[QUOTE=Doom14;45762926]I don't like either of them. Not that I've tried the MiG-15 yet, but god damn if I'm not tired of Korea and the horrible BR bracket there. You almost feel bad clubbing 262s.
Also, I was so fucking terrible at Rise of Flight, but it's such a nice game. I think I shot one person down. ONE. IN OUR FOUR HOUR DICKABOUT.[/QUOTE]
MiG-15 is like a good Bf-109 but with fire coming out the back it's amazing
And I think I managed to ram someone once in a french plane. We crashed a shitload of heavy bombers though. We should do more simmy things, more RoF or IL-2 '46 and Cliffs of Dover w/ TF 4.0 would sweet. We could also cock about with the free TF-51 module in DCS. First person to actually figure out the take-off procedure gets a medal.
[QUOTE=Shibbey;45762988]First person to actually figure out the take-off procedure gets a medal.[/QUOTE]
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fr94DmuzsLo[/media]
[QUOTE=Shibbey;45762988]MiG-15 is like a good Bf-109 but with fire coming out the back it's amazing
And I think I managed to ram someone once in a french plane. We crashed a shitload of heavy bombers though. We should do more simmy things, more RoF or IL-2 '46 and Cliffs of Dover w/ TF 4.0 would sweet. We could also cock about with the free TF-51 module in DCS. First person to actually figure out the take-off procedure gets a medal.[/QUOTE]
P-51D and the TF-51 startups are actually pretty easy, all you really have to have is a half page checklist for the first few times you fly and you'll be good.
How's the new IL2 that's in early access?
There's no grind whatsoever.
You pay per plane like in RoF.
[t]http://puu.sh/b2YoB/3f7ae16d74.jpg[/t]
2nd match in this thing
Looks like a land speed record attempt gone wrong
[QUOTE=Skwee;45766217][t]http://puu.sh/b2YoB/3f7ae16d74.jpg[/t]
2nd match in this thing
Looks like a land speed record attempt gone wrong[/QUOTE]
This reminds me of how fun it is to rip off your wings on the ground and then go driving. Kind of curious how a jet would handle that...
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;45765421]There's no grind whatsoever.
You pay per plane like in RoF.[/QUOTE]
No I've told you this like 3 or 4 times you [I]know[/I] this is wrong.
It's not going to have the same payment model as RoF, they're going to go with expansion packs like the old IL-2.
[editline]22nd August 2014[/editline]
Also you have to grind out bombloads for the bombers in BoS I think so yes there's a grind.
[IMG]http://puu.sh/b33cD/5fe7970155.png[/IMG]
[IMG]http://puu.sh/b33eq/0af17aaffe.png[/IMG]
"lol fuck you" - War thunder
[hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqX2Kq1XN5c[/hd]
A new thing
They're gonna add APCs? What the hell are we gonna do with those? Faster cap rate?
It'd be sorta interesting if the devs somehow figured out a way to integrate infantry to the APCs
Not even sure how'd that work though, but it'd definitely add a twist to gameplay and it'd sure as hell put those tank machine gunners to use. (If it doesn't break the game and interrupt the flow of the game though.)
APCs should be able to resupply, repair and tow other tanks, that would be the most awesome thing :dance:
Or, they could add infantry.
[QUOTE=BananaMed;45767987]Or, they could add infantry.[/QUOTE]
Progression and battle rating system simply wouldn't work and it'd probably be boring (who needs another shooter anyway). Where are my botes?
Oh shit. War Thunder Dev server is going up.
[sp]For a tiny patch to 1.41.[/sp]
[URL="http://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/170368-14130x-patch-notes/"]Patch Notes Here[/URL]
tl;dr hit detection should work properly for big guns, AP machine gun rounds finally fixed, high altitude fighting should feel more natural, damage models less shit, buffs to nazi tank guns, trees now vulnerably to 70 tons of german stahl rather than completely immovable track removal devices.
I might actually make some skins now for planes in WT.
I log in and the first thing I see is
[IMG]http://gyazo.com/6972eff23e7a467acc3c7c1928b0dcf3.png[/IMG]
I don't think I'm THAT good.
[QUOTE=kiloy;45769178]I log in and the first thing I see is
[IMG]http://gyazo.com/6972eff23e7a467acc3c7c1928b0dcf3.png[/IMG]
I don't think I'm THAT good.[/QUOTE]
I got the same thing but had Teamkilling on top of that.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;45769186]I got the same thing but had Teamkilling on top of that.[/QUOTE]
Remember that time we team killed a moderator for kill stealing and you got banned?
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/VHlqmVc.png[/IMG]
I haven't really played the game in a few weeks, so if these complaints aren't recent then I'm surprised I only have 3.
[editline]22nd August 2014[/editline]
What's the point of even telling you how many complaints you have?
It's like playing bingo! Let's see who here has the most. :v:
Most of these complaints are pointless since most players who use that system are overacting 12 year olds anyway
[QUOTE=Shibbey;45769288]Remember that time we team killed a moderator for kill stealing and you got banned?[/QUOTE]
Hey, he was killstealing, and back then, every kill in RB meant tons to us!
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;45770314]Hey, he was killstealing, and back then, every kill in RB meant tons to us![/QUOTE]
Yeah! He totally deserved it! That's what I'm saying!
[editline]22nd August 2014[/editline]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/z5lfSnV.png[/img]
This is what the new shell descriptions look like.
finally open for discussion: [URL]http://forum.warthunder.com/index.php?/topic/170347-introduce-hr-history-rank-as-an-alternative-to-br-battle-rank/[/URL]
hint: History Rank next to Battle Rank
Bad idea, wouldn't work, don't bother.
Is the dev server still up?
It's telling me it isn't linked to my account and I have played on it before.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
