League of Legends v33 - Games

[QUOTE=Nintendo-Guy;42870437]the lucian rushing triforce makes me very sad[/QUOTE] im p sure koreans know what theyre doing [editline]15th November 2013[/editline] and triforce is a great item on him anyway

i'm secretly korean i'd much rather rush BT tho, to me it feels like a waste to spend 3.6k gold for 30 AD even for it's passive i'd rather have my spells deal damage [editline]15th November 2013[/editline] i've played about 40 games as him since his release, might not be a huge amount but this is the build i've been sticking with recently [img]http://i.imgur.com/2BTPjuh.png[/img] most of the time i end up needing a zephyr because cc, if not i buy IE instead

keep in mind its not a normal match hes probably building triforce for more ult damage and better trading, sieging is the key part of their composition

triforce would give his ult fuck all damage tho and we play vs plats and diamonds in all our normals so it's not like i'm a total shitter

i play against plats in my normals and golds in my ranked nice to know if i stopped being a puss about ranked i could have had the plat border

i'll probly actually play ranked this season, everyone keeps telling me i could easily reach diamond if i tried even the almighty katsuie told me

well if you see plats and diamonds in your normals then yeah probably [editline]15th November 2013[/editline] i see a diamonds every couple of games too so idk what to think about normals

lole I actually play against worse people in normals than in rankeds, with my experience from dota etc I actually did jump into ranked asap and I was placed in silver. Right now I'm silver high, like, II and sometimes I but I play against golds mostly normals? bring out the mid or feed

[QUOTE=MrHeadHopper;42870431]Wait what's with this champion? Thought we had Ao Shin up next? I have no idea how Riot manages their champion development. They're putting a generic human infront of storm dragon/lizard thing? The same thing featured in Udyr's comics and that had quite a lot of push behind it? I do not understand. Someone mind explaining why they believe pushing another swordsman is better than adding to the creature cove?[/QUOTE] There isn't 1 "Championmaker"-Team, every hero has their own team. Making stuff takes time, they don't just press some buttons in the MOBA-Character-Creator-2000.

[QUOTE=Fake-XM;42870858]There isn't 1 "Championmaker"-Team, every hero has their own team. Making stuff takes time, they don't just press some buttons in the MOBA-Character-Creator-2000.[/QUOTE] I know, but it is quite clear that Ao Shin would've just been better received than yet another swordsman, possibly two because of their little lore thing they have going on. Maybe it's just me and my group that feel this way, but it feels redundant when we have Yi to fill in the "agile samurai" slot MOBAs seem to always have. We have very little in the way of monsters compared to normal humans.

[QUOTE=MrHeadHopper;42871012]I know, but it is quite clear that Ao Shin would've just been better received than yet another swordsman, possibly two because of their little lore thing they have going on. Maybe it's just me and my group that feel this way, but it feels redundant when we have Yi to fill in the "agile samurai" slot MOBAs seem to always have. We have very little in the way of monsters compared to normal humans.[/QUOTE] I agree, unless his kit is super amazing he looks super dull, doesn't have anything to do with release date or putting him infront of other champs though. It's a bit like saying "why are they releasing this lame skin for X instead of that awesome one for Y"

i only wish they didnt have anything against ugly champions urgot's design isn't really the greatest thing ever but at least it adds some much needed variety

[QUOTE=Fake-XM;42871127]I agree, unless his kit is super amazing he looks super dull, doesn't have anything to do with release date or putting him infront of other champs though. It's a bit like saying "why are they releasing this lame skin for X instead of that awesome one for Y"[/QUOTE] Well this samurai dude's being designed by CertainlyT who made Zed, Thresh, Darius and Zyra. I think it's safe to say he'll have an interesting kit.

Yeah I want them to make monsters too, the only champ that comes to mind is Anivia. She aint walking around on legs.

[QUOTE=Zar;42871400]Yeah I want them to make monsters too, the only champ that comes to mind is Anivia. She aint walking around on legs.[/QUOTE] cassiopaieia

[QUOTE=Zukriuchen;42868159]aka its the community's version of marksman [editline]15th November 2013[/editline] basically what i'm saying is that adc isnt "champion that builds attack damage and can carry" even if that's literally what it says, and that its only used to describe a more specific type of champion, because if it wasnt then itd make the whole thing confusing as fuck[/QUOTE] The "carry" part in ADC, doesn't refer to "I carry this game, XD, report botlane" [quote]Carries are the heroes that can obtain the greatest power and utility [b]as the game progresses.[/b] (It is so derived from the act of "carrying" a team; that is, to bear the responsibility for ultimate victory.) They tend to be those who become extremely powerful later in the game as compared to other heroes/champions once they amass enough levels and items.[/quote] When you look at the way, an Marksman scales, they very much outclass every other kind of role in terms of DPS lategame, but early game they kinda suck. Tryndamere and Yi, and Sion, Build and scale exactly the same way.

No, you're just nitpicking. Let's look at it this way: There are two "roles" that the champion can fill. One of them involves the lane that they're going, so basically what you hear people calling during champ select in blind pick, stuff like "mid" or, of course, "adc". This adc is the traditional, ranged, squishy carry that usually goes bot. Then, there's the definition for the actual champion, which is stuff like "apc" or "assassin". You don't hear people say "I'm going bruiser", they say "I'm going top", because this definition doesn't tell them the lane you're going, it only defines the type of champion you have, how you're building him and what his role is in the team. This adc is the carry you're talking about, and this is the category that Trynd would fit in, together with the traditional adcs. The thing is, the term adc fits both categories, with slightly different meanings, and the champions that fit the adc role according to both definitions are almost the same, save for Trynd (which is still the only one I agree with, because Sion is nothing but a late game bruiser, a definition that'd count for so many other champions that we might as well call everyone an adc, and because there's literally nothing that makes Yi different than other melee ads). However, the fact that the second definition of adc has [b]absolutely no use in-game[/b] makes it utterly retarded. Trynd (and the other two if you still wanna go with that) is so unique that using such a specific label for him makes no sense and would only confuse people, which is why absolutely nobody actually refers to him as an adc in most situations. Really, the only time you're gonna use the second definition for any role is when you're asking a player that has a champion like Diana whether he's gonna build as an AP bruiser or an assassin. Trynd is unique like I said though, and he has no paths other than what you'd define as adc, so there's really no point in even using that definition.

[QUOTE=Gubbygub;42867309]I wanted to try that parser thing too! [t]http://puu.sh/5iEPD.png[/t] Never underestimate the power of the scout's code![/QUOTE] You're Hitler incarnate

I have spent 500 hours on this fucking game Jesus Christ and I thought my 1000+ hours on garry's mod was bad

[QUOTE=Ganerumo;42872327]I have spent 500 hours on this fucking game Jesus Christ and I thought my 1000+ hours on garry's mod was bad[/QUOTE] 500 hours is nothing...

500 is nothing for time sink games like League, Gmod, random mmo #12321 etc

I might buy Wukong, is he a strong champ? I never see him get played

wukong's ult has the highest AD ratio of any skill in the game, his Q reduces armor and his E increases attack speed (and both are great for pushing towers) and his W is great fun. he's strong but he's not that great. He has the damage and not a lot else. Still better than fiora.

Wukong is one of the most boring champions

Well I was thinking either Wukong or Renekton as he always seems to be a pain in the dick to play against [editline]15th November 2013[/editline] Or Vladimir (I'm looking for a top laner)

Vlad top can be beast against some very specific champions but in most cases he'll get his ass handed to him. Like how in most occasions he'll beat shen in laning phase but if a gank from shen's team ever happens he's dead meat. When someone picks vladimir top and insists that it's good (usually not from their own experience but more from watching pros playing it on some extremely specific matchups) they tend to regret their decision within 10 minutes of the game. It's even worse when everyone insists that vladimir top is not a good pick and that the situation is just not proper for such a choice, and the guy still picks top, feeds a dozen kills and blames his team for not supporting his sorry ass. For your other propositions I think renekton is a much more situational pick and definitely one of those win lane/lose game type champions while wukong seems to fit on a lot more games. Personally I think all three champions are rather boring.

[QUOTE=Katsuie;42872886]Wukong is one of the most boring champions[/QUOTE] what no most boring champion is soraka or yorick

i hate wukong that piece of shit monkey E Q WOOHOO half of my hp gone, reach six time to dive!!!

[QUOTE=MrFlashcat;42873158]what no most boring champion is soraka or yorick[/QUOTE] I said [b]one[/b] of the most [editline]15th November 2013[/editline] of course yorick is more boring than wukong

but wukong is really fun to play as