[QUOTE=Shibbey;46002595]The cannons are fine and it has 6x12.7mms on top of them. Problem is that it's by far the slowest and least agile fighter at its rank, completely worthless at anything other than head-ons.[/QUOTE]
its pretty agile at low speeds like the other Beaus
of course getting to low speed/low energy is suicidal at that BR because it sucks balls at regaining energy again compared to everything else it fights
[editline]17th September 2014[/editline]
now that I think about it, all the Beaufighters are very good arcade planes and that's about it
Beau X is fine at 3.7 in RB. I've heard they're okay in SB too but no cockpit so I can't be bothered playing them.
Why do people try to fly completely level behind my plane, ignoring the [I]three[/I] 12.7mm machine guns pointed in that direction? It happens so often, I even had a beaufighter try the same thing, despite it being even EASIER to hit.
Tiny dev update changed the ShVAK sound again.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qEID_9eE_I[/media]
[QUOTE=Doom14;46003745]Tiny dev update changed the ShVAK sound again.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qEID_9eE_I[/media][/QUOTE]
That echo trailing the sound [img]http://i.somethingawful.com/forumsystem/emoticons/emot-flashfap.gif[/img]
A bit of a tangent, and call me a scrub for saying this, but I really don't get the P2W complaints I hear in-game. Seems to me like most of my deaths are less a result of someone being a higher level or having better hardware (purchased with real money), and more a result of me being rubbish and them being not-rubbish (or them having Russian equipment and me using japperneezey ricepaper gliders or fuckhueg 'murrikan bombers).
I did recently get a month premium with some spare eagles I forgot I had, and the only impact its made is accelerated progression and more decals. So maybe it's Pay-To-Escape-The-Grind, but to be honest, it's not quite a grind in an action game: Repetitive maybe, but this isn't an RPG where grinding is just clicking on shit and watching your character have at it. I figure I play WT because it's fun, and I don't see it as a chore to play it with the same range of equipment for a time just so I can broaden that range.
Though maybe I'm just a masochist. Maybe I just get something out of incessant instances of "whoopsee, they chipped some paint off your wing! Now you can't maneuver your plane. Oh, by the way, [B]YOUR RIGHT WING! YOUR RIGHT WING! YOUR RIGHT WING! YOUR RIGHT WING![/B]"
Really intrested if the update makes the bearcat have m2s instead of m3s, the firerate causes issues due to how limited the ammo is.
[quote]2)F-82's 8x12.7(M3) additional guns?[/quote]
[quote=Lassar]2. for sure[/quote]
[t]http://i.imgur.com/F8BWZpw.jpg[/t]
[I]Soon, my precious.[/I]
[T]http://puu.sh/bCUKP.jpg[/T]
Well. That was intresting.
Edit: so warthunder takes screenshots of ALL screens? wat
[QUOTE=Doom14;46004621][t]http://i.imgur.com/F8BWZpw.jpg[/t]
[I]Soon, my precious.[/I][/QUOTE]
What was the thinking behind twin-fuselage aeroplanes like that? Is it simply so you can decentralise the pilots and be less susceptible to pilot injury?
[editline]a[/editline]
[del]That's assuming it actually has two pilots... Does it?[/del]
[editline]a[/editline]
Regarding two pilots, I answer my own question, haha.
[quote]Prototype XP-82s, P-82Bs and P-82Es [B]retained both fully equipped cockpits so that pilots could fly the aircraft from either position, alternating control on long flights[/B], while later night fighter versions kept the cockpit on the left side only, placing the radar operator in the right position.[/quote]
Yeah, nothing, it was designed as a super long range interceptor. It has two cockpits so that the pilots can take turn flying the plane.
[t]https://i.imgur.com/Zky68xP.jpg[/t]
someone help me
please
what new jet bomber should i turbo grind for
[QUOTE=Crumpet;46006378]what new jet bomber should i turbo grind for[/QUOTE]
Clearly the answer is the AR 234
In all seriousness however, until the better versions of the AR 234 come along, I'm going for the HO 229 and the RY2 Japanese bombers/attackers after the B7A2.
[QUOTE=Crumpet;46006378]what new jet bomber should i turbo grind for[/QUOTE]
IL-28
Who wouldn't go for a jet bomber with Shvak cannons in the tail turret?
[QUOTE=Sunkite;46006530]IL-28
Who wouldn't go for a jet bomber with Shvak cannons in the tail turret?[/QUOTE]
Totally forgot about that.
Play it if you want to be the cancer of War Thunder.
Heres hoping the British and US Canberras aren't horrible.
[QUOTE=Doom14;46003745]Tiny dev update changed the ShVAK sound again.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6qEID_9eE_I[/media][/QUOTE]
Have the Berezins been touched at all? They're not exactly satisfying to fire as is, and I have a feeling they won't even be noticeable at all if the Shvaks sound like that.
Speaking of Shvaks, does the tier I Yak have one or does it have Shkas's and an inline Berezin? Shvaks at tier one sounds a bit ridiculously unfair.
[QUOTE=Ekalektik_1;46007082]Have the Berezins been touched at all? They're not exactly satisfying to fire as is, and I have a feeling they won't even be noticeable at all if the Shvaks sound like that.[/QUOTE]
UB/Berezins haven't been touched, yet. Nor has the Japanese 12.7mms, nor the other nation's .303/7.7mm guns (except Spahgett.)
[QUOTE=BBOOBBYY!;46006323][t]https://i.imgur.com/Zky68xP.jpg[/t]
someone help me
please[/QUOTE]
.................[B] TAKE [/B]......T
.................[B]HOT[/B]......BO...
htning........[B] COCK"[/B]
Most i've ever gotten in a RB match: :dance:
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/hZX2JYM.png[/IMG]
Tried out the korean war event too. Shit's bullshit. The enemy team had 3 mig15s and lots of la9s vs 1 sabre and p51s.
[QUOTE=shadowboy303;46004630][T]http://puu.sh/bCUKP.jpg[/T]
Well. That was intresting.
Edit: so warthunder takes screenshots of ALL screens? wat[/QUOTE]
Ctrl-Alt-Prtnscrn.
That will screenshot the window.
[QUOTE=kiloy;46008836]
Thanks gaijin[/QUOTE]
Don't you love that? Did it to me with the Griffon Spits when the put in the two below them.
[QUOTE=MAC21500;46006573]Totally forgot about that.
Play it if you want to be the cancer of War Thunder.
Heres hoping the British and US Canberras aren't horrible.[/QUOTE]
That's what I'm worried about because I really want a canberra
[URL="http://coub.com/view/3bv1w"]"combat" footage of the zsu-57-2[/URL]
[URL="http://coub.com/view/3bv3i"]Flakpanzer V Coelian[/URL]
[url="http://coub.com/view/3bv24"]ZSU-37[/url]
Get out of my way with these shitty coub links, here, have it the right way
[hd]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8Ys5RaByUI[/hd]
why is one tracer coming out of one barrel but not both?
[QUOTE=mastfire;46011428]why is one tracer coming out of one barrel but not both?[/QUOTE]
I see two tracers
[img]http://sinus.cz/~milan/zsu-57-2_twin.png[/img]
Really looking forward grinding out SPAAGs.
Most of them just look fun to me. :v:
[QUOTE=Doom14;46011908]Really looking forward grinding out SPAAGs.
Most of them just look fun to me. :v:[/QUOTE]
kinda sucks that there isnt anything between the ZSU-37 and the ZSU-57-2
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
