[QUOTE=Juniez;44695127][t]http://media1.gameinformer.com/filestorage/CommunityServer.Components.SiteFiles/imagefeed/featured/activision2014/callofduty/154865/BlacksmithACTUALFULLSIZE.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
So looks like more future warfare setting.... Oh god.
Got to admit, looks pretty tasty looking. Possible new engine? But Won't judge that till a free weekend on steam.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDG2Lm2C4wo[/media]
So this happened to me the other day. I still can't believe it :v:
[editline]1st May 2014[/editline]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhANGzAMbs[/media]
Oh and one more that happened to me.
decided to reinstall over free weekend and it's still a stuttering piece of shit
how are you managing to run it smooth
Sorry if I'm late to the party, but I downloaded for free weekend.
I run two 295s. Can I not play multiplayer?
pff good luck to sledgehammer is all i can say
amazing
fucking kevin spacey
it may just be me but that tech design looks straight from elysium
SOE. If you have an old graphics cardd you're not allowed to play Call of Duty any more???
[QUOTE=usaokay;44701310][url]http://www.destructoid.com/call-of-duty-advanced-warfare-leaked-see-the-first-video-and-images-274126.phtml[/url]
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare
Coming this November.[/QUOTE]
By looking at this I'm hoping that's a new engine, it doesn't look like the same shit.
Also Power Armour.
call of duty ghosts actually had pretty fantastic visuals - it had incredible pixel density for its props / weapons / characters without resorting to tiling bases, went for realistic and subtle material definition instead of blowing the reflections out because muh next gen(like battlefield 4...), had some niche graphical innovations like Sub-D interpolation (in a similarly impressive achievement, black ops / black ops 2 was one of the first adopters of real-time Physically Based Shading), but it just ruined by some of the (relative to the rest of the game) low-resolution environment textures which the community cherry picked
and also it ran like shit
[t]http://puu.sh/8vOo5.jpg[/t][t]http://puu.sh/8vOne.jpg[/t][t]http://puu.sh/8vOnJ.jpg[/t]
[t]http://puu.sh/8k2Gd.jpg[/t]
a texture for the shoe above, [I]4x bigger than the average TLoU's environment textures[/I]
[QUOTE=Juniez;44701770]call of duty ghosts actually had pretty fantastic visuals - it had incredible pixel density for its props / weapons / characters without resorting to tiling bases, went for realistic and subtle material definition instead of blowing the reflections out because muh next gen(like battlefield 4...), had some niche graphical innovations like Sub-D interpolation (in a similarly impressive achievement, black ops / black ops 2 was one of the first adopters of real-time Physically Based Shading), but[B][U] it just ruined by some of the (relative to the rest of the game) low-resolution environment textures which the community cherry picked[/U][/B]
[/QUOTE]
Standardization is pretty important. It's pretty stupid to have one texture on shoe 1k and then road texture with same size
keeping similar resolutions throughout the entire game would have been unfeasible with their current method and even if it's low-resolution compared to the rest of the game, the environment textures stand up just fine to any other major release
Since I just finished watching House of Cards, the inclusion of Spacey in the upcoming CoD is weird for me.
I really hope this new COD has better optimization than COD: Ghosts.
The fucking game lagged on my GTX 760.
[QUOTE=Half-Dead;44611176]Oh my god
[URL]http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=1024946802[/URL][/QUOTE]
This exists because Pornhub is better as a video site than YouTube
I have by no means a good system (Intel Q9550 2.83ghz quad core, GTX 560, 8gb DDR2 RAM) and I get no stutter. It actually runs pretty well on medium settings and looks noticeably better than previous CoD games.
Having fun with it, but not enough for $40, especially since the next game is already announced.
Hasn't been posted in here yet:
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFu5qXMuaJU[/media]
Looks neat, I suppose. Has a bit of a Crysis vibe when it comes to the armor and stuff.
Exo-skeletons are screaming Elysium!
Spacey... future... space future... heh heh heh...
[QUOTE=Critz2;44705488]I really hope this new COD has better optimization than COD: Ghosts.
The fucking game lagged on my GTX 760.[/QUOTE]
You think that's bad? I have a GTX 780 and it runs like shit. No wonder Ghosts PC never has more than like, 1,000 players playing at once.
I just want a Call of Duty United Offensive remake by Treyarch. That was one of the last great additions to the series.
[editline]2nd May 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Half-Dead;44611176]Oh my god
[url]http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=1024946802[/url][/QUOTE]
At least the song is good.
Spider tanks?
You have my attention Sledgehammer.
[QUOTE=Mister_Jack;44701488]SOE. If you have an old graphics cardd you're not allowed to play Call of Duty any more???[/QUOTE]
Please.
I decided to give Ghosts a try today.
There were less than 300 players total online and the game still has a huge issue with framerate stutters.
I tried ghosts in portrait screen mode.
Everything was squished to hell horizontally but I was playing better than ever.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
