• WAR THUNDER Mk5 -- Tanks open beta test now!
    9,543 replies, posted
[QUOTE=aydin690;46341320]Climb rate is different, isn't it? the stat card says so. [/QUOTE] the aircraft statcards are pretty much worthlessly inaccurate for whatever reason
the 190 A4 is hilarious oh wow
Which Jap plane is it that looks like a Kingfisher and sprays giant orange slugs at you? Those things have rekt me since before i could remember.
[QUOTE=PaperBurrito;46343086]Which Jap plane is it that looks like a Kingfisher and sprays giant orange slugs at you? Those things have rekt me since before i could remember.[/QUOTE] A6M2-N? F1M2?
[QUOTE=Shibbey;46343159]A6M2-N? F1M2?[/QUOTE] Orange slugs points towards the former, I'd say.
Lost a 5v1 because the last enemy decided to fly to the edge of the map and then to space. great
[t]http://i.imgur.com/0yxNfOy.jpg[/t] I am become cancer, destroyer of games.
I shot down a B-24 with my A6M5 Ko today. I was fighting against a Ki-61 when he dove past me trying to get me with his gunners, I turned and fired a two second burst at him when he was 1.50km out. Right as I turned back around thinking I didn't do anything the kill counter popped up in the bottom right: "Pilot Unconscious" He must have been so pissed
[quote]"To research this vehicle model, you have to research the previous vehicle model [B]SM.79 1936[/B]"[/quote] Uggh, annoying piece of...why the hell did they had to mix the italian subtree with the german main one? Is the spaguetti bomber at least any fun to fly? 'Cause is ugly as hell
Send halp, can't do it anymore. I've only been playing the premium zero for the past 4 days. Can't take it anymore. My stats so far: [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/fIBgGdH.png[/IMG]
[QUOTE=T553412;46349237]Uggh, annoying piece of...why the hell did they had to mix the italian subtree with the german main one? Is the spaguetti bomber at least any fun to fly? 'Cause is ugly as hell[/QUOTE] Since it is a bomber, no.
Ever since 1.43 hit, I can't see my pilot's model and tank crews. Any help with that? Is that dependant on some graphical setting?
[QUOTE=BananaMed;46349729]Ever since 1.43 hit, I can't see my pilot's model and tank crews. Any help with that? Is that dependant on some graphical setting?[/QUOTE] dependent on the texture quality you have set [editline]28th October 2014[/editline] [QUOTE=Skwee;46217344]You need to turn your texture quality up. Low: [t]http://puu.sh/ca3wr/a507ad8c51.png[/t] high: [t]http://puu.sh/ca3vs/ba85eb3d97.png[/t][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=aydin690;46349277]Send halp, can't do it anymore. I've only been playing the premium zero for the past 4 days. Can't take it anymore. My stats so far: [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/fIBgGdH.png[/IMG][/QUOTE] Fuckin did it, my first jet: [t]http://i.imgur.com/pyP4742.jpg[/t] I grinded all of it today, i'm so disgusted with myself right now. [editline]28th October 2014[/editline] planning on getting the ki200 tomorrow. [editline]28th October 2014[/editline] If i can somehow convince myself to keep playing the premium zero for 8 hours a day every day, i'll have all the japanese jets by Sunday.
[QUOTE=Skwee;46349278]Since it is a bomber, no.[/QUOTE] the meatball bomber is pretty fun for a bomber, its quick, reasonably maneuverable, and it has a pilot controlled gun also someone clearly hasnt played the MG151 Do217, or the B-25, or the Il-28
[quote]1.43.9.6: us_m103[/quote] [B]HEAVY BREATHING.[/B] [QUOTE=Skwee;46349278]Since it is a bomber, no.[/QUOTE] Lol way to be wrong. S'getti bombers are maneuverable as all hell, have a pilot gun that you can (attempt) to get kills with, and a respectable 5 x 250kg when most nations are 'round 4 x 250kg max at that time. [media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzUZaWjRhEA[/media]
[QUOTE=Doom14;46350810][B]HEAVY BREATHING.[/B][/QUOTE] I fuckin kn[B]EW IT[/B] that mean's the Conqueror is assured as well.
[QUOTE=Doom14;46350810][B]HEAVY BREATHING.[/B] [/QUOTE] I wonder what they are going to use between the M6 and the M103, since all of the reasonable candidates (T29/32/34 etc) were prototypes
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;46351222]I wonder what they are going to use between the M6 and the M103, since all of the reasonable candidates (T29/32/34 etc) were prototypes[/QUOTE] They are, but the M103 is a direct descendant from those tanks so they [B][I]COULD[/I][/B] put them in. another less exciting option is the M6 is a premium tank and the M103 just sits at Era V with no connections.
I also wonder what the story will be for rank 4-5 tank destroyers, since the last real non-prototype TD that the US fielded was the M36, and that thing certainly isn't rank 5 material
[QUOTE=Doom14;46350810][B]HEAVY BREATHING.[/B][/QUOTE] As if era V wasn't already an imbalanced piece of shit we need a new power creep
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;46351464]I also wonder what the story will be for rank 4-5 tank destroyers, since the last real non-prototype TD that the US fielded was the M36, and that thing certainly isn't rank 5 material[/QUOTE] Well if they let the T29 series in the T30 is a pretty easy fit for Era V. but you know [B]Prototypes[/B]
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;46351464]I also wonder what the story will be for rank 4-5 tank destroyers, since the last real non-prototype TD that the US fielded was the M36, and that thing certainly isn't rank 5 material[/QUOTE] ontos pls [editline]f[/editline] Alternately this [img]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0b/1942Jeep.jpg[/img]
T29 series will be put in. No questions, they just will. Bigger issue is that barebone T29 pretty much already fits late era 4. [editline]28th October 2014[/editline] I wonder if M6A2E1 could make it in as well (basically T29 turret and 105m gun on M6 hull and 200mm front armor) but I am not sure if it would be better or worse than the T29.
[QUOTE=Timebomb575;46350426]the meatball bomber is pretty fun for a bomber, its quick, reasonably maneuverable, and it has a pilot controlled gun also someone clearly hasnt played the MG151 Do217, or the B-25, or the Il-28[/QUOTE] yes bombers with actual offensive weapons can be more fun than literally every other bomber in the game, still doesn't mean they are that fun. like you said, "pretty fun for a bomber"
Gotta love B-17 pilots bailing out when they see you coming.
[QUOTE=Skwee;46352236]yes bombers with actual offensive weapons can be more fun than literally every other bomber in the game, still doesn't mean they are that fun. like you said, "pretty fun for a bomber"[/QUOTE] Ok I will personally say it, the B-25 is very good fun. Fucks up shit on the ground and the air with the insane front 50s, nice bomb load, decently durable, and is comfy as fuck. I'm not a big bomber guy at all but I have had tons of fun with it. Fun is a subjective term imo anyways, even if you don't have fun in them how can you say that they are no fun. I know people in this and in WOT that use weird shit that arent that great and have loads of fun.
To each his own, but I can't stand flying bombers. Even if they have front mounted guns, I feel like a liability to my team. Especially when my bombing will in 90% of cases have no appreciable effect on the outcome of the match. I would be doing it just to grind for myself and not because it helps the team win.
The B-25 is the only bomber I enjoy flying because it can be used as both a bomber and ground attacker. It also really annoys me how that is so but people on my team using them NEVER even bother to try shooting down rival bombers. There was one G5N1 bombing our base for the win and we had a friendly B-25 completely ignoring him even though he was at the same height. C'mon you have 6 (or 7) front facing 50.s that can tear apart bombers well before you run out of your 1000 rounds of ammunition and they just fly around dropping bombs... [editline]28th October 2014[/editline] I can usually rack up 3 or 4 bomber kills at the start of the match using the B-25 because you literally start at the same height as most of them, why other people on my team ignore them is beyond me.
Isn't the M103 past the cutoff date? [url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M103_heavy_tank[/url] [IMG]http://i.gyazo.com/32a94784201fbd0eb23eeda56ca67187.png[/IMG]
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.