• WAR THUNDER Mk5 -- Tanks open beta test now!
    9,543 replies, posted
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;45684895]L-11 [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] also because 50mm railguns[/QUOTE] I don't have a problem with the gun on it, it's the German 50mm/75mm railguns
[QUOTE=Taepodong-2;45684762]Why is the first KV-1 so bad?[/QUOTE] because there's no good heavy tanks in the game. seriously.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;45685939]because there's no good heavy tanks in the game [b]yet[/b]. seriously.[/QUOTE] [Img]http://www.tanksinworldwar2.com/pictures/sovietunion/t35-02.jpg[/Img] FIFY
[QUOTE=Deathgrunt;45686125][Img]http://www.tanksinworldwar2.com/pictures/sovietunion/t35-02.jpg[/Img] FIFY[/QUOTE] Have fun getting strafed to death by 12.7mm machineguns. [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] [sp]I am looking towards it myself but only for the comedy value; I honestly don't think it's going to be [I]good[/I][/sp]
Apparently this is a thing now [video=youtube;gbP5GTZlFpk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gbP5GTZlFpk[/video] Sounds pretty boring to me tbh tho it could be fun in sim mode when I can actually try to fly with the joystick and not worry about shooting at anything. idk
Air racing would be great with good courses and stick controls but it'd be dull with mouse aim. [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=togFXO-ysB8[/media]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=togFXO-ysB8&list=UUPZsNertSS82YCT2qX9-wHA[/media] this will be seriously cool if they manage to pull it off i'd probably end up watching replays of all my matches
yes yes yes yES YES The armor visualizer is also going to be awesome [video=youtube;6er2OSB94uM]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6er2OSB94uM[/video] Even distinctions between the different types of metals used and how they were worked, holy shit
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfeNStSPqE0[/media] Shit quality but watch it all. [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] [img]http://i.imgur.com/2SZhDoE.gif[/img] [B][U]WE'RE GETTING DESTRUCTABLE TERRAIN[/U][/B] [img]http://i.imgur.com/2SZhDoE.gif[/img] [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] Also the trailer at the start owns bones
That Panther driver taking off without a turret is metal as fuck.
Missions based on RNG are the best! [t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/24075839/warthunder/images/justmyluck.jpg[/t] Just my fucking luck...
[QUOTE=Shibbey;45687087]Air racing would be great with good courses and stick controls but it'd be dull with mouse aim. [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=togFXO-ysB8[/media][/QUOTE] Ewww... That looks lame as heck. But then again that's work in progress so I guess it will improve a lot.
[QUOTE=Judqment8;45688174]Ewww... That looks lame as heck. But then again that's work in progress so I guess it will improve a lot.[/QUOTE] what looks lame about that??? it looks cool as hell and informative as fuck the graphical style is really cool too, reminds me of a history channel show
Doom sent these to me, since he's sadly banhammered he can't post them himself: [url]http://imgur.com/a/52HMW[/url] Highlights I guess: [t]http://i.imgur.com/drxgXSz.jpg[/t] [t]http://i.imgur.com/0rKE5f8.jpg[/t] [t]http://i.imgur.com/h3r9i8D.jpg[/t] [t]http://i.imgur.com/9AdKk52.jpg[/t] [t]http://i.imgur.com/dMM4UjX.jpg[/t] [t]http://i.imgur.com/d2avuDR.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=Skwee;45684728]What bomb loads do you use on the tu-2s? Just unlocked them, not sure which is better[/QUOTE] Late reply. But Doom, the master of the TU-2S suggested using 9x100, which I'll agree with. They can take out most, if not all, ground units you will ever meet, they drop singularly and you have a lot of them.
Nothing like scoring 8k points on Kursk
Hoyl fuck. Urban maps and destructible buildings, I want to see people tearing through buildings to flank the enemy.
[QUOTE=Shibbey;45688391] [t]http://i.imgur.com/h3r9i8D.jpg[/t] [/QUOTE] -x2 30mm cannons with [I]50 rounds each[/I] -shittier engines than the Me262 7.0 BR hahahahahahha because fuck japan
Stats + BRs are probably placeholders. No fucking way can the Kitsuka go 700km/h let alone 865.
[QUOTE=Shibbey;45687885][media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfeNStSPqE0[/media] Shit quality but watch it all. [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] [img]http://i.imgur.com/2SZhDoE.gif[/img] [B][U]WE'RE GETTING DESTRUCTABLE TERRAIN[/U][/B] [img]http://i.imgur.com/2SZhDoE.gif[/img] [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] Also the trailer at the start owns bones[/QUOTE] It's private. Anyone got another?
I mean "Kitsuka" isn't even capitalised step up your game Gaijin
[QUOTE=Shibbey;45689040]I mean "Kitsuka" isn't even capitalised step up your game Gaijin[/QUOTE] truely living up to their name I guess lol [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Shibbey;45689027]Stats + BRs are probably placeholders. No fucking way can the Kitsuka go 700km/h let alone 865.[/QUOTE] yeah actually I think they are placeholders because the R2Y2s and the Kikka have the exact same stats and BRs
Reading about some of the vehicles in this game is kinda funny. [quote]The Kikka was designed in preliminary form to use the Tsu-11, a very crude thermojet style of jet engine that was little more than a ducted fan with an afterburner. [/quote] But at least it's not as bad as WoT where half of the vehicles are ideas found written on toilet paper in hitlers bunker.
not too long till golden battles get hype
[QUOTE=Dermock;45689284]not too long till golden battles get hype[/QUOTE] if by "get hype" you mean "get ready to kill yourself" or "get ready to advocate for the extermination of the entirety of eastern europe and russia" then yes gold battles bring out the absolute WORST of the retards in this game
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;45689406]if by "get hype" you mean "get ready to kill yourself" or "get ready to advocate for the extermination of the entirety of eastern europe and russia" then yes gold battles bring out the absolute WORST of the retards in this game[/QUOTE] They only bring out the worst when they manage to not crash the servers for more than 5 minutes
wow just doing a little research the Kikka really has absolutely garbage performance its literally worse than even the Mustang in every way, including straight line speed I at least expected it to have broadly similar performance to the Me262, but its more than 200kph slower lol
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;45689739]wow just doing a little research the Kikka really has absolutely garbage performance its literally worse than even the Mustang in every way, including straight line speed I at least expected it to have broadly similar performance to the Me262, but its more than 200kph slower lol[/QUOTE] It's the same weight as a Yak-3 so it'll turn okay but hold energy like shit. Probably 4.7/5.0 BR material that'll end up at 6.3.
[QUOTE=Shibbey;45689932]It's the same weight as a Yak-3 so it'll turn okay but hold energy like shit. Probably 4.7/5.0 BR material that'll end up at 6.3.[/QUOTE] oh god it climbs 3 times slower than the Yak-15 (according to wikipedia) god WHY [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] jesus christ 1200 meters/minute is an appauling climb rate thank god it has RATO [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] and oh god no it will actually turn like a boat because it has awful wing loading Kikka: 54.3 lb/ft2 Mustang: 39.3 lb/ft2 Zero: 22 lb/ft2
Wing loading isn't the only thing that determines turning tho, He-162 has tiny stubby POS wings and that's pretty agile. [editline]14th August 2014[/editline] It'll still be a flying wanksock tho
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.