[QUOTE=Araknid;46086797]US 50 cals and Russian 20mms[/QUOTE]
For the US, ground targets tends to be the best, but tracers are also good if you're running M3's.
Don't know about Russian 20mm's. I haven't flown Russian aircraft since before the days of the Lumberyaks and the indestructible Lagg.
[QUOTE=Araknid;46086797]US 50 cals and Russian 20mms[/QUOTE]
Ground targets (AP-I) and ground targets (HEF-I) respectively.
Every time I play Russian CARB, I think long and hard about which of my planes I should use.
And then I remember the Yak 9t exists.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiTjtqMgyZk[/media]
[QUOTE=Shibbey;46082234]Talisman on La-5FN if you're grinding. P-39 for fun factor (though SU version is best). Kingcobra is for bads.[/QUOTE]
Why La-5FN in particular?
[QUOTE=Araknid;46088611]Why La-5FN in particular?[/QUOTE]
Best Lala performance vs battle rank wise, dirt cheap, a lot of fun. I think it's the best Rank 3 soviet fighter personally (I-185 is good too but it turns like a brick so not everyone will like it, P-39 with gunpods removed is also good but very rarely on sale). I have a talisman on mine from aeons ago (like over a year) and it's been great since then. Now that I think about it B-25 might be a better pure grinding machine but god level bombers are so boring and I assumed that guy wanted a fighter.
For rank 4 if you don't have the P-63 A-10 I used to say the Tu-2S with a talisman but since the bomb nerfs I'm thinking the La-9 might be a strong contender. That said, I haven't [I]actually[/I] flown my M-71 yet, that could be good too.
Picked up IL2 BOS, after bounching the Russian airfield I got my first A2A kill :)
Anyone else play it? Sim mode in WT wasn't enough for me.
[QUOTE=arthuro12;46088875]Picked up IL2 BOS, after bounching the Russian airfield I got my first A2A kill :)
Anyone else play it? Sim mode in WT wasn't enough for me.[/QUOTE]
I am turned off by apparent gross imbalance in favor of Germany coupled with apparent pay-2-win of the higher (grossly expensive) rank of planes like the Fockewulf.
I might look into it once it's not so hugely overpriced (by which I mean I gonna pick up some huge pack once it's $5 in a few years)
Imbalance? In what way?
Also, many players say that the FW isn't THAT great for a DLC type plane.. so yeah.
9/10 German pilots fly the 109's.. occasionally you'll see an oddball flying the 190.
£60 for the full experience of the game is far too steep for me. Especially when it only has a small handful of aircraft [I]and it's not even finished.[/I]
[QUOTE=arthuro12;46089824]Imbalance? In what way?
Also, many players say that the FW isn't THAT great for a DLC type plane.. so yeah.
9/10 German pilots fly the 109's.. occasionally you'll see an oddball flying the 190.[/QUOTE]
The LaGG the soviets get is trash variant (that apparently wasn't even present at Stalingrad) and the F-4 is just better than what the soviets have.
Still, made by the guys who made ROF + a very small team.
I personally didn't mind paying a full game's price if I can support development or future projects.
Ech.. they should make IL2: 1946 with this engine, it looks stunning to say the least.
[QUOTE=Shibbey;46088775]Best Lala performance vs battle rank wise, dirt cheap, a lot of fun. I think it's the best Rank 3 soviet fighter personally (I-185 is good too but it turns like a brick so not everyone will like it, P-39 with gunpods removed is also good but very rarely on sale). I have a talisman on mine from aeons ago (like over a year) and it's been great since then. Now that I think about it B-25 might be a better pure grinding machine but god level bombers are so boring and I assumed that guy wanted a fighter.
For rank 4 if you don't have the P-63 A-10 I used to say the Tu-2S with a talisman but since the bomb nerfs I'm thinking the La-9 might be a strong contender. That said, I haven't [I]actually[/I] flown my M-71 yet, that could be good too.[/QUOTE]
B-25 is best grinding machine. Fuck level bombing, you can get on the deck and absolutely decimate soft targets and tanks, plus pretty much anyone who hangs around near you gets perforated by your gunners.
The Based-25 is the reason I have more unlocked planes in USSR tree than any other.
[QUOTE=JoeSibilant;46090480]B-25 is best grinding machine. Fuck level bombing, you can get on the deck and absolutely decimate soft targets and tanks, plus pretty much anyone who hangs around near you gets perforated by your gunners.
The Based-25 is the reason I have more unlocked planes in USSR tree than any other.[/QUOTE]
I can't tell you how many B-25 I've killed in my JakJak-9Thousand. They just seem to.. combust and/or cease to exist in this dimension whenever I look at them funny-like.
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;46089984]The LaGG the soviets get is trash variant (that apparently wasn't even present at Stalingrad) and the F-4 is just better than what the soviets have.[/QUOTE]
I have no idea why they put in an (I guess even more) outdated LaGG rather than a -35 with leading edge slats. The current one doesn't even have an agility advantage on the F-4 in BoS, and the -35 was present at Stalingrad in good numbers anyway so it's not like it'd be historically inaccurate. Feels like too much of a Wehraboo masturbationary aid.
When should I start playing realistic?
[QUOTE=Pyroknight;46091856]When should I start playing realistic?[/QUOTE]
As soon as you learn the controls for the game.
[QUOTE=Pyroknight;46091856]When should I start playing realistic?[/QUOTE]
When you've got a single plane moderately upgraded that you like. Just jump in. You might do terrible. There will be equally terrible people, however, on the other side. If you don't enjoy it you can back out, nothing to lose. If you have any questions about aircraft just drop them here. Happy to help.
[QUOTE=PsiSoldier;46088466]Every time I play Russian CARB, I think long and hard about which of my planes I should use.
And then I remember the Yak 9t exists.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiTjtqMgyZk[/media][/QUOTE]
you only need 1-2 shots to kill a tank, way too many rounds wasted
[QUOTE=Skwee;46092335]you only need 1-2 shots to kill a tank, way too many rounds wasted[/QUOTE]
totally depends, Ive had oneshots and tanks than ate almost half a belt before going down
Is anyone looking to play a couple realistic battles?
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;46092475]totally depends, Ive had oneshots and tanks than ate almost half a belt before going down[/QUOTE]
well you have to attack from the top or the rear too
[QUOTE=Shibbey;46088775]Best Lala performance vs battle rank wise, dirt cheap, a lot of fun. I think it's the best Rank 3 soviet fighter personally (I-185 is good too but it turns like a brick so not everyone will like it, P-39 with gunpods removed is also good but very rarely on sale). I have a talisman on mine from aeons ago (like over a year) and it's been great since then. Now that I think about it B-25 might be a better pure grinding machine but god level bombers are so boring and I assumed that guy wanted a fighter.
For rank 4 if you don't have the P-63 A-10 I used to say the Tu-2S with a talisman but since the bomb nerfs I'm thinking the La-9 might be a strong contender. That said, I haven't [I]actually[/I] flown my M-71 yet, that could be good too.[/QUOTE]
B-25 is actually fun as fuck when you have the crew on ace and the gunners completely leveled up.
You just fly in a straight line and watch as everything around you gets set on fire
[QUOTE=Araknid;46094257]B-25 is actually fun as fuck when you have the crew on ace and the gunners completely leveled up.
You just fly in a straight line and watch as everything around you gets set on fire[/QUOTE]
I had an experience like that on the US vs UK map in RB, when I was in my Spit Mk.XVI I dove on a B-17, hit about 650 KMH when I started firing at 1 KM out, and all I got was my engine catching fire just before my pilot got knocked out with 1 engine damaged on the B-17.
It's times like that when I wonder why the hell I still play this game.
[QUOTE=Trooper0315;46094472]I had an experience like that on the US vs UK map in RB, when I was in my Spit Mk.XVI I dove on a B-17, hit about 650 KMH when I started firing at 1 KM out, and all I got was my engine catching fire just before my pilot got knocked out with 1 engine damaged on the B-17.
It's times like that when I wonder why the hell I still play this game.[/QUOTE]
I hope people do notice that the B-17 was one of the most heavily armored bombers in ww2 and it was pretty common that they got torn to shreds and still able to return to base
[QUOTE=Araknid;46094257]B-25 is actually fun as fuck when you have the crew on ace and the gunners completely leveled up.
You just fly in a straight line and watch as everything around you gets set on fire[/QUOTE]
That's exactly my point it's not engaging and there's no real strategy
[QUOTE=Teippiman;46094739]I hope people do notice that the B-17 was one of the most heavily armored bombers in ww2 and it was pretty common that they got torn to shreds and still able to return to base[/QUOTE]
[img]http://i.imgur.com/wpOf3tR.png[/img]
[QUOTE=Teippiman;46094739]I hope people do notice that the B-17 was one of the most heavily armored bombers in ww2 and it was pretty common that they got torn to shreds and still able to return to base[/QUOTE]
It was also pretty common to send hundreds of them to bomb cities and factories, only to have a handful return.
[QUOTE=Teippiman;46094739]I hope people do notice that the B-17 was one of the most heavily armored bombers in ww2 and it was pretty common that they got torn to shreds and still able to return to base[/QUOTE]
Based on German testing it took an average of ~25 MG151/20 shells to take down a B-17, or just four MK108 shells.
B-17s we have in the game never ever too less than hundreds of 20mm shells and dozens of 30mm shells.
Highly armored "meant to take hits" bombers were a blind take proven to not to be feasible approach. That's why since soon after the war, practically no strategic bombers carried defensive weapons - there's no point. Once fighter gets in range, you are fucked. The bombers are only meant to be deployed with enough support to ensure no threat will get within range.
Just as a heads up, a single 30mm Mineshot shell can carry over 70g of explosive filler. The american hand grenade of the time had 50g of TNT. No your Burger-17 can't tank that.
Guess what time it is
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/8UHbTJx.jpg[/IMG]
[QUOTE=Awesomecaek;46096043]Guess what time it is
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/8UHbTJx.jpg[/IMG][/QUOTE]
cryingHitler.jpg
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.