• WAR THUNDER Mk5 -- Tanks open beta test now!
    9,543 replies, posted
CFLAP Conglomerate of Facepunch Land & Air Pilots [editline]11th August 2014[/editline] Wow I don't even like that suggestion
TCAT
uwotm8 would be hilarious if it could fit
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;45664990]uwotm8 would be hilarious if it could fit[/QUOTE] uwtm8
ICUP International Cornucopia of United Pilots
GMF Generally Mediocre Fliers
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;45664990]uwotm8 would be hilarious if it could fit[/QUOTE] It can, but I'm pretty sure there can't be any brackets.
Hey, posting this again, It would be cool if I could actually join this group we've been discussing but its ya know full.
[QUOTE=lope;45665174]Hey, posting this again, It would be cool if I could actually join this group we've been discussing but its ya know full.[/QUOTE] I didn't start in the in-game one, whoever did can use the Steam group player list to cull some inactive faggots to make room for you.
[QUOTE=Doom14;45665215]I didn't start in the in-game one, whoever did can use the Steam group player list to cull some inactive faggots to make room for you.[/QUOTE] Isn't Crumpets the leader and haven't we not heard from him in a while?
[QUOTE=Ekalektik_1;45665249]Isn't Crumpets the leader and haven't we not heard from him in a while?[/QUOTE] If this is the case, does Gaijin do appeals for removing inactive commanders of active squadrons?
Well honestly, if our name is changed and our leader is inactive, why not just make a new squadron with one of our newly proposed names? I don't think we much care for stats, and its a way of booting all the inactive people to make room for people who want to play in our squadron.
[QUOTE=notrabies;45665520]Well honestly, if our name is changed and our leader is inactive, why not just make a new squadron with one of our newly proposed names? I don't think we much care for stats, and its a way of booting all the inactive people to make room for people who want to play in our squadron.[/QUOTE] It costs money to make a squadron.
[QUOTE=Fayez;45665593]It costs money to make a squadron.[/QUOTE] I can do this if it's a better option than trying to oust Crumpets, we can decide on a name and if it's agreeable, I will set up a new squadron.
[URL="http://strawpoll.me/2323307"]Here's the Poll for the new name.[/URL]
So we're definitely making a new one? I guess I'll abandon [ed76] then. I'm still amazed "[IFAP]" had as long a run as it did.
So should I get on the Eagles to make a new one? Also what should OIFY even stand for? "Only I Facepunch You"? I don't even know
Only Infidels Fly Yaks idk
Bet you they'd ban for 'infidels' although anyone who flies a yak-15 or 17 is an infidel anyway I guess [editline]11th August 2014[/editline] Ok, for anyone checking out the poll, I'm officially making OIFY stand for "Only I Facepunch You". Unless someone has a funnier suggestion, anyway.
You could try doing this [IMG]http://gyazo.com/ee86b570d8b53783ede752e4bb2b51cc.png[/IMG] and tell them that it is an acronym and totally not anything suggestive on purpose
I think having an MIA squadron commander is a problem now too. Besides, if their moderators are willing to chatban for saying fuck, I get the feeling trying to get the clantag restored wouldn't go over well, but maybe I'm just being pessimistic.
[QUOTE=TheLolrus;45666014]Bet you they'd ban for 'infidels'[/QUOTE] Don't see why they would..
[QUOTE=Skwee;45666232]Don't see why they would..[/QUOTE] From their rules page outlining prohibited squadron content: [quote]Propaganda or [b]discrimination[/b] at all levels, including but not limited to political, [b]religious,[/b] national, racial, ethnic, sexual, etc.[/quote] Nobody here would seriously take exception to 'infidel', but they seem to be particularly sensitive and/or thin-skinned.
[QUOTE=Fayez;45665942][URL="http://strawpoll.me/2323307"]Here's the Poll for the new name.[/URL][/QUOTE] Bumping because it was at the bottom of the last page.
We'd probably be better off naming the group something like "Facepunch War Thunder Group" and making OIFY not actually stand for anything. IIRC, the real OIFY only has a few theoretical meanings anyway.
I've bought the requisite Eagles and asked Shibbey for his opinion on making a new squadron. Hopefully the poll has enough votes when I wake up.
[QUOTE=TheLolrus;45666546]I've bought the requisite Eagles and asked Shibbey for his opinion on making a new squadron. Hopefully the poll has enough votes when I wake up.[/QUOTE] I'd seriously like to contest this with Gaijin at least first, i mean steam group n' all with same name.
[QUOTE=TheLolrus;45666546]I've bought the requisite Eagles and asked Shibbey for his opinion on making a new squadron. Hopefully the poll has enough votes when I wake up.[/QUOTE] I've woken up. It seems like a huge amount of effort and spent glod for what could be done by harassing the mods.
The Ki-200 is weird. I love flying it, even though it's not very good. I love landing it, but I hate having my wings blow up afterwards. I suck at flying it, but I still make money. I barely even broke even with the Ki-84 on a good match, but the Ki-200 just shits money.
Fayez. The D in IFAD is for Division, not defense. Sorry for not clearing that out. If we do not make a new Squadron, I will boot out inactive members today. If we do make a new Squadron. I wouldn't mind being an officer once again. [editline]12th August 2014[/editline] Also, Am I really the only one that has no idea what OIFY stands for or means? Would someone please enlighten me?
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.