League of Legends v33 - Games

sejuani was never bad, just underplayed as hell

was sej a lot worse than now tho like, i really dont remember because i never saw her

[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;42243995]was sej a lot worse than now tho like, i really dont remember because i never saw her[/QUOTE] she's way more reliable now but she was good back then too hard to be useless when you have so much cc

[QUOTE=Whiterfire;42243966]remember when sejuani was shyvana but worse[/QUOTE] no because they were never alike

[QUOTE=Whiterfire;42243966]remember when sejuani was shyvana but worse [editline]19th September 2013[/editline] he got himself banned by shitposting[/QUOTE] There's a big difference between being sarcastic and shitposting. You must not know the difference.

[QUOTE=Whiterfire;42243966]remember when sejuani was shyvana but worse[/QUOTE] good point, CC sucks especially when it's aoe :^)

[img]http://i.imgur.com/b4f4n0n.png[/img] triforce is some broken item [editline]19th September 2013[/editline] speaking of broken so's brand

heard someone was talkin shit [editline]19th September 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Whiterfire;42243966] he got himself banned by shitposting[/QUOTE] didnt you quit playin League 3 times this week?

noooooo

[img]http://i.imgur.com/0GVT2th.png[/img] here we go

[QUOTE=Nintendo-Guy;42243977]sejuani was never bad, just underplayed as hell[/QUOTE] Release Sej was a massive pile of frozen boar shit.

[QUOTE=papaya;42244652][img]http://i.imgur.com/b4f4n0n.png[/img] triforce is some broken item [editline]19th September 2013[/editline] speaking of broken so's brand[/QUOTE] lol normals tho

this just in standard adc corki build brings expected results next up, thresh is good [editline]19th September 2013[/editline] good to be back everyone ive been keeping tabs and taking names

[url]http://lol.gamepedia.com/Articles:Snowballing_in_the_Group_Stages_of_the_S3_World_Championship[/url] This is pretty disgusting.

The teams ahead win? Disgusting. [editline]19th September 2013[/editline] Every now and then something shows up showing graphs about how leads = wins and that there isnt room for comebacks. I dont get it, what are you expecting? You shouldn't win if you're behind, you wouldn't be behind for no reason right? The only thing that's awful about that is that the gold leads take effect from 15/25 minutes which is shit but barons, dragons and inhib control is pretty much how you win games, why is it surprising [editline]19th September 2013[/editline] Reading comments [quote]This is obviously flawed methodology. First, you see correlation and claim causality. It is different to say that having first dragon "causes" teams to win as opposed to saying that better teams usually take objectives first, but it is the teams being better (individual skills, map awareness, composition, teamfights etc.) not the gold/exp from first objective that makes them win. If teams are equally matched, this totally brakes. For instance Lemondogs vs TSM - lemondogs got first blood at level 1, and they also got first dragon. Since these things have such a huge impact in your stats this should basically mean lost match and no chance for TSM. And we all know how it went. [/quote] sums it up pretty well

Talon vs Orianna who wins?

[QUOTE=Louis;42246536]The teams ahead win? Disgusting. [editline]19th September 2013[/editline] Every now and then something shows up showing graphs about how leads = wins and that there isnt room for comebacks. I dont get it, what are you expecting? You shouldn't win if you're behind, you wouldn't be behind for no reason right? The only thing that's awful about that is that the gold leads take effect from 15/25 minutes which is shit but barons, dragons and inhib control is pretty much how you win games, why is it surprising [/QUOTE] If the game is decided by 15-25 minutes but continues until 30-50 that isn't a very interesting spectator sport. [quote]This is obviously flawed methodology. First, you see correlation and claim causality. It is different to say that having first dragon "causes" teams to win as opposed to saying that better teams usually take objectives first, but it is the teams being better (individual skills, map awareness, composition, teamfights etc.) not the gold/exp from first objective that makes them win. If teams are equally matched, this totally brakes. [B]For instance Lemondogs vs TSM - lemondogs got first blood at level 1, and they also got first dragon. Since these things have such a huge impact in your stats this should basically mean lost match and no chance for TSM. And we all know how it went.[/B][/quote] "Here is one time this didn't work, therefore it's not real" What are outliers? This seems like a chicken and the egg kinda deal. Is this game too snowbally and teams that take these things first win because of it, or do better teams take these things first because they are better and therefore win?

[QUOTE=Qeme;42246441]lol normals tho[/QUOTE] im scared of ranked

[QUOTE=papaya;42246711]im scared of ranked[/QUOTE] Don't be scared of ranked. Be scared of the unknown horrors that lurk in it.

[QUOTE=papaya;42246711]im scared of ranked[/QUOTE] I see a lot more scary shit in normals than ranked.

[QUOTE=Derpmonster;42246667]Talon vs Orianna who wins?[/QUOTE] Talon as long as he is extra careful not to get poked while the ball is out there and not with ori

I have 3150, should I buy Olaf now because he's getting buffed, or wait for Lee Sin? I'm trying to get more top laners/junglers

Wait for Lee Sin, much more worth the purchase.

has trundle's q always been able to crit?

after a 10 losses in a row i finally won a game an aram game but still

ugh lost my second series to gold II this means i must play fizz every single game

the w animation on iBlitzcrank is so amazing hes like "wheeeeeee" also i will ask again, someone let me support them on euw, i have 13 defeats in a row and I need a win.

wtf ori turned into the new fotm, at least here

Everything good ever is fotm forever [editline]20th September 2013[/editline] [QUOTE=Sparrowsluck;42246708]If the game is decided by 15-25 minutes but continues until 30-50 that isn't a very interesting spectator sport. "Here is one time this didn't work, therefore it's not real" What are outliers?[/QUOTE] Every time I've watched comp LoL the games are over at like something like 32 min, thats a number i see a lot and people are fine with it. You going to tell me these leads aren't prominant in normals/ranked either? What are you trying to point out, we all know that an advantage increases our chances of winning. You watch it for the gameplay and if its a short game then its short, its not as black and white as "first dragon most gold gg" if you actually watch the games, teams play differnetly and some are flat out better, we shouldnt watch TSM vs some noname team because it's ALREADY decided who is going to win? People still watch games like that. If anyone had a REAL justified problem then LoL wouldnt be what it is today. [quote]This seems like a chicken and the egg kinda deal. Is this game too snowbally and teams that take these things first win because of it, or do better teams take these things first because they are better and therefore win?[/quote] I dont get what you're trying to say, a team kills botlane+jungler and dragon is open, they take it. Its evident they are pressing their advantage after killing the enemy, you'd rather they didnt and just recall buy items and repeat the same gameplay? Just remove dragon and inhibs if they're killing the game by making teams win Should also remove killstreaks from CoD because those give you an advantage while you're ahead and an incentive to use them to get further ahead, much like any other bonuses you get from winning. [editline]20th September 2013[/editline] this argument = make LoL deathmatch remove objectives (very dumb no thx)

words [editline]20th September 2013[/editline] vi is strong champion ty