[QUOTE=Shibbey;46486555]All this is true as fuck it's pretty much gospel
Thing about fighter pilot-ing is it's all about predicting what the other dude will do and trying to be ahead of the curve if possible all while compensating for the performance of both planes (and not every fight is a 1v1 sooooo). You have to know what another plane is capable of doing and will probably do, both what is right and what is completely stupid. It's kinda trial-and-error-y at times, try and watch what experienced players are doing and copy their tactics (or squad up with good people and get on mic)[/QUOTE]
My ACM is pretty bad, but my shooting skills are incredibly awful. Eventually you'll have me following this enemy plane like a some dumbass refusing to give up, usually ending up getting myself killed.
[media]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBvG5l-Tboc[/media]
[QUOTE=doomsniper;46486918]My ACM is pretty bad, but my shooting skills are incredibly awful. Eventually you'll have me following this enemy plane like a some dumbass refusing to give up, usually ending up getting myself killed.
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NBvG5l-Tboc[/media][/QUOTE]
Your flying itself seemed pretty fine and perfectly smooth (you didn't snap-roll or stall out aggressively constantly like I do anyway :v) you just need to be a bit more patient, A6Ms are a cunt to deal with in a kittyhawk tho when you're flying stick
[QUOTE=Shibbey;46487044]Your flying itself seemed pretty fine and perfectly smooth (you didn't snap-roll or stall out aggressively constantly like I do anyway :v) you just need to be a bit more patient, A6Ms are a cunt to deal with in [del]a kittyhawk[/del] [I]anything that's not chaika[/I] tho when you're flying stick[/QUOTE]
[editline]14th November 2014[/editline]
Not to imply the Zero is OP in SB or anything, but it's easy to overcommit to a Zero chase and suddenly find yourself without energy, without altitude, without sufficient airflow on your wings and soon without your anal virginity.
[editline]14th November 2014[/editline]
I-153P counters at least earlier zeroes hard tho, because they always think they can hardball turnfight but they totally can not.
Awesomecaek, is that YOU?!
Edit: Btw, this was in RB. I don't play SB very much at all.
I somehow got myself into SB and I find my aim is going all over the place due to wind(?) or something but my screen was shaking/drifting harder than a montage parody (using a joystick)
is this something to do with propwash or...?
[editline]14th November 2014[/editline]
also I kept losing targets since they'd get blocked by my canopy frame :v:
I was in a Shiden-kai
[QUOTE=doomsniper;46487542]Btw, this was in RB. I don't play SB very much at all.[/QUOTE]
You should, you'd probably be pretty good at it if you can win fights like that in RB
I kinda want to get into SB, but I don't have any headtracking, so that'd be kind of a limiting factor
I just want IL-2 BoS, but it's so expensive ;-;
[QUOTE=Natti;46488246]I kinda want to get into SB, but I don't have any headtracking, so that'd be kind of a limiting factor
I just want IL-2 BoS, but it's so expensive ;-;[/QUOTE]
I play SB with right hand on stick left hand on mouse (hurrr) and I feel competitive, I have my arrow keys bound to head movement and the hat-stick bound to zoom (the left-right function of it broke) and honestly it's fine
Also BoS is pay2win, I still want it tho
[QUOTE=doomsniper;46487542]Awesomecaek, is that YOU?!
Edit: Btw, this was in RB. I don't play SB very much at all.[/QUOTE]
Yes it is him.
[editline]14th November 2014[/editline]
[QUOTE=Natti;46488246]I kinda want to get into SB, but I don't have any headtracking, so that'd be kind of a limiting factor
I just want IL-2 BoS, but it's so expensive ;-;[/QUOTE]
I play sim and having a $60 stick with little digital thumb stick at the top is perfectly fine. Head tracking gives far less of an advantage than you would think.
I've tried flying sim using the little doohickey to look around, and it works fine in DCS and IL-2, but I just haven't had any luck with it in War Thunder, I don't really know what's up with it
I should probably just get off my fat ass and configure it properly
but that'd require me to get off my fat ass
Or you can just use the mouse with your left hand to look around, works amazingly well once you get use to it.
[quote]Friday Nov 14
09:12 PM - Azaz3l: [url]http://forum.warthunder.ru/index.php?/topic/117037-bvv-dshnaia-2-strogaia-moderatciia-tolko-voprosy/?p=3681961[/url]
09:12 PM - Azaz3l: oi some news
09:13 PM - Teal: separate shells and propellant huh
09:13 PM - Azaz3l: gonna read and give a short tl,dr from devs answers
09:13 PM - Azaz3l: pics in that post illustrate remade IS-2 damage model
09:13 PM - Teal: yeah the new damage model looks suhweet
09:15 PM - Azaz3l: tl;dr from that post
09:16 PM - Azaz3l: -fixed a bug when a shell would penetrate a massive gun masks
09:17 PM - Azaz3l: -looks like we're going to have to improve ricochet system [lol indeed]
09:17 PM - Teal: ha
09:17 PM - Azaz3l: by massive gun mask I think he meant KT's and IS-3's
09:19 PM - Azaz3l: -improvements and fixed to multiturret system
09:19 PM - Azaz3l: (additional reload timers to each gun)
09:21 PM - Azaz3l: remaking IS-4's damage model according to this blueprint
09:21 PM - Azaz3l: [url]http://screenshot.ru/d596080b4edfd98f173f9ea90feff951.png[/url]
09:22 PM - Teal: oh, shelltrap weakspot?
09:23 PM - Azaz3l: currently IS-4's frontal DM is pretty fucked as the frontal plate somehow has 2 different slope angles according to the game
09:25 PM - Azaz3l: [B]"about Maus, we'll say when we will take a decision, currently we're seriously considering it"[/B]
09:27 PM - Azaz3l: oh mein gott
09:27 PM - Azaz3l: [url]http://forum.warthunder.ru/index.php?/topic/117037-bvv-dshnaia-2-strogaia-moderatciia-tolko-voprosy/?p=3684212[/url]
09:28 PM - Azaz3l: 1. [B]No to T34, T29 etc american heavies[/B]
09:28 PM - Azaz3l: 2. No to M26E5 and M26E4 with 105mm gun
09:29 PM - Azaz3l: 3. [B]Mostly likely no US TDs in 1.45, but we're considering T95 as top TD[/B]
09:29 PM - Azaz3l: 4. Most likely no "German Answer" to M103 in 1.45. Probably in the patch after it
09:32 PM - Azaz3l: 5. [B]Soviets at era 5 will most probably get T-10M, BR-471D ammo for SU-122-54 [which means D-49 gun, fuck], IS-4M and 100mm subcaliber ammo [could mean APCR or APDS] for T-54. All that coming at the same time as "German Answer".[/B]
09:33 PM - Azaz3l: 6. No planning adding IS-6 anytime soon, but I wouldn't exclude that possibility
09:35 PM - Teal: dude
09:35 PM - Teal: [url]http://forum.warthunder.com/uploads/monthly_10_2014/post-318258-0-79583000-1414173734.jpg[/url]
09:35 PM - Teal: BR-471D will be fucking fune
09:36 PM - Teal: fine*
09:36 PM - Azaz3l: uhhh it'll prolly have more pen in war tundra than in that table considering that ww2 122mm ammo is reaching 200mm pen
09:36 PM - Teal: 30mm extra penetrtion over the B shell t 500 meters
09:37 PM - Teal: yeah I am comparing it to B shell
09:37 PM - Teal: 30-20mm of extra pen
09:38 PM - Azaz3l: uh oh
09:38 PM - Azaz3l: "Спасибо. Я так примерно и думал, что это уже 60ые годы. Пока не очень актуально, но возможно в танках мы шагнем чуть дальше чем в самолетах ,и привет Лео-1, Т-62 и прочие радости :)."
09:38 PM - Azaz3l: [B]Maybe we'll jump a little further in tanks than in planes, and hello Leo 1, T-62 and other nice stuff[/B]
[/quote]
Okay they say yes to Tiger II with the 105, Panther II, and Panther Ausf F, but they say no to the T34, T29, and the M26E5/E4?
Also what could possibly be the German "answer" to the M103 and T-10 because I doubt the Maus, if they added it, would be able to counter them unless they pull a imported M103 and T-10 out of their ass.
Also I for one welcome the idea of introducing the Leo 1, T-62, M60, and whatever Centurion versions came with a 105mm mounted on it and maybe the Type 74 for Japan as well?
[QUOTE=Bbarnes005;46490636]Okay they say yes to Tiger II with the 105, Panther II, and Panther Ausf F, but they say no to the T34, T29, and the M26E5/E4?
Also what could possibly be the German "answer" to the M103 and T-10 because I doubt the Maus, if they added it, would be able to counter them unless they pull a imported M103 and T-10 out of their ass.
Also I for one welcome the idea of introducing the Leo 1, T-62, M60, and whatever Centurion versions came with a 105mm mounted on it.[/QUOTE]
I really hope it won't be imports. Maus should be fun.
I am also surprised about no for T29 tho.
[QUOTE=Bbarnes005;46490636]Okay they say yes to Tiger II with the 105, Panther II, and Panther Ausf F, but they say no to the T34, T29, and the M26E5/E4?
Also what could possibly be the German "answer" to the M103 and T-10 because I doubt the Maus, if they added it, would be able to counter them unless they pull a imported M103 and T-10 out of their ass.
Also I for one welcome the idea of introducing the Leo 1, T-62, M60, and whatever Centurion versions came with a 105mm mounted on it and maybe the Type 74 for Japan as well?[/QUOTE]
well East Germany WAS going to buy T-10Ms but decided to just buy T-62s instead.
[QUOTE=goon165;46490782]well East Germany WAS going to buy T-10Ms but decided to just buy T-62s instead.[/QUOTE]
please just fucking no
[editline]14th November 2014[/editline]
Germany can get L7 Leopard, they can get Epapertanks, just no more East Germany West Germany bullshit
Since the Maus was [i]technically[/i] a production tank, it should at least be considered.
Its mobility would make it kind of impossible to drive, though, considering the rough offroad nature of nearly every GF map, Poland and Mozdok notwithstanding. Would be really awesome to see in game, though, just because of its mythical status in history.
[QUOTE=millan;46490257][/QUOTE]
to better appreciate the impact of this information
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwA1LHrY4D0&feature=youtu.be[/media]
REALLY? Leopard 1 in War Thunder? I will seriously cry out of joy when I actually see it with the marvelous WT graphics. PLEASE MAKE IT HAPPEN!
If you squeeze the Leopard PTA in you can take my money! ALL OF IT!
Are the reserve tanks just really one sided or do I get lucky? I've been getting games like this everytime I use the T-26 mod.1939 against Tier 1 German tanks. It's like, one shot kills all across the board.
[t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/68824667/2014-11-03_00001.jpg[/t]
[QUOTE=Blitzkrieg Zero;46492613]Are the reserve tanks just really one sided or do I get lucky? I've been getting games like this everytime I use the T-26 mod.1939 against Tier 1 German tanks. It's like, one shot kills all across the board.
[t]https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/68824667/2014-11-03_00001.jpg[/t][/QUOTE]
The 45mm is like a hot knife through butter against early German tanks, and a lot of the German tankers refuse to use the speed and mobility of the Pz. II to get around the Russian tanks and effectively use the 20mm they get. It's not [i]hard[/i] to beat Russian teams with early German tanks, but a lot of the window-licking arcade pubbies don't have the first clue and will happily sit in front of you at 300m and try to pen you with default ammo in their autocannons.
Maybe this could work as a German answer to the M103 and T-10?
[URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VT_tank[/URL]
[QUOTE=spekter;46428132]I just got 30 pounds worth of gold eagles to use in War Thunder free with my graphics card.
What the fuck do I do with all this dosh.[/QUOTE]
Hey this is super late and all but, what card?
GTX 750 right? Cause the website says 760 too but I can't find any with this promo.
I NEED MY GOLD EAGLES
[QUOTE=Destroyox;46493234]Hey this is super late and all but, what card?
GTX 750 right? Cause the website says 760 too but I can't find any with this promo.
I NEED MY GOLD EAGLES[/QUOTE]
I think it would be cheaper for you to buy the gold eagles than to buy a graphics card
[QUOTE=Bbarnes005;46493157]Maybe this could work as a German answer to the M103 and T-10?
[URL]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VT_tank[/URL][/QUOTE]
thats waaaaaaaaay to far out of the range for the timeline of the game. You could add in T-80's if you go that far ahead.
Sorry, you need to Log In to post a reply to this thread.
