-08_00002.jpg[/IMG] Basically massive primary stage, then a secondary to get to orbit. Tertiary (inside the payload fairing) does the TLI and munar injection, then the lander separates. The lander can take off and do the home burn as well, or the capsule has engines on it.

[QUOTE=talon03;34115578]Basically massive primary stage, then a secondary to get to orbit. Tertiary (inside the payload fairing) does the TLI and munar injection, then the lander separates. The lander can take off and do the home burn as well, or the capsule has engines on it.[/QUOTE] Woah, woah, woah, woah. Woah. Munshot is the name of [b]my[/b] series of rockets/landers. I'll add your lander to the index if you get a different name.

How do you guys keep your engines from shifting under the weight of the rocket?

[QUOTE=LarparNar;34114986]You're free to look through all my posts and use any screenshots you want. I can't be arsed to take more in hi-res.[/QUOTE] If you get a minute, get a good number of orbital shots, with the HUD hidden. (F2 as I'm sure you know) Try something with Silisko Edition. [sub]Also anybody who contributes pictures will get a little textbox with their username in it.[/sub] [editline]8th January 2012[/editline] [QUOTE=sami-elite;34118356]How do you guys keep your engines from shifting under the weight of the rocket?[/QUOTE] Don't put all the weight on one engine. Strap some boosters to the side.

[QUOTE=sami-elite;34118356]How do you guys keep your engines from shifting under the weight of the rocket?[/QUOTE] More boosters :v:

But more boosters is also more weight etc. This rocket takes me to the mun but the first stage is wonky.

[QUOTE=MC3craze;34113700]I need to get some good screenshots for a KSP chrome theme, I'll touch them up and render them. I just need some high resolution, clean, and anti aliased screenshots.[/QUOTE] [t]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13781308/KSP/screenshot27.png[/t] I'll take a couple better ones.

How can I make a tank supply 2 engines? The fuel pump only makes it go to ONLY ONE, while ignoring the engine directly below it on the stack

Diagram?

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/DRVmL.jpg[/IMG]

[QUOTE=sami-elite;34118483]But more boosters is also more weight etc. This rocket takes me to the mun but the first stage is wonky.[/QUOTE] Boosters lift their own weight.

That 1.75m decoupler gets in the way if I try to attach the top tank to the lower one.

Fuel Line.

But where?

[QUOTE=Dacheet;34119229][t]http://i.imgur.com/DRVmL.jpg[/t][/QUOTE] Run a fuel line from each peripheral tank up to the top source tank. [editline]edit[/editline] Run a fuel line from the large bottom tank up to the vanguard tank, then run another from the vanguard tank up to top source tank. I think.

[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/DVOD5.jpg[/IMG] Did I win?

I wanted to see if 7 of these actually flew. the answer was yes. and that God will be sending me to hell for this beautiful creation. [IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1417259/kerbal/temps/screenshot1%20%281%29.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1417259/kerbal/temps/screenshot1%20%282%29.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1417259/kerbal/temps/screenshot1%20%283%29.png[/IMG] [IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1417259/kerbal/temps/screenshot1%20%284%29.png[/IMG]

[QUOTE=Pelf;34118962]I'll take a couple better ones.[/QUOTE] [t]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13781308/KSP/screenshot58.png[/t] [t]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13781308/KSP/screenshot61.png[/t] [t]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13781308/KSP/screenshot62.png[/t]

Pelf, could you get a shot of the shuttle from the side on the dark side of Kerbin? Preferably with the engines firing.

[QUOTE=MC3craze;34121419]Pelf, could you get a shot of the shuttle from the side on the dark side of Kerbin? Preferably with the engines firing.[/QUOTE] A couple different angles. [t]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13781308/KSP/Shuttle/screenshot65.png[/t] [t]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13781308/KSP/Shuttle/screenshot66.png[/t] [t]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13781308/KSP/Shuttle/screenshot67.png[/t] [t]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/13781308/KSP/Shuttle/screenshot68.png[/t]

[QUOTE=CardBoardBox;34120349]I wanted to see if 7 of these actually flew. the answer was yes. and that God will be sending me to hell for this beautiful creation.[/QUOTE] Could you explain to me the science behind those engines? Why do they thrust down a ramp?

[QUOTE=Squeegy Mackoy;34122668]Could you explain to me the science behind those engines? Why do they thrust down a ramp?[/QUOTE] umm. I don't really know. They are like 30% more fuel efficient in air by using he pressure of the air as it's nozzle it adapts to atm pressure as it encounters it. or something. [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aerospike_engine[/url]

[t]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/46862728/kspchromethemenewtabpage.png[/t] Okay, this is what I have so far for the new tab background. Add suggestions, give criticism, etc. I'm going to sleep now... [editline]8th January 2012[/editline] And its obviously not done.

need an opinion windows. tempted to have no windows for they are all ugly. [img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1417259/window2.png[/img] [img]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1417259/window1.png[/img]

If you want windows, the second one looks a bit better.

I think I will just go with windowless :/ they are so ugly lol.

No, that just seems weirder. The second one looks pretty decent actually.

eh. I am unhappy with them. Kliper has no windows :P [editline]9th January 2012[/editline] pretty decent is still not so great. alittle closer. still dislike it compared to windoless. [IMG]http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1417259/window3.png[/IMG]